World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 48 3061 2807 1486 1342 190 15010

Ann R. Bradlow publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ann R. Bradlow between 1988 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ann R. Bradlow published across 38 years, from 1988 to 2025, averaging 5.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2007. 14 of the 205 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1988 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2007. 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 7 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 7 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 14 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 13 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 4 publications
1988 2025

205 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ann R. Bradlow: publications per year, 1988 to 2025
Year Publications
1988 1
1989 0
1990 1
1991 0
1992 1
1993 1
1994 1
1995 7
1996 6
1997 3
1998 1
1999 7
2000 3
2001 6
2002 4
2003 4
2004 9
2005 5
2006 5
2007 14
2008 13
2009 13
2010 6
2011 7
2012 8
2013 10
2014 9
2015 9
2016 4
2017 5
2018 7
2019 4
2020 4
2021 5
2022 4
2023 4
2024 10
2025 4
Total 205
Download as CSV

Ann R. Bradlow publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ann R. Bradlow sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 184–193 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 190 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319 190
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Ann R. Bradlow D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ann R. Bradlow sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203 48
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Ann R. Bradlow is affiliated with Northwestern University in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines, primarily focusing on the intersection of computer science and psychology, with significant contributions to experimental and cognitive psychology as well as artificial intelligence and signal processing.

The scientist's work extensively covers topics such as:

  • Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Speech and Audio Processing
  • Speech Recognition and Synthesis
  • Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
  • Linguistic Variation and Morphology
  • Speech and dialogue systems
  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism

Bradlow's frequent co-authors include Matthew Goldrick, Pamela E. Souza, Seung-Eun Kim, Abhijit Sinha Roy, and Catherine T. Best, highlighting collaborations across related research areas.

Research outputs have appeared predominantly in these venues:

  • The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
  • Phonetica
  • JASA Express Letters
  • Languages
  • Bilingualism Language and Cognition

Notable recent publications comprise a range of studies addressing speech perception, intelligibility, and bilingualism. Selected papers include:

  • "Generalized perceptual adaptation to second-language speech: Variability, similarity, and intelligibility" (2023) published in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
  • "Automatic recognition of second language speech-in-noise" (2024) appearing in JASA Express Letters
  • "Early versus Extended Exposure in Speech Perception Learning: Evidence from Switched-Dominance Bilinguals" (2020) featured in Languages
  • "Recognition of foreign-accented speech in noise: The interplay between talker intelligibility and linguistic structure" (2020) published in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
  • "Information encoding and transmission profiles of first-language (L1) and second-language (L2) speech" (2021) appearing in Bilingualism Language and Cognition

Their academic focus integrates cognitive neuroscience and linguistics with practical applications in speech and hearing research. This includes analyzing speech recognition in complex auditory environments, bilingual speech processing, and the impact of linguistic structures on intelligibility.

Best Publications

  • Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: IV. Some effects of perceptual learning on speech production.

    Ann R. Bradlow;David B. Pisoni;Reiko Akahane-Yamada;Yoh’ichi Tohkura

  • Perceptual adaptation to non-native speech.

    Ann R. Bradlow;Tessa Bent

  • Speech recognition in adverse conditions: A review

    Sven L. Mattys;Matthew H. Davis;Ann R. Bradlow;Sophie K. Scott

  • Intelligibility of normal speech I: global and fine-grained acoustic-phonetic talker characteristics

    Ann R. Bradlow;Gina M. Torretta;David B. Pisoni

  • The interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit.

    Tessa Bent;Ann R. Bradlow

  • Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/and /l/: Long-term retention of learning in perception and production

    Ann R. Bradlow;Reiko Akahane-Yamada;David B. Pisoni;Yoh’ichi Tohkura

  • Speaking clearly for children with learning disabilities: sentence perception in noise.

    Ann R. Bradlow;Nina Kraus;Erin Hayes

  • Recognition of spoken words by native and non-native listeners: Talker-, listener-, and item-related factors

    Ann R. Bradlow;David B. Pisoni

  • The clear speech effect for non-native listeners

    Ann R. Bradlow;Tessa Bent

  • A comparative acoustic study of English and Spanish vowels

    Ann R. Bradlow

  • Neurobiologic responses to speech in noise in children with learning problems: deficits and strategies for improvement

    Jenna Cunningham;Trent Nicol;Steven G Zecker;Ann R Bradlow

  • Speaking and Hearing Clearly: Talker and Listener Factors in Speaking Style Changes

    Rajka Smiljanić;Ann R. Bradlow

  • Semantic and phonetic enhancements for speech-in-noise recognition by native and non-native listeners

    Ann R. Bradlow;Jennifer A. Alexander

  • Production and perception of clear speech in Croatian and English.

    Rajka Smiljanić;Ann R. Bradlow

  • Sentence recognition in native- and foreign-language multi-talker background noise

    Kristin J. Van Engen;Ann R. Bradlow

  • Effects of talker, rate, and amplitude variation on recognition memory for spoken words.

    Ann R. Bradlow;Lynne C. Nygaard;David B. Pisoni

  • Phonetic convergence in spontaneous conversations as a function of interlocutor language distance

    Midam Kim;William S. Horton;Ann R. Bradlow

  • Accent-independent adaptation to foreign accented speech

    Melissa M. Baese-Berk;Ann R. Bradlow;Beverly A. Wright

  • Consequences of neural asynchrony: a case of auditory neuropathy.

    N. Kraus;A.R. Bradlow;M.A. Cheatham;J. Cunningham

  • Deficient Brainstem Encoding of Pitch in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders

    N.M. Russo;E. Skoe;B. Trommer;T. Nicol

  • The Wildcat Corpus of Native- and Foreign-Accented English: Communicative Efficiency across Conversational Dyads with Varying Language Alignment Profiles

    Kristin J. Van Engen;Melissa Baese-Berk;Rachel E. Baker;Arim Choi

  • The influence of sexual orientation on vowel production (L)

    Janet B. Pierrehumbert;Tessa Bent;Benjamin Munson;Ann R. Bradlow

  • The interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit for native speakers of Mandarin: Production and perception of English word-final voicing contrasts

    Rachel Hayes-Harb;Bruce L. Smith;Tessa Bent;Ann R. Bradlow

  • The influence of linguistic experience on the cognitive processing of pitch in speech and nonspeech sounds.

    Tessa Bent;Ann R. Bradlow;Beverly A. Wright

  • Variability in word duration as a function of probability, speech style, and prosody.

    Rachel E. Baker;Ann R. Bradlow

Frequent Co-Authors

Nina Kraus
Nina Kraus Northwestern University
David B. Pisoni
David B. Pisoni Indiana University
Trent Nicol
Trent Nicol Northwestern University
Steven G. Zecker
Steven G. Zecker Northwestern University
Patrick C. M. Wong
Patrick C. M. Wong Chinese University of Hong Kong
Sven L. Mattys
Sven L. Mattys University of York
Erika Skoe
Erika Skoe University of Connecticut
Catherine T. Best
Catherine T. Best Haskins Laboratories
Matthew H. Davis
Matthew H. Davis University of Cambridge
Sophie K. Scott
Sophie K. Scott University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in advancing their studies in Social Sciences and Humanities, online degrees offer flexible and accessible options. Fields such as counseling, psychology, social work, and family therapy continue to grow in demand across the USA, opening up diverse career possibilities in both private and public sectors.

If you’re pursuing a career in mental health or therapy, exploring cacrep-accredited online counseling programs can prepare you for licensure and practice. Specialized roles like marriage and family therapist can be accessed through online marriage and family therapy masters programs, which are ideal for those seeking to help individuals and families navigate complex relationships.

For a broader perspective in human behavior, consider enrolling in one of the cheapest online psychology degree programs that combine affordability with academic quality. If social work is your passion, there are msw degree online options that make entering this field more accessible than ever.

Each of these pathways builds valuable skills for meaningful careers in education, healthcare, community service, and advocacy.

Best Scientists Citing Ann R. Bradlow

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles