World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Bharath Chandrasekaran

Bharath Chandrasekaran

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
41
Citations
7077
World Ranking
7899
National Ranking
4239

Bharath Chandrasekaran publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bharath Chandrasekaran sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 148 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Bharath Chandrasekaran D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bharath Chandrasekaran sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bharath Chandrasekaran is affiliated with the University of Pittsburgh in the United States and conducts research primarily in the fields of neuroscience and psychology. Their work spans various subfields including cognitive neuroscience, experimental and cognitive psychology, developmental and educational psychology, signal processing, and artificial intelligence.

Their research addresses diverse topics such as neuroscience and music perception, neural dynamics and brain function, hearing loss and rehabilitation, EEG and brain-computer interfaces, multisensory perception and integration, neurobiology of language and bilingualism, and phonetics and phonology research.

Chandrasekaran has published frequently in venues including bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Brain and Language, Neurobiology of Language, and Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.

Among their recent publications are:

  • Non-invasive peripheral nerve stimulation selectively enhances speech category learning in adults (2020) in npj Science of Learning
  • Neural tracking of the speech envelope is differentially modulated by attention and language experience (2020) in Brain and Language
  • Electrical stimulation of the external ear acutely activates noradrenergic mechanisms in humans (2021) in Brain Stimulation
  • Cortical Tracking of the Speech Envelope in Logopenic Variant Primary Progressive Aphasia (2021) in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
  • Cortical Tracking of Speech in Delta Band Relates to Individual Differences in Speech in Noise Comprehension in Older Adults (2020) in Ear and Hearing

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Chandrasekaran include Fernando Llanos, Jacie R. McHaney, G. Nike Gnanateja, Casey L. Roark, and Abhra Sarkar.

Best Publications

  • Music training for the development of auditory skills

    Nina Kraus;Bharath Chandrasekaran

  • The scalp‐recorded brainstem response to speech: Neural origins and plasticity

    Bharath Chandrasekaran;Nina Kraus

  • Context-Dependent Encoding in the Human Auditory Brainstem Relates to Hearing Speech in Noise: Implications for Developmental Dyslexia

    Bharath Chandrasekaran;Jane Hornickel;Erika Skoe;Trent Nicol

  • Neural Timing Is Linked to Speech Perception in Noise

    Samira Anderson;Erika Skoe;Bharath Chandrasekaran;Nina Kraus

  • Individual variability in cue-weighting and lexical tone learning

    Bharath Chandrasekaran;Padma D. Sampath;Patrick C.M. Wong

  • Relative influence of musical and linguistic experience on early cortical processing of pitch contours

    Bharath Chandrasekaran;Ananthanarayan Krishnan;Jackson T. Gandour

  • Mismatch negativity to pitch contours is influenced by language experience.

    Bharath Chandrasekaran;Ananthanarayan Krishnan;Jackson T. Gandour

  • Evolving perspectives on the sources of the frequency-following response.

    Emily B. J. Coffey;Emily B. J. Coffey;Trent Nicol;Travis White-Schwoch;Bharath Chandrasekaran

  • White matter anisotropy in the ventral language pathway predicts sound-to-word learning success.

    Francis C. K. Wong;Bharath Chandrasekaran;Kyla Garibaldi;Patrick C. M. Wong

  • Human inferior colliculus activity relates to individual differences in spoken language learning.

    Bharath Chandrasekaran;Nina Kraus;Patrick C. M. Wong

  • Brainstem correlates of speech-in-noise perception in children.

    Samira Anderson;Erika Skoe;Bharath Chandrasekaran;Steven Zecker

  • Dual-learning systems during speech category learning

    Bharath Chandrasekaran;Han Gyol Yi;W. Todd Maddox

  • Enhancing speech intelligibility: Interactions among context, modality, speech style, and masker

    Kristin J. Van Engen;Kristin J. Van Engen;Jasmine E. B. Phelps;Rajka Smiljanic;Bharath Chandrasekaran

  • Effects of Speech Clarity on Recognition Memory for Spoken Sentences

    Kristin J. Van Engen;Bharath Chandrasekaran;Rajka Smiljanic

  • Neuroplasticity in the processing of pitch dimensions: A multidimensional scaling analysis of the mismatch negativity

    Bharath Chandrasekaran;Jackson T. Gandour;Ananthanarayan Krishnan

  • Auditory brainstem measures predict reading and speech-in-noise perception in school-aged children

    Jane Hornickel;Bharath Chandrasekaran;Steve Zecker;Nina Kraus

  • Music, Noise-Exclusion, and Learning

    Bharath Chandrasekaran;Nina Kraus

  • Tracing the Trajectory of Sensory Plasticity across Different Stages of Speech Learning in Adulthood

    Rachel Reetzke;Zilong Xie;Fernando Llanos;Bharath Chandrasekaran

  • Reduced efficiency of audiovisual integration for nonnative speech

    Han Gyol Yi;Jasmine E.B. Phelps;Rajka Smiljanic;Bharath Chandrasekaran

  • Changes to respiratory mechanisms during speech as a result of different cues to increase loudness

    Jessica E. Huber;Bharath Chandrasekaran;John J. Wolstencroft

  • The Role of Corticostriatal Systems in Speech Category Learning

    Han-Gyol Yi;W. Todd Maddox;Jeanette A. Mumford;Bharath Chandrasekaran

Frequent Co-Authors

W. Todd Maddox
W. Todd Maddox The University of Texas at Austin
Patrick C. M. Wong
Patrick C. M. Wong Chinese University of Hong Kong
Nina Kraus
Nina Kraus Northwestern University
John E. McGeary
John E. McGeary Brown University
Erika Skoe
Erika Skoe University of Connecticut
Jackson T. Gandour
Jackson T. Gandour Purdue University West Lafayette
Ananthanarayan Krishnan
Ananthanarayan Krishnan Purdue University West Lafayette
Valerie S. Knopik
Valerie S. Knopik Purdue University West Lafayette
Samira Anderson
Samira Anderson University of Maryland, College Park
Christopher G. Beevers
Christopher G. Beevers The University of Texas at Austin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology opens doors to diverse professions, from mental health counseling to research and beyond. Many students opt for related online degrees, such as Clinical Psychology, Counseling, or Social Work, which provide flexibility and accessibility no matter where you live.

Becoming a mental health counselor in the U.S. involves specific education and licensing requirements that vary by location. For example, the Baltimore mental health counselor education requirements emphasize accredited graduate programs and supervised clinical hours. Meanwhile, understanding the mental health counselor requirements in Boise is key for those aspiring to practice in Idaho, as the process can include additional state-specific exams.

Requirements also differ in major cities like Boston. Check out this guide on how to become a mental health counselor in Boston to learn about local licensing standards. Similarly, if you’re planning a career in New York, the Buffalo mental health counselor certification requirements outline the unique steps for licensure in that state.

Understanding these differences helps you choose the right online program and prepare for your future career, no matter where you live or plan to work.

Best Scientists Citing Bharath Chandrasekaran

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles