D-Index & Metrics Best Publications

D-Index & Metrics D-index (Discipline H-index) only includes papers and citation values for an examined discipline in contrast to General H-index which accounts for publications across all disciplines.

Discipline name D-index D-index (Discipline H-index) only includes papers and citation values for an examined discipline in contrast to General H-index which accounts for publications across all disciplines. Citations Publications World Ranking National Ranking
Psychology D-index 30 Citations 4,728 76 World Ranking 7929 National Ranking 4407

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Artificial intelligence
  • Machine learning
  • Neuroscience

Bharath Chandrasekaran mainly focuses on Speech perception, Communication, Audiology, Perception and Mismatch negativity. His studies in Speech perception integrate themes in fields like Context, Syllable, Speech recognition and Phonetics. He works mostly in the field of Speech recognition, limiting it down to topics relating to Auditory brainstem response and, in certain cases, Auditory system and Active listening, as a part of the same area of interest.

His study in Communication is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Representation and Electroencephalography. His work is dedicated to discovering how Perception, Stimulus are connected with Working memory, Time perception, Speech coding and Structural equation modeling and other disciplines. His Mismatch negativity research includes elements of Mandarin Chinese and Tone.

His most cited work include:

  • Music training for the development of auditory skills (621 citations)
  • The scalp‐recorded brainstem response to speech: Neural origins and plasticity (308 citations)
  • Context-Dependent Encoding in the Human Auditory Brainstem Relates to Hearing Speech in Noise: Implications for Developmental Dyslexia (196 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His primary areas of study are Speech perception, Speech recognition, Perception, Cognitive psychology and Audiology. His Speech perception study incorporates themes from Communication, Syllable, Phonetics and Noise. His research in Speech recognition intersects with topics in Mandarin Chinese and Active listening.

His research in Perception tackles topics such as Sensory system which are related to areas like Frequency following response. His Cognitive psychology study also includes fields such as

  • Developmental psychology, which have a strong connection to Auditory perception,
  • Cognition which connect with Context. His Audiology research integrates issues from Young adult, Speech sounds, Depressive symptoms and Electroencephalography.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Speech perception (37.01%)
  • Speech recognition (30.71%)
  • Perception (27.56%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2019-2021)?

  • Concept learning (20.47%)
  • Speech recognition (30.71%)
  • Cognitive psychology (25.98%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Bharath Chandrasekaran mostly deals with Concept learning, Speech recognition, Cognitive psychology, Audiology and Electroencephalography. The study incorporates disciplines such as Cognition and Perception in addition to Concept learning. His Speech recognition study combines topics in areas such as Bayesian probability and Pitch tracking.

Bharath Chandrasekaran works mostly in the field of Audiology, limiting it down to concerns involving Comprehension and, occasionally, Sentence and Language disorder. His work deals with themes such as Tone, Sensory system and Active listening, which intersect with Electroencephalography. Bharath Chandrasekaran focuses mostly in the field of Semantic memory, narrowing it down to matters related to Speech perception and, in some cases, Speech coding.

Between 2019 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Neural tracking of the speech envelope is differentially modulated by attention and language experience (4 citations)
  • Cortical Tracking of Speech in Delta Band Relates to Individual Differences in Speech in Noise Comprehension in Older Adults. (4 citations)
  • Non-invasive peripheral nerve stimulation selectively enhances speech category learning in adults. (3 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Artificial intelligence
  • Machine learning
  • Neuroscience

His primary scientific interests are in Concept learning, Sensory system, Perception, Tracking and Audiology. His research on Concept learning concerns the broader Cognitive psychology. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Subjective constancy, Categorization, Mandarin Chinese, Neural decoding and Brain network.

Other disciplines of study, such as Envelope, Narrative, Cortical auditory evoked potentials, Neural processing and Speech recognition, are mixed together with his Tracking studies. His Audiology research incorporates themes from Working memory, Memory span, Active listening and Electroencephalography. His Electroencephalography research incorporates elements of Noise and Comprehension.

This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s body of work. If you have any feedback, you can contact us here.

Best Publications

Music training for the development of auditory skills

Nina Kraus;Bharath Chandrasekaran.
Nature Reviews Neuroscience (2010)

1110 Citations

The scalp‐recorded brainstem response to speech: Neural origins and plasticity

Bharath Chandrasekaran;Nina Kraus.
Psychophysiology (2010)

434 Citations

Context-Dependent Encoding in the Human Auditory Brainstem Relates to Hearing Speech in Noise: Implications for Developmental Dyslexia

Bharath Chandrasekaran;Jane Hornickel;Erika Skoe;Trent Nicol.
Neuron (2009)

255 Citations

Neural Timing Is Linked to Speech Perception in Noise

Samira Anderson;Erika Skoe;Bharath Chandrasekaran;Nina Kraus.
The Journal of Neuroscience (2010)

225 Citations

Relative influence of musical and linguistic experience on early cortical processing of pitch contours

Bharath Chandrasekaran;Ananthanarayan Krishnan;Jackson T. Gandour.
Brain and Language (2009)

188 Citations

Mismatch negativity to pitch contours is influenced by language experience.

Bharath Chandrasekaran;Ananthanarayan Krishnan;Jackson T. Gandour.
Brain Research (2007)

179 Citations

Individual variability in cue-weighting and lexical tone learning

Bharath Chandrasekaran;Padma D. Sampath;Patrick C.M. Wong.
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (2010)

175 Citations

White matter anisotropy in the ventral language pathway predicts sound-to-word learning success.

Francis C. K. Wong;Bharath Chandrasekaran;Kyla Garibaldi;Patrick C. M. Wong.
The Journal of Neuroscience (2011)

118 Citations

Human inferior colliculus activity relates to individual differences in spoken language learning.

Bharath Chandrasekaran;Nina Kraus;Patrick C. M. Wong.
Journal of Neurophysiology (2012)

115 Citations

Brainstem correlates of speech-in-noise perception in children.

Samira Anderson;Erika Skoe;Bharath Chandrasekaran;Steven Zecker.
Hearing Research (2010)

106 Citations

Editorial Boards

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Contact us

Best Scientists Citing Bharath Chandrasekaran

Nina Kraus

Nina Kraus

Northwestern University

Publications: 137

Gavin M. Bidelman

Gavin M. Bidelman

University of Memphis

Publications: 95

Erika Skoe

Erika Skoe

University of Connecticut

Publications: 48

Trent Nicol

Trent Nicol

Northwestern University

Publications: 30

Patrick C. M. Wong

Patrick C. M. Wong

Chinese University of Hong Kong

Publications: 30

Katharina von Kriegstein

Katharina von Kriegstein

TU Dresden

Publications: 27

Mireille Besson

Mireille Besson

Aix-Marseille University

Publications: 26

Carles Escera

Carles Escera

University of Barcelona

Publications: 20

Robert J. Zatorre

Robert J. Zatorre

McGill University

Publications: 18

Mari Tervaniemi

Mari Tervaniemi

University of Helsinki

Publications: 17

Minna Huotilainen

Minna Huotilainen

University of Helsinki

Publications: 16

Lori L. Holt

Lori L. Holt

Carnegie Mellon University

Publications: 15

Merav Ahissar

Merav Ahissar

Hebrew University of Jerusalem

Publications: 15

John D. E. Gabrieli

John D. E. Gabrieli

MIT

Publications: 15

Lutz Jäncke

Lutz Jäncke

University of Zurich

Publications: 14

Ping Li

Ping Li

Sun Yat-sen University

Publications: 13

Trending Scientists

Carlos Castillo

Carlos Castillo

Pompeu Fabra University

Vincent Hayward

Vincent Hayward

Sorbonne University

René Fournet

René Fournet

University of Lorraine

Heinrich Lang

Heinrich Lang

Chemnitz University of Technology

Josep Caixach

Josep Caixach

Spanish National Research Council

Roger J. W. Truscott

Roger J. W. Truscott

Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute

Gerhard Meyer

Gerhard Meyer

IBM (United States)

John P. Hirth

John P. Hirth

Washington State University

Ray Dixon

Ray Dixon

John Innes Centre

Duane A. Peltzer

Duane A. Peltzer

Landcare Research

Richard J. Weinberg

Richard J. Weinberg

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Karen E. Adolph

Karen E. Adolph

New York University

Nigel S. Key

Nigel S. Key

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Javier Redondo

Javier Redondo

University of Zaragoza

Charles F. Gammie

Charles F. Gammie

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Something went wrong. Please try again later.