World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
37
Citations
5954
World Ranking
8770
National Ranking
3718

Samira Anderson publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Samira Anderson sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 102 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Samira Anderson D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Samira Anderson sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Samira Anderson is affiliated with the University of Maryland, College Park in the United States. The primary focus of their research lies within the field of Neuroscience, with particular attention to Cognitive Neuroscience, Speech and Hearing, Sensory Systems, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Signal Processing.

The scientist's work spans several main topics including Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation, Neuroscience and Music Perception, Noise Effects and Management, Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics, Multisensory Perception and Integration, Neural Dynamics and Brain Function, and Speech and Audio Processing.

They have contributed to numerous publications, frequently collaborating with co-authors such as Matthew J. Goupell, Jonathan Z. Simon, Sandra Gordon-Salant, Stefanie E. Kuchinsky, and Alessandro Presacco.

Samira Anderson's research has been published in several prominent venues, including:

  • The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Hearing Research
  • Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology
  • Journal of Neurophysiology

Some of their recent papers include:

  • "High gamma cortical processing of continuous speech in younger and older listeners," 2020, NeuroImage
  • "Objective evidence of temporal processing deficits in older adults," 2020, Hearing Research
  • "Effects of aging on cortical representations of continuous speech," 2023, Journal of Neurophysiology
  • "Exaggerated cortical representation of speech in older listeners: mutual information analysis," 2020, Journal of Neurophysiology
  • "Peripheral deficits and phase-locking declines in aging adults," 2021, Hearing Research

In addition to journal articles, Samira Anderson has also contributed to book publications, such as a title released by Frontiers Media:

  • Aging-Related Changes in Auditory Perception and Cognition: Measurements, Mechanisms, and Interventions, 2022

Best Publications

  • Aging Affects Neural Precision of Speech Encoding

    Samira Anderson;Alexandra Parbery-Clark;Travis White-Schwoch;Nina Kraus

  • Musical experience and the aging auditory system: implications for cognitive abilities and hearing speech in noise.

    Alexandra Parbery-Clark;Dana L. Strait;Samira Anderson;Emily Hittner

  • Reversal of age-related neural timing delays with training

    Samira Anderson;Travis White-Schwoch;Alexandra Parbery-Clark;Nina Kraus

  • A dynamic auditory-cognitive system supports speech-in-noise perception in older adults.

    Samira Anderson;Travis White-Schwoch;Alexandra Parbery-Clark;Nina Kraus

  • Older adults benefit from music training early in life: biological evidence for long-term training-driven plasticity.

    Travis White-Schwoch;Kali Woodruff Carr;Samira Anderson;Dana L. Strait

  • A neural basis of speech-in-noise perception in older adults.

    Samira Anderson;Alexandra Parbery-Clark;Han Gyol Yi;Nina Kraus

  • Neural Timing Is Linked to Speech Perception in Noise

    Samira Anderson;Erika Skoe;Bharath Chandrasekaran;Nina Kraus

  • Musical experience offsets age-related delays in neural timing

    Alexandra Parbery-Clark;Samira Anderson;Emily Hittner;Nina Kraus

  • Evidence of degraded representation of speech in noise, in the aging midbrain and cortex

    Alessandro Presacco;Jonathan Z. Simon;Samira Anderson

  • Stability and Plasticity of Auditory Brainstem Function Across the Lifespan

    Erika Skoe;Jennifer Krizman;Samira Anderson;Nina Kraus

  • Auditory Processing in Noise: A Preschool Biomarker for Literacy

    Travis White-Schwoch;Kali Woodruff Carr;Elaine C. Thompson;Samira Anderson

  • Auditory brainstem response to complex sounds predicts self-reported speech-in-noise performance.

    Samira Anderson;Alexandra Parbery-Clark;Travis White-Schwoch;Nina Kraus

  • Effects of hearing loss on the subcortical representation of speech cues

    Samira Anderson;Alexandra Parbery-Clark;Travis White-Schwoch;Sarah Drehobl

  • Sensory-cognitive interaction in the neural encoding of speech in noise: a review.

    Samira Anderson;Nina Kraus

  • Training changes processing of speech cues in older adults with hearing loss

    Samira Anderson;Travis White-Schwoch;Hee Jae Choi;Nina Kraus

  • Speech-in-noise representation in the aging midbrain and cortex: Effects of hearing loss.

    Alessandro Presacco;Jonathan Z. Simon;Samira Anderson

  • Brainstem correlates of speech-in-noise perception in children.

    Samira Anderson;Erika Skoe;Bharath Chandrasekaran;Steven Zecker

  • Effect of informational content of noise on speech representation in the aging midbrain and cortex.

    Alessandro Presacco;Jonathan Z. Simon;Samira Anderson

  • The Frequency-Following Response: A Window into Human Communication

    Nina Kraus;Samira Anderson;Travis White-Schwoch

  • Auditory Training: Evidence for Neural Plasticity in Older Adults

    Samira Anderson;Nina Kraus

  • Musical experience strengthens the neural representation of sounds important for communication in middle-aged adults.

    Alexandra Parbery-Clark;Samira Anderson;Emily Hittner;Nina Kraus

Frequent Co-Authors

Nina Kraus
Nina Kraus Northwestern University
Jonathan Z. Simon
Jonathan Z. Simon University of Maryland, College Park
Erika Skoe
Erika Skoe University of Connecticut
Bharath Chandrasekaran
Bharath Chandrasekaran University of Pittsburgh
Trent Nicol
Trent Nicol Northwestern University
Steven G. Zecker
Steven G. Zecker Northwestern University
Ann R. Bradlow
Ann R. Bradlow Northwestern University
Patrick C. M. Wong
Patrick C. M. Wong Chinese University of Hong Kong
Arthur N. Popper
Arthur N. Popper University of Maryland, College Park
Gavin M. Bidelman
Gavin M. Bidelman Indiana University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience can open many diverse career doors in related fields such as psychology, social work, and counseling. If you’re interested in the mental health profession, several online degree options offer flexibility and specialization. For example, accelerated bachelor's degree in psychology programs let students fast-track their education and enter the workforce sooner.

Many students interested in neuroscience pursue careers as counselors or social workers. Those aiming to become licensed social workers might consider msw accelerated programs, which can reduce the time and cost to graduate. Similarly, for those drawn to mental health counseling, online mental health counseling programs allow for flexible study and hands-on training.

Budget is also an important factor to consider. If cost is a primary concern, researching the masters in counseling online cost can help you find reputable and affordable colleges. With so many online pathways available, students interested in neuroscience can build a personalized academic and professional journey that fits their goals.

Best Scientists Citing Samira Anderson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles