World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
80
Citations
21729
World Ranking
1625
National Ranking
797

Arthur N. Popper publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arthur N. Popper sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 255 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Arthur N. Popper D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arthur N. Popper sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1983 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Best Publications

  • Sensory biology of aquatic animals

    W. N. McFarland;J. Atema;R. R. Fay;A. N. Popper

  • High intensity anthropogenic sound damages fish ears

    Robert D. McCauley;Jane Fewtrell;Arthur N. Popper

  • Sound Detection and Processing by Fish: Critical Review and Major Research Questions (Part 1 of 2)

    Arthur N. Popper;Richard R. Fay

  • The Mammalian Auditory Pathway: Neuroanatomy

    Douglas B. Webster;Arthur N. Popper;Richard R. Fay

  • Rethinking sound detection by fishes.

    Arthur N. Popper;Richard R. Fay

  • Why otoliths? Insights from inner ear physiology and fisheries biology

    Arthur N. Popper;John Ramcharitar;Steven E. Campana

  • Noise-induced stress response and hearing loss in goldfish (Carassius auratus).

    Michael E. Smith;Andrew S. Kane;Arthur N. Popper

  • The Mammalian auditory pathway : neurophysiology

    A. N. Popper;R. R. Fay;Whitlow W. L. Au

  • Sound Detection Mechanisms and Capabilities of Teleost Fishes

    Arthur N. Popper;Richard R. Fay;Christopher Platt;Olav Sand

  • Evolution of hearing in vertebrates: the inner ears and processing.

    Richard R. Fay;Arthur N. Popper

  • Hearing by whales and dolphins

    Whitlow W. L. Au;Arthur N. Popper;Richard R. Fay

  • Structure–function relationships in fish otolith organs

    Arthur N. Popper;Zhongmin Lu

  • Effects of Anthropogenic Sounds on Fishes

    Arthur N. Popper

  • Pitch : neural coding and perception

    Christopher J. Plack;Andrew J Oxenham;Richard R. Fay;Arthur N. Popper

  • Acoustic detection and communication by decapod crustaceans.

    Arthur N. Popper;Michael Salmon;Kenneth W. Horch

  • Comparative studies of hearing in vertebrates

    Arthur N. Popper;Richard R. Fay;日本音響学会

  • The Auditory Periphery in Fishes

    Arthur N. Popper;Richard R. Fay

  • Fine Structure and Function of the Ear

    Christopher Platt;Arthur N. Popper

  • Growth of a fish ear: 1. Quantitative analysis of hair cell and ganglion cell proliferation

    Arthur N. Popper;Becky Hoxter

  • Evolution of the Vertebrate Auditory System

    Geoffrey A. Manley;Arthur N. Popper;Richard R. Fay

  • Integrative functions in the mammalian auditory pathway

    Donata Oertel;Richard R. Fay;Arthur N. Popper

  • Comparative hearing : birds and reptiles

    Robert J. Dooling;Richard R. Fay;Arthur N. Popper

  • Auditory perception of sound sources

    William A. Yost;Arthur N. Popper;Richard R. Fay

Frequent Co-Authors

Brandon L. Southall
Brandon L. Southall University of California, Santa Cruz
Geoffrey A. Manley
Geoffrey A. Manley Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg
Fan-Gang Zeng
Fan-Gang Zeng University of California, Irvine
Antoni Lombarte
Antoni Lombarte Spanish National Research Council
Catherine E. Carr
Catherine E. Carr University of Maryland, College Park
Donald Henderson
Donald Henderson University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Thomas A. Carlson
Thomas A. Carlson University of Sydney
Shaun P. Collin
Shaun P. Collin La Trobe University
Russell D. Fernald
Russell D. Fernald Stanford University
David Poeppel
David Poeppel New York University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re passionate about Neuroscience but considering your options, it’s worth exploring related online degrees and certifications. Some fields closely connected to Neuroscience—like biomedical engineering or computer science—rank among the highest paying college majors. These can complement a neuroscience background or offer alternative career paths in health tech or data analysis.

For those seeking affordability without sacrificing quality, consider institutions featured as a cheapest online college. Accredited, budget-friendly online degrees make it easier to manage education costs while building your neuroscience credentials.

If you’re aiming to quickly upskill, there are short certificate programs that pay well. These programs cover areas like medical coding, health informatics, or lab technology—all valuable for students interested in neuroscience-related roles.

Finally, some learners might benefit from choosing an easiest bachelor degree to get online. These degrees can serve as efficient stepping stones into graduate neuroscience studies or allied professions.

Best Scientists Citing Arthur N. Popper

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles