World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
38
Citations
15362
World Ranking
8480
National Ranking
3023

James E. Vogelmann publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James E. Vogelmann sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 69 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

James E. Vogelmann D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James E. Vogelmann sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

James E. Vogelmann is affiliated with the United States Geological Survey in the United States. Their research is primarily focused within the field of Environmental Science, with specific expertise across several subfields including Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Environmental Engineering, Atmospheric Science, and Soil Science.

Their scholarly activities cover a variety of topics related to ecosystems and environmental dynamics. Key topics of research include:

  • Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
  • Rangeland and Wildlife Management
  • Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
  • Climate variability and models
  • Urban Heat Island Mitigation
  • Cryospheric studies and observations

James E. Vogelmann has contributed to several recent papers that highlight their research scope and focus. Some of these include:

  • Assessment of Fire Fuel Load Dynamics in Shrubland Ecosystems in the Western United States Using MODIS Products, 2020, published in Remote Sensing
  • Climate sensitivity to decadal land cover and land use change across the conterminous United States, 2020, published in Global and Planetary Change
  • Spatiotemporal patterns and environmental drivers of eastern redcedar (Juniperus virginiana) abundance along the Missouri River, USA, 2023, published in Landscape Ecology
  • Spatiotemporal Patterns and Environmental Drivers of Eastern Redcedar (Juniperus virginiana) Abundance along the Missouri River, USA, 2022, published in Research Square (Research Square)

The frequent venues for their publications include:

  • Remote Sensing
  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Landscape Ecology
  • Research Square (Research Square)

Collaboration appears to be an integral part of their research, with frequent coauthors such as:

  • Nadeesha D. Illeperuma
  • Mark D. Dixon
  • Caroline M. Elliott
  • Kimberly I. Magnuson
  • Miyuraj Harishchandra Hikkaduwa Withanage

Best Publications

  • Landsat-8: Science and Product Vision for Terrestrial Global Change Research

    David P. Roy;M.A. Wulder;Thomas R. Loveland;C.E. Woodcock

  • COMPLETION OF THE 1990S NATIONAL LAND COVER DATA SET FOR THE CONTERMINOUS UNITED STATES FROM LANDSAT THEMATIC MAPPER DATA AND ANCILLARY DATA SOURCES

    James E. Vogelmann;Stephen M. Howard;Limin Yang;Charles R. Larson

  • Red edge spectral measurements from sugar maple leaves

    J. E. Vogelmann;B. N. Rock;D. M. Moss

  • Free access to Landsat imagery.

    Curtis E. Woodcock;Richard Allen;Martha Anderson;Alan Belward

  • Current status of Landsat program, science, and applications

    Michael A. Wulder;Thomas R. Loveland;David P. Roy;Christopher J. Crawford

  • An automated approach for reconstructing recent forest disturbance history using dense Landsat time series stacks

    Chengquan Huang;Samuel N. Goward;Jeffrey G. Masek;Nancy Thomas

  • A simple and effective method for filling gaps in Landsat ETM+ SLC-off images

    Jin Chen;Xiaolin Zhu;Xiaolin Zhu;James E. Vogelmann;Feng Gao

  • Effects of biotic disturbances on forest carbon cycling in the United States and Canada

    Jeffrey A. Hicke;Craig D. Allen;Ankur R. Desai;Michael C. Dietze

  • Remote detection of forest damage

    B. N. Rock;J. E. Vogelmann;D. L. Williams;A. F. Vogelmann

  • Regional characterization of land cover using multiple sources of data

    James E. Vogelmann;Terry L. Sohl;Stephen M. Howard

  • Bringing an ecological view of change to Landsat‐based remote sensing

    Robert E Kennedy;Serge Andréfouët;Warren B Cohen;Cristina Gómez

  • Regional land cover characterization using landsat thematic mapper data and ancillary data sources

    James E. Vogelmann;Terry L. Sohl;P.V. Campbell;D.M. Shaw

  • Mapping forest change using stacked generalization: An ensemble approach

    Sean P. Healey;Warren B. Cohen;Zhiqiang Yang;C. Kenneth Brewer

  • Ten ways remote sensing can contribute to conservation

    Robert A. Rose;Dirck Byler;J. Ron Eastman;Erica Fleishman

  • Including land cover change in analysis of greenness trends using all available Landsat 5, 7, and 8 images: A case study from Guangzhou, China (2000–2014)

    Zhe Zhu;Yingchun Fu;Curtis E. Woodcock;Pontus Olofsson

  • Monitoring gradual ecosystem change using Landsat time series analyses: Case studies in selected forest and rangeland ecosystems

    James E. Vogelmann;George Xian;Collin G. Homer;Brian Tolk

  • Perspectives on monitoring gradual change across the continuity of Landsat sensors using time-series data

    James E. Vogelmann;Alisa L. Gallant;Hua Shi;Zhe Zhu

  • Lessons learned implementing an operational continuous United States national land change monitoring capability: The Land Change Monitoring, Assessment, and Projection (LCMAP) approach

    Jesslyn F. Brown;Heather J. Tollerud;Christopher P. Barber;Qiang Zhou

  • How Similar Are Forest Disturbance Maps Derived from Different Landsat Time Series Algorithms

    Warren B. Cohen;Sean P. Healey;Zhiqiang Yang;Stephen V. Stehman

  • Automated masking of cloud and cloud shadow for forest change analysis using Landsat images

    Chengquan Huang;Nancy Thomas;Samuel N. Goward;Jeffrey G. Masek

  • Monitoring forest changes in the southwestern United States using multitemporal Landsat data

    James E. Vogelmann;Brian L. Tolk;Zhiliang Zhu

Frequent Co-Authors

Zhe Zhu
Zhe Zhu University of Connecticut
Curtis E. Woodcock
Curtis E. Woodcock Boston University
Warren B. Cohen
Warren B. Cohen Oregon State University
Thomas R. Loveland
Thomas R. Loveland United States Geological Survey
Zhiliang Zhu
Zhiliang Zhu United States Geological Survey
Stephen V. Stehman
Stephen V. Stehman SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry
Sean P. Healey
Sean P. Healey US Forest Service
Chengquan Huang
Chengquan Huang University of Maryland, College Park
Robert E. Kennedy
Robert E. Kennedy Oregon State University
Jeffrey G. Masek
Jeffrey G. Masek Goddard Space Flight Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring environmental sciences often leads students to consider related online degrees that complement their knowledge and skillset. For those new to higher education or seeking flexible options, discovering the what is the easiest bachelor's degree to get can help balance workload while meeting academic goals.

Specializations like geology offer in-depth understanding of Earth's processes. Many universities now offer a geology online degree, perfect for students wanting to study from anywhere without sacrificing quality.

Geographic Information Systems (GIS) is another rapidly growing field essential for environmental data analysis and decision-making. For this, students can refer to colleges with colleges with gis programs that offer tailored coursework and practical skills.

For professionals aiming to enhance their leadership and administrative capabilities in environmental policy or public sectors, pursuing the best online masters in public administration can be a strategic next step, providing advanced knowledge in governance and management.

Best Scientists Citing James E. Vogelmann

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles