World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
49
Citations
11100
World Ranking
5909
National Ranking
2591

Jonathan Z. Simon publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan Z. Simon sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 146 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Jonathan Z. Simon D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan Z. Simon sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jonathan Z. Simon is a researcher affiliated with the University of Maryland, College Park in the United States. Their work primarily spans the field of Neuroscience, with a focus on Cognitive Neuroscience and related subfields such as Signal Processing, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Statistics and Probability, and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine.

Their research covers a range of topics including Neural Dynamics and Brain Function, Neuroscience and Music Perception, Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation, Blind Source Separation Techniques, EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces, and Cognitive and Developmental Aspects of Mathematical Skills.

Jonathan Z. Simon has published extensively in several scientific venues. Frequent publication outlets include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • NeuroImage
  • Frontiers in Neuroscience
  • Journal of Neurophysiology
  • Journal of Neuroscience

Their recent papers highlight work on continuous speech processing and cortical responses. Selected publications include:

  • "Continuous speech processing," 2020, Current Opinion in Physiology
  • "Eelbrain, a Python toolkit for time-continuous analysis with temporal response functions," 2023, eLife
  • "High gamma cortical processing of continuous speech in younger and older listeners," 2020, NeuroImage
  • "Eelbrain: A Python toolkit for time-continuous analysis with temporal response functions," 2021, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • "Effects of aging on cortical representations of continuous speech," 2023, Journal of Neurophysiology

Collaboration forms a significant part of their research output. Frequent coauthors include:

  • Joshua P. Kulasingham
  • Christian Brodbeck
  • I. M. Dushyanthi Karunathilake
  • Stefanie E. Kuchinsky
  • Proloy Das

Best Publications

  • Mechanisms Underlying Selective Neuronal Tracking of Attended Speech at a “Cocktail Party”

    Elana M. Zion Golumbic;Elana M. Zion Golumbic;Nai Ding;Stephan Bickel;Stephan Bickel;Peter Lakatos

  • Emergence of neural encoding of auditory objects while listening to competing speakers

    Nai Ding;Jonathan Z. Simon

  • Spectro-temporal response field characterization with dynamic ripples in ferret primary auditory cortex.

    Didier A. Depireux;Jonathan Z. Simon;David J. Klein;Shihab A. Shamma

  • Neural coding of continuous speech in auditory cortex during monaural and dichotic listening

    Nai Ding;Jonathan Z. Simon

  • Cortical entrainment to continuous speech: functional roles and interpretations

    Nai Ding;Jonathan Z. Simon

  • Adaptive Temporal Encoding Leads to a Background-Insensitive Cortical Representation of Speech

    Nai Ding;Jonathan Z. Simon

  • Rapid Transformation from Auditory to Linguistic Representations of Continuous Speech.

    Christian Brodbeck;L. Elliot Hong;Jonathan Z. Simon

  • Diffusion Kurtosis as an In Vivo Imaging Marker for Reactive Astrogliosis in Traumatic Brain Injury

    Jiachen Zhuo;Su Xu;Julie L. Proctor;Roger J. Mullins

  • Robust spectrotemporal reverse correlation for the auditory system: optimizing stimulus design.

    David J. Klein;Didier A. Depireux;Jonathan Z. Simon;Shihab A. Shamma

  • Robust cortical entrainment to the speech envelope relies on the spectro-temporal fine structure.

    Nai Ding;Nai Ding;Monita Chatterjee;Jonathan Z. Simon

  • Speech Intelligibility Predicted from Neural Entrainment of the Speech Envelope.

    Jonas Vanthornhout;Lien Decruy;Jan Wouters;Jonathan Z. Simon

  • Denoising based on spatial filtering.

    Alain de Cheveigné;Jonathan Z. Simon

  • Denoising based on time-shift PCA

    Alain de Cheveigné;Jonathan Z. Simon

  • Evidence of degraded representation of speech in noise, in the aging midbrain and cortex

    Alessandro Presacco;Jonathan Z. Simon;Samira Anderson

  • Interaction between Attention and Bottom-Up Saliency Mediates the Representation of Foreground and Background in an Auditory Scene

    Mounya Elhilali;Juanjuan Xiang;Shihab A. Shamma;Jonathan Z. Simon

  • Dynamics of precise spike timing in primary auditory cortex.

    Mounya Elhilali;Jonathan B. Fritz;David J. Klein;Jonathan Z. Simon

  • Neural source dynamics of brain responses to continuous stimuli: Speech processing from acoustics to comprehension.

    Christian Brodbeck;Alessandro Presacco;Jonathan Z. Simon

  • Neural markers of speech comprehension: measuring EEG tracking of linguistic speech representations, controlling the speech acoustics.

    Marlies Gillis;Jonas Vanthornhout;Jonathan Z. Simon;Tom Francart

  • Continuous speech processing.

    Christian Brodbeck;Jonathan Z Simon

  • Speech-in-noise representation in the aging midbrain and cortex: Effects of hearing loss.

    Alessandro Presacco;Jonathan Z. Simon;Samira Anderson

  • The auditory system at the cocktail party

    John C. Middlebrooks;Jonathan Z. Simon;Arthur N. Popper;Richard R. Fay

  • Overlapping communities reveal rich structure in large-scale brain networks during rest and task conditions.

    Mahshid Najafi;Brenton W. McMenamin;Jonathan Z. Simon;Luiz Pessoa

Frequent Co-Authors

Shihab A. Shamma
Shihab A. Shamma University of Maryland, College Park
David Poeppel
David Poeppel New York University
Samira Anderson
Samira Anderson University of Maryland, College Park
L. Elliot Hong
L. Elliot Hong University of Maryland, Baltimore
Alain de Cheveigné
Alain de Cheveigné École Normale Supérieure
Catherine E. Carr
Catherine E. Carr University of Maryland, College Park
Jonathan B. Fritz
Jonathan B. Fritz New York University
Jan Wouters
Jan Wouters KU Leuven
Steven I. Marcus
Steven I. Marcus University of Maryland, College Park
Gianluca Setti
Gianluca Setti Polytechnic University of Turin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Neuroscience in the USA opens up diverse opportunities in healthcare, research, and counseling. For those interested in a clinical career, pursuing a psyd online can lead to roles in mental health assessment and therapy. This path is ideal if you're looking to directly impact patient care through psychological services.

Another rewarding field is marriage and family therapy. If you're aiming for a relevant credential quickly, consider the mft program options available online, which can help you launch a career supporting families and couples in various settings.

If your goal is to fast-track your entry into the job market, accelerated bachelor degree programs provide a way to earn your qualifications faster and begin working in your chosen field sooner.

Finally, knowing which fields ensure strong earning potential is crucial. Explore the highest paid degrees for insights into lucrative options related to neuroscience, such as biomedical engineering or health informatics.

Best Scientists Citing Jonathan Z. Simon

Trending Scientists