World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Alain de Cheveigné

Alain de Cheveigné

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
36
Citations
11252
World Ranking
10980
National Ranking
267

Alain de Cheveigné publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alain de Cheveigné sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 123 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Alain de Cheveigné D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alain de Cheveigné sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Alain de Cheveigné is affiliated with the École Normale Supérieure in France. Their research primarily falls within the field of Neuroscience, with a significant emphasis on Cognitive Neuroscience. Their scientific contributions span subfields including Signal Processing, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sensory Systems, and Speech and Hearing.

Their work focuses on several main topics:

  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
  • Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Multisensory perception and integration
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Blind Source Separation Techniques
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies

Alain de Cheveigné has published extensively, often collaborating with a set of frequent coauthors, including Giovanni M. Di Liberto, Edmund C. Lalor, Malcolm Slaney, Søren A. Fuglsang, and Jens Hjortkjær.

Recent publications include:

  • "Cortical encoding of melodic expectations in human temporal cortex," 2020, eLife
  • "Neurophysiological Indices of Audiovisual Speech Processing Reveal a Hierarchy of Multisensory Integration Effects," 2021, Journal of Neuroscience
  • "Auditory stimulus-response modeling with a match-mismatch task," 2021, Journal of Neural Engineering
  • "Harmonic Cancellation-A Fundamental of Auditory Scene Analysis," 2021, Trends in Hearing
  • "Real-time control of a hearing instrument with EEG-based attention decoding," 2025, Journal of Neural Engineering

The scientist has published in a variety of venues, with multiple papers appearing in bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), arXiv (Cornell University), Journal of Neural Engineering, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, and eLife.

Best Publications

  • YIN, a fundamental frequency estimator for speech and music

    Alain de Cheveigné;Hideki Kawahara

  • Restructuring speech representations using a pitch-adaptive time-frequency smoothing and an instantaneous-frequency-based F0 extraction: possible role of a repetitive structure in sounds

    Hideki Kawahara;Ikuyo Masuda-Katsuse;Alain de Cheveigné

  • Fixed point analysis of frequency to instantaneous frequency mapping for accurate estimation of F0 and periodicity

    Hideki Kawahara;Haruhiro Katayose;Alain de Cheveigné;Roy D. Patterson

  • Separation of concurrent harmonic sounds: Fundamental frequency estimation and a time‐domain cancellation model of auditory processing

    Alain de Cheveigné

  • Denoising based on spatial filtering.

    Alain de Cheveigné;Jonathan Z. Simon

  • Pitch Perception Models

    Alain de Cheveigné

  • Denoising based on time-shift PCA

    Alain de Cheveigné;Jonathan Z. Simon

  • Filters: When, Why, and How (Not) to Use Them.

    Alain de Cheveigné;Alain de Cheveigné;Alain de Cheveigné;Israel Nelken

  • The dependency of timbre on fundamental frequency

    Jeremy Marozeau;Alain de Cheveigné;Stephen McAdams;Suzanne Winsberg

  • Joint decorrelation, a versatile tool for multichannel data analysis.

    Alain de Cheveigné;Alain de Cheveigné;Alain de Cheveigné;Lucas C. Parra

  • Decoding the auditory brain with canonical component analysis

    Alain de Cheveigné;Daniel D. E. Wong;Giovanni M. di Liberto;Jens Hjortkjær

  • ZapLine: A simple and effective method to remove power line artifacts

    Alain de Cheveigné;Alain de Cheveigné;Alain de Cheveigné

  • Robust detrending, rereferencing, outlier detection, and inpainting for multichannel data.

    Alain de Cheveigné;Alain de Cheveigné;Alain de Cheveigné;Dorothée Arzounian

  • Cancellation model of pitch perception.

    Alain de Cheveigné

  • Cortical Encoding of Melodic Expectations in Human Temporal Cortex

    Giovanni M Di Liberto;Claire Pelofi;Claire Pelofi;Roberta Bianco;Prachi Patel

  • A Comparison of Regularization Methods in Forward and Backward Models for Auditory Attention Decoding.

    Daniel D. E. Wong;Søren A. Fuglsang;Jens Hjortkjær;Enea Ceolini

  • EEG-based Auditory Attention Decoding: Towards Neuro-Steered Hearing Devices

    Simon Geirnaert;Servaas Vandecappelle;Emina Alickovic;Alain de Cheveigné

  • Nearly defect-free F0 trajectory extraction for expressive speech modifications based on STRAIGHT.

    Hideki Kawahara;Alain de Cheveigné;Hideki Banno;Toru Takahashi

  • Identification of concurrent harmonic and inharmonic vowels: A test of the theory of harmonic cancellation and enhancement

    Alain de Cheveigné;Stephen McAdams;Jean Laroche;Muriel Rosenberg

  • Multiple period estimation and pitch perception model

    Alain de Cheveigné;Hideki Kawahara

  • Concurrent vowel identification. III. A neural model of harmonic interference cancellation

    Alain de Cheveigné

  • Comparative evaluation of F0 estimation algorithms.

    Alain de Cheveigné;Hideki Kawahara

Frequent Co-Authors

Hideki Kawahara
Hideki Kawahara Wakayama University
Malcolm Slaney
Malcolm Slaney Stanford University
Shihab A. Shamma
Shihab A. Shamma University of Maryland, College Park
Edmund C. Lalor
Edmund C. Lalor University of Rochester
Jonathan Z. Simon
Jonathan Z. Simon University of Maryland, College Park
Stephen McAdams
Stephen McAdams McGill University
Ashesh D. Mehta
Ashesh D. Mehta Feinstein Institute for Medical Research
Lucas C. Parra
Lucas C. Parra City College of New York
Nima Mesgarani
Nima Mesgarani Columbia University
David Poeppel
David Poeppel New York University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Computer Science degree opens doors to various online study options and career opportunities. For those seeking affordable education, exploring the cheapest bachelor degree programs can help students avoid excessive debt while gaining essential skills.

Many students consider related majors, such as engineering degrees online, which share overlapping coursework and career prospects. Studying engineering online can lead to roles in tech, software development, and systems design.

For professionals aiming to move into leadership or management roles, pursuing an emba online provides a pathway to executive positions in technology or business. This is ideal for those with technical backgrounds who wish to develop strategic and managerial skills.

Additionally, if your interests include information management or digital curation, specialized programs such as online mlis programs offer expertise in library and information science—a rising field closely tied to advancements in computing and technology.

Best Scientists Citing Alain de Cheveigné

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles