World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Barnaby J. W. Dixson

Barnaby J. W. Dixson

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
43
Citations
5710
World Ranking
7354
National Ranking
434

Barnaby J. W. Dixson publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Barnaby J. W. Dixson sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 100 publications — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Barnaby J. W. Dixson D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Barnaby J. W. Dixson sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Barnaby J. W. Dixson is affiliated with the University of Queensland in Australia. The primary field of research is Psychology, with a specific focus on multiple subfields including Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Sociology and Political Science, and Social Psychology.

Their work covers several main topics, such as Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior, Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment, Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies, Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation, Eating Disorders and Behaviors, Face Recognition and Perception, and Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Dixson include Sara Álvarez Solas, John Jamir Benzon R. Aruta, Anthony J. Lee, Neil R. Caton, and Martin Voracek.

The most common venues where Dixson's research articles have been published are Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology, Evolution and Human Behavior, Nature Human Behaviour, Biology Letters, and Archives of Sexual Behavior.

Recent papers associated with Dixson, including their titles, years, and publication venues, are:

  • Body appreciation around the world: Measurement invariance of the Body Appreciation Scale-2 (BAS-2) across 65 nations, 40 languages, gender identities, and age (2023) - Body Image
  • A multivariate analysis of women's mating strategies and sexual selection on men's facial morphology (2020) - Royal Society Open Science
  • Situational factors shape moral judgements in the trolley dilemma in Eastern, Southern and Western countries in a culturally diverse sample (2022) - Nature Human Behaviour
  • Multivariate Intra-Sexual Selection on Men's Perceptions of Male Facial Morphology (2020) - Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology
  • Facial width-to-height ratio predicts fighting success: A direct replication and extension of Zilioli et al. (2014) (2022) - Aggressive Behavior

Best Publications

  • The Psychological Science Accelerator: Advancing Psychology through a Distributed Collaborative Network

    Hannah Moshontz;Lorne Campbell;Charles R. Ebersole;Hans Ijzerman

  • Evidence from Meta-Analyses of the Facial Width-to-Height Ratio as an Evolved Cue of Threat

    Shawn N. Geniole;Thomas F. Denson;Barnaby J. Dixson;Justin M. Carré

  • Cross-cultural consensus for waist–hip ratio and women's attractiveness

    Devendra Singh;B.J. Dixson;T.S. Jessop;B. Morgan

  • Eye-Tracking of Men’s Preferences for Waist-to-Hip Ratio and Breast Size of Women

    Barnaby J. Dixson;Gina M. Grimshaw;Wayne L. Linklater;Alan F. Dixson

  • To which world regions does the valence–dominance model of social perception apply?

    Benedict C. Jones;Lisa M. DeBruine;Jessica K. Flake;Marco Tullio Liuzza

  • Studies of human physique and sexual attractiveness: Sexual preferences of men and women in China

    Barnaby J. Dixson;Alan F. Dixson;Baoguo Li;M.J. Anderson

  • The role of facial hair in women's perceptions of men's attractiveness, health, masculinity and parenting abilities

    Barnaby J. Dixson;Robert C. Brooks

  • Beards augment perceptions of men's age, social status, and aggressiveness, but not attractiveness

    Barnaby J. Dixson;Paul L. Vasey

  • Human physique and sexual attractiveness in men and women: a New Zealand-U.S. comparative study.

    Barnaby J. Dixson;Alan F. Dixson;Phil J. Bishop;Amy Parish

  • A multi-country test of brief reappraisal interventions on emotions during the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Ke Wang;Amit Goldenberg;Charles A. Dorison;Jeremy K. Miller

  • Standardized protocols for characterizing women's fertility: A data-driven approach

    Khandis R. Blake;Barnaby J.W. Dixson;Siobhan M. O'Dean;Thomas F. Denson

  • Are badges of status adaptive in large complex primate groups

    Cyril C. Grueter;Karin Isler;Barnaby J. Dixson

  • Human Physique and Sexual Attractiveness: Sexual Preferences of Men and Women in Bakossiland, Cameroon

    Barnaby J. Dixson;Alan F. Dixson;Bethan Morgan;Matthew J. Anderson

  • Sexual selection and the evolution of visually conspicuous sexually dimorphic traits in male monkeys, apes, and human beings

    Alan Dixson;Barnaby Dixson;Matthew Anderson

  • Cross-cultural variation in men's preference for sexual dimorphism in women's faces.

    Urszula M. Marcinkowska;Mikhail V. Kozlov;Huajian Cai;Jorge Contreras-Garduño

  • Women's preferences for men's facial masculinity are strongest under favorable ecological conditions

    Urszula M. Marcinkowska;Urszula M. Marcinkowska;Markus J. Rantala;Anthony J. Lee;Mikhail V. Kozlov

  • Negative frequency-dependent preferences and variation in male facial hair.

    Zinnia J. Janif;Robert C. Brooks;Barnaby J. Dixson

  • The masculinity paradox: facial masculinity and beardedness interact to determine women's ratings of men's facial attractiveness

    B. J. W. Dixson;D. Sulikowski;A. Gouda‐Vossos;M. J. Rantala

  • Men’s Preferences for Women’s Breast Morphology in New Zealand, Samoa, and Papua New Guinea

    Barnaby J. Dixson;Paul L. Vasey;Katayo Sagata;Nokuthaba Sibanda

  • Eye-tracking women’s preferences for men’s somatotypes

    Barnaby J. Dixson;Gina M. Grimshaw;Diane K. Ormsby;Alan F. Dixson

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert Brooks
Robert Brooks University of New South Wales
Markus J. Rantala
Markus J. Rantala University of Turku
Thomas F. Denson
Thomas F. Denson University of New South Wales
Wayne L. Linklater
Wayne L. Linklater California State University, Sacramento
Paul L. Vasey
Paul L. Vasey University of Lethbridge
Anthony C. Little
Anthony C. Little University of Bath
Stefan Stieger
Stefan Stieger Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences
Mikhail V. Kozlov
Mikhail V. Kozlov University of Turku
Martin Voracek
Martin Voracek University of Vienna
William J. Chopik
William J. Chopik Michigan State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees in the USA offers a flexible pathway to a diverse range of meaningful careers. As the demand for mental health professionals continues to grow, many students are curious about what it takes to become a licensed therapist in different locations across the country.

While studying psychology online, it’s important to understand that educational requirements, clinical hours, and licensing exams can vary significantly depending on your state or city of practice. For example, you can see the specific Fresno licensed therapist requirements or review the licensed therapist requirements in Garland. Both pages provide useful checklists for coursework, supervised experience, and application steps.

If you’re interested in Arizona, you’ll want to look into the licensed therapist requirements in Gilbert. Similarly, those aiming for careers in California should explore the detailed process for becoming a licensed therapist in Glendale. Each area’s regulations help shape the education and career journey, making it crucial for students to research and plan accordingly as they pursue online degrees and professional licensure in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Barnaby J. W. Dixson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles