World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 56 4145 3825 187 184 218 15748

Lars Penke publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Lars Penke between 2005 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Lars Penke published across 21 years, from 2005 to 2025, averaging 11.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 26 publications in 2019. 21 of the 239 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 26. Peak 26 publications in 2019. 2005: 1 publication 2006: 3 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 16 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 19 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 26 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 14 publications
2005 2025

239 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Lars Penke: publications per year, 2005 to 2025
Year Publications
2005 1
2006 3
2007 7
2008 12
2009 10
2010 10
2011 14
2012 12
2013 11
2014 16
2015 5
2016 13
2017 19
2018 14
2019 26
2020 14
2021 13
2022 9
2023 9
2024 7
2025 14
Total 239
Download as CSV

Lars Penke publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lars Penke sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 211–220 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 218 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313 218
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Lars Penke D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lars Penke sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56–57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345 56
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Lars Penke is affiliated with the University of Göttingen in Germany and specializes in psychology with a primary focus on evolutionary psychology and human behavior. Their research portfolio encompasses multiple subfields, including experimental and cognitive psychology, social psychology, clinical psychology, sociology and political science, and ecology, evolution, behavior, and systematics.

The main topics of Penke's work include:

  • Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Neuroendocrine Regulation and Behavior

Penke's recent publications demonstrate a wide range of interests. Notable papers include:

  • "Age and gender differences in narcissism: A comprehensive study across eight measures and over 250,000 participants," 2023, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  • "Not within spitting distance: Salivary immunoassays of estradiol have subpar validity for predicting cycle phase," 2022, Psychoneuroendocrinology
  • "Routinely randomize potential sources of measurement reactivity to estimate and adjust for biases in subjective reports," 2020, Psychological Methods
  • "A longitudinal evaluation of ovulatory cycle shifts in women's mate attraction and preferences," 2021, Hormones and Behavior
  • "Do voices carry valid information about a speaker's personality?," 2021, Journal of Research in Personality

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Penke include:

  • Julia Stern
  • Tanja M. Gerlach
  • Tobias L. Kordsmeyer
  • Julie C. Driebe
  • Christoph Schild

Penke's work is regularly published in specific venues such as:

  • Psychoneuroendocrinology
  • Hormones and Behavior
  • Personality Science
  • Evolutionary Human Sciences
  • Evolution and Human Behavior

Best Publications

  • Age-associated cognitive decline

    Ian J Deary;Janie Corley;Alan J Gow;Sarah E Harris

  • Beyond global sociosexual orientations: A more differentiated look at sociosexuality and its effects on courtship and romantic relationships.

    Lars Penke;Jens B. Asendorpf

  • The Neuroscience of Human Intelligence Differences

    Ian J. Deary;Lars Penke;Wendy Johnson

  • The evolutionary genetics of personality

    Lars Penke;Jaap J. A. Denissen;Geoffrey F. Miller

  • Motivational individual reaction norms underlying the Five-Factor model of personality: First steps towards a theory-based conceptual framework

    Jaap J.A. Denissen;Lars Penke

  • The effects of weather on daily mood: A multilevel approach.

    Jaap J. A. Denissen;Ligaya Butalid;Lars Penke;Marcel A. G. van Aken

  • Different cognitive processes underlie human mate choices and mate preferences.

    Peter M. Todd;Lars Penke;Barbara Fasolo;Alison P. Lenton

  • A General Factor of Brain White Matter Integrity Predicts Information Processing Speed in Healthy Older People

    Lars Penke;Susana Muñoz Maniega;Catherine Murray;Alan J. Gow

  • Correlated preferences for facial masculinity and ideal or actual partner's masculinity

    Lisa M DeBruine;Benedict C Jones;Anthony C Little;Lynda G Boothroyd

  • Telling facial metrics: facial width is associated with testosterone levels in men

    Carmen E. Lefevre;Gary J. Lewis;David I. Perrett;Lars Penke

  • Brain white matter tract integrity as a neural foundation for general intelligence

    L Penke;S Muñoz Maniega;M E Bastin;M C Valdés Hernández

  • Self-esteem reactions to social interactions: evidence for sociometer mechanisms across days, people, and nations.

    Jaap J. A. Denissen;Lars Penke;David P. Schmitt;Marcel A. G. van Aken

  • Meta-analysis of associations between human brain volume and intelligence differences: How strong are they and what do they mean?

    Jakob Pietschnig;Jakob Pietschnig;Lars Penke;Jelte M. Wicherts;Michael Zeiler

  • PERSOC : A unified framework for understanding the dynamic interplay of personality and social relationships

    Mitja D. Back;Anna Baumert;Jaap J. A. Denissen;Freda-Marie Hartung

  • Self‐Regulation Underlies Temperament and Personality: An Integrative Developmental Framework

    Jaap J. A. Denissen;Marcel A. G. van Aken;Lars Penke;Dustin Wood

  • From dating to mating and relating: Predictors of initial and long‐term outcomes of speed‐dating in a community sample

    Jens B. Asendorpf;Lars Penke;Mitja D. Back

  • Maintenance of genetic variation in human personality: testing evolutionary models by estimating heritability due to common causal variants and investigating the effect of distant inbreeding.

    Karin J.H. Verweij;Jian Yang;Jari Lahti;Juha Veijola

  • The Nature of Creativity: The Roles of Genetic Factors, Personality Traits, Cognitive Abilities, and Environmental Sources

    Christian Kandler;Rainer Riemann;Alois Angleitner;Frank M. Spinath

  • Age and Gender Differences in Motivational Manifestations of the Big Five from Age 16 to 60.

    Regula Lehmann;Jaap J. A. Denissen;Mathias Allemand;Lars Penke

  • How self-assessments can guide human mating decisions

    Lars Penke;Peter M. Todd;Alison P. Lenton;Barbara Fasolo

  • MAINTENANCE OF GENETIC VARIATION IN HUMAN PERSONALITY: TESTING EVOLUTIONARY MODELS BY ESTIMATING HERITABILITY DUE TO COMMON CAUSAL VARIANTS AND INVESTIGATING THE EFFECT OF DISTANT INBREEDING

    Karin J. H. Verweij;Jian Yang;Jari Lahti;Juha Veijola

Frequent Co-Authors

Ian J. Deary
Ian J. Deary University of Edinburgh
John M. Starr
John M. Starr University of Edinburgh
Alan J. Gow
Alan J. Gow Heriot-Watt University
Mark E. Bastin
Mark E. Bastin University of Edinburgh
Joanna M. Wardlaw
Joanna M. Wardlaw University of Edinburgh
Jens B. Asendorpf
Jens B. Asendorpf Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Jaap J. A. Denissen
Jaap J. A. Denissen Utrecht University
Wendy Johnson
Wendy Johnson University of Edinburgh
Karin J. H. Verweij
Karin J. H. Verweij University of Amsterdam
Brendan P. Zietsch
Brendan P. Zietsch University of Queensland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA can open doors to a range of dynamic career pathways. Today, many students are leveraging online degree programs to specialize in areas such as behavioral analysis, counseling, and mental health. Online programs often provide flexibility, allowing you to balance coursework with other commitments while gaining essential knowledge for future roles.

One promising path is becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA). Achieving this credential requires a combination of specific academic prerequisites, supervised fieldwork, and passing a national exam. Location can influence your journey, as requirements may vary slightly. For example, those interested in becoming a bcba in Richmond or fulfilling Riverside bcba education requirements should review local guidelines and programs for the most accurate information.

Other regions have their own considerations as well. Learn about the process for becoming a bcba in Sacramento or explore what’s involved in becoming a bcba in Saint Paul. Whichever path you choose, online psychology degrees are a strong foundation for beginning or advancing your career in behavioral health and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Lars Penke

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles