World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Matthew E. Pritchard

Matthew E. Pritchard

D-Index & Metrics

Earth Science

D-Index
42
Citations
7055
World Ranking
5225
National Ranking
1956

Matthew E. Pritchard publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew E. Pritchard sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

This scientist: 184 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Matthew E. Pritchard D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew E. Pritchard sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

Matthew E. Pritchard is affiliated with Cornell University in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of Earth and Planetary Sciences, with a focus on geophysics. Their research spans multiple subfields, including Geophysics, Atmospheric Science, Artificial Intelligence, Aerospace Engineering, and Astronomy and Astrophysics.

Their main topics of work include earthquake and tectonic studies, geological and geochemical analysis, earthquake detection and analysis, high-pressure geophysics and materials, Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) applications and techniques, seismology and earthquake studies, and geochemistry and geologic mapping.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Matthew E. Pritchard include Patricia MacQueen, Francisco Delgado, Joachim Gottsmann, K. Reath, and P. Lundgren.

Pritchard has published papers in several venues, with notable recurring publishing in Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Seismological Research Letters, Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth, Geophysical Research Letters, and Bulletin of Volcanology.

Selected recent papers include:

  • New Opportunities to Study Earthquake Precursors, 2020, Seismological Research Letters
  • Volcano-Tectonic Interactions at Sabancaya Volcano, Peru: Eruptions, Magmatic Inflation, Moderate Earthquakes, and Fault Creep, 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth
  • Spatial and Temporal Quantification of Subaerial Volcanism From 1980 to 2019: Solid Products, Masses, and Average Eruptive Rates, 2023, Reviews of Geophysics
  • From slab to surface: Earthquake evidence for fluid migration at Uturuncu volcano, Bolivia, 2021, Earth and Planetary Science Letters
  • Using Conceptual Models to Relate Multiparameter Satellite Data to Subsurface Volcanic Processes in Latin America, 2020, Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems

Best Publications

  • The Constitution and Structure of the Lunar Interior

    Mark A. Wieczorek;Bradley L. Jolliff;Amir Khan;Matthew E. Pritchard

  • Thermal and Magmatic Evolution of the Moon

    Charles K. Shearer;Paul C. Hess;Mark A. Wieczorek;Matt E. Pritchard

  • A satellite geodetic survey of large-scale deformation of volcanic centres in the central Andes

    Matthew E. Pritchard;Mark Simons

  • An InSAR‐based survey of volcanic deformation in the central Andes

    M. E. Pritchard;M. Simons

  • Global link between deformation and volcanic eruption quantified by satellite imagery

    Juliet Biggs;S. K. Ebmeier;Willy P Aspinall;Z. Lu

  • Duration, magnitude, and frequency of subaerial volcano deformation events: New results from Latin America using InSAR and a global synthesis

    T. J. Fournier;M. E. Pritchard;S. N. Riddick

  • Ice loss from the Southern Patagonian Ice Field, South America, between 2000 and 2012

    Michael J. Willis;Andrew K. Melkonian;Matthew E. Pritchard;Andrés Rivera;Andrés Rivera

  • Evidence of Recent Thrust Faulting on the Moon Revealed by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera

    Thomas R. Watters;Mark S. Robinson;Ross A. Beyer;Ross A. Beyer;Maria E. Banks

  • Co-seismic slip from the 1995 July 30 Mw= 8.1 Antofagasta, Chile, earthquake as constrained by InSAR and GPS observations

    M. E. Pritchard;M. Simons;P. A. Rosen;S. Hensley

  • An aseismic slip pulse in northern Chile and along‐strike variations in seismogenic behavior

    M. E. Pritchard;M. Simons

  • Global Volcano Monitoring: What Does It Mean When Volcanoes Deform?

    Juliet Biggs;Matthew E. Pritchard

  • Uturuncu volcano, Bolivia: Volcanic unrest due to mid-crustal magma intrusion

    R Sj Sparks;Christopher Blake Folkes;Madeleine C S Humphreys;Daniel N Barfod

  • Ice loss rates at the Northern Patagonian Icefield derived using a decade of satellite remote sensing

    Michael J. Willis;Andrew K. Melkonian;Matthew E. Pritchard;Joan M. Ramage

  • Synthesis of global satellite observations of magmatic and volcanic deformation: implications for volcano monitoring & the lateral extent of magmatic domains

    S. K. Ebmeier;B. J. Andrews;M. C. Araya;D. W. D. Arnold

  • Subsidence at southern Andes volcanoes induced by the 2010 Maule, Chile earthquake

    M. E. Pritchard;J. A. Jay;F. Aron;S. T. Henderson

  • Geodetic, teleseismic, and strong motion constraints on slip from recent southern Peru subduction zone earthquakes

    M. E. Pritchard;E. O. Norabuena;C. Ji;C. Ji;R. Boroschek

  • Locating magma reservoirs using InSAR and petrology before and during the 2011–2012 Cordón Caulle silicic eruption

    Jennifer Jay;Fidel Costa;Matthew E Pritchard;Luis Lara

  • Decadal volcanic deformation in the Central Andes Volcanic Zone revealed by InSAR time series

    S. T. Henderson;M. E. Pritchard

  • Thermal Aspects of a Lunar Origin by Giant Impact

    M. E. Pritchard;D. J. Stevenson

  • Earthquake swarms in South America

    S. G. Holtkamp;S. G. Holtkamp;M. E. Pritchard;R. B. Lohman

  • An InSAR-based survey of volcanic deformation in the southern Andes

    M. E. Pritchard;M. Simons

Frequent Co-Authors

Juliet Biggs
Juliet Biggs University of Bristol
Michael P. Poland
Michael P. Poland United States Geological Survey
Paul Lundgren
Paul Lundgren California Institute of Technology
Thomas R. Watters
Thomas R. Watters Smithsonian Institution
Mark Simons
Mark Simons California Institute of Technology
Stephen R. McNutt
Stephen R. McNutt University of South Florida
James F. Bell
James F. Bell Arizona State University
Simon Carn
Simon Carn Michigan Technological University
Joachim H Gottsmann
Joachim H Gottsmann University of Bristol
Cynthia J. Ebinger
Cynthia J. Ebinger Tulane University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Earth Science in the USA opens doors to diverse educational paths, including many online options that cater to various interests and career goals. For those wanting to blend creativity with environmental knowledge, the best online MFA programs offer affordable avenues to develop skills in visual communication and storytelling related to Earth Science issues.

Students aiming to enhance organizational and leadership abilities within scientific institutions may consider pursuing a human resource management masters degree online. This specialization supports career growth in managing scientific teams and research departments effectively.

Online learning also provides flexible opportunities for all age groups. Seniors interested in lifelong learning or shifting to consulting roles in environmental fields can benefit from the options highlighted in online degree programs for seniors, which offer tailored support for mature students.

For those pursuing library and information science as it relates to environmental data management, an online MLIS degree ALA accredited ensures quality education in curating and managing scientific resources, crucial for research and public knowledge dissemination.

Best Scientists Citing Matthew E. Pritchard

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles