World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
35
Citations
9387
World Ranking
9104
National Ranking
72

Ehud Zohary publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ehud Zohary sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 93 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Ehud Zohary D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ehud Zohary sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ehud Zohary is affiliated with the Hebrew University of Jerusalem in Israel and has a research focus spanning several areas within neuroscience and psychology. Their work primarily addresses topics related to sensory perception and cognitive mechanisms.

The main fields of study in which Ehud Zohary conducts research include Neuroscience and Psychology. More specifically, their work touches on subfields such as Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Ophthalmology, Molecular Biology, and Developmental and Educational Psychology.

The scientist's research covers a variety of main topics, including:

  • Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Multisensory perception and integration
  • Intraocular Surgery and Lenses
  • Connexins and lens biology
  • Face Recognition and Perception
  • Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

Ehud Zohary has contributed to multiple research publications, many of which focus on vision, sensory processing, and cognitive integration. Notable recent papers include:

  • Development of multisensory integration following prolonged early-onset visual deprivation (2021), published in Current Biology
  • Gaze following requires early visual experience (2022), published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Learning to perceive shape from temporal integration following late emergence from blindness (2021), published in Current Biology
  • Visual motion perception before and after sight recovery from early-onset and prolonged near-blindness (2022), published in Journal of Vision
  • The presence of semantic content in a visual recognition memory task reduces the severity of neglect (2021), published in Neuropsychologia

Ehud Zohary frequently coauthors work with other researchers, including:

  • Itay Ben-Zion
  • Asael Y. Sklar
  • Ayelet McKyton
  • Sara Attias
  • Tanya Orlov

The scientist's publications are commonly found in prominent journals such as the Journal of Vision, Current Biology, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Neuropsychologia, and iScience.

Best Publications

  • Correlated neuronal discharge rate and its implications for psychophysical performance

    Ehud Zohary;Michael N. Shadlen;William T. Newsome

  • Visuo-haptic object-related activation in the ventral visual pathway

    Amir Amedi;Rafael Malach;Talma Hendler;Sharon Peled

  • Early 'visual' cortex activation correlates with superior verbal memory performance in the blind

    Amir Amedi;Amir Amedi;Noa Raz;Pazit Pianka;Rafael Malach

  • Correlated Firing in Macaque Visual Area MT: Time Scales and Relationship to Behavior

    Wyeth Bair;Wyeth Bair;Ehud Zohary;William T. Newsome;William T. Newsome

  • Convergence of Visual and Tactile Shape Processing in the Human Lateral Occipital Complex

    Amir Amedi;Gilad Jacobson;Talma Hendler;Rafael Malach

  • Is That Near My Hand? Multisensory Representation of Peripersonal Space in Human Intraparietal Sulcus

    Tamar R. Makin;Nicholas P. Holmes;Ehud Zohary

  • Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the occipital pole interferes with verbal processing in blind subjects

    Amir Amedi;Agnes Floel;Agnes Floel;Stefan Knecht;Ehud Zohary

  • Neuronal plasticity that underlies improvement in perceptual performance.

    Ehud Zohary;Simona Celebrini;Kenneth H. Britten;William T. Newsome

  • Contrast Sensitivity in Human Visual Areas and Its Relationship to Object Recognition

    Galia Avidan;Michal Harel;Talma Hendler;Dafna Ben-Bashat

  • Dissociation between ventral and dorsal fMRI activation during object and action recognition.

    Lior Shmuelof;Ehud Zohary;Ehud Zohary

  • Topographic representation of the human body in the occipitotemporal cortex.

    Tanya Orlov;Tamar R. Makin;Tamar R. Makin;Ehud Zohary;Ehud Zohary

  • V1 Activation in Congenitally Blind Humans is Associated with Episodic Retrieval

    Noa Raz;Amir Amedi;Ehud Zohary

  • Cortical activity during tactile exploration of objects in blind and sighted humans

    Amir Amedi;Noa Raz;Haim Azulay;Rafael Malach

  • Analysis of the Neuronal Selectivity Underlying Low fMRI Signals

    Galia Avidan;Uri Hasson;Talma Hendler;Ehud Zohary;Ehud Zohary

  • Macaque monkeys categorize images by their ordinal number

    Tanya Orlov;Volodya Yakovlev;Shaul Hochstein;Ehud Zohary

  • Inter-trial neuronal activity in inferior temporal cortex: a putative vehicle to generate long-term visual associations.

    Volodya Yakovlev;Stefano Fusi;Stefano Fusi;Elisha Berman;Ehud Zohary

  • How serial is serial processing in vision

    Ehud Zohary;Shaul Hochstein

  • Superior serial memory in the blind: a case of cognitive compensatory adjustment.

    Noa Raz;Ella Striem;Golan Pundak;Tanya Orlov

  • A Mirror Representation of Others' Actions in the Human Anterior Parietal Cortex

    Lior Shmuelof;Ehud Zohary

  • Population coding of visual stimuli by cortical neurons tuned to more than one dimension

    Ehud Zohary

Frequent Co-Authors

Galia Avidan
Galia Avidan Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
William T. Newsome
William T. Newsome Stanford University
Rafael Malach
Rafael Malach Weizmann Institute of Science
Amir Amedi
Amir Amedi Reichman University
Shaul Hochstein
Shaul Hochstein Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Stefano Fusi
Stefano Fusi Columbia University
Talma Hendler
Talma Hendler Tel Aviv University
Eilon Vaadia
Eilon Vaadia Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Oliver Braddick
Oliver Braddick University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a neuroscience degree online opens several doors for students interested in flexible education options. Many institutions now offer accelerated online programs, which help students fast-track their studies and enter the workforce sooner. These programs are ideal for those who want to balance education with other responsibilities or who are looking to make a career switch quickly.

It’s important to consider both the academic and financial aspects when choosing a degree path. Prospective students should research fafsa approved online colleges to find affordable options that fit their budget and offer federal financial aid opportunities.

A neuroscience background can lead to many lucrative professions. Students interested in the financial outcomes should also explore the best bachelor degrees to get and the highest paying jobs for college graduates. Knowing which majors and degrees align with top-paying careers can help students plan a pathway that meets both their intellectual passions and salary expectations.

Best Scientists Citing Ehud Zohary

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles