World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
48
Citations
14434
World Ranking
6087
National Ranking
41

Amir Amedi publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amir Amedi sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 161 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Amir Amedi D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amir Amedi sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Amir Amedi is a researcher affiliated with Reichman University in Israel, specializing primarily in neuroscience. Their work spans multiple subfields within cognitive neuroscience, with a notable emphasis on experimental and cognitive psychology, social psychology, automotive engineering, and psychiatry and mental health.

Their research topics cover a range of areas including tactile and sensory interactions, visual perception and processing mechanisms, multisensory perception and integration, neural dynamics and brain function, EEG and brain-computer interfaces, face recognition and perception, and spatial cognition and navigation.

Amir Amedi has contributed to numerous scientific publications across various journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Scientific Reports
  • Frontiers in Neuroscience
  • PLoS ONE
  • Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Amir Amedi include:

  • "Decoding Natural Sounds in Early "Visual" Cortex of Congenitally Blind Individuals" (2020, Current Biology)
  • "Are critical periods reversible in the adult brain? Insights on cortical specializations based on sensory deprivation studies" (2020, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews)
  • "Effects of training and using an audio-tactile sensory substitution device on speech-in-noise understanding" (2022, Scientific Reports)
  • "Activation of human visual area V6 during egocentric navigation with and without visual experience" (2023, Current Biology)
  • "Core knowledge of geometry can develop independently of visual experience" (2021, Cognition)

Amir Amedi collaborates regularly with several researchers, including:

  • Benedetta Heimler
  • Amber Maimon
  • Or Yizhar
  • Katarzyna Cieśla
  • Tomasz Wolak

Best Publications

  • The plastic human brain cortex.

    Alvaro Pascual-Leone;Amir Amedi;Felipe Fregni;Lotfi B. Merabet

  • Visuo-haptic object-related activation in the ventral visual pathway

    Amir Amedi;Rafael Malach;Talma Hendler;Sharon Peled

  • Spontaneous Fluctuations in Posterior α-Band EEG Activity Reflect Variability in Excitability of Human Visual Areas

    Vincenzo Romei;Verena Brodbeck;Christoph Michel;Amir Amedi;Amir Amedi

  • Early 'visual' cortex activation correlates with superior verbal memory performance in the blind

    Amir Amedi;Amir Amedi;Noa Raz;Pazit Pianka;Rafael Malach

  • Shape conveyed by visual-to-auditory sensory substitution activates the lateral occipital complex.

    Amir Amedi;William M Stern;Joan A Camprodon;Felix Bermpohl;Felix Bermpohl

  • Convergence of Visual and Tactile Shape Processing in the Human Lateral Occipital Complex

    Amir Amedi;Gilad Jacobson;Talma Hendler;Rafael Malach

  • Functional imaging of human crossmodal identification and object recognition.

    A Amedi;K von Kriegstein;N M van Atteveldt;M S Beauchamp

  • A Ventral Visual Stream Reading Center Independent of Visual Experience

    Lior Reich;Marcin Szwed;Laurent Cohen;Laurent Cohen;Amir Amedi

  • Reading with sounds: sensory substitution selectively activates the visual word form area in the blind.

    Ella Striem-Amit;Laurent Cohen;Laurent Cohen;Stanislas Dehaene;Amir Amedi

  • Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the occipital pole interferes with verbal processing in blind subjects

    Amir Amedi;Agnes Floel;Agnes Floel;Stefan Knecht;Ehud Zohary

  • Negative BOLD differentiates visual imagery and perception.

    Amir Amedi;Rafael Malach;Alvaro Pascual-Leone

  • Multisensory Processes: A Balancing Act across the Lifespan.

    Micah M. Murray;David J. Lewkowicz;Amir Amedi;Mark T. Wallace

  • Origins of the specialization for letters and numbers in ventral occipitotemporal cortex.

    Thomas Hannagan;Thomas Hannagan;Amir Amedi;Laurent Cohen;Ghislaine Dehaene-Lambertz

  • Sensory substitution: closing the gap between basic research and widespread practical visual rehabilitation.

    Shachar Maidenbaum;Sami Abboud;Amir Amedi

  • EyeMusic: Introducing a "visual" colorful experience for the blind using auditory sensory substitution.

    Sami Abboud;Shlomi Hanassy;Shelly Levy-Tzedek;Shachar Maidenbaum

  • What blindness can tell us about seeing again: merging neuroplasticity and neuroprostheses

    Lotfi B. Merabet;Joseph F. Rizzo;Amir Amedi;David C. Somers

  • Functional connectivity of visual cortex in the blind follows retinotopic organization principles

    Ella Striem-Amit;Ella Striem-Amit;Smadar Ovadia-Caro;Alfonso Caramazza;Daniel S. Margulies;Daniel S. Margulies

  • A Putative Model of Multisensory Object Representation

    Simon A Lacey;Noa Tal;Amir Amedi;Krish Sathian

  • Combined activation and deactivation of visual cortex during tactile sensory processing

    Lotfi B. Merabet;Jascha D. Swisher;Stephanie A. McMains;Mark A. Halko

  • The large-Scale Organization of “Visual” Streams Emerges Without Visual Experience

    Ella Striem-Amit;Ornella Dakwar;Lior Reich;Amir Amedi

Frequent Co-Authors

Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Alvaro Pascual-Leone Harvard University
Lotfi B. Merabet
Lotfi B. Merabet Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary
Felix Bermpohl
Felix Bermpohl Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Ehud Zohary
Ehud Zohary Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Tamar Flash
Tamar Flash Weizmann Institute of Science
Laurent D. Cohen
Laurent D. Cohen Paris Dauphine University
Rafael Malach
Rafael Malach Weizmann Institute of Science
Felipe Fregni
Felipe Fregni Harvard University
Maurice Ptito
Maurice Ptito University of Montreal
Georg Northoff
Georg Northoff University of Ottawa

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Amir Amedi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles