World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
38
Citations
5699
World Ranking
8628
National Ranking
3083

Clark J. Gantzer publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Clark J. Gantzer sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 91 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Clark J. Gantzer D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Clark J. Gantzer sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Clark J. Gantzer is affiliated with the University of Missouri in the United States and conducts research primarily within the fields of Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Engineering. Their work integrates both soil science and engineering disciplines, contributing knowledge across several subfields including Soil Science, Civil and Structural Engineering, Environmental Engineering, Agronomy and Crop Science, and Biomedical Engineering.

Their research focus encompasses multiple main topics such as Soil and Unsaturated Flow, Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics, Soil Erosion and Sediment Transport, Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing, Bioenergy Crop Production and Management, Biofuel Production and Bioconversion, and Forest Biomass Utilization and Management.

Among their recent scientific publications are studies that analyze soil and water dynamics, cover crop influences, and biomass production. Recent papers include:

  • "Improving soil physical properties through the use of cover crops: A review" (2020), published in Agrosystems Geosciences & Environment
  • "Cover crop influence on soil water dynamics for a corn-soybean rotation" (2021), published in Agrosystems Geosciences & Environment
  • "Soil and water ecosystem services of agroforestry" (2022), published in Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
  • "Influence of Species Composition and Management on Biomass Production in Missouri" (2020), published in Agriculture
  • "Cover crop effects on μCT-measured geometrical pore characteristics" (2022), published in Agrosystems Geosciences & Environment

Clark J. Gantzer collaborates frequently with a number of researchers, including Ranjith P. Udawatta, Stephen H. Anderson, Lalith M. Rankoth, Samuel I. Haruna, and N. Phillips. This collaborative network reflects the interdisciplinary nature of their work, spanning agronomy, soil science, and environmental research.

The scientist's research contributions have appeared mainly in a select group of publication venues, demonstrating a focus on agricultural and environmental sciences. The most frequent venues include:

  • Agrosystems Geosciences & Environment
  • Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
  • Agriculture

Best Publications

  • Grass Barrier and Vegetative Filter Strip Effectiveness in Reducing Runoff, Sediment, Nitrogen, and Phosphorus Loss

    Humberto Blanco-Canqui;C. J. Gantzer;S. H. Anderson;E. E. Alberts

  • Influence of Grass and Agroforestry Buffer Strips on Soil Hydraulic Properties for an Albaqualf

    Tshepiso Seobi;S. H. Anderson;R. P. Udawatta;C. J. Gantzer

  • Improving soil physical properties through the use of cover crops: A review

    Samuel I. Haruna;Stephen H. Anderson;Ranjith P. Udawatta;Clark J. Gantzer

  • Influence of Long-term Cropping Systems on Soil Physical Properties Related to Soil Erodibility

    Achmad Rachman;S. H. Anderson;C. J. Gantzer;A. L. Thompson

  • Evaluation of constructed and natural soil macropores using X-ray computed tomography

    S.H. Anderson;R.L. Peyton;C.J. Gantzer

  • Compaction effects on soil macropore geometry and related parameters for an arable field

    HyeMin Kim;S.H. Anderson;P.P. Motavalli;C.J. Gantzer

  • Soil physical properties after 100 years of continuous cultivation

    S. H. Anderson;C. J. Gantzer;J. R. Brown

  • Soil Respiration in a Winter Wheat Ecosystem

    G. A. Buyanovsky;G. H. Wagner;C. J. Gantzer

  • Computed tomographic measurement of macroporosity in chisel-disk and no-tillage seedbeds

    Clark J Gantzer;Stephen H Anderson

  • Physical Characteristics of Le Sueur Clay Loam Soil Following No‐till and Conventional Tillage1

    Unknown

  • Rapid Nondestructive Bulk Density and Soil-Water Content Determination by Computed Tomography

    S. H. Anderson;C. J. Gantzer;John M Boone;R. J. Tully

  • Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity and Its Impact on Simulated Runoff for Claypan Soils

    Humberto Blanco-Canqui;Clark J. Gantzer;Stephen H. Anderson;E. E. Alberts

  • Applying X-ray CT to measure macropore diameters in undisturbed soil cores

    R.L. Peyton;B.A. Haeffner;S.H. Anderson;C.J. Gantzer

  • Fractal dimension to describe soil macropore structure using X ray computed tomography

    R. Lee Peyton;Clark J. Gantzer;Stephen H. Anderson;Brian A. Haeffner

  • Influence of prairie restoration on CT-measured soil pore characteristics.

    Ranjith P. Udawatta;Stephen H. Anderson;Clark J. Gantzer;Harold E. Garrett

  • Runoff, Soil, and Dissolved Nutrient Losses from No-Till Soybean with Winter Cover Crops

    J. C. Zhu;C. J. Gantzer;S. H. Anderson;E. E. Alberts

  • Soil Hydraulic Properties Influenced by Stiff‐Stemmed Grass Hedge Systems

    Achmad Rachman;S. H. Anderson;C. J. Gantzer;E. E. Alberts

  • Agroforestry and Grass Buffer Influence on Macropore Characteristics

    Ranjith P. Udawatta;Stephen H. Anderson;Clark J. Gantzer;Harold E. Garrett

  • Fractal Dimension and Lacunarity of Bulk Density Determined with X-ray Computed Tomography

    Y. Zeng;R. L. Payton;C. J. Gantzer;S. H. Anderson

  • Grass Barriers for Reduced Concentrated Flow Induced Soil and Nutrient Loss

    Humberto Blanco-Canqui;C. J. Gantzer;S. H. Anderson;E. E. Alberts

  • Computed‐Tomographic Measurement of Soil Macroporosity Parameters as Affected by Stiff‐Stemmed Grass Hedges

    Achmad Rachman;S. H. Anderson;C. J. Gantzer

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephen H. Anderson
Stephen H. Anderson University of Missouri
Ranjith P. Udawatta
Ranjith P. Udawatta University of Missouri
Humberto Blanco-Canqui
Humberto Blanco-Canqui University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Shibu Jose
Shibu Jose University of Missouri
Shmuel Assouline
Shmuel Assouline Agricultural Research Organization
Richard A. Ketcham
Richard A. Ketcham The University of Texas at Austin
Peter P. Motavalli
Peter P. Motavalli University of Missouri
Jorge A. Delgado
Jorge A. Delgado Agricultural Research Service
Robert J. Kremer
Robert J. Kremer University of Missouri
Thomas E. Schumacher
Thomas E. Schumacher South Dakota State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences opens diverse career opportunities, many of which benefit from complementary online degrees. For instance, expertise in spatial data is crucial; students interested in this can explore the best GIS undergraduate programs to enhance skills in Geographic Information Systems, vital for environmental mapping and analysis.

Leadership and management roles in environmental agencies often require strong public administration knowledge. Pursuing one of the best online masters in public administration offers flexibility while preparing professionals for policy-making and organizational challenges.

Understanding social dynamics is also important in addressing environmental issues. Degrees like a sociology bachelor degree online can complement environmental studies by providing insights into human behavior and societal impacts on natural resources.

For those aiming to influence academia or lead research initiatives, pursuing advanced education is key. Some may prefer streamlined options like online doctoral programs without dissertation, which allow professionals to advance without the traditional research-heavy path.

Best Scientists Citing Clark J. Gantzer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles