World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Martin Voracek

Martin Voracek

Award Badge
Psychology
Austria
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
75
Citations
34194
World Ranking
1750
National Ranking
3

Martin Voracek publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Voracek sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 426 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Martin Voracek D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Voracek sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 75 D-Index — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Psychology in Austria Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Psychology in Austria Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Psychology in Austria Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Psychology in Austria Leader Award

Overview

Martin Voracek is affiliated with the University of Vienna in Austria. Their research primarily focuses on psychology, with a significant number of publications in the field. They have contributed extensively to clinical psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, social psychology, sociology and political science, as well as developmental and educational psychology.

The major themes in Voracek's work include mindfulness and compassion interventions, COVID-19 and mental health, mental health research topics, suicide and self-harm studies, social and intergroup psychology, personality traits and psychology, and cognitive abilities and testing.

Voracek's recent papers include:

  • Association between suicide reporting in the media and suicide: systematic review and meta-analysis (2020), published in BMJ
  • A multi-country test of brief reappraisal interventions on emotions during the COVID-19 pandemic (2021), published in Nature Human Behaviour
  • Test Anxiety and Physiological Arousal: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2020), published in Educational Psychology Review
  • Charting the landscape of graphical displays for meta-analysis and systematic reviews: a comprehensive review, taxonomy, and feature analysis (2020), published in BMC Medical Research Methodology
  • Association of Logic's hip hop song "1-800-273-8255" with Lifeline calls and suicides in the United States: interrupted time series analysis (2021), published in BMJ

Voracek frequently collaborates with several researchers, including Ulrich S. Tran, Viren Swami, David Moreau, Stefan Stieger, and Thomas Niederkrotenthaler. These collaborations have resulted in multiple co-authored publications.

The scholar's work appears regularly in several publication venues, notably Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, PLoS ONE, Personality and Individual Differences, Frontiers in Psychology, and Body Image.

Best Publications

  • Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science

    Alexander A. Aarts;Joanna E. Anderson;Christopher J. Anderson;Peter R. Attridge;Peter R. Attridge

  • Why can't a man be more like a woman? Sex differences in Big Five personality traits across 55 cultures.

    David P. Schmitt;Anu Realo;Martin Voracek;Jüri Allik

  • The Geographic Distribution of Big Five Personality Traits Patterns and Profiles of Human Self-Description Across 56 Nations

    David P. Schmitt;Jüri Allik;Robert R. McCrae;Verónica Benet-Martínez

  • The Attractive Female Body Weight and Female Body Dissatisfaction in 26 Countries Across 10 World Regions: Results of the International Body Project I

    Viren Swami;David A Frederick;Toivo Aavik;Lidia Alcalay

  • Analytic thinking reduces belief in conspiracy theories

    Viren Swami;Martin Voracek;Stefan Stieger;Ulrich S. Tran

  • Role of media reports in completed and prevented suicide: Werther v. Papageno effects

    Thomas Niederkrotenthaler;Martin Voracek;Arno Herberth;Benedikt Till

  • Universal sex differences in the desire for sexual variety: Tests from 52 nations, 6 continents, and 13 islands

    David P. Schmitt

  • Patterns and Universals of Adult Romantic Attachment Across 62 Cultural Regions Are Models of Self and of Other Pancultural Constructs

    David P. Schmitt;Lidia Alcalay;Melissa Allensworth;Jüri Allik

  • Effects of music therapy for children and adolescents with psychopathology: a meta‐analysis

    Christian Gold;Martin Voracek;Tony Wigram

  • Conspiracist ideation in Britain and Austria: Evidence of a monological belief system and associations between individual psychological differences and real-world and fictitious conspiracy theories

    Viren Swami;Viren Swami;Rebecca Coles;Stefan Stieger;Jakob Pietschnig

  • Krisenintervention und Suizidverhütung

    Gernot Sonneck;Nestor Kapusta;Gerald Tomandl;Martin Voracek

  • One Century of Global IQ Gains: A Formal Meta-Analysis of the Flynn Effect (1909–2013)

    Jakob Pietschnig;Martin Voracek

  • The Psychological Science Accelerator: Advancing Psychology through a Distributed Collaborative Network

    Hannah Moshontz;Lorne Campbell;Charles R. Ebersole;Hans Ijzerman

  • Genetics of suicide: a systematic review of twin studies.

    Martin Voracek;Lisa Mariella Loibl

  • Association between suicide reporting in the media and suicide: systematic review and meta-analysis

    Thomas Niederkrotenthaler;Marlies Braun;Jane Pirkis;Benedikt Till

  • A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Psychological Research on Conspiracy Beliefs: Field Characteristics, Measurement Instruments, and Associations With Personality Traits.

    Andreas Goreis;Martin Voracek

  • Patterns and Universals of Mate Poaching Across 53 Nations: The Effects of Sex, Culture, and Personality on Romantically Attracting Another Person's Partner

    David P. Schmitt

  • Mozart effect–Shmozart effect: A meta-analysis

    Jakob Pietschnig;Martin Voracek;Anton K. Formann

  • Meta-analysis of associations between human brain volume and intelligence differences: How strong are they and what do they mean?

    Jakob Pietschnig;Jakob Pietschnig;Lars Penke;Jelte M. Wicherts;Michael Zeiler

  • Sex differences in tax compliance: Differentiating between demographic sex, gender-role orientation, and prenatal masculinization (2D:4D)

    Barbara Kastlunger;Stefan G. Dressler;Erich Kirchler;Luigi Mittone

Frequent Co-Authors

Ulrich S. Tran
Ulrich S. Tran University of Vienna
Stefan Stieger
Stefan Stieger Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences
Viren Swami
Viren Swami Anglia Ruskin University
Maryanne L. Fisher
Maryanne L. Fisher Saint Mary's University
Nestor D. Kapusta
Nestor D. Kapusta Medical University of Vienna
Adrian Furnham
Adrian Furnham BI Norwegian Business School
Todd K. Shackelford
Todd K. Shackelford Oakland University
David P. Schmitt
David P. Schmitt Kansas State University
David Lester
David Lester Richard Stockton College of New Jersey
John T. Manning
John T. Manning Swansea University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in psychology opens up many rewarding career options—both in traditional and online formats. Many students aspire to become licensed therapists, a path that generally requires completing a bachelor's and master's degree in psychology or related fields, plus supervised clinical experience.

Becoming a licensed therapist in the U.S. is a structured process, but state-specific requirements can vary. For example, San Antonio licensed therapist education requirements and San Diego licensed therapist requirements each detail distinct educational milestones, exams, and supervised practice hours.

Similarly, you’ll find key differences reading about San Francisco licensed therapist requirements or San Jose licensed therapist requirements. Students interested in flexible study options may consider online degrees, which can fulfill many educational prerequisites and prepare you for various specialties, including clinical counseling, school psychology, or research-based roles.

Whether you pursue on-campus or online credentials, understanding state-by-state pathways will help you meet your career goals in psychology or therapy.

Best Scientists Citing Martin Voracek

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles