World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Ulrich S. Tran

Ulrich S. Tran

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
44
Citations
7326
World Ranking
7002
National Ranking
33

Ulrich S. Tran publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ulrich S. Tran sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 202 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Ulrich S. Tran D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ulrich S. Tran sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ulrich S. Tran is affiliated with the University of Vienna in Austria. Their research primarily spans the field of Psychology, with a substantial focus on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. The scope of Tran's work also extends to Sociology and Political Science as well as Applied Psychology.

The scientist's publication record includes recent papers in a variety of reputable journals. Notable publications include:

  • "A Consensus-Based Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies (CROSS)" (2021), Journal of General Internal Medicine
  • "Association between suicide reporting in the media and suicide: systematic review and meta-analysis" (2020), BMJ
  • "Charting the landscape of graphical displays for meta-analysis and systematic reviews: a comprehensive review, taxonomy, and feature analysis" (2020), BMC Medical Research Methodology
  • "The Cross-cultural Validity of the Five-Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire Across 16 Countries" (2020), Mindfulness
  • "Association of Logic's hip hop song "1-800-273-8255" with Lifeline calls and suicides in the United States: interrupted time series analysis" (2021), BMJ

Tran's frequent co-authors include Martin Voracek, Viren Swami, Thomas Niederkrotenthaler, Benedikt Till, and Stefan Stieger. This collaboration network highlights an interdisciplinary approach and consistent partnership within the psychological sciences.

The scientist publishes often in specific venues, notably:

  • Mindfulness
  • Body Image
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Personality and Individual Differences
  • Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science

Tran's research topics cover several key areas with multiple publications, including:

  • Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Mental Health Research Topics

Best Publications

  • Analytic thinking reduces belief in conspiracy theories

    Viren Swami;Martin Voracek;Stefan Stieger;Ulrich S. Tran

  • Association between suicide reporting in the media and suicide: systematic review and meta-analysis

    Thomas Niederkrotenthaler;Marlies Braun;Jane Pirkis;Benedikt Till

  • Suicidal Behavior and Psychological Distress in University Students: A 12-nation Study.

    Mehmet Eskin;Jian Min Sun;Jamila Abuidhail;Kouichi Yoshimasu

  • Suicide mortality in the United States following the suicides of Kate Spade and Anthony Bourdain.

    Mark Sinyor;Mark Sinyor;Ulrich S Tran;David Garcia;David Garcia;Benedikt Till

  • Investigating the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ): Construction of a Short Form and Evidence of a Two‐Factor Higher Order Structure of Mindfulness

    Ulrich S. Tran;Tobias M. Glück;Ingo W. Nader

  • Declining Autopsy Rates and Suicide Misclassification A Cross-national Analysis of 35 Countries

    Nestor D. Kapusta;Ulrich S. Tran;Ian Richard Hildreth Rockett;Diego De Leo

  • Association of Increased Youth Suicides in the United States With the Release of 13 Reasons Why

    Thomas Niederkrotenthaler;Steven Stack;Benedikt Till;Mark Sinyor;Mark Sinyor

  • Lunar Lies: The Impact of Informational Framing and Individual Differences in Shaping Conspiracist Beliefs About the Moon Landings

    Viren Swami;Viren Swami;Jakob Pietschnig;Ulrich S. Tran;Ingo W. Nader

  • The association of posttraumatic stress disorder, complex posttraumatic stress disorder, and borderline personality disorder from a network analytical perspective.

    Matthias Knefel;Ulrich S. Tran;Brigitte Lueger-Schuster

  • Associations Between Women’s Body Image and Happiness: Results of the YouBeauty.com Body Image Survey (YBIS)

    Viren Swami;Viren Swami;Ulrich S. Tran;Stefan Stieger;Martin Voracek

  • A multi-country test of brief reappraisal interventions on emotions during the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Ke Wang;Amit Goldenberg;Charles A. Dorison;Jeremy K. Miller

  • "A joke a day keeps the doctor away?" Meta-analytical evidence of differential associations of habitual humor styles with mental health.

    Martha Schneider;Martin Voracek;Ulrich S. Tran

  • Registered replication report on Mazar, Amir, and Ariely (2008)

    Bruno Verschuere;Ewout H. Meijer;Ariane Jim;Katherine Hoogesteyn

  • Evidence for general right-, mixed-, and left-sidedness in self-reported handedness, footedness, eyedness, and earedness, and a primacy of footedness in a large-sample latent variable analysis

    Ulrich S. Tran;Stefan Stieger;Martin Voracek

  • The Serenity of the Meditating Mind: A Cross-Cultural Psychometric Study on a Two-Factor Higher Order Structure of Mindfulness, Its Effects, and Mechanisms Related to Mental Health among Experienced Meditators

    Ulrich S. Tran;Ausiàs Cebolla;Tobias M. Glück;Joaquim Soler

  • Low validity of Google Trends for behavioral forecasting of national suicide rates

    Ulrich S. Tran;Rita Andel;Thomas Niederkrotenthaler;Benedikt Till

  • More or less than the sum of its parts? Mapping the Dark Triad of personality onto a single Dark Core

    Bianca Bertl;Bianca Bertl;Jakob Pietschnig;Ulrich S. Tran;Stefan Stieger;Stefan Stieger

  • Body image and personality: Associations between the Big Five Personality Factors, actual-ideal weight discrepancy, and body appreciation

    Viren Swami;Ulrich S. Tran;Louise Hoffmann Brooks;Laura Kanaan

  • Association of Logic’s hip hop song “1-800-273-8255” with Lifeline calls and suicides in the United States: interrupted time series analysis

    Unknown

  • Humor styles and personality: A systematic review and meta-analysis on the relations between humor styles and the Big Five personality traits

    Constantin Y. Plessen;Fabian R. Franken;Christoph Ster;Rebecca R. Schmid

  • Digit ratio (2D:4D) and sensation seeking: New data and meta-analysis

    Martin Voracek;Ulrich S. Tran;Stefan G. Dressler

  • Personality and individual difference correlates of attitudes toward human rights and civil liberties

    Viren Swami;Viren Swami;Ingo W. Nader;Jakob Pietschnig;Stefan Stieger

  • Girl in the Cellar: A Repeated Cross-Sectional Investigation of Belief in Conspiracy Theories about the Kidnapping of Natascha Kampusch

    Stefan Stieger;Nora Gumhalter;Ulrich S. Tran;Martin Voracek

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin Voracek
Martin Voracek University of Vienna
Stefan Stieger
Stefan Stieger Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences
Viren Swami
Viren Swami Anglia Ruskin University
Nestor D. Kapusta
Nestor D. Kapusta Medical University of Vienna
Mauro Giovanni Carta
Mauro Giovanni Carta University of Cagliari
Jane Pirkis
Jane Pirkis University of Melbourne
Maryanne L. Fisher
Maryanne L. Fisher Saint Mary's University
Tobias Greitemeyer
Tobias Greitemeyer University of Innsbruck
Vladeta Ajdacic-Gross
Vladeta Ajdacic-Gross University of Zurich
Ilona Papousek
Ilona Papousek University of Graz

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Psychology in the USA opens doors to a variety of online degree options and specialized career pathways in counseling and therapeutic professions. Many students choose to pursue careers as Licensed Professional Counselors (LPCs) or Speech-Language Pathologists (SLPs), which require meeting specific state licensure requirements.

If you’re interested in counseling, understanding the lpc license requirements in Wisconsin or the Wyoming licensed professional counselor requirements is essential, as each state has different criteria regarding education, supervised experience, and examinations.

For those drawn to communication sciences, knowing the steps for becoming a speech therapist in Alabama and the Alaska slp certification requirements will help you align your academic choices and prepare for certification.

No matter your pathway, online degrees can offer flexibility while helping you meet the coursework and practicum requirements vital for professional licensure. Be sure to research your intended state’s regulations and choose accredited programs to ensure a smooth transition into a rewarding psychology-related career.

Best Scientists Citing Ulrich S. Tran

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles