World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 83 312 265 23 20 561 27796
Medicine 83 15522 14604 517 504 544 27800

Jane Pirkis publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jane Pirkis between 1990 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jane Pirkis published across 37 years, from 1990 to 2026, averaging 17.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 39 publications in 2016. 25 of the 632 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1990 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 39. Peak 39 publications in 2016. 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 9 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 10 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 11 publications 2004: 13 publications 2005: 28 publications 2006: 28 publications 2007: 16 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 20 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 23 publications 2012: 24 publications 2013: 22 publications 2014: 34 publications 2015: 24 publications 2016: 39 publications 2017: 31 publications 2018: 29 publications 2019: 34 publications 2020: 34 publications 2021: 37 publications 2022: 28 publications 2023: 34 publications 2024: 26 publications 2025: 24 publications 2026: 1 publication
1990 2026

632 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jane Pirkis: publications per year, 1990 to 2026
Year Publications
1990 1
1991 0
1992 0
1993 2
1994 0
1995 2
1996 2
1997 3
1998 5
1999 9
2000 3
2001 10
2002 9
2003 11
2004 13
2005 28
2006 28
2007 16
2008 12
2009 20
2010 14
2011 23
2012 24
2013 22
2014 34
2015 24
2016 39
2017 31
2018 29
2019 34
2020 34
2021 37
2022 28
2023 34
2024 26
2025 24
2026 1
Total 632
Download as CSV

Jane Pirkis publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jane Pirkis sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 554–563 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 561 publications — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12 561
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Jane Pirkis D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jane Pirkis sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 83 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26 83
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Jane Pirkis is affiliated with the University of Melbourne in Australia. Their research primarily focuses on psychology, with a strong emphasis on clinical psychology. Their work extends into related subfields such as social psychology, general health professions, health, and sociology and political science.

The main topics covered in Pirkis's research include suicide and self-harm studies, mental health treatment and access, COVID-19 and mental health, health disparities and outcomes, employment and welfare studies, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, and gun ownership and violence research.

Pirkis has contributed to numerous academic publications, frequently appearing in several key journals. These publication venues include:

  • Crisis
  • Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • Journal of Affective Disorders
  • BMC Psychiatry

Their research collaborations often involve a group of coauthors with whom they have worked extensively. Frequent coauthors are:

  • Matthew J. Spittal
  • Mark Sinyor
  • Thomas Niederkrotenthaler
  • Karolina Krysińska
  • Cathrine Mihalopoulos

Among their recent publications are several studies related to suicide trends and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health. These include:

  • "Suicide trends in the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic: an interrupted time-series analysis of preliminary data from 21 countries," 2021, The Lancet Psychiatry
  • "Suicide numbers during the first 9-15 months of the COVID-19 pandemic compared with pre-existing trends: An interrupted time series analysis in 33 countries," 2022, EClinicalMedicine

In addition, Pirkis is connected to interdisciplinary research on related topics such as media reporting on suicide and general suicide risk and prevention strategies during the pandemic. Relevant notable papers linked to this sphere include:

  • "Suicide risk and prevention during the COVID-19 pandemic," 2020, The Lancet Psychiatry
  • "Association between suicide reporting in the media and suicide: systematic review and meta-analysis," 2020, BMJ
  • "Trends in suicide during the covid-19 pandemic," 2020, BMJ

Jane Pirkis's research portfolio reflects a sustained academic contribution to understanding suicide, mental health, and related social factors, particularly in the context of recent global health challenges.

Best Publications

  • Suicide risk and prevention during the COVID-19 pandemic.

    David Gunnell;Louis Appleby;Ella Arensman;Keith Hawton

  • Suicide and suicide risk

    Gustavo Turecki;David A. Brent;David Gunnell;David Gunnell;Rory C. O’Connor

  • Suicide trends in the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic: an interrupted time-series analysis of preliminary data from 21 countries.

    Jane Pirkis;Ann John;Sangsoo Shin;Marcos DelPozo-Banos

  • The burden attributable to mental and substance use disorders as risk factors for suicide: Findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010

    Alize J. Ferrari;Rosana E. Norman;Greg Freedman;Amanda J. Baxter

  • Suicide by occupation: systematic review and meta-analysis

    Allison Milner;Matthew J. Spittal;Jane Pirkis;Anthony D. LaMontagne

  • Service use for mental health problems: findings from the 2007 National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing.

    Philip Burgess;Jane Pirkis;Tim N Slade;Amy K Johnston

  • The Mental Health of Australians 2 Report on the 2007 National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing

    Tim Slade;Amy Johnston;Maree Teesson;Harvey Whiteford

  • Long-term effects of childhood abuse on the quality of life and health of older people : results from the Depression and early prevention of suicide in general practice project

    Brian Draper;Jon J Pfaff;Jane E Pirkis;John Snowdon

  • Suicide and recency of health care contacts. A systematic review.

    Jane Pirkis;Philip Burgess

  • Predicting suicidal behaviours using clinical instruments: systematic review and meta-analysis of positive predictive values for risk scales

    Gregory Carter;Allison Milner;Katie McGill;Jane Pirkis

  • Suicide and the media. Part I: Reportage in nonfictional media.

    J Pirkis;R W Blood

  • A review of the psychometric properties of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS) family of measures

    Jane E Pirkis;Philip M Burgess;Pia K Kirk;Sarity Dodson

  • Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of schizophrenia and related disorders

    P. McGorry;E. Killackey;T. Lambert;M. Lambert

  • Changes in suicide rates following media reports on celebrity suicide: a meta-analysis

    Thomas Niederkrotenthaler;King Wa Fu;Paul S F Yip;Daniel Y T Fong

  • Association between suicide reporting in the media and suicide: systematic review and meta-analysis

    Thomas Niederkrotenthaler;Marlies Braun;Jane Pirkis;Benedikt Till

  • The association between mental disorders and suicide: A systematic review and meta-analysis of record linkage studies.

    Lay San Too;Matthew J. Spittal;Lyndal Bugeja;Lennart Reifels

  • Media Guidelines on the Reporting of Suicide

    Jane Pirkis;R. Warwick Blood;Annette Beautrais;Philip Burgess

  • Suicide in developing countries (2): risk factors.

    Lakshmi Vijayakumar;Sujit John;Jane Pirkis;Harvey Whiteford

  • A systematic review and evaluation of measures for suicidal ideation and behaviors in population-based research.

    Philip J. Batterham;Maria Ftanou;Jane Pirkis;Jacqueline L. Brewer

  • Mental health affects future employment as job loss affects mental health: findings from a longitudinal population study

    Sarah C Olesen;Peter Butterworth;Liana S Leach;Margaret Kelaher

  • Trends in suicide during the covid-19 pandemic

    Ann John;Jane Pirkis;David Gunnell;Louis Appleby

Frequent Co-Authors

Matthew J Spittal
Matthew J Spittal University of Melbourne
Jo Robinson
Jo Robinson University of Melbourne
Harvey Whiteford
Harvey Whiteford University of Queensland
Nicola J. Reavley
Nicola J. Reavley University of Melbourne
Allison Milner
Allison Milner University of Melbourne
Anthony F. Jorm
Anthony F. Jorm University of Melbourne
Nicola T. Lautenschlager
Nicola T. Lautenschlager University of Melbourne
Cathrine Mihalopoulos
Cathrine Mihalopoulos Deakin University
Theo Vos
Theo Vos Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation
Anthony D. LaMontagne
Anthony D. LaMontagne Deakin University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens a wide array of online degree options tailored to different interests and career goals. For those interested in clinical psychology, earning an online psyd program offers advanced training for clinical or counseling roles. These programs typically focus on practical experience, licensure, and preparing graduates for direct client work.

Students passionate about couple and family therapy may consider pursuing online mft degrees for focused, flexible learning. These degrees equip graduates to support families and individuals navigating complex relationships.

For those prioritizing cost, an online master degree in psychology can be a budget-friendly way to advance your knowledge and open additional employment opportunities in research, education, or advocacy-related roles.

If your aim is educational leadership or administration, online edd programs offer fast-track options to help you earn a doctorate more efficiently.

With these varied online pathways, you can find a program that aligns with your interests, budget, and long-term career ambitions within the social sciences and humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Jane Pirkis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles