World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 71 2175 1979 104 100 372 18194

Philip J. Batterham publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Philip J. Batterham between 1980 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Philip J. Batterham published across 46 years, from 1980 to 2025, averaging 12.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 49 publications in 2022. 71 of the 557 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1980 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 49. Peak 49 publications in 2022. 1980: 1 publication 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 4 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 5 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 3 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 14 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 16 publications 2013: 19 publications 2014: 27 publications 2015: 22 publications 2016: 26 publications 2017: 38 publications 2018: 23 publications 2019: 27 publications 2020: 39 publications 2021: 45 publications 2022: 49 publications 2023: 48 publications 2024: 38 publications 2025: 33 publications
1980 2025

557 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Philip J. Batterham: publications per year, 1980 to 2025
Year Publications
1980 1
1981 0
1982 0
1983 2
1984 2
1985 0
1986 1
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 1
1991 0
1992 1
1993 4
1994 3
1995 2
1996 4
1997 1
1998 5
1999 0
2000 2
2001 1
2002 3
2003 2
2004 3
2005 10
2006 9
2007 14
2008 7
2009 8
2010 9
2011 12
2012 16
2013 19
2014 27
2015 22
2016 26
2017 38
2018 23
2019 27
2020 39
2021 45
2022 49
2023 48
2024 38
2025 33
Total 557
Download as CSV

Philip J. Batterham publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip J. Batterham sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 371–380 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 372 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63 372
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Philip J. Batterham D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip J. Batterham sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 70–71 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 71 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215 71
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Philip J. Batterham is affiliated with the Australian National University in Australia. Their primary field of study is Psychology, with a significant focus on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Applied Psychology, General Health Professions, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

Their research topics encompass various dimensions of mental health and psychological well-being. Key areas include:

  • Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum

Philip J. Batterham has contributed to multiple papers, several of which demonstrate their engagement with topics related to mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic and suicidal behaviors. Notable publications include:

  • "The Effect of COVID-19 on Mental Health and Wellbeing in a Representative Sample of Australian Adults" (2020), published in Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • "Suicidal thoughts, suicidal behaviours and self-harm in daily life: A systematic review of ecological momentary assessment studies" (2020), published in Digital Health
  • "Trajectories of depression and anxiety symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic in a representative Australian adult cohort" (2021), published in The Medical Journal of Australia
  • "A Detailed Hierarchical Model of Psychopathology: From Individual Symptoms up to the General Factor of Psychopathology" (2021), published in Clinical Psychological Science
  • "Gone Too Soon: priorities for action to prevent premature mortality associated with mental illness and mental distress" (2023), published in The Lancet Psychiatry

Their collaboration network includes frequent co-authors such as Alison L. Calear, Helen Christensen, Aliza Werner-Seidler, Louise M. Farrer, and Amelia Gulliver.

Philip J. Batterham's research has been published regularly in several academic journals. The venues with the most frequent publications include:

  • Journal of Affective Disorders
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • BMC Psychiatry
  • Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior
  • Journal of Affective Disorders Reports

In addition to journal articles, Philip J. Batterham has contributed to book publications, including a work published by Cambridge University Press titled "The Cambridge Handbook of Stigma and Mental Health" (2022).

Best Publications

  • The mental health of Australian elite athletes.

    Amelia Gulliver;Kathleen M. Griffiths;Andrew Mackinnon;Philip J. Batterham

  • The Suicidal Ideation Attributes Scale (SIDAS): Community-Based Validation Study of a New Scale for the Measurement of Suicidal Ideation

    Bregje A. J. van Spijker;Bregje A. J. van Spijker;Philip J. Batterham;Alison L. Calear;Louise Farrer

  • Detecting suicidality on Twitter

    Bridianne O'Dea;Stephen Wan;Philip J. Batterham;Alison L. Calear

  • A systematic review of the predictions of the Interpersonal–Psychological Theory of Suicidal Behavior

    Jennifer Ma;Philip J. Batterham;Alison L. Calear;Jin Han

  • Recruiting for health, medical or psychosocial research using Facebook: Systematic review

    Louise Thornton;Philip J. Batterham;Daniel B. Fassnacht;Frances Kay-Lambkin;Frances Kay-Lambkin

  • Effectiveness of an online insomnia program (SHUTi) for prevention of depressive episodes (the GoodNight Study): a randomised controlled trial

    Helen Christensen;Philip J Batterham;John A Gosling;Lee M Ritterband

  • Characterization of Drosophila melanogaster cytochrome P450 genes

    Henry Chung;Tamar Sztal;Shivani Pasricha;Mohan Sridhar

  • Genomic innovations, transcriptional plasticity and gene loss underlying the evolution and divergence of two highly polyphagous and invasive Helicoverpa pest species

    S. L. Pearce;D. F. Clarke;D. F. Clarke;P. D. East;S. Elfekih

  • Copy Number Variation and Transposable Elements Feature in Recent, Ongoing Adaptation at the Cyp6g1 Locus

    Joshua M. Schmidt;Robert T. Good;Belinda Appleton;Jayne Sherrard

  • Correlates of Suicide Stigma and Suicide Literacy in the Community

    Philip J. Batterham;Alison L. Calear;Helen Christensen

  • Internet-based interventions to promote mental health help-seeking in elite athletes: an exploratory randomized controlled trial

    Amelia Gulliver;Kathleen M Griffiths;Helen Christensen;Andrew Mackinnon

  • A systematic review and evaluation of measures for suicidal ideation and behaviors in population-based research.

    Philip J. Batterham;Maria Ftanou;Jane Pirkis;Jacqueline L. Brewer

  • Predictors of help-seeking for suicidal ideation in the community: Risks and opportunities for public suicide prevention campaigns

    Alison Louise Calear;Philip James Batterham;Helen Christensen

  • The Stigma of Suicide Scale: Psychometric properties and correlates of the stigma of suicide

    Philip J. Batterham;Alison L. Calear;Helen Christensen

  • Personality predicts mortality risk: An integrative data analysis of 15 international longitudinal studies

    Eileen Kranz Graham;Joshua P. Rutsohn;Nicholas A. Turiano;Rebecca Bendayan

  • The genetic, molecular and phenotypic consequences of selection for insecticide resistance.

    John A. McKenzie;Philip Batterham

  • Technology-based interventions for mental health in tertiary students: Systematic review

    Louise Farrer;Amelia Gulliver;Jade K.Y. Chan;Philip J. Batterham

  • Recruitment of mental health survey participants using Internet advertising: content, characteristics and cost effectiveness

    Philip J. Batterham

  • A test of the Interpersonal Theory of Suicide in a large community-based cohort

    Helen Christensen;Philip J. Batterham;Andrea Soubelet;Andrew J. Mackinnon

  • Oral folic acid and vitamin B-12 supplementation to prevent cognitive decline in community-dwelling older adults with depressive symptoms—the Beyond Ageing Project: a randomized controlled trial

    Janine G Walker;Philip J Batterham;Andrew J Mackinnon;Anthony F Jorm

  • Evaluation of an online psychoeducation intervention to promote mental health help seeking attitudes and intentions among young adults: randomised controlled trial.

    Eleanor Taylor-Rodgers;Philip J. Batterham

  • Predictors of Adherence by Adolescents to a Cognitive Behavior Therapy Website in School and Community-Based Settings

    Alison L Neil;Philip Batterham;Helen Christensen;Kylie Bennett

  • A systematic review of the predictions of the Interpersonal-Psychological Theory of suicidal behaviour

    Jennifer Ma;Philip J. Batterham;Alison L. Calear;Jin Han

Frequent Co-Authors

Alison L. Calear
Alison L. Calear Australian National University
Helen Christensen
Helen Christensen University of New South Wales
Andrew Mackinnon
Andrew Mackinnon University of New South Wales
Matthew Sunderland
Matthew Sunderland University of Sydney
Kathleen M Griffiths
Kathleen M Griffiths Australian National University
Louise Farrer
Louise Farrer Australian National University
Tim Slade
Tim Slade University of Sydney
Bridianne O'Dea
Bridianne O'Dea Flinders University
Fiona Shand
Fiona Shand University of New South Wales
Mary Jane Rotheram-Borus
Mary Jane Rotheram-Borus University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens doors to a variety of online degrees and career pathways, especially in the fast-growing field of mental health counseling. Many aspiring professionals choose online psychology programs to gain critical knowledge and flexibility as they prepare for their careers.

Becoming a mental health counselor requires specialized education and certification, which vary by state and city. For example, those interested in working in New York can explore how to become a mental health counselor in New York City, while those targeting opportunities in New Jersey can learn about how to become a mental health counselor in Newark. It's important to research the specific licensure requirements for different locations.

If you’re considering practicing in Virginia, investigate how to become a mental health counselor in Norfolk. For opportunities in the West, you’ll want to understand North Las Vegas mental health counselor certification requirements.

Online degrees help streamline the educational journey and prepare students for diverse, rewarding careers within psychology and mental health support across the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Philip J. Batterham

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles