World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
57
Citations
13621
World Ranking
4012
National Ranking
213

Alison L. Calear publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alison L. Calear sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 247 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Alison L. Calear D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alison L. Calear sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Alison L. Calear is affiliated with the Australian National University in Australia, focusing primarily on psychology. Their work encompasses a broad range of psychological subfields, including clinical psychology, social psychology, applied psychology, general health professions, and sociology and political science.

The scientist's research addresses several main topics, such as:

  • Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health disparities and outcomes

Their recent publications include the following papers:

  • "The Effect of COVID-19 on Mental Health and Wellbeing in a Representative Sample of Australian Adults" (2020), published in Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • "School-based depression and anxiety prevention programs: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis" (2021), published in Clinical Psychology Review
  • "Trajectories of depression and anxiety symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic in a representative Australian adult cohort" (2021), published in The Medical Journal of Australia
  • "A Detailed Hierarchical Model of Psychopathology: From Individual Symptoms up to the General Factor of Psychopathology" (2021), published in Clinical Psychological Science
  • "A hidden pandemic? An umbrella review of global evidence on mental health in the time of COVID-19" (2023), published in Frontiers in Psychiatry

Frequent co-authors in Alison L. Calear's research include:

  • Philip J. Batterham
  • Louise M. Farrer
  • Helen Christensen
  • Amelia Gulliver
  • Aliza Werner-Seidler

Their work is frequently published in several academic venues such as:

  • Journal of Affective Disorders
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • BMC Public Health
  • Frontiers in Public Health
  • Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior

The scope of Alison L. Calear's work is extensive within psychology, with over 280 publications contributing to the field. Their research particularly emphasizes mental health-related issues across various populations and settings, with a significant focus on prevention, digital interventions, and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health and wellbeing.

Best Publications

  • School-based depression and anxiety prevention programs for young people: A systematic review and meta-analysis

    Aliza Werner-Seidler;Yael Perry;Alison L. Calear;Jill M. Newby

  • Systematic review of school-based prevention and early intervention programs for depression

    Alison L. Calear;Helen Christensen

  • The Suicidal Ideation Attributes Scale (SIDAS): Community-Based Validation Study of a New Scale for the Measurement of Suicidal Ideation

    Bregje A. J. van Spijker;Bregje A. J. van Spijker;Philip J. Batterham;Alison L. Calear;Louise Farrer

  • Detecting suicidality on Twitter

    Bridianne O'Dea;Stephen Wan;Philip J. Batterham;Alison L. Calear

  • A systematic review of the predictions of the Interpersonal–Psychological Theory of Suicidal Behavior

    Jennifer Ma;Philip J. Batterham;Alison L. Calear;Jin Han

  • The YouthMood Project: A cluster randomized controlled trial of an online cognitive behavioral program with adolescents.

    Alison L. Calear;Helen Christensen;Andrew Mackinnon;Kathleen M. Griffiths

  • Recruiting for health, medical or psychosocial research using Facebook: Systematic review

    Louise Thornton;Philip J. Batterham;Daniel B. Fassnacht;Frances Kay-Lambkin;Frances Kay-Lambkin

  • The Effect of COVID-19 on Mental Health and Wellbeing in a Representative Sample of Australian Adults

    Amy Dawel;Yiyun Shou;Michael Smithson;Nicolas Cherbuin

  • Correlates of Suicide Stigma and Suicide Literacy in the Community

    Philip J. Batterham;Alison L. Calear;Helen Christensen

  • Internet-based interventions to promote mental health help-seeking in elite athletes: an exploratory randomized controlled trial

    Amelia Gulliver;Kathleen M Griffiths;Helen Christensen;Andrew Mackinnon

  • Review of internet-based prevention and treatment programs for anxiety and depression in children and adolescents

    Alison L Calear;Helen Christensen

  • Predictors of help-seeking for suicidal ideation in the community: Risks and opportunities for public suicide prevention campaigns

    Alison Louise Calear;Philip James Batterham;Helen Christensen

  • The Stigma of Suicide Scale: Psychometric properties and correlates of the stigma of suicide

    Philip J. Batterham;Alison L. Calear;Helen Christensen

  • Systematic Review on Internet Support Groups (ISGs) and Depression (1): Do ISGs Reduce Depressive Symptoms?

    Kathleen M Griffiths;Alison L Calear;Michelle Banfield

  • A systematic review of psychosocial suicide prevention interventions for youth

    Alison L Calear;Helen Christensen;Alexander Freeman;Katherine Fenton

  • School-based depression and anxiety prevention programs: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Aliza Werner-Seidler;Samantha Spanos;Alison L. Calear;Yael Perry

  • Technology-based interventions for mental health in tertiary students: Systematic review

    Louise Farrer;Amelia Gulliver;Jade K.Y. Chan;Philip J. Batterham

  • Personal and perceived depression stigma in Australian adolescents: magnitude and predictors.

    Alison L. Calear;Kathleen M. Griffiths;Helen Christensen

  • Factors Influencing Professional Help-Seeking for Suicidality

    Jin Han;Philip J Batterham;Alison L Calear;Rebecca Randall

  • Preferences for Internet-Based Mental Health Interventions in an Adult Online Sample: Findings From an Online Community Survey

    Philip J Batterham;Alison L Calear

  • Systematic Review on Internet Support Groups (ISGs) and Depression (2): What Is Known About Depression ISGs?

    Kathleen M Griffiths;Alison L Calear;Michelle Banfield;Ada Tam

  • A systematic review of the predictions of the Interpersonal-Psychological Theory of suicidal behaviour

    Jennifer Ma;Philip J. Batterham;Alison L. Calear;Jin Han

Frequent Co-Authors

Philip J. Batterham
Philip J. Batterham Australian National University
Helen Christensen
Helen Christensen University of New South Wales
Matthew Sunderland
Matthew Sunderland University of Sydney
Aliza Werner-Seidler
Aliza Werner-Seidler University of New South Wales
Andrew Mackinnon
Andrew Mackinnon University of New South Wales
Louise Farrer
Louise Farrer Australian National University
Michelle Torok
Michelle Torok Black Dog Institute
Kathleen M Griffiths
Kathleen M Griffiths Australian National University
Fiona Shand
Fiona Shand University of New South Wales
Bridianne O'Dea
Bridianne O'Dea Flinders University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens doors to a range of rewarding online degrees and career pathways. A popular option is becoming a Marriage and Family Therapist (MFT), a professional role that requires specialized training and certification. The educational journey typically involves a master’s degree in psychology, counseling, or a related field, along with supervised clinical experience.

Certification requirements can differ greatly depending on where you plan to practice. For instance, you can learn more about how to become a marriage and family therapist in Milwaukee, or discover the Minneapolis mft certification requirements. If you’re interested in the south, review the mft requirements in Nashville or see how to become an mft in New Orleans.

Enrolling in an accredited online psychology program can help you meet these requirements from anywhere. Whether you aim to counsel couples, work in community mental health, or continue toward doctoral study, a strong educational foundation is essential for success in this growing field.

Best Scientists Citing Alison L. Calear

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles