World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 60 3577 3299 383 363 239 11740

Elemer Szabadi publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Elemer Szabadi between 1971 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Elemer Szabadi published across 55 years, from 1971 to 2025, averaging 5.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2006. 2 of the 290 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1971 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2006. 1971: 1 publication 1972: 1 publication 1973: 6 publications 1974: 4 publications 1975: 5 publications 1976: 4 publications 1977: 8 publications 1978: 9 publications 1979: 6 publications 1980: 6 publications 1981: 5 publications 1982: 4 publications 1983: 4 publications 1984: 6 publications 1985: 8 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 9 publications 1988: 5 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 8 publications 1993: 9 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 13 publications 1997: 9 publications 1998: 12 publications 1999: 13 publications 2000: 13 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 15 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 2 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 0 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 1 publication
1971 2025

290 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Elemer Szabadi: publications per year, 1971 to 2025
Year Publications
1971 1
1972 1
1973 6
1974 4
1975 5
1976 4
1977 8
1978 9
1979 6
1980 6
1981 5
1982 4
1983 4
1984 6
1985 8
1986 0
1987 9
1988 5
1989 2
1990 4
1991 3
1992 8
1993 9
1994 3
1995 4
1996 13
1997 9
1998 12
1999 13
2000 13
2001 5
2002 7
2003 5
2004 5
2005 9
2006 15
2007 10
2008 9
2009 7
2010 5
2011 6
2012 6
2013 5
2014 3
2015 3
2016 0
2017 0
2018 1
2019 2
2020 0
2021 1
2022 0
2023 0
2024 1
2025 1
Total 290
Download as CSV

Elemer Szabadi publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elemer Szabadi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 231–240 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 239 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226 239
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Elemer Szabadi D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elemer Szabadi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 60–61 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321 60
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Elemer Szabadi is affiliated with the University of Nottingham in the United Kingdom. Their academic work centers predominantly on the field of Neuroscience, with specific contributions across several subfields including Neurology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems.

Their research focus spans multiple key topics related to brain function and behavior. These areas include neurological disorders and treatments, transcranial magnetic stimulation studies, neurotransmitter receptor influence on behavior, sleep and wakefulness research, sleep and related disorders, as well as circadian rhythm and melatonin.

Szabadi's publication record includes articles in notable venues such as the Journal of Psychopharmacology and Frontiers in Neurology. Two recent papers illustrate the scope of their research:

  • Three paradoxes related to the mode of action of pramipexole: The path from D2/D3 dopamine receptor stimulation to modification of dopamine-modulated functions, 2024, Journal of Psychopharmacology
  • Editorial: The Neuropsychiatry of Dreaming: Brain Mechanisms and Clinical Presentations, 2021, Frontiers in Neurology

Collaboration is present in their work, with frequent co-authors including Paul Reading and Seithikurippu R. Pandi-Perumal, reflecting a collaborative approach within the research community.

Best Publications

  • Effects of lesions of the orbitofrontal cortex on sensitivity to delayed and probabilistic reinforcement

    S. Mobini;S. Body;M.-Y. Ho;C. M. Bradshaw

  • Functional neuroanatomy of the central noradrenergic system

    Elemer Szabadi

  • Effects of central 5-hydroxytryptamine depletion on sensitivity to delayed and probabilistic reinforcement.

    S. Mobini;T.-J. Chiang;M.-Y. Ho;C.M. Bradshaw

  • Theory and method in the quantitative analysis of ”impulsive choice” behaviour: implications for psychopharmacology

    M.-Y. Ho;S. Mobini;T.-J. Chiang;C. M. Bradshaw

  • Changes in Autonomic Function with Age: A Study of Pupillary Kinetics in Healthy Young and Old People

    P. Bitsios;R. Prettyman;E. Szabadi

  • Effect of lesions of the ascending 5-hydroxytryptaminergic pathways on choice between delayed reinforcers

    Mary A. Wogar;C. M. Bradshaw;E. Szabadi

  • Quantification of Steady-State Operant Behavior

    Unknown

  • Standards in Pupillography.

    Carina Kelbsch;Torsten Strasser;Yanjun Chen;Beatrix Feigl

  • Does modafinil activate the locus coeruleus in man? Comparison of modafinil and clonidine on arousal and autonomic functions in human volunteers

    R. H. Hou;C. Freeman;R. W. Langley;E. Szabadi

  • Effect of central 5-hydroxytryptamine depletion on inter-temporal choice: a quantitative analysis.

    S. Mobini;T.-J. Chiang;A. S. A. Al-Ruwaitea;M.-Y. Ho

  • Time and behaviour : psychological and neurobehavioural analyses

    C. M. Bradshaw;E. Szabadi

  • THE PHARMACOLOGY OF ADRENERGIC NEURONAL RESPONSES IN THE CEREBRAL CORTEX: EVIDENCE FOR EXCITATORY α‐ AND INHIBITORY β‐RECEPTORS

    P. Bevan;C.M. Bradshaw;E. Szabadi

  • Effects of orbital prefrontal cortex dopamine depletion on inter-temporal choice: a quantitative analysis.

    S. Kheramin;S. Body;M.-Y. Ho;D. N. Velázquez-Martinez

  • Altered pupillary size and darkness and light reflexes in Alzheimer's disease.

    R Prettyman;P Bitsios;E Szabadi

  • Relationship between response rate and reinforcement frequency in variable-interval schedules: II. Effect of the volume of sucrose reinforcement.

    C. M. Bradshaw;H. V. Ruddle;E. Szabadi

  • Comparison of the effects of clozapine, haloperidol, chlorpromazine and d-amphetamine on performance on a time-constrained progressive ratio schedule and on locomotor behaviour in the rat.

    S. Mobini;T.-J. Chiang;M.-Y. Ho;C. M. Bradshaw

  • Functional Organization of the Sympathetic Pathways Controlling the Pupil: Light-Inhibited and Light-Stimulated Pathways.

    Elemer Szabadi

  • Elongation of Pause-Time in Speech: A Simple, Objective Measure of Motor Retardation in Depression

    Unknown

  • Drugs for sleep disorders: mechanisms and therapeutic prospects.

    Elemer Szabadi

  • Comparison of the effects of clonidine and yohimbine on spontaneous pupillary fluctuations in healthy human volunteers.

    M A Phillips;E Szabadi;C M Bradshaw

  • Attenuation of the pupillary light reflex in anxious patients.

    A Bakes;CM Bradshaw;E Szabadi

  • Modulation of physiological reflexes by pain: role of the locus coeruleus.

    Elemer Szabadi

  • Stroop performance in multiple sclerosis: information processing, selective attention, or executive functioning?

    J.A.B. Macniven;C. Davis;M.-Y. Ho;C.M. Bradshaw

Frequent Co-Authors

C. M. Bradshaw
C. M. Bradshaw University of Nottingham
Kevin C. F. Fone
Kevin C. F. Fone University of Nottingham
Panos Bitsios
Panos Bitsios University of Crete
Ian M. Anderson
Ian M. Anderson University of Manchester
John Francis William Deakin
John Francis William Deakin University of Manchester
Stuart R. Steinhauer
Stuart R. Steinhauer University of Pittsburgh
Paul D. Gamlin
Paul D. Gamlin University of Alabama at Birmingham
David S. Baldwin
David S. Baldwin University of Southampton
John A. Wagner
John A. Wagner Cygnal Therapeutics (United States)
Randy H. Kardon
Randy H. Kardon University of Iowa

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Psychology in the USA opens doors to a variety of online degrees and professional career pathways. A popular route for many graduates is pursuing a career as a social worker, which requires careful consideration of state-specific licensing and education requirements.

For example, becoming a social worker in North Carolina involves earning an accredited degree and meeting state guidelines for supervised experience. Similarly, if you are interested in learning how to become a social worker in North Dakota, you will need to meet specific educational and licensing criteria tailored to the state.

Additionally, the requirements to be a social worker in Ohio differ, emphasizing both education and ongoing professional development. Likewise, exploring how to become a social worker in Oklahoma highlights yet another set of unique qualifications and pathways.

Online degrees in psychology and related fields can provide flexible access to these career opportunities. Make sure to research your preferred state’s social work pathways, as each jurisdiction sets its own standards for licensing and practice.

Best Scientists Citing Elemer Szabadi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles