World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
John Francis William Deakin

John Francis William Deakin

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 71 2178 1982 241 225 228 17814
Neuroscience 72 2310 2111 230 209 238 18073

John Francis William Deakin publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by John Francis William Deakin between 1976 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. John Francis William Deakin published across 48 years, from 1976 to 2023, averaging 5 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 1996. 2 of the 240 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1976 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 1996. 1976: 1 publication 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 1 publication 1987: 1 publication 1988: 2 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 8 publications 1992: 5 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 3 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 14 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 1 publication
1976 2023

240 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
John Francis William Deakin: publications per year, 1976 to 2023
Year Publications
1976 1
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 1
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 1
1986 1
1987 1
1988 2
1989 2
1990 3
1991 8
1992 5
1993 1
1994 3
1995 4
1996 14
1997 4
1998 6
1999 4
2000 7
2001 2
2002 9
2003 9
2004 3
2005 8
2006 3
2007 10
2008 8
2009 8
2010 11
2011 14
2012 10
2013 6
2014 8
2015 11
2016 13
2017 13
2018 8
2019 4
2020 5
2021 7
2022 1
2023 1
Total 240
Download as CSV

John Francis William Deakin publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Francis William Deakin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 221–230 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 228 publications — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283 228
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

John Francis William Deakin D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Francis William Deakin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 70–71 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 71 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215 71
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Internal medicine
  • Neuroscience
  • Major depressive disorder

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Neuroscience, Orbitofrontal cortex, Hippocampus, Hippocampal formation and Endocrinology. John Francis William Deakin has included themes like Glutamate receptor, Psychosis and Monoaminergic in his Neuroscience study. His Monoaminergic research includes elements of Methamphetamine, Amphetamine, Dopamine, Neuromodulation and Opiate.

His Orbitofrontal cortex study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Stimulus, Functional magnetic resonance imaging, Impulsivity and Brain mapping. In his research, Bioinformatics and Pharmacology toxicology is intimately related to Psychiatry, which falls under the overarching field of Hippocampus. His Hippocampal formation study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Nitric oxide synthase, Gene expression, In situ hybridization, NMDA receptor and Citalopram.

His most cited work include:

  • Dissociable deficits in the decision-making cognition of chronic amphetamine abusers, opiate abusers, patients with focal damage to prefrontal cortex, and tryptophan-depleted normal volunteers: evidence for monoaminergic mechanisms. (906 citations)
  • Neuronal correlates of theory of mind and empathy: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study in a nonverbal task (767 citations)
  • Response inhibition and impulsivity: an fMRI study (480 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

John Francis William Deakin mainly investigates Neuroscience, Psychiatry, Schizophrenia, Internal medicine and Clinical psychology. His Neuroscience study focuses mostly on Orbitofrontal cortex, Amygdala, Hippocampus, Basal ganglia and Nucleus accumbens. His Orbitofrontal cortex research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Functional magnetic resonance imaging, Impulsivity and Brain mapping.

The study incorporates disciplines such as Neuropsychology, Audiology, Electroencephalography, Working memory and Psychosis in addition to Schizophrenia. John Francis William Deakin studied Internal medicine and Endocrinology that intersect with Receptor and Glutamate receptor. John Francis William Deakin works mostly in the field of Clinical psychology, limiting it down to topics relating to Depression and, in certain cases, Young adult, as a part of the same area of interest.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Neuroscience (34.31%)
  • Psychiatry (23.36%)
  • Schizophrenia (20.44%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2015-2020)?

  • Clinical psychology (14.60%)
  • Depression (14.60%)
  • Schizophrenia (20.44%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His primary scientific interests are in Clinical psychology, Depression, Schizophrenia, Psychiatry and Major depressive disorder. His Rumination study in the realm of Depression connects with subjects such as Signature. John Francis William Deakin focuses mostly in the field of Schizophrenia, narrowing it down to matters related to Working memory and, in some cases, Effects of sleep deprivation on cognitive performance and Audiology.

The concepts of his Psychiatry study are interwoven with issues in Healthy volunteers and Neuroscience. His Neuroscience study combines topics in areas such as Forearm skin and Serotonin. His research in Major depressive disorder focuses on subjects like Cingulate cortex, which are connected to Physical medicine and rehabilitation, Psychological resilience, Functional magnetic resonance imaging and Blame.

Between 2015 and 2020, his most popular works were:

  • Collaborative meta-analysis finds no evidence of a strong interaction between stress and 5-HTTLPR genotype contributing to the development of depression (154 citations)
  • Minocycline as an adjunct for treatment-resistant depressive symptoms: A pilot randomised placebo-controlled trial (56 citations)
  • The relationship between negative symptoms and depression in schizophrenia: a systematic review (45 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Internal medicine
  • Major depressive disorder
  • Psychiatry

His main research concerns Neuroscience, Clinical psychology, Stressor, Addiction and Depression. Neuroscience is closely attributed to Forearm skin in his study. His work deals with themes such as Gene–environment interaction and Risk factor, which intersect with Clinical psychology.

His Stressor research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of 5-HTTLPR, Epigenetics, Gene, Candidate gene and Single-nucleotide polymorphism. His studies deal with areas such as Substantia nigra, Amphetamine, Nucleus accumbens, Dopamine and Reward system as well as Addiction. His work on Depressive symptoms as part of general Depression research is frequently linked to Clinical Global Impression, Adjunct and Placebo-controlled study, bridging the gap between disciplines.

Best Publications

  • Dissociable Deficits in the Decision-Making Cognition of Chronic Amphetamine Abusers, Opiate Abusers, Patients with Focal Damage to Prefrontal Cortex, and Tryptophan-Depleted Normal Volunteers: Evidence for Monoaminergic Mechanisms

    R D Rogers;B J Everitt;A Baldacchino;A J Blackshaw

  • Neuronal correlates of theory of mind and empathy: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study in a nonverbal task

    Birgit A. Völlm;Alexander N. W. Taylor;Paul Richardson;Rhiannon Corcoran

  • Response inhibition and impulsivity: an fMRI study

    N R Horn;Mairead Dolan;Rebecca Elliott;John F W Deakin

  • Differential Response Patterns in the Striatum and Orbitofrontal Cortex to Financial Reward in Humans: A Parametric Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study

    Rebecca Elliott;Jana L. Newman;Olivia A. Longe;J. F. William Deakin

  • Affective cognition and its disruption in mood disorders.

    Rebecca Elliott;Roland Zahn;J F William Deakin;Ian M Anderson

  • Tryptophan depletion impairs stimulus-reward learning while methylphenidate disrupts attentional control in healthy young adults: implications for the monoaminergic basis of impulsive behaviour.

    R. D. Rogers;Alison J. Blackshaw;H C Middleton;K Matthews

  • Collaborative meta-analysis finds no evidence of a strong interaction between stress and 5-HTTLPR genotype contributing to the development of depression

    R. C. Culverhouse;N. L. Saccone;A. C. Horton;Y. Ma

  • Glutamate and the neural basis of the subjective effects of ketamine: a pharmaco-magnetic resonance imaging study.

    J. F. William Deakin;Jane Lees;Shane McKie;Jaime E. C. Hallak

  • The effect of Citalopram pretreatment on neuronal responses to neuropsychological tasks in normal volunteers: an FMRI study.

    Cristina M Del-Ben;J F William Deakin;Shane Mckie;Nicola A Delvai

  • State-dependent changes in hippocampal grey matter in depression.

    D. Arnone;Shane McKie;Rebecca Elliott;Gabriella Juhász;Gabriella Juhász

  • Reduced GABA uptake sites in the temporal lobe in schizophrenia.

    M.D.C. Simpson;P. Slater;J.F.W. Deakin;M.C. Royston

  • Resting state networks in major depressive disorder.

    Arpan Dutta;Shane McKie;J.F. William Deakin

  • Bio-social origins of depression in the community. Interactions between social adversity, cortisol and serotonin neurotransmission

    Paul L Strickland;J F William Deakin;Carol Percival;Joanne Dixon

  • The relationship between negative symptoms and depression in schizophrenia: a systematic review

    C. R. Krynicki;R. Upthegrove;J. F. W. Deakin;T. R. E. Barnes

  • Temporal discounting in major depressive disorder

    E Pulcu;P D Trotter;E J Thomas;M McFarquhar

  • Expression of hippocampal brain-derived neurotrophic factor and its receptors in Stanley consortium brains

    J.S. Dunham;J.F.W. Deakin;F. Miyajima;A. Payton

  • NMDA receptor subunit NRI and postsynaptic protein PSD-95 in hippocampus and orbitofrontal cortex in schizophrenia and mood disorder.

    Carla Toro;J.F.W. Deakin

  • Increased Amygdala Responses to Sad But Not Fearful Faces in Major Depression: Relation to Mood State and Pharmacological Treatment

    Danilo Arnone;Shane McKie;Rebecca Elliott;Emma J Thomas

  • The role of self-blame and worthlessness in the psychopathology of major depressive disorder.

    Roland Zahn;Karen E. Lythe;Jennifer A. Gethin;Sophie Green

  • CNR1 gene is associated with high neuroticism and low agreeableness and interacts with recent negative life events to predict current depressive symptoms.

    Gabriella Juhasz;Diana Chase;Emma Pegg;Darragh Downey

  • Instrumental responding for rewards is associated with enhanced neuronal response in subcortical reward systems.

    Rebecca Elliott;Jana L Newman;Olivia A Longe;J.F William Deakin

  • Collaborative meta-analysis finds no evidence of a strong interaction between stress and 5-HTTLPR genotype contributing to the development of depression

    Robert C. Culverhouse;Nancy L. Saccone;Amy C. Horton;Yinjiao Ma

Frequent Co-Authors

Ian M. Anderson
Ian M. Anderson University of Manchester
Rebecca Elliott
Rebecca Elliott University of Manchester
Roland Zahn
Roland Zahn King's College London
Shane McKie
Shane McKie University of Manchester
Gyorgy Bagdy
Gyorgy Bagdy Semmelweis University
Xenia Gonda
Xenia Gonda Semmelweis University
Antonio Waldo Zuardi
Antonio Waldo Zuardi Universidade de São Paulo
Wael El-Deredy
Wael El-Deredy Valparaiso University
Emma Barkus
Emma Barkus Northumbria University
Barbara J. Sahakian
Barbara J. Sahakian University of Cambridge

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in Psychology opens up a variety of related online degrees and professional pathways, especially in social work. Many roles in this field require specific degrees and state-approved licensure. For instance, those interested in becoming a social worker should be familiar with unique state education requirements.

Students planning to practice in the Midwest should review Iowa education requirements for social workers and Kansas education requirements for social workers. Each state sets its own stipulations regarding degree levels, with most requiring a Bachelor’s or Master’s in Social Work from an accredited program.

Similarly, those aiming to build a career in the South can refer to the degree needed to be a social worker in Kentucky and understand the social worker education requirements in Louisiana. Understanding these pathways is crucial as requirements determine eligibility for licensure and career advancement.

Exploring these options early ensures you select an online psychology or social work degree that aligns with your state’s standards and your long-term career goals.

Best Scientists Citing John Francis William Deakin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles