World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
33
Citations
4851
World Ranking
10523
National Ranking
1027

Emma Barkus publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emma Barkus sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 90 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Emma Barkus D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emma Barkus sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Emma Barkus is affiliated with Northumbria University in the United Kingdom and has a research focus primarily in the field of psychology. Their scholarly work spans multiple subfields, including clinical psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, psychiatry and mental health, cognitive neuroscience, and social psychology.

Their research covers a variety of topics related to psychosocial and emotional development, mental health, and cognitive processes. The main topics addressed include child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment, cognitive processes, schizophrenia research and treatment, mental health research topics, family and disability support research, mindfulness, compassion interventions, and psychosomatic disorders and their treatments.

Emma Barkus has contributed to academic journals with multiple publications, often appearing in the following venues:

  • PsyCh Journal
  • Cognitive Neuropsychiatry
  • Mindfulness
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Current Behavioral Neuroscience Reports

Among their recent papers are:

  • Effects of working memory training on emotion regulation: Transdiagnostic review (2020), published in PsyCh Journal
  • The Effects of Anhedonia in Social Context (2021), published in Current Behavioral Neuroscience Reports

Emma Barkus frequently collaborates with several co-authors, which include:

  • Judy A. Pickard
  • Mark Donovan
  • Jane S. Herbert
  • Raymond C. K. Chan
  • Steven Roodenrys

Their work includes examinations of emotion regulation, social functioning, and mental health conditions, contributing to various dimensions of psychological science. The total number of their publications in psychology reaches into the dozens, with significant contributions in clinical psychology and related domains.

Best Publications

  • Auditory Hallucinations in Schizophrenia and Nonschizophrenia Populations: A Review and Integrated Model of Cognitive Mechanisms

    Flavie Waters;Paul Allen;Andre Aleman;Charles Fernyhough

  • Dissociation mediates the relationship between childhood trauma and hallucination-proneness.

    F Varese;Emma Barkus;R P Bentall

  • Experience sampling research in individuals with mental illness:Reflections and guidance

    Jasper E. Palmier-Claus;I. Myin-Germeys;Emma Barkus;Emma Barkus;L. Bentley

  • A comprehensive review of auditory verbal hallucinations: lifetime prevalence, correlates and mechanisms in healthy and clinical individuals

    Saskia de Leede-Smith;Emma Barkus

  • The feasibility and validity of ambulatory self-report of psychotic symptoms using a smartphone software application.

    Jasper E Palmier-Claus;John Ainsworth;Matthew Machin;Cristine Barrowclough

  • Hope and emotional well-being: A six-year study to distinguish antecedents, correlates, and consequences

    Joseph Ciarrochi;Philip Parker;Todd B. Kashdan;Patrick C. L. Heaven

  • Cannabis-induced psychosis-like experiences are associated with high schizotypy.

    Emma J. Barkus;John D. Stirling;Richard S. Hopkins;Shôn Lewis

  • Integrating mobile-phone based assessment for psychosis into people's everyday lives and clinical care: a qualitative study

    Jasper E Palmier-Claus;Anne Rogers;John Ainsworth;Matt Machin

  • A systematic review of cognitive failures in daily life: Healthy populations

    Nicole Carrigan;Emma Barkus

  • A comparison of two delivery modalities of a mobile phone-based assessment for serious mental illness: native smartphone application vs text-messaging only implementations.

    John Ainsworth;Jasper E Palmier-Claus;Matthew Machin;Christine Barrowclough

  • The structure of schizotypal personality traits: a cross-national study

    E. Fonseca-Pedrero;Martin Debbané;Martin Debbané;J. Ortuño-Sierra;R. C. K. Chan

  • A Transdiagnostic Perspective on Social Anhedonia.

    Emma Barkus;Johanna C. Badcock

  • Cognitive and neural processes in non-clinical auditory hallucinations.

    Emma Barkus;John Stirling;Richard Hopkins;Shane McKie

  • Schizotypy and psychosis-like experiences from recreational cannabis in a non-clinical sample

    Emma Barkus;Shon Lewis

  • Does intravenous Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol increase dopamine release? A SPET study

    Emma Barkus;Emma Barkus;Paul D Morrison;D Vuletic;John C Dickson

  • Dissociative and metacognitive factors in hallucination- proneness when controlling for comorbid symptoms

    Filippo Varese;Emma Barkus;Richard P Bentall

  • Substance Use in Adolescence and Psychosis: Clarifying the Relationship

    Emma Barkus;Robin M Murray

  • The Presence of Neurological Soft Signs Along the Psychosis Proneness Continuum

    Emma J. Barkus;John D. Stirling;Richard S. Hopkins;Shôn Lewis

  • Cannabis-induced psychotic-like experiences are predicted by high schizotypy. Confirmation of preliminary results in a large cohort.

    John Stirling;Emma Barkus;L Nabosi;S Irshad

  • The Network Structure of Schizotypal Personality Traits

    Eduardo Fonseca-Pedrero;Javier Ortuño;Martin Debbané;Martin Debbané;Raymond C K Chan

  • Cognitive and neural processes in non-clinical auditory hallucinations

    John Stirling;Emma Barkus;Shon Lewis;Richard Hopkins

Frequent Co-Authors

Shôn Lewis
Shôn Lewis University of Manchester
Frank Larøi
Frank Larøi University of Oslo
Martin Debbané
Martin Debbané University of Geneva
Johanna C. Badcock
Johanna C. Badcock University of Western Australia
Alex S. Cohen
Alex S. Cohen Louisiana State University
Steven Roodenrys
Steven Roodenrys University of Wollongong
Raymond C.K. Chan
Raymond C.K. Chan Chinese Academy of Sciences
Eduardo Fonseca-Pedrero
Eduardo Fonseca-Pedrero University of La Rioja
David C. Cicero
David C. Cicero University of North Texas
Adrian Raine
Adrian Raine University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees can open a variety of career opportunities in counseling, research, education, and more. Flexible learning options are making psychology more accessible, allowing students to balance studies with other responsibilities.

Those searching for flexible programs can consult the USA easiest psychology doctorate degree online to discover doctoral paths designed with working adults in mind. For master’s-level learners, check out the easiest online psychology master's degrees in California or the easiest online psychology master's programs in Pennsylvania to compare state-specific online options.

Students in the central US may also want to research the easiest psychology degrees online in the Midwest. These programs are tailored for convenience and offer a variety of specializations.

Overall, online psychology degrees can help you pursue roles in mental health services, education, or human resources. Carefully review each program to ensure it fits your educational goals and desired career pathway.

Best Scientists Citing Emma Barkus

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles