World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 48 5968 5551 609 577 163 8376

Sandra Bucci publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Sandra Bucci between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Sandra Bucci published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 9.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 33 publications in 2025. 60 of the 237 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 33. Peak 33 publications in 2025. 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 2 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 5 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 6 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 16 publications 2019: 21 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 16 publications 2023: 18 publications 2024: 27 publications 2025: 33 publications
2001 2025

237 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Sandra Bucci: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 1
2002 1
2003 2
2004 2
2005 1
2006 5
2007 3
2008 3
2009 1
2010 6
2011 2
2012 2
2013 5
2014 5
2015 11
2016 15
2017 13
2018 16
2019 21
2020 15
2021 13
2022 16
2023 18
2024 27
2025 33
Total 237
Download as CSV

Sandra Bucci publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sandra Bucci sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 161–170 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 163 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477 163
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Sandra Bucci D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sandra Bucci sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48–49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487 48
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Sandra Bucci is affiliated with the University of Manchester in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily focusing on psychology and medicine, with a significant emphasis on applied and clinical psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, psychiatry, and social psychology.

The scientist's work concentrates on a range of mental health topics, including digital mental health interventions, general mental health research, schizophrenia research and treatment, access to mental health treatment, the impact of technology on adolescents, psychiatric care, and mobile health applications.

Sandra Bucci's recent notable papers include:

  • The growing field of digital psychiatry: current evidence and the future of apps, social media, chatbots, and virtual reality, 2021, World Psychiatry
  • The Relationship Between Dissociation and Symptoms of Psychosis: A Meta-analysis, 2020, Schizophrenia Bulletin
  • The Digital Therapeutic Alliance and Human-Computer Interaction, 2020, JMIR Mental Health
  • The relationship between stigma and subjective quality of life in psychosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis, 2021, Clinical Psychology Review
  • Digital Therapeutic Alliance With Fully Automated Mental Health Smartphone Apps: A Narrative Review, 2022, Frontiers in Psychiatry

Frequent co-authors in their publications include:

  • Katherine Berry
  • Gillian Haddock
  • Filippo Varese
  • Xiaolong Zhang
  • Matthias Schwannauer

Bucci frequently publishes in several scientific journals, with multiple contributions to:

  • Schizophrenia Bulletin
  • Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • BMC Psychiatry
  • British Journal of Clinical Psychology
  • JMIR Mental Health

Their research integrates perspectives from psychology and medicine to explore both theoretical frameworks and practical applications of mental health treatment, especially within digital environments. The focus on digital mental health interventions and mobile applications reflects current trends in the field toward technology-assisted care.

Best Publications

  • The digital revolution and its impact on mental health care

    Sandra Bucci;Matthias Schwannauer;Natalie Berry

  • Mobile Phone Ownership and Endorsement of “mHealth” Among People With Psychosis: A Meta-analysis of Cross-sectional Studies

    Joseph Firth;Jack Cotter;John Torous;Sandra Bucci

  • Right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and personality: An analysis using the IPIP measure

    Patrick C. L. Heaven;Sandra Bucci

  • Relationship between childhood adversity and bipolar affective disorder: systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Jasper Palmier-Claus;Katherine Berry;Sandra Bucci;Warren Mansell

  • #WhyWeTweetMH: Understanding Why People Use Twitter to Discuss Mental Health Problems.

    Natalie Berry;Fiona Lobban;Maksim Belousov;Richard Emsley

  • Acceptability of Interventions Delivered Online and Through Mobile Phones for People Who Experience Severe Mental Health Problems: A Systematic Review

    Natalie Berry;Fiona Lobban;Richard Emsley;Sandra Bucci

  • Actissist: Proof-of-Concept Trial of a Theory-Driven Digital Intervention for Psychosis.

    Sandra Bucci;Christine Barrowclough;John Ainsworth;Matthew Machin

  • Cognitive-behavioural therapy for substance use disorders in people with psychotic disorders: Randomised controlled trial.

    Amanda Baker;Sandra Bucci;Terry J. Lewin;Frances Kay-Lambkin

  • Mindfulness and self-esteem: A systematic review.

    Chloe Randal;Daniel Pratt;Sandra Bucci

  • A qualitative exploration of service user views about using digital health interventions for self-management in severe mental health problems.

    Natalie Berry;Fiona Lobban;Sandra Bucci

  • The relationship between dissociation and voices: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

    Marie Pilton;Filippo Varese;Katherine Berry;Sandra Bucci

  • The Relationship Between Dissociation and Symptoms of Psychosis: A Meta-analysis.

    Eleanor Longden;Alison Branitsky;Andrew Moskowitz;Katherine Berry

  • What drives poor functioning in the at-risk mental state? A systematic review

    Jack Cotter;Richard J. Drake;Sandra Bucci;Joseph Firth

  • Psychological mediators of the association between childhood adversities and psychosis: A systematic review.

    Jessica Williams;Sandra Bucci;Katherine Berry;Filippo Varese

  • “They Are Not Hard-to-Reach Clients. We Have Just Got Hard-to-Reach Services.” Staff Views of Digital Health Tools in Specialist Mental Health Services.

    Sandra Bucci;Natalie Berry;Rohan Morris;Katherine Berry

  • Use of the Internet and Mobile Phones for Self-Management of Severe Mental Health Problems: Qualitative Study of Staff Views

    Natalie Berry;Sandra Bucci;Fiona Lobban

  • Client and Therapist Attachment Styles and Working Alliance.

    Sandra Bucci;Annily Seymour-Hyde;Alison Harris;Katherine Berry

  • A Novel, Web-Based, Psychological Intervention for People with Psoriasis: The Electronic Targeted Intervention for Psoriasis (eTIPs) Study.

    C. Bundy;B. Pinder;S. Bucci;D. Reeves

  • Assessing Therapeutic Alliance in the Context of mHealth Interventions for Mental Health Problems: Development of the Mobile Agnew Relationship Measure (mARM) Questionnaire

    Katherine Berry;Amy Salter;Rohan Morris;Susannah James

  • Using attachment theory to inform the design and delivery of mental health services: a systematic review of the literature.

    Sandra Bucci;Nicola H. Roberts;Adam N. Danquah;Katherine Berry

Frequent Co-Authors

Katherine Berry
Katherine Berry University of Manchester
Richard Emsley
Richard Emsley King's College London
Amanda L. Baker
Amanda L. Baker University of Newcastle Australia
Gillian Haddock
Gillian Haddock Manchester Academic Health Science Centre
Terry J. Lewin
Terry J. Lewin University of Newcastle Australia
Richard Drake
Richard Drake University of Manchester
Filippo Varese
Filippo Varese University of Manchester
Christine Barrowclough
Christine Barrowclough University of Manchester
Vaughan J. Carr
Vaughan J. Carr University of New South Wales
Shôn Lewis
Shôn Lewis University of Manchester

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens up a variety of online degree options and rewarding career pathways. One increasingly popular specialization is applied behavior analysis, which can lead to a career as a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA).

Students curious about this pathway should be aware of specific education and certification requirements that can vary by location. For example, understanding Jacksonville bcba education requirements is vital for those considering Florida, while prospective professionals in the Northeast should look into bcba certification requirements in Jersey City.

Each city and state may have its own steps regarding degree prerequisites, supervised fieldwork, and exam processes. If you’re planning a career in the Midwest, explore the bcba certification requirements in Kansas City. For those aiming for a position in Texas, it’s important to understand the Laredo bcba requirements.

With the increasing availability of online psychology programs, gaining the required academic credentials and experience for roles like BCBA is more accessible than ever before.

Best Scientists Citing Sandra Bucci

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles