World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 65 2829 2594 138 133 474 16252

Amanda L. Baker publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Amanda L. Baker between 1985 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Amanda L. Baker published across 41 years, from 1985 to 2025, averaging 13.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 41 publications in 2017. 18 of the 554 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1985 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 41. Peak 41 publications in 2017. 1985: 1 publication 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 4 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 4 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 17 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 20 publications 2010: 23 publications 2011: 24 publications 2012: 37 publications 2013: 28 publications 2014: 29 publications 2015: 28 publications 2016: 39 publications 2017: 41 publications 2018: 40 publications 2019: 39 publications 2020: 32 publications 2021: 38 publications 2022: 24 publications 2023: 16 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 9 publications
1985 2025

554 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Amanda L. Baker: publications per year, 1985 to 2025
Year Publications
1985 1
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 1
1991 0
1992 1
1993 4
1994 3
1995 1
1996 1
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 1
2001 4
2002 6
2003 5
2004 9
2005 4
2006 17
2007 13
2008 7
2009 20
2010 23
2011 24
2012 37
2013 28
2014 29
2015 28
2016 39
2017 41
2018 40
2019 39
2020 32
2021 38
2022 24
2023 16
2024 9
2025 9
Total 554
Download as CSV

Amanda L. Baker publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amanda L. Baker sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 471–480 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 474 publications — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25 474
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Amanda L. Baker D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amanda L. Baker sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 64–65 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290 65
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Amanda L. Baker is affiliated with the University of Newcastle Australia in Australia, contributing extensively to the fields of medicine, health professions, and psychology. Their research encompasses 124 publications in medicine, 76 in health professions, and 59 in psychology, with notable emphasis on general health professions, epidemiology, physiology, applied psychology, and clinical psychology as key subfields.

The primary research topics covered by Amanda L. Baker include substance abuse treatment and outcomes, smoking behavior and cessation, mental health and patient involvement, digital mental health interventions, mental health treatment and access, behavioral health and interventions, and health policy implementation science.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Amanda L. Baker include:

  • Peter J. Kelly
  • Frank P. Deane
  • Alison Beck
  • Billie Bonevski
  • Kristen McCarter

Major publication venues with recurring contributions are:

  • Drug and Alcohol Review
  • Addictive Behaviors
  • BMJ Open
  • Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Recent papers authored by Amanda L. Baker include:

  • Loneliness among people with substance use problems: A narrative systematic review, 2020, Drug and Alcohol Review
  • The long-term unmet needs of informal carers of stroke survivors at home: a systematic review of qualitative and quantitative studies, 2020, Disability and Rehabilitation
  • Insight in substance use disorder: A systematic review of the literature, 2020, Addictive Behaviors
  • An online survey of informal caregivers' unmet needs and associated factors, 2020, PLoS ONE
  • Addressing concerns about smoking cessation and mental health: theoretical review and practical guide for healthcare professionals, 2020, BJPsych Advances

Best Publications

  • An improved brief measure of cannabis misuse: The Cannabis Use Disorders Identification Test-Revised (CUDIT-R)

    Simon J. Adamson;Frances J. Kay-Lambkin;Amanda L. Baker;Terry J. Lewin

  • A trial of two cognitive-behavioural methods of treating drug-resistant residual psychotic symptoms in schizophrenic patients: I. Outcome.

    Nicholas Tarrier;Richard Beckett;Sue Harwood;Amanda Baker

  • Integrated Exposure-Based Therapy for Co-occurring Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Substance Dependence: A Randomized Controlled Trial

    Katherine L. Mills;Maree Teesson;Sudie E. Back;Kathleen T. Brady

  • Online alcohol interventions: a systematic review.

    Angela White;David J Kavanagh;Helen Stallman;Britt Klein

  • Exploring Teachers' Knowledge of Second Language Pronunciation Techniques: Teacher Cognitions, Observed Classroom Practices, and Student Perceptions

    Amanda Baker

  • Computer-based psychological treatment for comorbid depression and problematic alcohol and/or cannabis use: a randomized controlled trial of clinical efficacy

    Frances J. Kay‐Lambkin;Amanda L. Baker;Terry J. Lewin;Vaughan J. Carr

  • A meta-analysis of differences in IL-6 and IL-10 between people with and without depression: Exploring the causes of heterogeneity

    Sarah A. Hiles;Amanda L. Baker;Theo de Malmanche;John Attia;John Attia

  • A randomized controlled trial of a smoking cessation intervention among people with a psychotic disorder

    Amanda Baker;Robyn Richmond;Melanie Haile;Terry J. Lewin

  • Brief cognitive behavioural interventions for regular amphetamine users: a step in the right direction

    Amanda Baker;Nicole K. Lee;Melissa Claire;Terry J. Lewin

  • Dose-related psychotic symptoms in chronic methamphetamine users: evidence from a prospective longitudinal study.

    Rebecca McKetin;Dan I. Lubman;Amanda L. Baker;Sharon Dawe

  • Interleukin-6, C-reactive protein and interleukin-10 after antidepressant treatment in people with depression: a meta-analysis.

    S. A. Hiles;A. L. Baker;T. de Malmanche;J. Attia

  • Does methamphetamine use increase violent behaviour? Evidence from a prospective longitudinal study

    Rebecca McKetin;Dan I. Lubman;Jake M. Najman;Sharon Dawe

  • Cognitive-behavioural therapy for substance use disorders in people with psychotic disorders: Randomised controlled trial.

    Amanda Baker;Sandra Bucci;Terry J. Lewin;Frances Kay-Lambkin

  • Evaluating the impact of community-based treatment options on methamphetamine use: findings from the Methamphetamine Treatment Evaluation Study (MATES).

    Rebecca McKetin;Jake M. Najman;Amanda L. Baker;Dan I. Lubman

  • Randomized controlled trial of cognitive-behavioural therapy for coexisting depression and alcohol problems: short-term outcome

    Amanda L. Baker;David J. Kavanagh;Frances J. Kay-Lambkin;Sally A. Hunt

  • Evaluation of a motivational interview for substance use within psychiatric in-patient services

    Amanda Baker;Terry Lewin;Heidi Reichler;Richard Clancy

  • Clinician-assisted computerised versus therapist-delivered treatment for depressive and addictive disorders: a randomised controlled trial

    Frances J Kay-Lambkin;Amanda L Baker;Brian Kelly;Terry J Lewin

  • Randomized controlled trial of brief cognitive–behavioural interventions among regular users of amphetamine.

    Amanda Baker;Tracy G. Boggs;Terry J. Lewin

  • Psychological interventions for alcohol misuse among people with co-occurring depression or anxiety disorders: A systematic review

    Amanda L. Baker;Louise K. Thornton;Sarah Hiles;Leanne Hides

  • Coping Strategy Enhancement (CSE): A Method of Treating Residual Schizophrenic Symptoms

    Nicholas Tarrier;Susan Harwood;Lawrence Yusopoff;Richard Beckett

  • Loneliness among people with substance use problems: A narrative systematic review

    Isabella Ingram;Peter J. Kelly;Frank P. Deane;Amanda L. Baker

Frequent Co-Authors

Frances Kay-Lambkin
Frances Kay-Lambkin University of Newcastle Australia
Terry J. Lewin
Terry J. Lewin University of Newcastle Australia
Leanne Hides
Leanne Hides University of Queensland
Frank P. Deane
Frank P. Deane University of Wollongong
Dan I. Lubman
Dan I. Lubman Monash University
Vaughan J. Carr
Vaughan J. Carr University of New South Wales
Rebecca McKetin
Rebecca McKetin University of New South Wales
Luke Wolfenden
Luke Wolfenden University of Newcastle Australia
Brian Kelly
Brian Kelly University of Newcastle Australia
Gregory Carter
Gregory Carter University of Newcastle Australia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Psychology in the USA offers a multitude of career pathways, many of which can be accessed through online degree programs. A popular area is Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA), which leads to a career as a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA). The requirements for this credential vary from state to state.

For example, the Vermont bcba education requirements emphasize completion of an accredited graduate program and supervised fieldwork. Similarly, the bcba certification requirements in Virginia outline coursework, experience hours, and examination steps you must follow.

If you're aiming to qualify in a different state, check the Washington bcba education requirements to see their approved training and supervision standards. For those interested in West Virginia, specific details are covered under the bcba certification requirements in West Virginia.

Understanding your chosen state’s requirements is essential, whether you're pursuing a traditional or online program. Take time to review credentials and licensing rules to ensure your educational pathway leads to your desired career in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Amanda L. Baker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles