World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
109
Citations
51403
World Ranking
5713
National Ranking
155

David J. Kavanagh publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David J. Kavanagh sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 636 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

David J. Kavanagh D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David J. Kavanagh sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 109 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

David J. Kavanagh is affiliated with the Queensland University of Technology in Australia. Their research contributions are primarily in medicine, with extensive focus on immunology and microbiology. Within these fields, their work is concentrated on subdomains such as immunology, nephrology, hematology, physiology, and genetics.

The scientist's research encompasses several key topics including the complement system in diseases, renal diseases and glomerulopathies, blood groups and transfusion, adenosine and purinergic signaling, retinal diseases and treatments, coagulation, bradykinin, polyphosphates and angioedema, as well as platelet disorders and treatments.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with David J. Kavanagh include Edwin Wong, Sally Johnson, Neil Sheerin, Andrew S. Bomback, and Fádi Fakhouri.

The scientist's publications appear regularly in notable academic journals such as:

  • Kidney International Reports
  • Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
  • Kidney International
  • Immunobiology
  • Journal of the American Society of Nephrology

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by David J. Kavanagh include:

  • The long-acting C5 inhibitor, Ravulizumab, is effective and safe in adult patients with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome naïve to complement inhibitor treatment, 2020, Kidney International
  • Management of thrombotic microangiopathy in pregnancy and postpartum: report from an international working group, 2020, Blood
  • The role of complement in kidney disease: conclusions from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Controversies Conference, 2024, Kidney International
  • Efficacy and Safety of Iptacopan in Patients With C3 Glomerulopathy, 2023, Kidney International Reports
  • Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of the Long-Acting Complement C5 Inhibitor Ravulizumab for the Treatment of Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome in Adults, 2021, Kidney International Reports

Best Publications

  • Biological insights from 108 schizophrenia-associated genetic loci

    Stephan Ripke;Stephan Ripke;Benjamin M. Neale;Benjamin M. Neale;Aiden Corvin;James T. R. Walters

  • Mobile App Rating Scale: A New Tool for Assessing the Quality of Health Mobile Apps

    Stoyan R Stoyanov;Leanne Hides;David J Kavanagh;Oksana Zelenko

  • De novo mutations in schizophrenia implicate synaptic networks

    Menachem Fromer;Andrew Pocklington;David Kavanagh;Hywel John Williams

  • Modeling Linkage Disequilibrium Increases Accuracy of Polygenic Risk Scores

    Bjarni J. Vilhjálmsson;Jian Yang;Hilary K. Finucane;Alexander Gusev

  • Recent Developments in Expressed Emotion and Schizophrenia

    David J. Kavanagh

  • Genetics of HUS: the impact of MCP, CFH, and IF mutations on clinical presentation, response to treatment, and outcome.

    Jessica Caprioli;Marina Noris;Simona Brioschi;Gaia Pianetti

  • Development and Validation of the User Version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale (uMARS)

    Stoyan R Stoyanov;Leanne Hides;David J Kavanagh;Hollie Wilson

  • Diagnosing postpartum depression in mothers and fathers: whatever happened to anxiety?

    Stephen Matthey;Bryanne Barnett;Pauline Howie;David J Kavanagh

  • Genomic Dissection of Bipolar Disorder and Schizophrenia, Including 28 Subphenotypes

    Douglas M. Ruderfer;Stephan Ripke;Stephan Ripke;Stephan Ripke;Andrew McQuillin;James Boocock

  • Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome and C3 glomerulopathy: conclusions from a “Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes” (KDIGO) Controversies Conference

    Timothy H.J. Goodship;H. Terence Cook;Fadi Fakhouri;Fernando C. Fervenza

  • Dropout from Internet‐based treatment for psychological disorders

    Katherine M. Melville;Leanne M. Casey;David J. Kavanagh

  • Validation of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale for men, and comparison of item endorsement with their partners

    Stephen Matthey;Bryanne Barnett;David J. Kavanagh;Pauline Howie

  • Eye-movements and visual imagery: A working memory approach to the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder

    Jackie Andrade;David Kavanagh;Alan Baddeley

  • Review and Evaluation of Mindfulness-Based iPhone Apps.

    Madhavan Mani;David J Kavanagh;Leanne Hides;Stoyan R Stoyanov

  • Rare variants in CFI, C3 and C9 are associated with high risk of advanced age-related macular degeneration.

    Johanna M Seddon;Yi Yu;Elizabeth C Miller;Robyn Reynolds

  • C-terminal truncations in human 3′-5′ DNA exonuclease TREX1 cause autosomal dominant retinal vasculopathy with cerebral leukodystrophy

    Anna Richards;Arn M J M Van Den Maagdenberg;Joanna C. Jen;David Kavanagh

  • Mutations in Complement Factor I Predispose to Development of Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome

    David Kavanagh;Elizabeth J. Kemp;Elizabeth Mayland;Robin J. Winney

  • Being stoned: a review of self-reported cannabis effects.

    Bob Green;David Kavanagh;Ross Young

  • Online alcohol interventions: a systematic review.

    Angela White;David J Kavanagh;Helen Stallman;Britt Klein

  • ATYPICAL HEMOLYTIC UREMIC SYNDROME AND C3 GLOMERULOPATHY: CONCLUSIONS FROM A «KIDNEY DISEASE: IMPROVING GLOBAL OUTCOMES» (KDIGO) CONTROVERSIES CONFERENCE

    Timothy H.J. Goodship;H. Terence Cook;Fadi Fakhouri;Fernando C. Fervenza

Frequent Co-Authors

Leanne Hides
Leanne Hides University of Queensland
Ross McD. Young
Ross McD. Young University of the Sunshine Coast
Jason P. Connor
Jason P. Connor University of Queensland
Jackie Andrade
Jackie Andrade Plymouth University
Jon May
Jon May Plymouth University
Timothy H.J. Goodship
Timothy H.J. Goodship Newcastle University
Frances Kay-Lambkin
Frances Kay-Lambkin University of Newcastle Australia
Amanda L. Baker
Amanda L. Baker University of Newcastle Australia
Sharon Dawe
Sharon Dawe Griffith University
Claire L. Harris
Claire L. Harris Newcastle University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens up various online degrees and certifications in the healthcare field. Many students consider online pharmd programs to pursue a Doctorate in Pharmacy from a distance. These programs offer flexibility for working professionals and international students.

For those interested in healthcare management, rhia certification programs online provide a pathway to careers in health information management and hospital administration. These credentials are increasingly necessary as digital patient data becomes more important in modern healthcare.

If you’re seeking a fast track into the medical field, cheapest medical coding certification online courses can provide the skills to start working in medical billing and coding—a high-demand area with remote job opportunities.

Additionally, for nursing professionals aiming to advance their careers, there are numerous affordable online fnp programs available. Family Nurse Practitioner programs are designed for registered nurses who want to specialize and take on leadership roles in healthcare settings.

Best Scientists Citing David J. Kavanagh

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles