World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 54 4613 4270 2565 2320 247 10871

Celia B. Fisher publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Celia B. Fisher between 1973 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Celia B. Fisher published across 53 years, from 1973 to 2025, averaging 5.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2021. 23 of the 307 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1973 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2021. 1973: 1 publication 1974: 1 publication 1975: 1 publication 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 1 publication 1981: 2 publications 1982: 4 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 1 publication 1987: 2 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 8 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 13 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 17 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 21 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 22 publications 2022: 14 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 12 publications
1973 2025

307 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Celia B. Fisher: publications per year, 1973 to 2025
Year Publications
1973 1
1974 1
1975 1
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 1
1980 1
1981 2
1982 4
1983 0
1984 2
1985 1
1986 1
1987 2
1988 4
1989 2
1990 4
1991 0
1992 3
1993 8
1994 4
1995 6
1996 2
1997 7
1998 3
1999 4
2000 7
2001 3
2002 7
2003 13
2004 5
2005 5
2006 11
2007 3
2008 8
2009 8
2010 3
2011 3
2012 10
2013 10
2014 17
2015 8
2016 7
2017 8
2018 21
2019 9
2020 9
2021 22
2022 14
2023 9
2024 11
2025 12
Total 307
Download as CSV

Celia B. Fisher publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Celia B. Fisher sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 241–250 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 247 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196 247
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Celia B. Fisher D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Celia B. Fisher sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54–55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408 54
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Celia B. Fisher is affiliated with Fordham University in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields including Medicine, Social Sciences, and Psychology. Within these fields, their work incorporates subfields such as Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, Infectious Diseases, Epidemiology, and Gender Studies.

The scientist's research predominantly addresses topics related to HIV/AIDS research and interventions, HIV, drug use, and sexual risk, LGBTQ health, identity and policy, COVID-19 and mental health, vaccine coverage and hesitancy, adolescent sexual and reproductive health, and racial and ethnic identity research.

Frequent coauthors who have collaborated with Celia B. Fisher include:

  • Xiangyu Tao
  • Elise Bragard
  • Aaliyah Gray
  • Brenda Curtis
  • Tiffany Yip

Common publication venues for their work are:

  • Vaccines
  • Archives of Sexual Behavior
  • Journal of Youth and Adolescence
  • Frontiers in Public Health
  • Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Celia B. Fisher include:

  • "COVID-19 Pediatric Vaccine Hesitancy among Racially Diverse Parents in the United States", 2021, Vaccines
  • "COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy among Parents of Children under Five Years in the United States", 2022, Vaccines
  • "The effects of COVID-19 victimization distress and racial bias on mental health among AIAN, Asian, Black, and Latinx young adults", 2022, Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology

Additional papers connected with their research interests are:

  • "Exposure to Social Media Racial Discrimination and Mental Health among Adolescents of Color", 2021, Journal of Youth and Adolescence
  • "Determinants of COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake in Adolescents 12-17 Years Old: Examining Pediatric Vaccine Hesitancy Among Racially Diverse Parents in the United States", 2022, Frontiers in Public Health

Among book publications, Celia B. Fisher has contributed to the volume titled "The Multiple Contexts Of Youth Development Ads V10#2", published by Psychology Press eBooks in 2024.

Best Publications

  • Discrimination Distress During Adolescence

    Celia B. Fisher;Scyatta A. Wallace;Rose E. Fenton

  • Toward a Science for and of the People: Promoting Civil Society through the Application of Developmental Science

    Richard M. Lerner;Celia B. Fisher;Richard A. Weinberg

  • Decoding the Ethics Code: A Practical Guide for Psychologists

    Celia B. Fisher

  • Research ethics for mental health science involving ethnic minority children and youths

    Celia B. Fisher;Kimberly Hoagwood;Cheryl Boyce;Troy Duster

  • Applied developmental psychology

    Celia B. Fisher;Richard M. Lerner

  • A review of machine learning in obesity.

    K. W. DeGregory;P. Kuiper;T. DeSilvio;J. D. Pleuss

  • The study of African American and Latin American children and youth.

    Celia B. Fisher;Jacquelyne Faye Jackson;Francisco A. Villarruel

  • Attitudes Toward Fertility and Reproductive Health Among Transgender and Gender-Nonconforming Adolescents

    Diane Chen;Diane Chen;Margaret Matson;Kathryn Macapagal;Emilie K. Johnson

  • Research Ethics Education for Community-Engaged Research: A Review and Research Agenda

    Emily E. Anderson;Stephanie Solomon;Elizabeth Heitman;James M. DuBois

  • Integrating science and ethics in research with high-risk children and youth.

    Celia B. Fisher

  • Aging and executive function skills: an examination of a community-dwelling older adult population.

    Mark Brennan;Marilyn C. Welsh;Celia B. Fisher

  • "I Won't Out Myself Just to Do a Survey": Sexual and Gender Minority Adolescents' Perspectives on the Risks and Benefits of Sex Research.

    Kathryn Macapagal;Ryan Coventry;Miriam R. Arbeit;Celia B. Fisher

  • Intervention research with persons at high risk for suicidality: safety and ethical considerations.

    Jane L. Pearson;Barbara Stanley;Cheryl A. King;Celia B. Fisher

  • Assessing and enhancing the research consent capacity of children and youth.

    Jean-Marie Bruzzese;Celia B. Fisher

  • Research Ethics in Social Science

    Celia B. Fisher;Andrea E. Anushko

  • Biomedical ethics and clinical oversight in multisite observational neuroimaging studies with children and adolescents: The ABCD experience.

    Duncan B Clark;Celia B. Fisher;Susan Bookheimer;Saundra A. Brown

  • Goodness-of-fit ethic for informed consent to research involving adults with mental retardation and developmental disabilities.

    Celia B. Fisher

  • Participant Partners: College Students Weigh the Costs and Benefits of Deceptive Research.

    Celia B. Fisher;Denise Fyrberg

  • Through the Community Looking Glass: Reevaluating the Ethical and Policy Implications of Research on Adolescent Risk and Psychopathology

    Celia B. Fisher;Scyatta A. Wallace

  • Health Care Decision-Making by Adults With Mental Retardation

    Christine D Cea;Celia B Fisher

  • The role of symmetry in infant form discrimination.

    Celia B. Fisher;Kay Ferdinandsen;Marc H. Bornstein

Frequent Co-Authors

Brian Mustanski
Brian Mustanski Northwestern University
Kathryn Macapagal
Kathryn Macapagal Northwestern University
Richard M. Lerner
Richard M. Lerner Tufts University
Andrew N. Nicolaides
Andrew N. Nicolaides Imperial College London
Kimberly Hoagwood
Kimberly Hoagwood New York University
Merrill Singer
Merrill Singer University of Connecticut
Gerald P. Koocher
Gerald P. Koocher Harvard Medical School
Margaret Beale Spencer
Margaret Beale Spencer University of Chicago
Warren W. Tryon
Warren W. Tryon Fordham University
Luis H. Zayas
Luis H. Zayas The University of Texas at Austin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology online opens up a range of degree options and career pathways. Many students are searching for affordable and flexible counseling programs that prepare them for in-demand roles such as school counselors, clinical therapists, or mental health advocates. When considering where to study, cost and accreditation are key factors.

Numerous institutions in the United States now offer both affordability and quality in their online and campus-based counseling degrees. For example, students can research the most affordable counseling degree programs in Los Angeles, as well as affordable counseling degrees in Michigan. There are also options offering the cheapest counseling degrees in Minnesota and most affordable counseling degree programs in Nashville.

Pursuing an online psychology degree can lead to various specialized careers beyond counseling, such as human resources, organizational consulting, and research roles. By comparing programs across different states, students can find flexible options that align with their budget, career goals, and preferred learning format.

Best Scientists Citing Celia B. Fisher

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles