World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 67 2606 2388 1503 1345 202 15740

Cheryl A. King publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Cheryl A. King between 1990 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Cheryl A. King published across 37 years, from 1990 to 2026, averaging 6.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2019. 14 of the 234 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1990 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2019. 1990: 2 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 4 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 3 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 3 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 18 publications 2020: 16 publications 2021: 18 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 13 publications 2026: 1 publication
1990 2026

234 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Cheryl A. King: publications per year, 1990 to 2026
Year Publications
1990 2
1991 1
1992 4
1993 5
1994 4
1995 6
1996 6
1997 6
1998 1
1999 3
2000 3
2001 4
2002 2
2003 1
2004 3
2005 2
2006 5
2007 5
2008 11
2009 4
2010 3
2011 2
2012 6
2013 6
2014 8
2015 9
2016 8
2017 9
2018 8
2019 18
2020 16
2021 18
2022 9
2023 11
2024 11
2025 13
2026 1
Total 234
Download as CSV

Cheryl A. King publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cheryl A. King sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 201–210 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 202 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328 202
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Cheryl A. King D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cheryl A. King sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 66–67 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218 67
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2008 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Cheryl A. King is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on psychology and medicine, with a substantial portion of their work concentrated in clinical psychology. They engage extensively in studies related to public health, environmental and occupational health, social psychology, health, and applied psychology.

The core topics of their research include suicide and self-harm studies, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, mental health treatment and access, maternal mental health during pregnancy and postpartum, gun ownership and violence research, digital mental health interventions, and substance abuse treatment and outcomes.

Their recent publications reflect these themes and include:

  • Variation in Suicide Risk among Subgroups of Sexual and Gender Minority College Students, 2020, Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior
  • Sociodemographic differences in barriers to mental health care among college students at elevated suicide risk, 2020, Journal of Affective Disorders
  • Prospective Development and Validation of the Computerized Adaptive Screen for Suicidal Youth, 2021, JAMA Psychiatry
  • Evidence-Based Interventions for Youth Suicide Risk, 2020, Current Psychiatry Reports
  • Telepsychotherapy with youth at clinical high risk for psychosis: Clinical issues and best practices during the COVID-19 pandemic, 2020, Journal of Psychotherapy Integration

Frequently collaborating with other researchers, Cheryl A. King works with co-authors such as Ewa K. Czyz, Jacqueline Grupp-Phelan, David A. Brent, Adam G. Horwitz, and Kai Zheng.

Their work commonly appears in publication venues including Psychological Medicine, UNC Libraries, Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, Journal of Affective Disorders, and JAMA Network Open.

They have been recognized as a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA), an honor awarded in 2008.

Best Publications

  • Acculturative stress, depression, and suicidal ideation among immigrant and second-generation Latino adolescents.

    Joseph D. Hovey;Cheryl A. King

  • Prevalence of Depression by Race/Ethnicity: Findings From the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III

    Stephanie A. Riolo;Tuan Anh Nguyen;John F. Greden;Cheryl A. King

  • Remissions in maternal depression and child psychopathology: A STAR*D-child report

    Myrna M. Weissman;Daniel J. Pilowsky;Priya J. Wickramaratne;Ardesheer Talati

  • Social and interpersonal factors relating to adolescent suicidality: a review of the literature

    Cheryl A. King;Christopher R. Merchant

  • Self-Reported Barriers to Professional Help Seeking among College Students at Elevated Risk for Suicide.

    Ewa K. Czyz;Adam G. Horwitz;Daniel Eisenberg;Anne Kramer

  • Specific coping behaviors in relation to adolescent depression and suicidal ideation.

    Adam G. Horwitz;Ryan M. Hill;Cheryl A. King

  • Parental Facilitation of Adolescent Mental Health Service Utilization: A Conceptual and Empirical Review

    Deirdre E. Logan;Cheryl A. King

  • Suicidal adolescents' social support from family and peers: gender-specific associations with psychopathology.

    David C. R. Kerr;Lesli J. Preuss;Cheryl A. King

  • Connectedness to family, school, peers, and community in socially vulnerable adolescents

    Cynthia Ewell Foster;Adam Horwitz;Alvin Thomas;Kiel Opperman

  • Narcissistic Features in Young Adolescents: Relations to Aggression and Internalizing Symptoms

    Jason J. Washburn;Susan D. McMahon;Cheryl A. King;Mark A. Reinecke

  • Children of Depressed Mothers 1 Year After the Initiation of Maternal Treatment: Findings From the STAR*D-Child Study

    Daniel J. Pilowsky;Priya Wickramaratne;Ardesheer Talati;Min Tang

  • Predicting Future Suicide Attempts Among Adolescent and Emerging Adult Psychiatric Emergency Patients

    Adam G. Horwitz;Ewa K. Czyz;Cheryl A. King

  • Children of currently depressed mothers: a STAR*D ancillary study

    Daniel J. Pilowsky;Priya J. Wickramaratne;A. John Rush;Carroll W. Hughes

  • Children of Depressed Mothers 1 Year After Remission of Maternal Depression: Findings From the STAR*D-Child Study

    Priya Wickramaratne;Marc J. Gameroff;Daniel J. Pilowsky;Carroll W. Hughes

  • Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale: predictive validity with adolescent psychiatric emergency patients

    Polly Y. Gipson;Prachi Agarwala;Kiel J. Opperman;Adam Horwitz

  • The Youth-Nominated Support Team-Version II for Suicidal Adolescents: A Randomized Controlled Intervention Trial

    Cheryl A. King;Nicole Klaus;Alexander Kramer;Sanjeev Venkataraman

  • Suicidality among acculturating Mexican Americans: current knowledge and directions for research

    Joseph D. Hovey;Cheryl A. King

  • Youth-nominated support team for suicidal adolescents (version 1): A randomized controlled trial

    Cheryl A. King;Alexander Kramer;Lesli Preuss;David C. R. Kerr

  • Suicidal adolescents after hospitalization: parent and family impacts on treatment follow-through

    Cheryl A. King;Joseph D. Hovey;Elena Brand;Robert Wilson

  • Online suicide risk screening and intervention with college students: A pilot randomized controlled trial.

    Cheryl A. King;Daniel Eisenberg;Kai Zheng;Ewa Czyz

Frequent Co-Authors

Ewa K. Czyz
Ewa K. Czyz University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Neera Ghaziuddin
Neera Ghaziuddin University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Judy Garber
Judy Garber Harvard University
Priya Wickramaratne
Priya Wickramaratne Columbia University
Jonathan E. Alpert
Jonathan E. Alpert Harvard University
David A. Brent
David A. Brent University of Pittsburgh
Madhukar H. Trivedi
Madhukar H. Trivedi The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Myrna M. Weissman
Myrna M. Weissman Columbia University
David C. R. Kerr
David C. R. Kerr Oregon State University
Carroll W. Hughes
Carroll W. Hughes The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens doors to a variety of career paths, including mental health counseling and substance abuse support roles. Online psychology programs make it easier for working professionals or those with scheduling challenges to advance their education.

A popular pathway is becoming a substance abuse counselor. However, each location has its own requirements for certification and practice. For example, the Anchorage substance abuse counselor certification requirements differ from the substance abuse counselor requirements in Arlington.

Similarly, understanding the Atlanta substance abuse counselor certification requirements or the Aurora substance abuse counselor certification requirements will help you plan your education and certification path.

Whether you aim to work in clinical settings, rehab centers, or community organizations, be sure to check local licensing rules and consider online degree options that meet both your career goals and state regulations.

Best Scientists Citing Cheryl A. King

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles