World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
47
Citations
13898
World Ranking
6051
National Ranking
3287

Diane M. Jacobs publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Diane M. Jacobs sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 89 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Diane M. Jacobs D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Diane M. Jacobs sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Diane M. Jacobs is affiliated with the University of California, San Diego in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medical fields related to dementia, Alzheimer's disease, and cognitive impairment.

The main field of study for this scientist is Medicine, with 50 published works. Within Medicine, their subfields of expertise include Psychiatry and Mental Health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Physiology, Economics and Econometrics, and General Health Professions.

The key topics covered in their work are:

  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Frailty in Older Adults
  • Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Technology Use by Older Adults

Diane M. Jacobs has contributed to research published in several venues. The most frequent publication outlets include:

  • Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • Alzheimer's & Dementia Translational Research & Clinical Interventions
  • Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
  • PubMed
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Some recent representative papers authored or co-authored by Diane M. Jacobs are:

  • "Women can bear a bigger burden: ante- and post-mortem evidence for reserve in the face of tau" (2020, Brain Communications)
  • "Association of Neurofibrillary Tangle Distribution With Age at Onset-Related Clinical Heterogeneity in Alzheimer Disease" (2021, Neurology)
  • "Protocol for the Brain Health Support Program Study of the Canadian Therapeutic Platform Trial for Multidomain Interventions to Prevent Dementia (CAN-THUMBS UP): A Prospective 12-Month Intervention Study" (2023, The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer s Disease)
  • "Preliminary findings from the predictors study: utility of clinical signs for predicting disease course" (2022, PubMed)
  • "A survey of smartphone and interactive video technology use by participants in Alzheimer's disease research: Implications for remote cognitive assessment" (2021, Alzheimer's & Dementia Diagnosis Assessment & Disease Monitoring)

Diane M. Jacobs frequently collaborates with other researchers. The most frequent co-authors include:

  • David P. Salmon
  • Howard Feldman
  • Gabriel C. Léger
  • Karen Messer
  • Carolyn Revta

Best Publications

  • EFFECT OF OESTROGEN DURING MENOPAUSE ON RISK AND AGE AT ONSET OF ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE

    Ming-Xin Tang;Diane Jacobs;Yaakov Stern;Karen Marder

  • Incidence of AD in African-Americans, Caribbean Hispanics, and Caucasians in Northern Manhattan

    Mingxin Tang;Peter Cross;Howard F. Andrews;Diane Jacobs

  • Reading level attenuates differences in neuropsychological test performance between African American and White elders.

    Jennifer J. Manly;Diane M. Jacobs;Pegah Touradji;Scott A. Small

  • Incidence and predictors of seizures in patients with Alzheimer's disease.

    Joan C. Amatniek;W. Allen Hauser;Carrie DelCastillo-Castaneda;Diane M. Jacobs

  • Neuropsychological detection and characterization of preclinical Alzheimer's disease

    Diane Jacobs;Mary Sano;George Dooneief;Karen Marder

  • The Course of Psychopathologic Features in Mild to Moderate Alzheimer Disease

    D P Devanand;D M Jacobs;M X Tang;C Del Castillo-Castaneda

  • Predicting Time to Nursing Home Care and Death in Individuals with Alzheimer Disease

    Yaakov Stern;Min Xing Tang;Marilyn S. Albert;Jason Brandt

  • Cognitive function in nondemented older women who took estrogen after menopause

    D. M. Jacobs;M.-X. Tang;Y. Stern;M. Sano

  • Memory and executive function impairment predict dementia in Parkinson's disease.

    Gilberto Levy;Diane M. Jacobs;Ming Xin Tang;Lucien J. Côté

  • Age at onset of Alzheimer's disease Relation to pattern of cognitive dysfunction and rate of decline

    Diane Jacobs;M. Sano;K. Marder;K. Bell

  • Plasma Amyloid Beta-Peptide 1-42 and Incipient Alzheimer's Disease

    Richard Paul Mayeux;Mingxin Tang;Diane Jacobs;Jennifer J. Manly

  • Effect of literacy on neuropsychological test performance in nondemented, education-matched elders

    Jennifer J. Manly;Diane M. Jacobs;Mary Sano;Karen Bell

  • Comparison of dementia with Lewy bodies to Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease with dementia

    Enrique Noe;Karen Marder;Karen L. Bell;Diane M. Jacobs

  • Differentiation of amnesic and demented patients with the wechsler memory scale -revised

    Nelson Butters;David P. Salmon;C. Munro Cullum;Patricia Cairns

  • Endogenous estrogen levels and Alzheimer’s disease among postmenopausal women

    J.J. Manly;C.A. Merchant;D.M. Jacobs;S.A. Small

  • Cognitive test performance among nondemented elderly African Americans and whites

    Jennifer J. Manly;Diane Jacobs;Mary Sano;Karen L. Bell

  • Association of subjective memory complaints with subsequent cognitive decline in community-dwelling elderly individuals with baseline cognitive impairment

    Peter W. Schofield;Karen Marder;George Dooneief;Diane M. Jacobs

  • Quality of Life in Patients with Alzheimer's Disease as Reported by Patient Proxies

    S. M. Albert;C. Del Castillo-Castaneda;M. Sano;D. M. Jacobs

  • Utility of extrapyramidal signs and psychosis as predictors of cognitive and functional decline, nursing home admission, and death in Alzheimer's disease: Prospective analyses from the Predictors Study

    Yaakov Stern;Marilyn Albert;Jason Brandt;Diane Jacobs

  • Neuropsychological characteristics of preclinical dementia in Parkinson's disease.

    Diane Jacobs;Karen Marder;Lucien J. Cote;Mary Sano

Frequent Co-Authors

Yaakov Stern
Yaakov Stern Columbia University
Mary Sano
Mary Sano Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Karen Marder
Karen Marder Columbia University
David P. Salmon
David P. Salmon University of California, San Diego
Richard Mayeux
Richard Mayeux Columbia University
Howard Andrews
Howard Andrews Columbia University
Marilyn S. Albert
Marilyn S. Albert Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Ming-Xin Tang
Ming-Xin Tang Columbia University
Jennifer J. Manly
Jennifer J. Manly Columbia University
Alexander I. Tröster
Alexander I. Tröster Barrow Neurological Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees opens up diverse career opportunities in fields such as mental health, education, social work, and corporate settings. As the demand for remote learning grows, more universities are offering flexible online psychology programs that mirror their on-campus quality and rigor.

When investigating degree options, consider programs that offer accreditation, experienced faculty, and strong student support. For instance, if you want a broad view of what’s available, the list of top psychology degrees in Colorado covers several reputable options statewide. Meanwhile, if location or local networking is important, you can compare the best psychology degree rankings in Colorado Springs, or browse the best psychology program rankings in Conway for students in Arkansas.

For those seeking programs in the East, the best psychology degree rankings in Fairfax showcase top choices in Virginia. No matter your location or specialty interest, careful research can help you find an online psychology program aligned with your professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Diane M. Jacobs

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles