World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
57
Citations
9131
World Ranking
3540
National Ranking
1346

Deborah H. Bennett publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Deborah H. Bennett sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 186 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Deborah H. Bennett D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Deborah H. Bennett sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Deborah H. Bennett is affiliated with the University of California, Davis in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science, with a significant emphasis on health, toxicology, and mutagenesis. The subfields of study in which they have contributed include environmental chemistry, public health, environmental and occupational health, plant science, and cancer research.

Bennett's work addresses several main topics, such as the effects and risks of endocrine-disrupting chemicals, toxic organic pollutants impact, air quality and health impacts, and per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research. Other areas of focus include health, environment, cognitive aging, carcinogens and genotoxicity assessment, and pesticide exposure and toxicity.

Their recent publications illustrate an ongoing commitment to exploring chemical exposures and their implications for child health and development. Notable papers include:

  • Exposure to Contemporary and Emerging Chemicals in Commerce among Pregnant Women in the United States: The Environmental influences on Child Health Outcome (ECHO) Program, 2022, Environmental Science & Technology
  • Prenatal exposure to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in association with autism spectrum disorder in the MARBLES study, 2020, Environment International
  • Birth Outcomes in Relation to Prenatal Exposure to Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances and Stress in the Environmental Influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) Program, 2023, Environmental Health Perspectives
  • Opportunities for evaluating chemical exposures and child health in the United States: the Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) Program, 2020, Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology
  • Modeled prenatal exposure to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in association with child autism spectrum disorder: A case-control study, 2020, Environmental Research

Bennett frequently publishes in venues including ISEE Conference Abstracts, Environmental Research, UNC Libraries, Environmental Science & Technology, and Environment International. These platforms reflect the interdisciplinary nature of their research across environmental and public health sciences.

Collaborative efforts are an important aspect of Bennett's scientific contributions. Frequent coauthors include Rebecca J. Schmidt, Irva Hertz-Picciotto, Jiwon Oh, Kurunthachalam Kannan, and Jessie P. Buckley, indicating active engagement with a broad network of researchers in epidemiology, toxicology, and environmental health.

Best Publications

  • Defining intake fraction.

    Deborah H. Bennett;Thomas E. McKone;John S. Evans;William W. Nazaroff

  • Ranking Cancer Risks of Organic Hazardous Air Pollutants in the United States

    Miranda M. Loh;Miranda M. Loh;Jonathan I. Levy;John D. Spengler;E. Andres Houseman;E. Andres Houseman

  • Organophosphate exposures during pregnancy and child neurodevelopment: Recommendations for essential policy reforms

    Irva Hertz-Picciotto;Jennifer B. Sass;Stephanie Engel;Deborah H. Bennett

  • BETR North America: A regionally segmented multimedia contaminant fate model for North America

    Matthew MacLeod;David G. Woodfine;Donald Mackay;Tom McKone

  • General Formulation of Characteristic Travel Distance for Semivolatile Organic Chemicals in a Multimedia Environment

    Deborah H. Bennett;Thomas E. McKone;Michael Matthies;William E. Kastenberg

  • Exposure to select phthalates and phenols through use of personal care products among Californian adults and their children

    Claire Philippat;Deborah Bennett;Antonia M. Calafat;Irva Hertz Picciotto

  • The Relationship of Urinary Metabolites of Carbaryl/Naphthalene and Chlorpyrifos with Human Semen Quality

    John D. Meeker;Louise Marie Ryan;Dana B. Barr;Robert F. Herrick

  • Project TENDR: targeting environmental neuro-developmental risks. The TENDR consensus statement.

    Deborah Bennett;David C Bellinger;David C Bellinger;Linda S Birnbaum;Asa Bradman

  • Polybrominated diphenyl ethers in relation to autism and developmental delay: a case-control study

    Irva Hertz-Picciotto;Åke Bergman;Britta Fängström;Melissa Rose

  • Fugacity-Based Indoor Residential Pesticide Fate Model

    Deborah H. Bennett;Edwin J. Furtaw

  • A multimedia, multiple pathway risk assessment of atrazine: the impact of age differentiated exposure including joint uncertainty and variability

    Deborah H Bennett;W. E. Kastenberg;T. E. McKone

  • Usage pattern of personal care products in California households

    Xiangmei May Wu;Deborah H Bennett;Beate Ritz;Diana L Cassady

  • Intake fraction for multimedia pollutants: a tool for life cycle analysis and comparative risk assessment.

    Deborah H. Bennett;Manuele D. Margni;Thomas E. McKone;Olivier Jolliet

  • Serum concentrations of perfluorinated compounds (PFC) among selected populations of children and adults in California.

    Xiangmei May Wu;Deborah H Bennett;Antonia M Calafat;Kayoko Kato

  • Determining the infiltration of outdoor particles in the indoor environment using a dynamic model

    Deborah H Bennett;Deborah H Bennett;P. Koutrakis

  • Household Dust as a Repository of Chemical Accumulation: New Insights from a Comprehensive High-Resolution Mass Spectrometric Study.

    Christoph Moschet;Tarun Anumol;Bonny M. Lew;Deborah H. Bennett

  • Indoor carbon monoxide and PM2.5 concentrations by cooking fuels in Pakistan

    A. R. Siddiqui;K. Lee;K. Lee;Deborah H Bennett;X. Yang

  • Pesticide loadings of select organophosphate and pyrethroid pesticides in urban public housing

    Rhona Julien;Gary Adamkiewicz;Jonathan I. Levy;Deborah H Bennett;Deborah H Bennett

  • Consensus Modeling of Median Chemical Intake for the U.S. Population Based on Predictions of Exposure Pathways

    Caroline L. Ring;Caroline L. Ring;Jon A. Arnot;Deborah H Bennett;Peter P. Egeghy

  • PBDEs in 2-5 year-old children from California and associations with diet and indoor environment.

    Melissa Rose;Deborah H Bennett;A. K E Bergman;Britta Fängström

  • Urinary levels of insecticide metabolites and DNA damage in human sperm.

    John D. Meeker;Narendra P. Singh;Louise Ryan;Susan M. Duty

Frequent Co-Authors

Irva Hertz-Picciotto
Irva Hertz-Picciotto University of California, Davis
Daniel J. Tancredi
Daniel J. Tancredi University of California, Davis
Thomas E. McKone
Thomas E. McKone University of California, Berkeley
John D. Spengler
John D. Spengler Harvard University
Beate Ritz
Beate Ritz University of California, Los Angeles
Frank M. Mitloehner
Frank M. Mitloehner University of California, Davis
Dana B. Barr
Dana B. Barr Emory University
Thomas M. Young
Thomas M. Young University of California, Davis
Antonia M. Calafat
Antonia M. Calafat Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
E. Andres Houseman
E. Andres Houseman Oregon State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Environmental Sciences opens doors to various related fields that complement and expand career opportunities. For students seeking flexibility, exploring the easiest bachelor degree to get options can provide guidance on accessible pathways tailored to their academic strengths.

Specialized programs such as geology degrees online offer a deeper understanding of Earth processes, which is crucial for roles in environmental consulting and resource management.

Additionally, expertise in spatial data is increasingly valuable. The best GIS programs in the US provide training in geographic information systems, an essential tool for environmental mapping, urban planning, and conservation efforts.

For those interested in leadership and public administration roles related to environmental policy, exploring the best online MPA programs offers a fast-tracked approach to gaining critical skills in management and governance.

Best Scientists Citing Deborah H. Bennett

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles