World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 48 5514 5287 234 220 128 9231

Jon A. Arnot publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jon A. Arnot between 2003 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jon A. Arnot published across 24 years, from 2003 to 2026, averaging 5.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2014. 4 of the 141 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2014. 2003: 2 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 3 publications 2026: 1 publication
2003 2026

141 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jon A. Arnot: publications per year, 2003 to 2026
Year Publications
2003 2
2004 2
2005 0
2006 2
2007 2
2008 4
2009 8
2010 5
2011 6
2012 10
2013 8
2014 11
2015 9
2016 10
2017 5
2018 11
2019 5
2020 8
2021 9
2022 8
2023 6
2024 6
2025 3
2026 1
Total 141
Download as CSV

Jon A. Arnot publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jon A. Arnot sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 128 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617 128
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Jon A. Arnot D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jon A. Arnot sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272 48
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Jon A. Arnot is affiliated with the University of Toronto in Canada and has contributed extensively to the field of environmental science. Their research primarily operates within the main field of Environmental Science, with significant focus on subfields such as Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Environmental Chemistry, Pollution, Cancer Research, and Chemical Health and Safety.

Their work addresses multiple critical topics including toxic organic pollutants impact, effects and risks of endocrine-disrupting chemicals, pharmaceutical and antibiotic environmental impacts, environmental chemistry and analysis, environmental toxicology and ecotoxicology, chemistry and chemical engineering, as well as carcinogens and genotoxicity assessment.

Jon A. Arnot's recent papers demonstrate a broad scope across environmental exposure and chemical risk assessment. Notable publications include:

  • Developing human biomonitoring as a 21st century toolbox within the European exposure science strategy 2020-2030 (2022) in Environment International
  • Addressing uncertainty in mouthing-mediated ingestion of chemicals on indoor surfaces, objects, and dust (2020) in Environment International
  • Tissue Distribution of Several Series of Cationic Surfactants in Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Following Exposure via Water (2020) in Environmental Science & Technology
  • Examining Uncertainty in In Vitro-In Vivo Extrapolation Applied in Fish Bioconcentration Models (2020) in Environmental Science & Technology
  • Retrieval, Selection, and Evaluation of Chemical Property Data for Assessments of Chemical Emissions, Fate, Hazard, Exposure, and Risks (2022) in ACS Environmental Au

Their frequent collaborators include Alessandro Sangion, James M. Armitage, Li Li, Trevor N. Brown, and Liisa Toose. Collaboration patterns show sustained coauthorship over multiple studies.

Jon A. Arnot has published in various respected scientific venues, with a concentration of articles in:

  • Environmental Science & Technology (6 publications)
  • Environmental Science Processes & Impacts (6 publications)
  • Environment International (3 publications)
  • Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management (3 publications)
  • Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology (3 publications)

This profile reflects a comprehensive engagement with research aimed at understanding environmental chemical exposures, their biological effects, and the methodologies to assess risks and uncertainties in exposure science.

Best Publications

  • A review of bioconcentration factor (BCF) and bioaccumulation factor (BAF) assessments for organic chemicals in aquatic organisms

    Jon A Arnot;Frank Apc Gobas

  • A food web bioaccumulation model for organic chemicals in aquatic ecosystems.

    Jon A. Arnot;Frank A. P. C. Gobas

  • Dechlorane Plus and Related Compounds in the Environment: A Review

    Ed Sverko;Gregg T. Tomy;Eric J. Reiner;Yi-Fan Li;Yi-Fan Li

  • Hexabromocyclododecane: current understanding of chemistry, environmental fate and toxicology and implications for global management.

    Christopher H. Marvin;Gregg T. Tomy;Gregg T. Tomy;James M. Armitage;James M. Armitage;Jon A. Arnot

  • A Generic QSAR for Assessing the Bioaccumulation Potential of Organic Chemicals in Aquatic Food Webs

    Jon A. Arnot;Frank A. P. C. Gobas

  • High-Throughput Models for Exposure-Based Chemical Prioritization in the ExpoCast Project

    John F. Wambaugh;R. Woodrow Setzer;David M. Reif;Sumit Gangwal

  • Development and evaluation of a mechanistic bioconcentration model for ionogenic organic chemicals in fish.

    James M. Armitage;Jon A. Arnot;Frank Wania;Don Mackay

  • Policies for chemical hazard and risk priority setting: can persistence, bioaccumulation, toxicity, and quantity information be combined?

    Jon A. Arnot;Don Mackay

  • Application of Mass Balance Models and the Chemical Activity Concept To Facilitate the Use of in Vitro Toxicity Data for Risk Assessment

    James M. Armitage;Frank Wania;Jon A. Arnot

  • Estimating metabolic biotransformation rates in fish from laboratory data

    Jon Arnot;Donald Mackay;Mark Bonnell

  • Screening level risk assessment model for chemical fate and effects in the environment.

    Jon A Arnot;Don Mackay;Eva Webster;Jeanette M Southwood

  • A database of fish biotransformation rates for organic chemicals.

    Jon A. Arnot;Don Mackay;Thomas F. Parkerton;Mark Bonnell

  • A quantitative structure-activity relationship for predicting metabolic biotransformation rates for organic chemicals in fish

    Jon A. Arnot;William Meylan;Jay Tunkel;Phil H. Howard

  • Toward improved models for predicting bioconcentration of well-metabolized compounds by rainbow trout using measured rates of in vitro intrinsic clearance.

    John W. Nichols;Duane B. Huggett;Jon A. Arnot;Patrick N. Fitzsimmons

  • Assessing the bioaccumulation potential of ionizable organic compounds: Current knowledge and research priorities

    James M. Armitage;Russell J. Erickson;Till Luckenbach;Carla A. Ng

  • Consensus Modeling of Median Chemical Intake for the U.S. Population Based on Predictions of Exposure Pathways

    Caroline L. Ring;Caroline L. Ring;Jon A. Arnot;Deborah H Bennett;Peter P. Egeghy

  • Workgroup Report: Review of Fish Bioaccumulation Databases Used to Identify Persistent, Bioaccumulative, Toxic Substances

    Anne V. Weisbrod;Lawrence P. Burkhard;Jon Arnot;Ovanes Mekenyan

  • Metabolic biotransformation half-lives in fish: QSAR modeling and consensus analysis.

    Ester Papa;Leon van der Wal;Jon A. Arnot;Paola Gramatica

  • Prioritizing chemicals and data requirements for screening-level exposure and risk assessment.

    Jon A. Arnot;Trevor N. Brown;Frank Wania;Knut Breivik

  • Quantitative Structure Activity Relationships for Predicting the Bioaccumulation of POPs in Terrestrial Food-Webs

    Frank A. P. C. Gobas;Barry C. Kelly;Jon A. Arnot

Frequent Co-Authors

Donald Mackay
Donald Mackay Trent University
Frank Wania
Frank Wania University of Toronto
Frank A. P. C. Gobas
Frank A. P. C. Gobas Simon Fraser University
Michael S. McLachlan
Michael S. McLachlan Stockholm University
Knut Breivik
Knut Breivik Norwegian Institute for Air Research
Peter Fantke
Peter Fantke Technical University of Denmark
Olivier Jolliet
Olivier Jolliet University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Thomas F. Parkerton
Thomas F. Parkerton ExxonMobil (United States)
Philipp Mayer
Philipp Mayer Technical University of Denmark
Deborah H. Bennett
Deborah H. Bennett University of California, Davis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Environmental Sciences in the USA opens up a variety of related online degrees that can enhance your expertise and career prospects. For instance, pursuing geology degrees online offers specialized knowledge in earth processes, critical for roles in resource management and environmental consulting.

Geographic Information Systems (GIS) skills are increasingly valuable, and identifying the best GIS schools online can help you develop capabilities in spatial data analysis, which is pivotal for environmental monitoring and urban planning.

Additionally, environmental professionals often benefit from skills in public administration. The easiest online MPA programs provide a flexible pathway to leadership positions where policy and management intersect with environmental initiatives.

To understand the social impacts of environmental issues, a sociology bachelor degree online can be a strong complement, offering insights into community dynamics and sustainable development practices.

Best Scientists Citing Jon A. Arnot

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles