World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Konrad Hungerbühler

Konrad Hungerbühler

Award Badge
Engineering and Technology
Switzerland
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 88 2298 2064 52 46 386 26667
Engineering and Technology 83 441 418 8 8 347 23469
Environmental Sciences 90 598 564 20 20 339 28643

Konrad Hungerbühler publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Konrad Hungerbühler between 1976 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Konrad Hungerbühler published across 50 years, from 1976 to 2025, averaging 8.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 37 publications in 2012. 1 of the 440 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1976 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 37. Peak 37 publications in 2012. 1976: 1 publication 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 16 publications 2000: 11 publications 2001: 12 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 18 publications 2004: 22 publications 2005: 18 publications 2006: 21 publications 2007: 22 publications 2008: 34 publications 2009: 28 publications 2010: 30 publications 2011: 25 publications 2012: 37 publications 2013: 21 publications 2014: 25 publications 2015: 20 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 24 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 1 publication
1976 2025

440 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Konrad Hungerbühler: publications per year, 1976 to 2025
Year Publications
1976 1
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 4
1998 3
1999 16
2000 11
2001 12
2002 2
2003 18
2004 22
2005 18
2006 21
2007 22
2008 34
2009 28
2010 30
2011 25
2012 37
2013 21
2014 25
2015 20
2016 16
2017 24
2018 10
2019 4
2020 2
2021 13
2022 0
2023 0
2024 0
2025 1
Total 440
Download as CSV

Konrad Hungerbühler publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Konrad Hungerbühler sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 338–347 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 347 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99 347
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Konrad Hungerbühler D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Konrad Hungerbühler sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 83 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26 83
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Engineering and Technology in Switzerland Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Engineering and Technology in Switzerland Leader Award

Overview

Konrad Hungerbühler is affiliated with ETH Zurich in Switzerland. Their research intersects several domains within environmental and biological sciences, focusing primarily on environmental science and agricultural and biological sciences.

The scientist's work covers key subfields including molecular biology, ecology, evolution, behavior and systematics, pollution, health, toxicology and mutagenesis, as well as pharmacology. Main research topics encompass plant toxicity and pharmacological properties, plant and fungal interactions, pharmacogenetics and drug metabolism, allelopathy and phytotoxic interactions, pesticide and herbicide environmental studies, mercury impact and mitigation studies, and heavy metals in the environment.

Konrad Hungerbühler has contributed to publications appearing largely in these venues:

  • Environmental Science & Technology
  • CHIMIA International Journal for Chemistry
  • The Science of The Total Environment

The scientist has frequently collaborated with several coauthors, including:

  • Barbara F. Günthardt
  • Juliane Hollender
  • Martin Scheringer
  • Thomas D. Bucheli
  • Carina D. Schönsee

Representative papers by Konrad Hungerbühler include:

  • "Is there anybody else out there?" - First Insights from a Suspect Screening for Phytotoxins in Surface Water, published in 2020 in CHIMIA International Journal for Chemistry
  • Retrospective HRMS Screening and Dedicated Target Analysis Reveal a Wide Exposure to Pyrrolizidine Alkaloids in Small Streams, published in 2020 in Environmental Science & Technology
  • Aquatic occurrence of phytotoxins in small streams triggered by biogeography, vegetation growth stage, and precipitation, published in 2021 in The Science of The Total Environment
  • Uptake of Gaseous Elemental Mercury by a Rainforest: Insights from a Tropical Glasshouse Used as a Dynamic Flux Chamber, published in 2025 in Environmental Science & Technology

Best Publications

  • What is a green solvent? A comprehensive framework for the environmental assessment of solvents

    Christian Capello;Ulrich Fischer;Konrad Hungerbühler

  • What are the sources of exposure to eight frequently used phthalic acid esters in Europeans

    Matthias Wormuth;Martin Scheringer;Meret Vollenweider;Konrad Hungerbühler

  • Estimation of Cumulative Aquatic Exposure and Risk Due to Silver: Contribution of Nano-Functionalized Plastics and Textiles

    Sabine A. Blaser;Martin Scheringer;Matthew MacLeod;Konrad Hungerbühler

  • Fluorinated alternatives to long-chain perfluoroalkyl carboxylic acids (PFCAs), perfluoroalkane sulfonic acids (PFSAs) and their potential precursors

    Zhanyun Wang;Ian T. Cousins;Martin Scheringer;Konrad Hungerbühler

  • Comprehensive probabilistic modelling of environmental emissions of engineered nanomaterials

    Tian Yin Sun;Fadri Gottschalk;Konrad Hungerbühler;Bernd Nowack

  • Global emission inventories for C4-C14 perfluoroalkyl carboxylic acid (PFCA) homologues from 1951 to 2030, Part I: production and emissions from quantifiable sources.

    Zhanyun Wang;Ian T. Cousins;Martin Scheringer;Robert C. Buck

  • Estimating consumer exposure to PFOS and PFOA.

    David Trudel;Lea Horowitz;Matthias Wormuth;Martin Scheringer

  • Dynamic Probabilistic Modeling of Environmental Emissions of Engineered Nanomaterials

    Tian Yin Sun;Tian Yin Sun;Nikolaus A. Bornhöft;Nikolaus A. Bornhöft;Konrad Hungerbühler;Bernd Nowack

  • Cumulative energy demand as predictor for the environmental burden of commodity production.

    Mark A. J. Huijbregts;Stefanie Hellweg;Rolf Frischknecht;Harrie W. M. Hendriks

  • Assessment of Recent Process Analytical Technology (PAT) Trends: A Multiauthor Review

    Levente L. Simon;Hajnalka Pataki;György Marosi;Fabian Meemken

  • Development of Environmental Fate Models for Engineered Nanoparticles—A Case Study of TiO2 Nanoparticles in the Rhine River

    Antonia Praetorius;Martin Scheringer;Konrad Hungerbühler

  • Assessing Safety, Health, and Environmental Impact Early during Process Development

    Guntram Koller;and Ulrich Fischer;Konrad Hungerbühler

  • Bioaccumulation of Perfluorinated Alkyl Acids: Observations and Models

    Carla A. Ng;Konrad Hungerbühler

  • Global production, use, and emission volumes of short-chain chlorinated paraffins - A minimum scenario

    Juliane Glüge;Zhanyun Wang;Christian Bogdal;Martin Scheringer

  • Characterization of silver release from commercially available functional (nano)textiles.

    C. Lorenz;L. Windler;N. von Goetz;R.P. Lehmann

  • Using COSMOtherm to predict physicochemical properties of poly- and perfluorinated alkyl substances (PFASs)

    Zhanyun Wang;Matthew MacLeod;Ian T. Cousins;Martin Scheringer

  • Intrinsic Human Elimination Half-Lives of Polychlorinated Biphenyls Derived from the Temporal Evolution of Cross-Sectional Biomonitoring Data from the United Kingdom

    Roland Ritter;Martin Scheringer;Matthew MacLeod;Claudia Moeckel

  • Environmental Risks of Medium-Chain Chlorinated Paraffins (MCCPs): A Review

    Juliane Glüge;Lena Schinkel;Konrad Hungerbühler;Ronan Cariou

  • Ecological footprint accounting in the life cycle assessment of products

    Mark A.J. Huijbregts;Stefanie Hellweg;Rolf Frischknecht;Konrad Hungerbühler

  • Discounting and the environment should current impacts be weighted differently than impacts harming future generations

    Stefanie Hellweg;Thomas B. Hofstetter;Konrad Hungerbuhler

  • Release of titanium dioxide from textiles during washing.

    L. Windler;C. Lorenz;C. Lorenz;N. von Goetz;K. Hungerbühler

  • Bisphenol a: how the most relevant exposure sources contribute to total consumer exposure.

    Natalie von Goetz;Matthias Wormuth;Martin Scheringer;Konrad Hungerbühler

Frequent Co-Authors

Matthew MacLeod
Matthew MacLeod Stockholm University
Alfons Baiker
Alfons Baiker ETH Zurich
Kevin C. Jones
Kevin C. Jones Lancaster University
Ian T. Cousins
Ian T. Cousins Stockholm University
Kathrin Fenner
Kathrin Fenner Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology
Zoltan K. Nagy
Zoltan K. Nagy Purdue University West Lafayette
Thomas B. Hofstetter
Thomas B. Hofstetter Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring engineering and technology in the USA often opens doors to diverse fields that combine technical expertise with business insight. Many students choose to expand their career prospects by pursuing advanced business education, such as an mba for entrepreneurs. This degree is ideal for aspiring innovators eager to launch technology-driven startups or lead R&D teams.

For those looking to advance their skills quickly, an online mba without gmat offers flexibility, removing barriers for busy professionals. Engineering graduates also find value in online project management programs. Earning an online project management degree can help you oversee technical teams, manage engineering projects, or transition into technical lead roles.

Another emerging opportunity is the real estate degree. With technology rapidly transforming real estate, professionals with both technical and business expertise are in high demand. These online pathways make it easier to pursue your goals while developing the hybrid skills sought after in today’s job market.

Best Scientists Citing Konrad Hungerbühler

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles