World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
Italy
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
66
Citations
16954
World Ranking
2335
National Ranking
38

Aldo Gangemi publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Aldo Gangemi sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 311 publications — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Aldo Gangemi D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Aldo Gangemi sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in Italy Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Computer Science in Italy Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in Italy Leader Award

Overview

Aldo Gangemi is affiliated with the University of Bologna in Italy and has contributed extensively to the field of Computer Science. Their research spans several subfields, including Artificial Intelligence, Molecular Biology, Management Science and Operations Research, Social Psychology, and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

The scientist's work covers a range of main topics such as Semantic Web and Ontologies, Topic Modeling, Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies, Natural Language Processing Techniques, Data Quality and Management, Advanced Graph Neural Networks, and the Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment.

Among recent papers authored or coauthored by Aldo Gangemi are:

  • DOLCE: A descriptive ontology for linguistic and cognitive engineering1 (2021), Applied Ontology
  • Exposing implicit biases and stereotypes in human and artificial intelligence: state of the art and challenges with a focus on gender (2022), AI & Society
  • Knowledge Graph Construction with a Façade: A Unified Method to Access Heterogeneous Data Sources on the Web (2022), ACM Transactions on Internet Technology
  • Integrating Citizen Experiences in Cultural Heritage Archives: Requirements, State of the Art, and Challenges (2022), Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage
  • The practice of self-citations: a longitudinal study (2020), Scientometrics

Aldo Gangemi frequently collaborates with several researchers, including:

  • Stefano De Giorgis
  • Andrea Giovanni Nuzzolese
  • Luigi Asprino
  • Misael Mongiovì
  • Enrico Daga

The researcher often publishes in venues such as:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage
  • Semantic Web
  • Computers in Human Behavior

In addition to scholarly articles, Aldo Gangemi has authored a book published by the Studies on the Semantic Web publisher titled Further with Knowledge Graphs (2021).

Best Publications

  • Sweetening Ontologies with DOLCE

    Aldo Gangemi;Nicola Guarino;Claudio Masolo;Alessandro Oltramari

  • Ontology design patterns for semantic web content

    Aldo Gangemi

  • Ontology Design Patterns

    Aldo Gangemi;Valentina Presutti

  • Modelling ontology evaluation and validation

    Aldo Gangemi;Carola Catenacci;Massimiliano Ciaramita;Jos Lehmann

  • Ontology learning and its application to automated terminology translation

    R. Navigli;P. Velardi;A. Gangemi

  • Social roles and their descriptions

    Claudio Masolo;Laure Vieu;Emanuele Bottazzi;Carola Catenacci

  • Understanding the Semantic Web through Descriptions and Situations

    Aldo Gangemi;Peter Mika

  • Sweetening WORDNET with DOLCE

    Aldo Gangemi;Nicola Guarino;Claudio Masolo;Alessandro Oltramari

  • WonderWeb Deliverable D18 Ontology Library

    Claudio Masolo;Stefano Borgo;Aldo Gangemi;Nicola Guarino

  • The Won-derWeb Library of Foundational Ontologies

    Claudio Masolo;Stefano Borgo;Aldo Gangemi;Nicola Guarino

  • Introduction: Ontology Engineering in a Networked World

    Mari Carmen Suárez-Figueroa;Asunción Gómez-Pérez;Enrico Motta;Aldo Gangemi

  • An overview of the ONIONS project: applying ontologies to the integration of medical terminologies

    Aldo Gangemi;Domenico M. Pisanelli;Geri Steve

  • The OntoWordNet Project: Extension and Axiomatization of Conceptual Relations in WordNet

    Aldo Gangemi;Roberto Navigli;Paola Velardi

  • Ontology Engineering in a Networked World

    Mari Carmen Suarez-Figueroa;Asuncion Gomez-Perez;Enrico Motta;Aldo Gangemi

  • Content Ontology Design Patterns as Practical Building Blocks for Web Ontologies

    Valentina Presutti;Aldo Gangemi

  • WonderWeb Deliverable D17. The WonderWeb Library of Foundational Ontologies and the DOLCE ontology

    Claudio Masolo;Stefano Borgo;Aldo Gangemi;Nicola Guarino

  • A Comparison of Knowledge Extraction Tools for the Semantic Web

    Aldo Gangemi

  • Unsupervised learning of semantic relations between concepts of a molecular biology ontology

    Massimiliano Ciaramita;Aldo Gangemi;Esther Ratsch;Jasmin Šaric

  • A constructive framework for legal ontologies

    Aldo Gangemi;Maria-Teresa Sagri;Daniela Tiscornia

  • A theoretical framework for ontology evaluation and validation.

    Aldo Gangemi;Carola Catenacci;Massimiliano Ciaramita;Jos Lehmann

  • Semantic Web Machine Reading with FRED

    Aldo Gangemi;Valentina Presutti;Diego Reforgiato Recupero;Andrea Giovanni Nuzzolese

Frequent Co-Authors

Valentina Presutti
Valentina Presutti University of Bologna
Diego Reforgiato Recupero
Diego Reforgiato Recupero University of Cagliari
Paolo Ciancarini
Paolo Ciancarini University of Bologna
Nicola Guarino
Nicola Guarino National Research Council (CNR)
Enrico Motta
Enrico Motta The Open University
Mathieu d'Aquin
Mathieu d'Aquin University of Lorraine
Massimiliano Ciaramita
Massimiliano Ciaramita Google (United States)
Chu-Ren Huang
Chu-Ren Huang Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Peter Mika
Peter Mika Yahoo (United Kingdom)
Jérôme Euzenat
Jérôme Euzenat Grenoble Alpes University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science opens the door to a range of related online degrees and career options in the USA. Prospective students often compare computer science with other in-demand choices found among the top 10 best majors for the future. Many of these disciplines—like data science, engineering, or information technology—share overlapping skills and career opportunities.

For those aiming to advance quickly, pursuing one of the easy masters degrees can help you build on your undergraduate studies and enter the workforce sooner. Affordability is another key concern. If you're considering research or leadership roles, you can find cheap doctoral programs in related fields.

Educators interested in technology integration may consider the cheapest edd options, which can fast-track your path into advanced educational leadership positions. By being strategic in your degree selection, you can maximize both your career growth and return on investment in the ever-evolving technology landscape.

Best Scientists Citing Aldo Gangemi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles