World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
98
Citations
33520
World Ranking
8954
National Ranking
306

Guido Costamagna publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Guido Costamagna sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,234 publications — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Guido Costamagna D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Guido Costamagna sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 98 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Guido Costamagna is affiliated with the Catholic University of the Sacred Heart in Italy, contributing extensively to the field of Medicine, with a particular focus on Surgery. Their research spans multiple subfields including Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Oncology, Gastroenterology, and Epidemiology.

The scientist has published in several frequent venues, with a notable concentration in gastroenterology and surgical journals. These include:

  • Endoscopy
  • Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
  • Digestive and Liver Disease
  • Endoscopy International Open
  • Gut

Among the main topics of research addressed by Guido Costamagna are:

  • Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
  • Esophageal and GI Pathology
  • Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
  • Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
  • Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment
  • Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection

Guido Costamagna has collaborated frequently with a number of co-authors, which include:

  • Ivo Boškoski
  • Cristiano Spada
  • Andrea Tringali
  • Vincenzo Bove
  • Vincenzo Perri

The scientist's recent publications illustrate ongoing engagement with surgical safety, diagnostic procedures, and the application of digital and computerized technologies in medicine. Selected papers are:

  • Artificial Intelligence for Surgical Safety, 2020, published in Annals of Surgery
  • Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Biopsy With or Without Rapid On-site Evaluation for Diagnosis of Solid Pancreatic Lesions: A Randomized Controlled Non-Inferiority Trial, 2021, published in Gastroenterology
  • Computer vision in surgery: from potential to clinical value, 2022, published in npj Digital Medicine
  • COVID-19 pandemic and personal protective equipment shortage: protective efficacy comparing masks and scientific methods for respirator reuse, 2020, published in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
  • Safety and efficacy of hydrothermal duodenal mucosal resurfacing in patients with type 2 diabetes: the randomised, double-blind, sham-controlled, multicentre REVITA-2 feasibility trial, 2021, published in Gut

Best Publications

  • A prospective trial comparing small bowel radiographs and video capsule endoscopy for suspected small bowel disease.

    Guido Costamagna;Saumil K. Shah;Maria Elena Riccioni;Francesca Foschia

  • Randomised clinical trial: faecal microbiota transplantation by colonoscopy vs. vancomycin for the treatment of recurrent Clostridium difficile infection.

    Giovanni Cammarota;Luca Masucci;Gianluca Ianiro;Stefano Bibbò

  • Endoscopic biliary stenting: indications, choice of stents, and results: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline - Updated October 2017.

    Jean-Marc Dumonceau;Andrea Tringali;Ioannis I.S. Papanikolaou;Daniel Blero

  • Biliary stenting: Indications, choice of stents and results: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) clinical guideline

    Jean-Marc Dumonceau;Andrea Tringali;Daniel Blero;Jacques Devière

  • Papillary cannulation and sphincterotomy techniques at ERCP: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline

    Pier Alberto Testoni;Alberto Mariani;Lars Aabakken;Marianna Arvanitakis

  • European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis : Overview and introduction to the full Supplement publication.

    L. Von Karsa;J. Patnick;J. Patnick;N. Segnan;W. Atkin

  • European experts consensus statement on cystic tumours of the pancreas.

    Marco Del Chiaro;Caroline Verbeke;Roberto Salvia;Gunter Klöppel

  • Long-term results of endoscopic management of postoperative bile duct strictures with increasing numbers of stents

    Guido Costamagna;Monica Pandolfi;Massimiliano Mutignani;Cristiano Spada

  • Capsule endoscopy versus colonoscopy for the detection of polyps and cancer

    André Van Gossum;Miguel Munoz-Navas;Miguel Munoz Navas;Iñaqui Fernandez-Urien

  • Endoscopic treatment of chronic pancreatitis: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline

    J.M. Dumonceau;M. Delhaye;A. Tringali;Juan Enrique Dominguez-Muñoz

  • Second-generation colon capsule endoscopy compared with colonoscopy

    Cristiano Spada;Cesare Hassan;Miguel Munoz-Navas;Horst Neuhaus

  • Effect of Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy vs Pneumatic Dilation on Symptom Severity and Treatment Outcomes among Treatment-Naive Patients with Achalasia: A Randomized Clinical Trial

    Fraukje A. M. Ponds;Paul Fockens;Aaltje Lei;Horst Neuhaus

  • The European experience with double-balloon enteroscopy: indications, methodology, safety, and clinical impact

    Simona Di Caro;Andrea May;Dimitri G.N. Heine;Lucia Fini

  • Treatment for painful calcified chronic pancreatitis: extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus endoscopic treatment: a randomised controlled trial

    Jean-Marc Dumonceau;Guido Costamagna;Andrea Tringali;Kouroche Vahedi

  • Single-operator cholangioscopy in patients requiring evaluation of bile duct disease or therapy of biliary stones (with videos).

    Yang K.Yang Chen;Mansour Parsi;Kenneth Frank Binmoeller;Robert Hawes

  • Feasibility and yield of a new EUS histology needle: results from a multicenter, pooled, cohort study

    Julio Iglesias-Garcia;Jan Werner Poley;Alberto Larghi;Marc Giovannini

  • The 2018 ISDE achalasia guidelines

    G. Zaninotto;C. Bennett;G. Boeckxstaens;M. Costantini

  • Colon capsule endoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline.

    Cristiano Spada;Cesare Hassan;JP Galmiche;H Neuhaus

  • European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE): recommendations (2009) on clinical use of video capsule endoscopy to investigate small-bowel, esophageal and colonic diseases.

    S. D. Ladas;K. Triantafyllou;C. Spada;M. E. Riccioni

  • Clinical response to peroral endoscopic myotomy in patients with idiopathic achalasia at a minimum follow-up of 2 years

    Yuki B Werner;Guido Costamagna;Lee L Swanström;Daniel von Renteln

Frequent Co-Authors

Jacques Devière
Jacques Devière Université Libre de Bruxelles
Cesare Hassan
Cesare Hassan Catholic University of America
Thierry Ponchon
Thierry Ponchon Grenoble Alpes University
Antonio Gasbarrini
Antonio Gasbarrini Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
Marco J. Bruno
Marco J. Bruno Erasmus University Rotterdam
Paul Fockens
Paul Fockens University of Amsterdam
Alessandro Repici
Alessandro Repici Humanitas University
Paola Saccomandi
Paola Saccomandi Polytechnic University of Milan
Emiliano Schena
Emiliano Schena Università Campus Bio-Medico
Takuji Gotoda
Takuji Gotoda Nihon University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring the field of medicine in the USA opens up a variety of online degree and certification options that can fast-track your entry into healthcare careers. For students seeking to become advanced practice pharmacists with flexibility, several pharm d online programs offer affordable alternatives to traditional classroom learning.

Healthcare data is growing rapidly, and the demand for specialists in managing sensitive patient information is rising. An online mhi (Master of Health Informatics) degree provides the necessary skills to excel in health information management and pursue leadership roles.

For those interested in administrative roles, understanding the medical billing and coding certification cost is important for planning a quick and affordable entry into this essential health services career.

Nursing remains one of the most versatile pathways in medicine. Students seeking advanced clinical roles with maximum affordability should review the cheapest online fnp program options, which can prepare you for family nurse practitioner certification online.

Best Scientists Citing Guido Costamagna

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles