World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
UK
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 75 1428 1385 83 82 431 19542

Enrico Motta publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Enrico Motta between 1985 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Enrico Motta published across 41 years, from 1985 to 2025, averaging 11.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 33 publications in 2004. 29 of the 476 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1985 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 33. Peak 33 publications in 2004. 1985: 1 publication 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 2 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 2 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 15 publications 2000: 11 publications 2001: 14 publications 2002: 12 publications 2003: 11 publications 2004: 33 publications 2005: 27 publications 2006: 31 publications 2007: 32 publications 2008: 32 publications 2009: 23 publications 2010: 19 publications 2011: 17 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 17 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 14 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 17 publications
1985 2025

476 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Enrico Motta: publications per year, 1985 to 2025
Year Publications
1985 1
1986 0
1987 0
1988 1
1989 2
1990 2
1991 3
1992 0
1993 4
1994 3
1995 1
1996 2
1997 4
1998 1
1999 15
2000 11
2001 14
2002 12
2003 11
2004 33
2005 27
2006 31
2007 32
2008 32
2009 23
2010 19
2011 17
2012 9
2013 7
2014 14
2015 11
2016 13
2017 15
2018 9
2019 17
2020 14
2021 13
2022 10
2023 14
2024 12
2025 17
Total 476
Download as CSV

Enrico Motta publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Enrico Motta sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 422–431 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 431 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99 431
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Enrico Motta D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Enrico Motta sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 74–75 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 75 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165 75
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in United Kingdom Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Computer Science in United Kingdom Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in United Kingdom Leader Award

Overview

Enrico Motta is affiliated with The Open University in the United Kingdom and has contributed extensively to the field of Computer Science, with a primary focus on Artificial Intelligence. Their research spans several subfields, including Molecular Biology, Information Systems, Management Science and Operations Research, and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

The scientist's work concentrates on a variety of research topics, notably:

  • Semantic Web and Ontologies
  • Topic Modeling
  • Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
  • Advanced Graph Neural Networks
  • Data Quality and Management
  • Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Advanced Text Analysis Techniques

They have collaborated frequently with several coauthors, including:

  • Francesco Osborne
  • Angelo A. Salatino
  • Diego Reforgiato Recupero
  • Danilo Dessı̀
  • Davide Buscaldi

Enrico Motta's publications have appeared predominantly in venues such as:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • IEEE Access
  • Semantic Web
  • Knowledge-Based Systems

Some of the recent papers include:

  • Artificial intelligence for literature reviews: opportunities and challenges, 2024, published in Artificial Intelligence Review
  • Generating knowledge graphs by employing Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning techniques within the scholarly domain, 2020, published in Future Generation Computer Systems
  • Responsible media technology and AI: challenges and research directions, 2021, published in AI and Ethics
  • Trustworthy journalism through AI, 2023, published in Data & Knowledge Engineering
  • Robots for Elderly Care in the Home: A Landscape Analysis and Co-Design Toolkit, 2021, published in International Journal of Social Robotics

The research of Enrico Motta reflects a cross-disciplinary approach integrating Artificial Intelligence with domains such as biomedical text mining and media technology. The focus on semantic web technologies and ontologies appears prominent throughout their body of work.

Best Publications

  • Semantic annotation for knowledge management: Requirements and a survey of the state of the art

    Victoria Uren;Philipp Cimiano;José Iria;Siegfried Handschuh

  • Integrating Folksonomies with the Semantic Web

    Lucia Specia;Enrico Motta

  • Reusable Components for Knowledge Modelling

    Enrico Motta

  • The Semantic Web – ISWC 2005

    Yolanda Gil;Enrico Motta;V. Richard Benjamins;Mark A. Musen

  • Reusable Components for Knowledge Modelling: Case Studies in Parametric Design Problem Solving

    E. Motta

  • MnM: Ontology Driven Semi-automatic and Automatic Support for Semantic Markup

    Maria Vargas-Vera;Enrico Motta;John Domingue;Mattia Lanzoni

  • SemSearch: a search engine for the semantic web

    Yuangui Lei;Victoria Uren;Enrico Motta

  • Semantically enhanced Information Retrieval: An ontology-based approach

    Miriam Fernández;Iván Cantador;Vanesa López;David Vallet

  • The Semantic Web - ISWC 2009

    Abraham Bernstein;David R. Karger;Tom Heath;Lee Feigenbaum

  • Introduction: Ontology Engineering in a Networked World

    Mari Carmen Suárez-Figueroa;Asunción Gómez-Pérez;Enrico Motta;Aldo Gangemi

  • AquaLog: An ontology-driven question answering system for organizational semantic intranets

    Vanessa Lopez;Victoria Uren;Enrico Motta;Michele Pasin

  • AquaLog: an ontology-portable question answering system for the semantic web

    Vanessa Lopez;Michele Pasin;Enrico Motta

  • IRS-II: a framework and infrastructure for semantic web services

    Enrico Motta;John Domingue;Liliana Cabral;Mauro Gaspari

  • ScholOnto: an ontology-based digital library server for research documents and discourse

    Simon Buckingham Shum;Enrico Motta;John Domingue

  • Approaches to semantic web services: An overview and comparisons

    Liliana Cabral;John Domingue;Enrico Motta;Terry R. Payne

  • Ontology Engineering in a Networked World

    Mari Carmen Suarez-Figueroa;Asuncion Gomez-Perez;Enrico Motta;Aldo Gangemi

  • The unified problem-solving method development language UPML

    Dieter Fensel;Enrico Motta;Frank van Harmelen;V. Richard Benjamins

  • Magpie: towards a semantic web browser

    Martin Dzbor;John Domingue;Enrico Motta

  • Is question answering fit for the semantic web?: a survey

    Vanessa Lopez;Victoria Uren;Marta Sabou;Enrico Motta

  • Proceedings of the 8th International Semantic Web Conference

    Abraham Bernstein;David R. Karger;Tom Heath;Lee Feigenbaum

  • The Semantic Web - ISWC 2005: 4th International Semantic Web Conference, ISWC 2005, Galway, Ireland, November 6 - 10, 2005, Proceedings (Lecture Notes in Computer Science)

    Yolanda Gil;Enrico Motta;V. Richard Benjamins;Mark Musen

Frequent Co-Authors

Mathieu d'Aquin
Mathieu d'Aquin University of Lorraine
John Domingue
John Domingue The Open University
Marta Sabou
Marta Sabou Vienna University of Economics and Business
Simon Buckingham Shum
Simon Buckingham Shum University of Technology Sydney
Dieter Fensel
Dieter Fensel University of Innsbruck
Rudi Studer
Rudi Studer Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Aldo Gangemi
Aldo Gangemi University of Bologna
Mark A. Musen
Mark A. Musen Stanford University
Stefan Decker
Stefan Decker RWTH Aachen University
Nigel Shadbolt
Nigel Shadbolt University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens doors to a range of online degrees and fast-track career options. For those interested in big data and analytics, earning a data master online can provide practical skills for high-demand jobs, while allowing flexibility and cost savings.

If you’re looking to specialize beyond pure computer science, consider fields that blend technology with management. For example, a construction management accelerated degree can help you quickly build project management expertise in a tech-driven field.

Career advancement also often requires business knowledge. For many, enrolling in a cheap online mba program is a smart choice, delivering leadership and strategic decision-making skills without a hefty price tag.

Time is also a factor. Busy professionals seeking rapid advancement can benefit from enrolling in one of the 1 year masters programs, allowing you to gain recognized credentials in less time.

Best Scientists Citing Enrico Motta

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles