World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Fabio Ciravegna

Fabio Ciravegna

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
32
Citations
6483
World Ranking
12943
National Ranking
451

Fabio Ciravegna publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fabio Ciravegna sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 214 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Fabio Ciravegna D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fabio Ciravegna sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Fabio Ciravegna is affiliated with the University of Turin in Italy and conducts research primarily in the fields of Medicine and Computer Science. Their work spans multiple subfields including Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, General Health Professions, Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, and Neurology.

The main topics of Fabio Ciravegna's research include:

  • Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
  • Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments

Recent publications by Fabio Ciravegna cover a range of applied research areas. Notable papers include:

  • "A Low Cost Indoor Positioning System Using Bluetooth Low Energy," 2020, IEEE Access
  • "Technical validation of real-world monitoring of gait: a multicentric observational study," 2021, BMJ Open
  • "Wearable technology and the cardiovascular system: the future of patient assessment," 2023, The Lancet Digital Health
  • "Activity Graph Based Convolutional Neural Network for Human Activity Recognition Using Acceleration and Gyroscope Data," 2022, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics
  • "Feasibility and usability of a digital health technology system to monitor mobility and assess medication adherence in mild-to-moderate Parkinson's disease," 2023, Frontiers in Neurology

Frequent collaborators in Fabio Ciravegna's research include Neil Ireson, Silvia Del Din, Lisa Alcock, Stefano Bertuletti, and Vitaveska Lanfranchi.

Their publications are frequently found in venues such as BMJ Open, arXiv (Cornell University), IEEE Access, The Lancet Digital Health, and IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

Best Publications

  • Semantic annotation for knowledge management: Requirements and a survey of the state of the art

    Victoria Uren;Philipp Cimiano;José Iria;Siegfried Handschuh

  • S-CREAM - Semi-automatic CREAtion of Metadata

    Siegfried Handschuh;Steffen Staab;Fabio Ciravegna

  • MnM: Ontology Driven Semi-automatic and Automatic Support for Semantic Markup

    Maria Vargas-Vera;Enrico Motta;John Domingue;Mattia Lanzoni

  • Adaptive information extraction from text by rule induction and generalisation

    Fabio Ciravegna

  • A Comparative Evaluation of Term Recognition Algorithms

    Ziqi Zhang;José Iria;Christopher Brewster;Fabio Ciravegna

  • User-System Cooperation in Document Annotation Based on Information Extraction

    Fabio Ciravegna;Alexiei Dingli;Daniela Petrelli;Yorick Wilks

  • Learning to harvest information for the semantic web

    Fabio Ciravegna;Sam Chapman;Alexiei Dingli;Yorick Wilks

  • Hybrid search: effectively combining keywords and semantic searches

    Ravish Bhagdev;Sam Chapman;Fabio Ciravegna;Vitaveska Lanfranchi

  • (LP) 2 , an Adaptive Algorithm for Information Extraction from Web-related Texts

    Fabio Ciravegna

  • A Low Cost Indoor Positioning System Using Bluetooth Low Energy

    Lu Bai;Fabio Ciravegna;Raymond Bond;Maurice Mulvenna

  • Real-Time Detection, Tracking, and Monitoring of Automatically Discovered Events in Social Media

    Miles Osborne;Sean Moran;Richard McCreadie;Alexander Von Lunen

  • Automatic semantic annotation using unsupervised information extraction and integration

    Alexiei Dingli;Fabio Ciravegna;Yorick Wilks

  • User-centred ontology learning for knowledge management

    Christopher Brewster;Fabio Ciravegna;Yorick Wilks

  • User-Centred Ontology Learning for Knowledge Management

    Christopher Brewster;Fabio Ciravegna;Yorick Wilks

  • Image annotation with Photocopain

    Mischa M. Tuffield;Stephen Harris;David P. Dupplaw;Ajay Chakravarthy

  • Recent advances in methods of lexical semantic relatedness - a survey

    Ziqi Zhang;Anna Lisa Gentile;Fabio Ciravegna

  • Evaluating machine learning for information extraction

    Neil Ireson;Fabio Ciravegna;Mary Elaine Califf;Dayne Freitag

  • Background and Foreground Knowledge in Dynamic Ontology Construction: Viewing Text as Knowledge Maintenance

    Christopher Brewster;Fabio Ciravegna;Yorick Wilks

  • Integrating information to bootstrap information extraction from web sites

    Fabio Ciravegna;Alexiei Dingli;David Guthrie;Yorick Wilks

  • Cross-media document annotation and enrichment.

    Ajay Chakravarthy;Fabio Ciravegna;Vitaveska Lanfranchi

  • S-CREAM: Semiautomatic CREAtion of Metadata.

    Siegfried Handschuh;Steffen Staab;Fabio Ciravegna

Frequent Co-Authors

Yorick Wilks
Yorick Wilks Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition
Daniela Petrelli
Daniela Petrelli Polytechnic University of Milan
Steffen Staab
Steffen Staab University of Stuttgart
Philipp Cimiano
Philipp Cimiano Bielefeld University
Isabelle Augenstein
Isabelle Augenstein University of Copenhagen
Enrico Motta
Enrico Motta The Open University
John Domingue
John Domingue The Open University
Siegfried Handschuh
Siegfried Handschuh University of St. Gallen
Yannis Avrithis
Yannis Avrithis Institute of Advanced Research on Artificial Intelligence (IARAI)
Nigel Shadbolt
Nigel Shadbolt University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens doors to many online learning options. For students interested in analytics, consider seeking out the cheapest data science degree programs. These can help you develop highly sought-after skills without overstretching your budget.

Engineering also offers exciting remote opportunities. Many learners opt for an online electrical engineering degree ranking to find top-quality programs that match their academic needs and career goals.

If your goal is quick career advancement, there are certifications for jobs that take less time to earn and can boost your employment prospects—often leading to well-paying positions in tech and related fields.

For those wanting to fast-track their education, the shortest masters degree programs allow you to earn an advanced credential in a condensed timeframe. These flexible, accelerated pathways can speed your transition into advanced roles.

Best Scientists Citing Fabio Ciravegna

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles