World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Ebrahim Bagheri

Ebrahim Bagheri

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
31
Citations
9260
World Ranking
13352
National Ranking
515

Ebrahim Bagheri publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ebrahim Bagheri sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 279 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Ebrahim Bagheri D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ebrahim Bagheri sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • A detailed analysis of the KDD CUP 99 data set

    Mahbod Tavallaee;Ebrahim Bagheri;Wei Lu;Ali A. Ghorbani

  • Assessing the maintainability of software product line feature models using structural metrics

    Ebrahim Bagheri;Dragan Gasevic

  • Evolutionary search-based test generation for software product line feature models

    Faezeh Ensan;Ebrahim Bagheri;Dragan Gašević

  • The state of the art in critical infrastructure protection: a framework for convergence

    Ali A. Ghorbani;Ebrahim Bagheri

  • Mining user interests over active topics on social networks

    Unknown

  • Automated planning for feature model configuration based on functional and non-functional requirements

    Samaneh Soltani;Mohsen Asadi;Dragan Gašević;Marek Hatala

  • Document Retrieval Model Through Semantic Linking

    Unknown

  • A metrics-driven approach for quality assessment of linked open data

    Unknown

  • Stratified analytic hierarchy process: prioritization and selection of software features

    Ebrahim Bagheri;Mohsen Asadi;Dragan Gasevic;Samaneh Soltani

  • Semantic annotation in biomedicine: the current landscape

    Jelena Jovanović;Ebrahim Bagheri

  • Towards a more efficient static software change impact analysis method

    Mohammad-Amin Jashki;Reza Zafarani;Ebrahim Bagheri

  • Configuring software product line feature models based on Stakeholders' soft and hard requirements

    Ebrahim Bagheri;Tommaso Di Noia;Azzurra Ragone;Dragan Gasevic

  • Goal-Oriented Test Case Selection and Prioritization for Product Line Feature Models

    Alireza Ensan;Ebrahim Bagheri;Mohsen Asadi;Dragan Gasevic

  • Toward automated feature model configuration with optimizing non-functional requirements

    Mohsen Asadi;Samaneh Soltani;Dragan Gasevic;Dragan Gasevic;Marek Hatala

  • Text mining to support abstract screening for knowledge syntheses: a semi-automated workflow.

    Ba’ Pham;Jelena Jovanovic;Ebrahim Bagheri;Jesmin Antony

  • Decision support for the software product line domain engineering lifecycle

    Ebrahim Bagheri;Faezeh Ensan;Dragan Gasevic

  • UML-CI: A reference model for profiling critical infrastructure systems

    Ebrahim Bagheri;Ali A. Ghorbani

  • User community detection via embedding of social network structure and temporal content

    Unknown

  • The state of the art in semantic relatedness: a framework for comparison

    Yue Feng;Ebrahim Bagheri;Faezeh Ensan;Jelena Jovanovic

  • Community detection in social networks

    Hossein Fani;Hossein Fani;Ebrahim Bagheri

Frequent Co-Authors

Dragan Gasevic
Dragan Gasevic Monash University
Ali A. Ghorbani
Ali A. Ghorbani University of New Brunswick
Jelena Jovanovic
Jelena Jovanovic University of Belgrade
Marek Hatala
Marek Hatala Simon Fraser University
Andrea C. Tricco
Andrea C. Tricco St. Michael's Hospital
Xiuzhen Cheng
Xiuzhen Cheng Shandong University
Tommaso Di Noia
Tommaso Di Noia Polytechnic University of Bari
Muhammad Mamdani
Muhammad Mamdani University of Toronto
Per Runeson
Per Runeson Lund University
Sharon E. Straus
Sharon E. Straus University of Toronto

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Ebrahim Bagheri

Recently Published Articles