World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
David Benavides

David Benavides

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
35
Citations
7001
World Ranking
11524
National Ranking
200

David Benavides publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Benavides sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 121 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

David Benavides D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Benavides sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

David Benavides is affiliated with the University of Seville in Spain. Their research primarily spans the field of Computer Science, with a significant focus on Information Systems, Artificial Intelligence, Software, Computer Networks and Communications, and Computer Science Applications.

The scientist's work covers multiple key topics, including:

  • Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
  • Software Engineering Research
  • Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
  • Software System Performance and Reliability
  • Software Reliability and Analysis Research
  • Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services
  • AI-based Problem Solving and Planning

David Benavides has published research in several frequent venues, demonstrating a consistent presence in the academic community. These venues include:

  • Journal of Systems and Software
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Empirical Software Engineering
  • SoftwareX

Among recent papers aligned with their field, the following are notable:

  • UVL: Feature modelling with the Universal Variability Language, 2025, Journal of Systems and Software
  • Uniform and scalable sampling of highly configurable systems, 2022, Empirical Software Engineering
  • Using Scratch to Improve Learning Programming in College Students: A Positive Experience from a Non-WEIRD Country, 2021, Electronics
  • Open Source Adoption Factors-A Systematic Literature Review, 2020, IEEE Access
  • Empirical software product line engineering: A systematic literature review, 2020, Information and Software Technology

Frequent collaborators include:

  • José Á. Galindo
  • Alexander Felfernig
  • José-Miguel Horcas
  • Rubén Heradio
  • Andreas Falkner

David Benavides is also an author of book publications, including the title "Feature Models" published in 2024 by Springer Nature.

Best Publications

  • Automated analysis of feature models 20 years later: A literature review

    David Benavides;Sergio Segura;Antonio Ruiz-Cortés

  • Automated reasoning on feature models

    David Benavides;Pablo Trinidad;Antonio Ruiz-Cortés

  • Automated analysis of feature models: challenges ahead

    Don Batory;David Benavides;Antonio Ruiz-Cortes

  • Fama: Tooling a Framework for the Automated Analysis of Feature Models

    David Benavides;Sergio Segura;Pablo Trinidad;Antonio Ruiz Cortés

  • Automated error analysis for the agilization of feature modeling

    P. Trinidad;D. Benavides;A. Durán;A. Ruiz-Cortés

  • Automated Diagnosis of Product-Line Configuration Errors in Feature Models

    J. White;D.C. Schmidt;D. Benavides;P. Trinidad

  • Software diversity: state of the art and perspectives

    Ina Schaefer;Rick Rabiser;Dave Clarke;Lorenzo Bettini

  • Automated reasoning for multi-step feature model configuration problems

    Jules White;Brian Dougherty;Doulas C. Schmidt;David Benavides

  • BeTTy: benchmarking and testing on the automated analysis of feature models

    Sergio Segura;José A. Galindo;David Benavides;José A. Parejo

  • FAMA Framework

    P. Trinidad;D. Benavides;A. Ruiz-Cortes;S. Segura

  • Automated diagnosis of feature model configurations

    J. White;D. Benavides;D. C. Schmidt;P. Trinidad

  • Using Constraint Programming to Reason on Feature Models

    David Benavides;Pablo Trinidad;Antonio Ruiz Cortés

  • A Survey on the Automated Analyses of Feature Models.

    David Benavides;Antonio Ruiz Cortés;Pablo Trinidad;Sergio Segura

  • Using java CSP solvers in the automated analyses of feature models

    David Benavides;Sergio Segura;Pablo Trinidad;Antonio Ruiz-Cortés

  • Automated metamorphic testing on the analyses of feature models

    Sergio Segura;Robert M. Hierons;David Benavides;Antonio Ruiz-Cortés

  • Automated Merging of Feature Models Using Graph Transformations

    Sergio Segura;David Benavides;Antonio Ruiz-Cortés;Pablo Trinidad

  • An assessment of search-based techniques for reverse engineering feature models

    Roberto E. Lopez-Herrejon;Lukas Linsbauer;José A. Galindo;José A. Parejo

  • Evolving feature model configurations in software product lines

    Jules White;José A. Galindo;Tripti Saxena;Brian Dougherty

  • Automated Reasoning on Feature Models

    David Benavides;Pablo Trinidad Martín-Arroyo;Antonio Ruiz-Cortés

  • Automated Test Data Generation on the Analyses of Feature Models: A Metamorphic Testing Approach

    Sergio Segura;Robert M. Hierons;David Benavides;Antonio Ruiz-Cortés

Frequent Co-Authors

Antonio Ruiz-Cortés
Antonio Ruiz-Cortés University of Seville
Sergio Segura
Sergio Segura University of Seville
Alexander Felfernig
Alexander Felfernig Graz University of Technology
Don Batory
Don Batory The University of Texas at Austin
Rick Rabiser
Rick Rabiser Johannes Kepler University of Linz
Jules White
Jules White Vanderbilt University
Robert M. Hierons
Robert M. Hierons University of Sheffield
Paul Grünbacher
Paul Grünbacher Johannes Kepler University of Linz
Douglas C. Schmidt
Douglas C. Schmidt William & Mary
Miguel A. Toro
Miguel A. Toro Technical University of Madrid

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in STEM fields can significantly expand your career opportunities. For students interested in broadening their knowledge, the best online physics degree programs provide a flexible and affordable pathway into scientific research and technology roles.

Data continues to drive innovation across industries, making advanced studies highly valuable. If you’re aiming to specialize further, checking out the cheapest master in data science options is a smart move. These programs offer rigorous training in big data without the usual financial burden.

Engineering careers remain in high demand, and pursuing an online electrical engineering degree ranking can help you find top programs with flexible learning formats and strong job prospects after graduation.

For those looking to join the workforce quickly or gain an edge, there are also 3-month certificate programs that pay well. These short-term credentials are a practical way to boost your employability and enter high-paying tech roles with minimal time investment.

Best Scientists Citing David Benavides

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles