World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Muhammad Mamdani

Muhammad Mamdani

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
107
Citations
48602
World Ranking
6179
National Ranking
244

Muhammad Mamdani publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Muhammad Mamdani sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 651 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Muhammad Mamdani D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Muhammad Mamdani sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 107 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Muhammad Mamdani is affiliated with the University of Toronto in Canada. Their research spans extensively within the field of Medicine, with specific focus on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Epidemiology, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

The scientist's work covers a range of key topics, including:

  • Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
  • Peripheral Artery Disease Management
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
  • Aortic aneurysm repair treatments
  • Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Acute Ischemic Stroke Management

Mamdani has contributed to numerous peer-reviewed articles published in several frequent venues, such as:

  • Journal of Vascular Surgery
  • Canadian Medical Association Journal
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • JAMA Network Open
  • PLoS ONE

Recent papers in the scientist's publication record include:

  • Implementing machine learning in medicine, 2021, Canadian Medical Association Journal
  • Machine learning in vascular surgery: a systematic review and critical appraisal, 2022, npj Digital Medicine
  • Characteristics and outcomes of hospital admissions for COVID-19 and influenza in the Toronto area, 2021, Canadian Medical Association Journal
  • APPRAISE-AI Tool for Quantitative Evaluation of AI Studies for Clinical Decision Support, 2023, JAMA Network Open
  • Pharmacologic treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in adults: A systematic review and network meta-analysis, 2020, PLoS ONE

Collaborative efforts form an important part of Mamdani's research activities. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Charles de Mestral
  • Mohammed Al-Omran
  • Douglas S. Lee
  • Ben Li
  • Derek Beaton

Best Publications

  • Rates of Hyperkalemia after Publication of the Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study

    David N. Juurlink;Muhammad M. Mamdani;Douglas S. Lee;Alexander Kopp

  • Adherence with statin therapy in elderly patients with and without acute coronary syndromes

    C.A. Jackevicius;M. Mamdani;J.V. Tu

  • Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Cryptogenic Stroke

    David J. Gladstone;Melanie Spring;Paul Dorian;Val Panzov

  • A population-based study of the drug interaction between proton pump inhibitors and clopidogrel

    David N. Juurlink;Tara Gomes;Dennis T. Ko;Dennis T. Ko;Paul E. Szmitko

  • Effectiveness of Virtual Reality Using Wii Gaming Technology in Stroke Rehabilitation: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial and Proof of Principle

    Gustavo Saposnik;Robert Teasell;Muhammad Mamdani;Judith Hall

  • Drug-Drug Interactions Among Elderly Patients Hospitalized for Drug Toxicity

    David N. Juurlink;Muhammad Mamdani;Alexander Kopp;Andreas Laupacis

  • Long-term analgesic use after low-risk surgery: a retrospective cohort study.

    Asim Alam;Tara Gomes;Hong Zheng;Muhammad M. Mamdani

  • Chronic Dialysis and Death Among Survivors of Acute Kidney Injury Requiring Dialysis

    Ron Wald;Robert R. Quinn;Jin Luo;Ping Li

  • Opioid Dose and Drug-Related Mortality in Patients With Nonmalignant Pain

    Tara Gomes;Muhammad M. Mamdani;Irfan A. Dhalla;J. Michael Paterson

  • Reader's guide to critical appraisal of cohort studies: 2. Assessing potential for confounding

    Muhammad Mamdani;Kathy Sykora;Ping Li;Sharon-Lise T Normand

  • Harassment and Discrimination in Medical Training: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Naif Fnais;Charlene Soobiah;Maggie Hong Chen;Erin Lillie

  • A comparison of propensity score methods: a case-study estimating the effectiveness of post-AMI statin use.

    Peter C. Austin;Muhammad M. Mamdani;Muhammad M. Mamdani

  • Cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors versus non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and congestive heart failure outcomes in elderly patients: a population-based cohort study.

    Muhammad Mamdani;David N Juurlink;David N Juurlink;Douglas S Lee;Paula A Rochon

  • Bisphosphonate Use and the Risk of Subtrochanteric or Femoral Shaft Fractures in Older Women

    Laura Y. Park-Wyllie;Muhammad M. Mamdani;David N. Juurlink;Gillian A. Hawker

  • The Burden of Opioid-Related Mortality in the United States.

    Tara Gomes;Tara Gomes;Mina Tadrous;Muhammad M. Mamdani;Muhammad M. Mamdani;J. Michael Paterson

  • Risk of incident diabetes among patients treated with statins: population based study

    Aleesa A Carter;Tara Gomes;Ximena Camacho;David N Juurlink

  • Good Research Practices for Comparative Effectiveness Research: Defining, Reporting and Interpreting Nonrandomized Studies of Treatment Effects Using Secondary Data Sources: The ISPOR Good Research Practices for Retrospective Database Analysis Task Force Report—Part I

    Marc L. Berger;Muhammad Mamdani;David Atkins;Michael L. Johnson

  • Prescribing of opioid analgesics and related mortality before and after the introduction of long-acting oxycodone

    Irfan A. Dhalla;Muhammad M. Mamdani;Marco L.A. Sivilotti;Alex Kopp

  • Lipid-lowering therapy with statins in high-risk elderly patients. The treatment-risk paradox

    D.T Ko;M Mamdani;D.A Alter

  • Outpatient gatifloxacin therapy and dysglycemia in older adults.

    Laura Y Park-Wyllie;David N Juurlink;Alexander Kopp;Baiju R Shah

Frequent Co-Authors

David N. Juurlink
David N. Juurlink University of Toronto
Peter C. Austin
Peter C. Austin University of Toronto
Gustavo Saposnik
Gustavo Saposnik University of Toronto
Jack V. Tu
Jack V. Tu University of Toronto
Subodh Verma
Subodh Verma University of Toronto
Andreas Laupacis
Andreas Laupacis St. Michael's Hospital
Amit X. Garg
Amit X. Garg University of Western Ontario
Paula A. Rochon
Paula A. Rochon University of Toronto
Ross E. G. Upshur
Ross E. G. Upshur University of Toronto
Deepak L. Bhatt
Deepak L. Bhatt Mount Sinai Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a career in medicine but prefer alternative routes or want more flexibility, there are numerous online pathways to explore. For instance, non-nurses interested in advanced nursing can look into msn direct entry programs online, which allow those with a non-nursing bachelor’s degree to fast-track their career as a Registered Nurse and beyond.

Nursing remains one of the most accessible healthcare professions. Many adn programs (Associate Degree in Nursing) offer less competitive admissions and can often be completed in just two years. Also, students concerned about entrance exams can seek out programs where do all nursing schools require the teas is not a barrier, removing extra stress from the application process.

For those more interested in administrative or non-clinical roles, there are online medical billing and coding schools that accept fafsa, making it easier to finance your education while gaining skills for high-demand jobs in healthcare administration. Exploring these pathways can lead to rewarding careers both inside and outside direct patient care.

Best Scientists Citing Muhammad Mamdani

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles