World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Andreas Laupacis

Andreas Laupacis

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 127 2771 2585 109 104 477 90350

Andreas Laupacis publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Andreas Laupacis between 1981 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Andreas Laupacis published across 45 years, from 1981 to 2025, averaging 10.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 2004. 7 of the 473 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1981 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 2004. 1981: 1 publication 1982: 4 publications 1983: 7 publications 1984: 4 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 0 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 2 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 8 publications 1992: 9 publications 1993: 11 publications 1994: 12 publications 1995: 12 publications 1996: 17 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 22 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 12 publications 2002: 18 publications 2003: 13 publications 2004: 24 publications 2005: 19 publications 2006: 17 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 17 publications 2010: 15 publications 2011: 18 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 21 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 22 publications 2021: 18 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 5 publications
1981 2025

473 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Andreas Laupacis: publications per year, 1981 to 2025
Year Publications
1981 1
1982 4
1983 7
1984 4
1985 1
1986 0
1987 1
1988 2
1989 3
1990 4
1991 8
1992 9
1993 11
1994 12
1995 12
1996 17
1997 7
1998 7
1999 22
2000 9
2001 12
2002 18
2003 13
2004 24
2005 19
2006 17
2007 12
2008 13
2009 17
2010 15
2011 18
2012 14
2013 11
2014 13
2015 11
2016 9
2017 21
2018 14
2019 11
2020 22
2021 18
2022 0
2023 3
2024 2
2025 5
Total 473
Download as CSV

Andreas Laupacis publications per year - data summary

  • Andreas Laupacis, a Medicine scholar from St. Michael's Hospital, has 473 publications recorded across 45 years, from 1981 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1981 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2004, with 24 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1981, 1985 and 1987, with 1 publication each.
  • 2 of the 45 years in the span carry no publications at all (1986 and 2022).
  • The rate of publication averages 10.5 papers per year over the whole span, or 11.0 per year counting only the 43 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 28 publications, 6% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1981-1995: 79 publications (5.3 per year); 1996-2010: 222 publications (14.8 per year); 2011-2025: 172 publications (11.5 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Andreas Laupacis publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andreas Laupacis sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 461–480 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 477 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751 477
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Andreas Laupacis publication distribution in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 86 ranges running from 101–120 to 1,796+ publications.
  • Andreas Laupacis, a Medicine scholar from St. Michael's Hospital, records 477 publications - the 54th percentile of the discipline.
  • 54% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Andreas Laupacis, and about 46% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 441–460 publications range, and Andreas Laupacis ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 341–360 publications, holding 922 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 64% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 521–540 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Andreas Laupacis D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andreas Laupacis sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 126–127 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 127 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252 127
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Andreas Laupacis D-index placement in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 75 ranges running from 70–71 to 217+ D-Index.
  • Andreas Laupacis, a Medicine scholar from St. Michael's Hospital, records 127 D-Index - the 86th percentile of the discipline.
  • 86% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Andreas Laupacis, and about 14% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 94–95 D-Index range, and Andreas Laupacis ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 82–83 D-Index, holding 1,027 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 106–107 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Andreas Laupacis is affiliated with St. Michael's Hospital in Canada and has contributed extensively to medical research, particularly in the field of medicine and its subfields. Their work spans several areas including biochemistry, hematology, critical care and intensive care medicine, pediatrics, perinatology and child health, and gastroenterology.

The researcher's main topics of focus include blood transfusion and management, trauma, hemostasis, coagulopathy, resuscitation, maternal and fetal healthcare, hemophilia treatment and research, gastrointestinal bleeding diagnosis and treatment, platelet disorders and treatments, and blood donation and transfusion practices.

They have authored multiple papers, with recent publications including:

  • Effects of a high-dose 24-h infusion of tranexamic acid on death and thromboembolic events in patients with acute gastrointestinal bleeding (HALT-IT), 2020, The Lancet
  • Effect of tranexamic acid by baseline risk of death in acute bleeding patients: a meta-analysis of individual patient-level data from 28,333 patients, 2020, British Journal of Anaesthesia
  • Tranexamic acid for postpartum bleeding: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials, 2024, The Lancet
  • Tranexamic acid for preventing postpartum haemorrhage after caesarean section, 2024, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
  • Tranexamic acid for preventing postpartum haemorrhage after vaginal birth, 2025, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

The frequency of their publications in particular venues includes notable contributions to:

  • The Lancet (2 publications)
  • Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2 publications)
  • Gates Open Research (2 publications)
  • British Journal of Anaesthesia (1 publication)
  • BMJ Open (1 publication)

Frequent co-authors for Andreas Laupacis comprise:

  • Haleema Shakur-Still
  • Ian Roberts
  • Rizwana Chaudhri
  • Raoul Mansukhani
  • Mònica Arribas

Their research often intersects with topics such as blood transfusion protocols, management of bleeding and coagulopathy, and maternal health interventions. This interdisciplinary approach involves collaboration with researchers from critical care, haematology, and pediatric fields, reflecting a broad interest in clinical and translational medicine.

Best Publications

  • Spirit 2013 statement: Defining standard protocol items for clinical trials

    An Wen Chan;Jennifer M. Tetzlaff;Douglas G. Altman;Andreas Laupacis

  • SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials

    An Wen Chan;Jennifer M. Tetzlaff;Peter C. Gøtzsche;Douglas G. Altman

  • Evidence-Based Medicine: A New Approach to Teaching the Practice of Medicine

    Gordon Guyatt;John Cairns;David Churchill;Deborah Cook

  • Prevalence, Age Distribution, and Gender of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Analysis and Implications

    William M. Feinberg;Joseph L. Blackshear;Andreas Laupacis;Richard Kronmal

  • An assessment of clinically useful measures of the consequences of treatment.

    Andreas Laupacis;David L. Sackett;Robin S. Roberts

  • How attractive does a new technology have to be to warrant adoption and utilization? Tentative guidelines for using clinical and economic evaluations

    A Laupacis;D Feeny;A S Detsky;P X Tugwell

  • Rates of Hyperkalemia after Publication of the Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study

    David N. Juurlink;Muhammad M. Mamdani;Douglas S. Lee;Alexander Kopp

  • The Canadian CT Head Rule for patients with minor head injury.

    Ian G Stiell;George A Wells;Katherine Vandemheen;Catherine Clement

  • USERS' GUIDES TO THE MEDICAL LITERATURE. II: HOW TO USE AN ARTICLE ABOUT THERAPY OR PREVENTION A. ARE THE RESULTS OF THE STUDY VALID ?

    Gordon H. Guyatt;David L. Sackett;Deborah J. Cook;Gordon Guyatt

  • A study of the quality of life and cost-utility of renal transplantation

    Andreas Laupacis;Paul Keown;Nancy Pus;Hans Krueger

  • Canadian atrial fibrillation anticoaguiation (CAFA) study

    Stuart J. Connolly;Andreas Laupacis;Michael Gent;Robin S. Roberts

  • Vascular and upper gastrointestinal effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: Meta-analyses of individual participant data from randomised trials

    Colin Baigent;N. Bhala;J. Emberson;A. Merhi

  • Adjusted-dose warfarin versus low-intensity, fixed-dose warfarin plus aspirin for high-risk patients with atrial fibrillation: Stroke prevention in Atrial Fibrillation III Randomised Clinical Trial

    J. L. Blackshear;V. S. Baker;F. Rubino;R. Safford

  • The Canadian C-spine Rule for radiography in alert and stable trauma patients

    Ian G. Stiell;George A. Wells;Katherine L. Vandemheen;Catherine M. Clement

  • Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Cryptogenic Stroke

    David J. Gladstone;Melanie Spring;Paul Dorian;Val Panzov

  • Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: VI. How to Use an Overview

    Andrew D. Oxman;Deborah J. Cook;Gordon H. Guyatt;Eric Bass

  • Clinical prediction rules. A review and suggested modifications of methodological standards.

    A Laupacis;N Sekar;I G Stiell

  • Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: II. How to Use an Article About Therapy or Prevention B. What Were the Results and Will They Help Me in Caring for My Patients?

    Gordon H. Guyatt;David L. Sackett;Deborah J. Cook;Gordon Guyatt

  • Drug-Drug Interactions Among Elderly Patients Hospitalized for Drug Toxicity

    David N. Juurlink;Muhammad Mamdani;Alexander Kopp;Andreas Laupacis

  • Oral anticoagulants vs aspirin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: an individual patient meta-analysis.

    Carl van Walraven;Robert G. Hart;Daniel E. Singer;Andreas Laupacis

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter C. Austin
Peter C. Austin University of Toronto
Muhammad Mamdani
Muhammad Mamdani University of Toronto
Peter Tugwell
Peter Tugwell University of Ottawa
George A. Wells
George A. Wells University of Ottawa
Duminda N. Wijeysundera
Duminda N. Wijeysundera University of Toronto
Ian G. Stiell
Ian G. Stiell University of Ottawa
David N. Juurlink
David N. Juurlink University of Toronto
David L. Sackett
David L. Sackett McMaster University
Dean Fergusson
Dean Fergusson Ottawa Hospital
Ian D. Graham
Ian D. Graham Ottawa Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

While studying Medicine in the USA is a popular path, many students are also exploring related online degrees and career pathways in healthcare. Online programs provide flexible, accredited options for advancing your education or switching careers.

For those interested in nutrition and preventative health, an online dietitian degree can open doors to roles supporting patient wellness and dietary planning. If you are considering healthcare leadership rather than direct patient care, it's essential to know how to evaluate healthcare administration degree programs. Look for proper accreditation, relevant curriculum, and strong career support.

Registered Nurses aiming to advance their qualifications can opt for an rn to bsn online no clinicals accredited program, which can provide more flexibility while maintaining academic quality. For those seeking the highest nursing credentials, consider accelerated dnp programs that can fast-track your journey to leadership in clinical practice or education.

Exploring these online pathways allows you to tailor your education to your career goals—whether in direct patient care, administration, or specialized health fields.

Best Scientists Citing Andreas Laupacis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles