World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 38 8792 8211 4681 4261 77 7353

Julia L. Evans publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Julia L. Evans between 1989 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Julia L. Evans published across 37 years, from 1989 to 2025, averaging 2.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 7 publications in 2016. 1 of the 82 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1989 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 7. Peak 7 publications in 2016. 1989: 1 publication 1990: 0 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 3 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 3 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 7 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 5 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 1 publication
1989 2025

82 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Julia L. Evans: publications per year, 1989 to 2025
Year Publications
1989 1
1990 0
1991 2
1992 1
1993 1
1994 0
1995 0
1996 2
1997 1
1998 0
1999 3
2000 1
2001 3
2002 4
2003 1
2004 1
2005 3
2006 2
2007 4
2008 3
2009 4
2010 4
2011 2
2012 0
2013 3
2014 4
2015 1
2016 7
2017 3
2018 3
2019 7
2020 1
2021 5
2022 2
2023 2
2024 0
2025 1
Total 82
Download as CSV

Julia L. Evans publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julia L. Evans sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 71–80 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 77 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461 77
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Julia L. Evans D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julia L. Evans sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641 38
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Julia L. Evans is affiliated with The University of Texas at Dallas in the United States. Their research spans primarily the fields of Psychology and Neuroscience, with a focus on Developmental and Educational Psychology as well as Cognitive Neuroscience. Their work addresses topics related to language development and disorders, reading and literacy development, and the neurobiology of language and bilingualism.

The scientist has published research on child language comprehension, neurodevelopmental disorders, and language impairment. Some of their recent papers include:

  • A New Memory Perspective on the Sentence Comprehension Deficits of School-Age Children With Developmental Language Disorder: Implications for Theory, Assessment, and Intervention (2021), published in Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools
  • Neural patterns elicited by lexical processing in adolescents with specific language impairment: support for the procedural deficit hypothesis? (2022), published in Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Consistency of a Nonword Repetition Task to Discriminate Children with and without Developmental Language Disorder in Catalan-Spanish and European Portuguese Speaking Children (2021), published in Children
  • Statistical word learning in Catalan-Spanish and English-speaking children with and without developmental language disorder (2021), published in International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders
  • Tracking Changes in Frontal Lobe Hemodynamic Response in Individual Adults With Developmental Language Disorder Following HD tDCS Enhanced Phonological Working Memory Training: An fNIRS Feasibility Study (2020), published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

Frequent coauthors that collaborate with Julia L. Evans include James W. Montgomery, Ronald B. Gillam, Amy Berglund-Barraza, Nadia Ahufinger, and Laura Ferinu.

Their work often appears in publication venues such as Frontiers in Psychology, Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, and Children.

Topics central to their research include:

  • Language Development and Disorders
  • Reading and Literacy Development
  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Child and Animal Learning Development
  • RNA Research and Splicing
  • RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies

Their subfields within psychology and neuroscience consist mainly of developmental and educational psychology and cognitive neuroscience, with minor involvement in molecular biology, cardiology, cardiovascular medicine, and social psychology.

Best Publications

  • An examination of verbal working memory capacity in children with specific language impairment.

    Susan Ellis Weismer;Julia Evans;Linda J. Hesketh

  • Can Infants Map Meaning to Newly Segmented Words?: Statistical Segmentation and Word Learning

    Katharine Graf Estes;Julia L. Evans;Martha W. Alibali;Jenny R. Saffran

  • Differences in the Nonword Repetition Performance of Children With and Without Specific Language Impairment: A Meta-Analysis

    Katharine Graf Estes;Julia L. Evans;Nicole M. Else-Quest

  • Statistical Learning in Children With Specific Language Impairment

    Julia L. Evans;Jenny R. Saffran;Kathryn Robe-Torres

  • Uses and interpretations of non‐word repetition tasks in children with and without specific language impairments (SLI)

    Jeffry A. Coady;Julia L. Evans

  • Complex Sentence Comprehension and Working Memory in Children With Specific Language Impairment

    James W. Montgomery;Julia L. Evans

  • Utility of the MacArthur—Bates Communicative Development Inventory in Identifying Language Abilities of Late-Talking and Typically Developing Toddlers

    John Heilmann;Susan Ellis Weismer;Julia Evans;Christine Hollar

  • THE ROLE OF GESTURE IN CHILDREN'S COMPREHENSION OF SPOKEN LANGUAGE: NOW THEY NEED IT, NOW THEY DON'T

    Nicole M. McNeil;Martha W. Alibali;Julia L. Evans

  • The Role of Processing Limitations in Early Identification of Specific Language Impairment

    Susan Ellis Weismer;Julia L. Evans

  • Longitudinal relationships between lexical and grammatical development in typical and late-talking children.

    Maura Jones Moyle;Susan Ellis Weismer;Julia L. Evans;Mary J. Lindstrom

  • Language sample collection and analysis: interview compared to freeplay assessment contexts.

    Julia L. Evans;Holly K. Craig

  • Lexical leverage: category knowledge boosts real-time novel word recognition in 2-year-olds

    Arielle Borovsky;Erica M. Ellis;Erica M. Ellis;Julia L. Evans;Julia L. Evans;Jeffrey L. Elman

  • Divergence of Verbal Expression and Embodied Knowledge: Evidence from Speech and Gesture in Children with Specific Language Impairment.

    Julia L. Evans;Martha W. Alibali;Nicole M. McNeil

  • Beyond capacity limitations: determinants of word recall performance on verbal working memory span tasks in children with SLI.

    Elina Mainela-Arnold;Julia L. Evans

  • Lexical representations in children with SLI: evidence from a frequency-manipulated gating task.

    Elina Mainela-Arnold;Julia L. Evans;Jeffry A. Coady

  • Pragmatics and SLI: within-group variations in discourse behaviors.

    Holly K. Craig;Julia L. Evans

  • Explaining lexical-semantic deficits in specific language impairment: the role of phonological similarity, phonological working memory, and lexical competition.

    Elina Mainela-Arnold;Julia L. Evans;Jeffry A. Coady

  • Turn Exchange Characteristics of SLI Children's Simultaneous and Nonsimultaneous Speech

    Holly K. Craig;Julia L. Evans

  • Relation of auditory attention and complex sentence comprehension in children with specific language impairment: A preliminary study

    James W. Montgomery;Julia L. Evans;Ronald B. Gillam

  • An emergent account of language impairments in children with SLI: implications for assessment and intervention.

    Julia L Evans

  • Specific Language Impairment

    Julia L. Evans;Julia L. Evans;Timothy T. Brown

Frequent Co-Authors

Ronald B. Gillam
Ronald B. Gillam Utah State University
Martha W. Alibali
Martha W. Alibali University of Wisconsin–Madison
Susan Ellis Weismer
Susan Ellis Weismer University of Wisconsin–Madison
Timothy T. Brown
Timothy T. Brown University of California, Berkeley
Jeffrey L. Elman
Jeffrey L. Elman University of California, San Diego
Jamison D. Fargo
Jamison D. Fargo Utah State University
Lyn S. Turkstra
Lyn S. Turkstra McMaster University
Nicole M. McNeil
Nicole M. McNeil University of Notre Dame
Jenny R. Saffran
Jenny R. Saffran University of Wisconsin–Madison
robert e kass
robert e kass Carnegie Mellon University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in studying psychology in the USA, there are numerous online degree options and career pathways to explore. Many students choose to pursue degrees in counseling, clinical psychology, or specialized therapeutic fields. Online education allows you to access most popular counseling degree programs in America from anywhere, combining flexibility with quality instruction.

Certain states offer particularly compelling programs. For example, learners in the West may be interested in the popular counseling degrees in Utah, which are recognized for their focus on practical, real-world skills. Meanwhile, those seeking to maximize their return on investment should consider the most valuable counseling programs in Arizona and the most valuable counseling degree programs ranking in Colorado.

With a psychology or counseling degree, you can pursue careers as mental health counselors, school counselors, marriage and family therapists, or community outreach coordinators. No matter where you start your journey, online pathways offer diverse opportunities to specialize and grow in high-demand fields.

Best Scientists Citing Julia L. Evans

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles