World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Nicholas Eyles

Nicholas Eyles

D-Index & Metrics

Earth Science

D-Index
60
Citations
10943
World Ranking
1942
National Ranking
84

Nicholas Eyles publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicholas Eyles sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

This scientist: 220 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Nicholas Eyles D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicholas Eyles sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nicholas Eyles is affiliated with the University of Toronto in Canada, contributing extensively to fields intersecting engineering and Earth sciences. Their research engages primarily with areas of ocean and mechanical engineering, alongside atmospheric science, paleontology, and geology.

Their scholarly output includes work categorized under two main fields of study:

  • Engineering
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences

Within these broad disciplines, Eyles focuses on specialized subfields:

  • Ocean Engineering
  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Atmospheric Science
  • Paleontology
  • Geology

Key research topics covered by their publications include:

  • Drilling and Well Engineering
  • Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
  • Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
  • Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
  • Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
  • Geological and Geochemical Analysis
  • Geological formations and processes

Their recent identified publications are:

  • The Laurentian Neoproterozoic Glacial Interval: reappraising the extent and timing of glaciation (2020), published in Mitteilungen der Österreichischen Geologischen Gesellschaft/Austrian journal of earth sciences
  • The Paleoproterozoic (c. 2.3 Ga) Gowganda Formation: Deep water, glacially-influenced debrites and related mass flow along a passive margin (2024), published in Earth-Science Reviews
  • Mapping of glacial erratic boulders for mineral exploration: A review with LiDAR-based examples from modern and ancient glaciated terrains (2025), published in Geomorphology
  • ODP Leg 178, Hole 1103A - Well Logging Data (2021), published by OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University)
  • ODP Leg 178, Hole 1096C - Well Logging Data (2021), published by Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Eyles frequently collaborates with several scientists, including:

  • Angelo Camerlenghi
  • P. F. Barker
  • Gary D Acton
  • Stefanie Brachfeld
  • Ellen A. Cowan

Their work appears recurrently in a select set of publication venues, which include:

  • OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Mitteilungen der Österreichischen Geologischen Gesellschaft/Austrian journal of earth sciences
  • Earth-Science Reviews
  • Geomorphology

Best Publications

  • Lithofacies types and vertical profile models; an alternative approach to the description and environmental interpretation of glacial diamict and diamictite sequences

    Nicholas Eyles;Carolyn H. Eyles;Andrew D. Miall

  • Earth's glacial record and its tectonic setting

    N. Eyles

  • 'Zipper-rift': a tectonic model for Neoproterozoic glaciations during the breakup of Rodinia after 750 Ma

    Nicholas Eyles;Nicole Januszczak

  • Models of glaciomarine sedimentation and their application to the interpretation of ancient glacial sequences

    C.H. Eyles;N. Eyles;A.D. Miall

  • The Late Devensian (<22,000 BP) Irish Sea Basin: The sedimentary record of a collapsed ice sheet margin

    Nicholas Eyles;A. Marshall McCabe

  • Initiation and development of the Laurentide and Cordilleran Ice Sheets following the last interglaciation

    P.U. Clark;J.J. Clague;B. Brandon Curry;A. Dreimanis

  • Facies of supraglacial sedimentation on Icelandic and Alpine temperate glaciers

    Nicholas Eyles

  • Glacio-epochs and the supercontinent cycle after ∼ 3.0 Ga: Tectonic boundary conditions for glaciation

    Nick Eyles

  • Drumlins carved by deforming till streams below the Laurentide ice sheet

    Joseph I. Boyce;Nicholas Eyles

  • Architectural element analysis applied to glacial deposits: Internal geometry of a late Pleistocene till sheet, Ontario, Canada

    Joseph I. Boyce;Nicholas Eyles

  • Sedimentation in a large lake: A reinterpretation of the late Pleistocene stratigraphy at Scarborough Bluffs, Ontario, Canada

    Carolyn H. Eyles;Nicholas Eyles

  • Timing of late Cenozoic tidewater glaciation in the far North Pacific

    Martin B. Lagoe;Carolyn H. Eyles;Nicholas Eyles;Christopher Hale

  • Hummocky moraine: sedimentary record of stagnant Laurentide Ice Sheet lobes resting on soft beds

    N Eyles;J.I Boyce;R.W Barendregt

  • Glaciation and tectonics in an active intracratonic basin: the Late Palaeozoic Itararé Group, Paraná Basin, Brazil

    C. H. Eyles;N. Eyles;A. B. Franca

  • Hydrogeological impacts of road salt from Canada's busiest highway on a Lake Ontario watershed (Frenchman's Bay) and lagoon, City of Pickering.

    Mandana Meriano;Nick Eyles;Ken W.F. Howard

  • A depositional model for stratigraphic complexes and facies superimposition in lodgement tills

    Nicholas Eyles;James A. Sladen;Stephen Gilro

  • GLACIAL GEOLOGY. AN INTRODUCTION FOR ENGINEERS AND EARTH SCIENTISTS

    N Eyles

  • Constraints on the preservation of diamict facies (melt-out tills) at the margins of stagnant glaciers

    M.A. Paul;N. Eyles

  • Coarse-grained sediment gravity flow facies in a large supraglacial lake

    Nicholas Eyles;Bryan M. Clark;John J. Clague

  • Glacial facies models

    Nicholas Eyles;Carolyn Eyles;Andrew D. Miall

Frequent Co-Authors

Carolyn H. Eyles
Carolyn H. Eyles McMaster University
Henry T. Mullins
Henry T. Mullins Syracuse University
Ken W. F. Howard
Ken W. F. Howard University of Toronto
Andrew D. Miall
Andrew D. Miall University of Toronto
John J. Clague
John J. Clague Simon Fraser University
Andrés Maldonado
Andrés Maldonado University of Granada
Tom Bradwell
Tom Bradwell University of Stirling
Carol J. Pudsey
Carol J. Pudsey British Antarctic Survey
Myrna J. Simpson
Myrna J. Simpson University of Toronto
Patricia Chow-Fraser
Patricia Chow-Fraser McMaster University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Earth Science in the USA opens doors to diverse career paths that benefit from interdisciplinary skills. For students interested in enhancing their communication skills, exploring an online MFA creative writing can complement a scientific background by improving storytelling and report writing abilities.

For those leaning towards organizational roles within environmental agencies or research institutions, a specialized administration degree is valuable. Programs like the best online human resource management masters degree equip students with skills to manage teams and navigate workplace complexities effectively.

Many learners seek flexible options to fit their lifestyle or career goals. Seniors or adults returning to education might find one year degree programs for seniors especially appealing, providing a streamlined path to earn relevant credentials quickly.

Additionally, those interested in digital libraries, data curation, or archiving scientific research should consider ALA-accredited schools, offering respected programs that prepare graduates for careers managing information in scientific fields.

Best Scientists Citing Nicholas Eyles

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles