World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Nicholas Eyles

Nicholas Eyles

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Earth Science 60 1942 1753 84 73 220 10943

Nicholas Eyles publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Nicholas Eyles between 1976 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Nicholas Eyles published across 50 years, from 1976 to 2025, averaging 4.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 1989. 3 of the 218 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1976 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 1989. 1976: 3 publications 1977: 4 publications 1978: 3 publications 1979: 2 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 3 publications 1982: 3 publications 1983: 9 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 6 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 7 publications 1988: 8 publications 1989: 10 publications 1990: 8 publications 1991: 8 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 6 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 7 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 2 publications
1976 2025

218 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Nicholas Eyles: publications per year, 1976 to 2025
Year Publications
1976 3
1977 4
1978 3
1979 2
1980 0
1981 3
1982 3
1983 9
1984 3
1985 6
1986 1
1987 7
1988 8
1989 10
1990 8
1991 8
1992 4
1993 6
1994 6
1995 7
1996 3
1997 5
1998 6
1999 3
2000 2
2001 7
2002 4
2003 6
2004 2
2005 2
2006 3
2007 10
2008 4
2009 4
2010 4
2011 6
2012 4
2013 5
2014 2
2015 6
2016 7
2017 3
2018 5
2019 3
2020 5
2021 3
2022 0
2023 0
2024 1
2025 2
Total 218
Download as CSV

Nicholas Eyles publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicholas Eyles sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 603+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 557. Most scientists, 557, have 128–137 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 218–227 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 5 scientists 48–57 publications: 33 scientists 58–67 publications: 94 scientists 68–77 publications: 161 scientists 78–87 publications: 278 scientists 88–97 publications: 376 scientists 98–107 publications: 404 scientists 108–117 publications: 484 scientists 118–127 publications: 540 scientists 128–137 publications: 557 scientists 138–147 publications: 491 scientists 148–157 publications: 495 scientists 158–167 publications: 458 scientists 168–177 publications: 490 scientists 178–187 publications: 414 scientists 188–197 publications: 401 scientists 198–207 publications: 333 scientists 208–217 publications: 292 scientists 218–227 publications: 290 scientists 228–237 publications: 262 scientists 238–247 publications: 243 scientists 248–257 publications: 208 scientists 258–267 publications: 185 scientists 268–277 publications: 147 scientists 278–287 publications: 128 scientists 288–297 publications: 119 scientists 298–307 publications: 120 scientists 308–317 publications: 107 scientists 318–327 publications: 93 scientists 328–337 publications: 87 scientists 338–347 publications: 64 scientists 348–357 publications: 87 scientists 358–367 publications: 60 scientists 368–377 publications: 60 scientists 378–387 publications: 34 scientists 388–397 publications: 50 scientists 398–407 publications: 44 scientists 408–417 publications: 31 scientists 418–427 publications: 39 scientists 428–437 publications: 27 scientists 438–447 publications: 36 scientists 448–457 publications: 27 scientists 458–467 publications: 29 scientists 468–477 publications: 30 scientists 478–487 publications: 19 scientists 488–497 publications: 15 scientists 498–507 publications: 18 scientists 508–517 publications: 19 scientists 518–527 publications: 16 scientists 528–537 publications: 10 scientists 538–547 publications: 11 scientists 548–557 publications: 14 scientists 558–567 publications: 11 scientists 568–577 publications: 7 scientists 578–587 publications: 14 scientists 588–597 publications: 5 scientists 598–602 publications: 4 scientists 603+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 603+

This scientist: 220 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 5
48–57 33
58–67 94
68–77 161
78–87 278
88–97 376
98–107 404
108–117 484
118–127 540
128–137 557
138–147 491
148–157 495
158–167 458
168–177 490
178–187 414
188–197 401
198–207 333
208–217 292
218–227 290 220
228–237 262
238–247 243
248–257 208
258–267 185
268–277 147
278–287 128
288–297 119
298–307 120
308–317 107
318–327 93
328–337 87
338–347 64
348–357 87
358–367 60
368–377 60
378–387 34
388–397 50
398–407 44
408–417 31
418–427 39
428–437 27
438–447 36
448–457 27
458–467 29
468–477 30
478–487 19
488–497 15
498–507 18
508–517 19
518–527 16
528–537 10
538–547 11
548–557 14
558–567 11
568–577 7
578–587 14
588–597 5
598–602 4
603+ 100
Download as CSV

Nicholas Eyles D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicholas Eyles sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 77 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 106+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 389. Most scientists, 389, have 36 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 60 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 144 scientists 31 D-Index: 215 scientists 32 D-Index: 278 scientists 33 D-Index: 379 scientists 34 D-Index: 366 scientists 35 D-Index: 372 scientists 36 D-Index: 389 scientists 37 D-Index: 366 scientists 38 D-Index: 344 scientists 39 D-Index: 349 scientists 40 D-Index: 296 scientists 41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42 D-Index: 277 scientists 43 D-Index: 279 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 257 scientists 46 D-Index: 212 scientists 47 D-Index: 202 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 204 scientists 50 D-Index: 183 scientists 51 D-Index: 178 scientists 52 D-Index: 182 scientists 53 D-Index: 178 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 117 scientists 56 D-Index: 163 scientists 57 D-Index: 120 scientists 58 D-Index: 113 scientists 59 D-Index: 136 scientists 60 D-Index: 135 scientists 61 D-Index: 96 scientists 62 D-Index: 103 scientists 63 D-Index: 83 scientists 64 D-Index: 103 scientists 65 D-Index: 83 scientists 66 D-Index: 89 scientists 67 D-Index: 92 scientists 68 D-Index: 89 scientists 69 D-Index: 78 scientists 70 D-Index: 75 scientists 71 D-Index: 53 scientists 72 D-Index: 62 scientists 73 D-Index: 54 scientists 74 D-Index: 35 scientists 75 D-Index: 52 scientists 76 D-Index: 50 scientists 77 D-Index: 32 scientists 78 D-Index: 37 scientists 79 D-Index: 20 scientists 80 D-Index: 33 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 34 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 24 scientists 85 D-Index: 19 scientists 86 D-Index: 18 scientists 87 D-Index: 26 scientists 88 D-Index: 30 scientists 89 D-Index: 17 scientists 90 D-Index: 21 scientists 91 D-Index: 19 scientists 92 D-Index: 15 scientists 93 D-Index: 14 scientists 94 D-Index: 20 scientists 95 D-Index: 9 scientists 96 D-Index: 10 scientists 97 D-Index: 15 scientists 98 D-Index: 13 scientists 99 D-Index: 3 scientists 100 D-Index: 13 scientists 101 D-Index: 3 scientists 102 D-Index: 9 scientists 103 D-Index: 4 scientists 104 D-Index: 6 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 106+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 144
31 215
32 278
33 379
34 366
35 372
36 389
37 366
38 344
39 349
40 296
41 289
42 277
43 279
44 248
45 257
46 212
47 202
48 207
49 204
50 183
51 178
52 182
53 178
54 163
55 117
56 163
57 120
58 113
59 136
60 135 60
61 96
62 103
63 83
64 103
65 83
66 89
67 92
68 89
69 78
70 75
71 53
72 62
73 54
74 35
75 52
76 50
77 32
78 37
79 20
80 33
81 36
82 34
83 34
84 24
85 19
86 18
87 26
88 30
89 17
90 21
91 19
92 15
93 14
94 20
95 9
96 10
97 15
98 13
99 3
100 13
101 3
102 9
103 4
104 6
105 6
106+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Nicholas Eyles is affiliated with the University of Toronto in Canada, contributing extensively to fields intersecting engineering and Earth sciences. Their research engages primarily with areas of ocean and mechanical engineering, alongside atmospheric science, paleontology, and geology.

Their scholarly output includes work categorized under two main fields of study:

  • Engineering
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences

Within these broad disciplines, Eyles focuses on specialized subfields:

  • Ocean Engineering
  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Atmospheric Science
  • Paleontology
  • Geology

Key research topics covered by their publications include:

  • Drilling and Well Engineering
  • Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
  • Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
  • Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
  • Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
  • Geological and Geochemical Analysis
  • Geological formations and processes

Their recent identified publications are:

  • The Laurentian Neoproterozoic Glacial Interval: reappraising the extent and timing of glaciation (2020), published in Mitteilungen der Österreichischen Geologischen Gesellschaft/Austrian journal of earth sciences
  • The Paleoproterozoic (c. 2.3 Ga) Gowganda Formation: Deep water, glacially-influenced debrites and related mass flow along a passive margin (2024), published in Earth-Science Reviews
  • Mapping of glacial erratic boulders for mineral exploration: A review with LiDAR-based examples from modern and ancient glaciated terrains (2025), published in Geomorphology
  • ODP Leg 178, Hole 1103A - Well Logging Data (2021), published by OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University)
  • ODP Leg 178, Hole 1096C - Well Logging Data (2021), published by Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Eyles frequently collaborates with several scientists, including:

  • Angelo Camerlenghi
  • P. F. Barker
  • Gary D Acton
  • Stefanie Brachfeld
  • Ellen A. Cowan

Their work appears recurrently in a select set of publication venues, which include:

  • OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Mitteilungen der Österreichischen Geologischen Gesellschaft/Austrian journal of earth sciences
  • Earth-Science Reviews
  • Geomorphology

Best Publications

  • Lithofacies types and vertical profile models; an alternative approach to the description and environmental interpretation of glacial diamict and diamictite sequences

    Nicholas Eyles;Carolyn H. Eyles;Andrew D. Miall

  • Earth's glacial record and its tectonic setting

    N. Eyles

  • 'Zipper-rift': a tectonic model for Neoproterozoic glaciations during the breakup of Rodinia after 750 Ma

    Nicholas Eyles;Nicole Januszczak

  • Models of glaciomarine sedimentation and their application to the interpretation of ancient glacial sequences

    C.H. Eyles;N. Eyles;A.D. Miall

  • The Late Devensian (<22,000 BP) Irish Sea Basin: The sedimentary record of a collapsed ice sheet margin

    Nicholas Eyles;A. Marshall McCabe

  • Initiation and development of the Laurentide and Cordilleran Ice Sheets following the last interglaciation

    P.U. Clark;J.J. Clague;B. Brandon Curry;A. Dreimanis

  • Facies of supraglacial sedimentation on Icelandic and Alpine temperate glaciers

    Nicholas Eyles

  • Glacio-epochs and the supercontinent cycle after ∼ 3.0 Ga: Tectonic boundary conditions for glaciation

    Nick Eyles

  • Drumlins carved by deforming till streams below the Laurentide ice sheet

    Joseph I. Boyce;Nicholas Eyles

  • Architectural element analysis applied to glacial deposits: Internal geometry of a late Pleistocene till sheet, Ontario, Canada

    Joseph I. Boyce;Nicholas Eyles

  • Sedimentation in a large lake: A reinterpretation of the late Pleistocene stratigraphy at Scarborough Bluffs, Ontario, Canada

    Carolyn H. Eyles;Nicholas Eyles

  • Timing of late Cenozoic tidewater glaciation in the far North Pacific

    Martin B. Lagoe;Carolyn H. Eyles;Nicholas Eyles;Christopher Hale

  • Hummocky moraine: sedimentary record of stagnant Laurentide Ice Sheet lobes resting on soft beds

    N Eyles;J.I Boyce;R.W Barendregt

  • Glaciation and tectonics in an active intracratonic basin: the Late Palaeozoic Itararé Group, Paraná Basin, Brazil

    C. H. Eyles;N. Eyles;A. B. Franca

  • Hydrogeological impacts of road salt from Canada's busiest highway on a Lake Ontario watershed (Frenchman's Bay) and lagoon, City of Pickering.

    Mandana Meriano;Nick Eyles;Ken W.F. Howard

  • A depositional model for stratigraphic complexes and facies superimposition in lodgement tills

    Nicholas Eyles;James A. Sladen;Stephen Gilro

  • GLACIAL GEOLOGY. AN INTRODUCTION FOR ENGINEERS AND EARTH SCIENTISTS

    N Eyles

  • Constraints on the preservation of diamict facies (melt-out tills) at the margins of stagnant glaciers

    M.A. Paul;N. Eyles

  • Coarse-grained sediment gravity flow facies in a large supraglacial lake

    Nicholas Eyles;Bryan M. Clark;John J. Clague

  • Glacial facies models

    Nicholas Eyles;Carolyn Eyles;Andrew D. Miall

Frequent Co-Authors

Carolyn H. Eyles
Carolyn H. Eyles McMaster University
Henry T. Mullins
Henry T. Mullins Syracuse University
Ken W. F. Howard
Ken W. F. Howard University of Toronto
Andrew D. Miall
Andrew D. Miall University of Toronto
John J. Clague
John J. Clague Simon Fraser University
Andrés Maldonado
Andrés Maldonado University of Granada
Tom Bradwell
Tom Bradwell University of Stirling
Carol J. Pudsey
Carol J. Pudsey British Antarctic Survey
Myrna J. Simpson
Myrna J. Simpson University of Toronto
Patricia Chow-Fraser
Patricia Chow-Fraser McMaster University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Earth Science in the USA opens doors to diverse career paths that benefit from interdisciplinary skills. For students interested in enhancing their communication skills, exploring an online MFA creative writing can complement a scientific background by improving storytelling and report writing abilities.

For those leaning towards organizational roles within environmental agencies or research institutions, a specialized administration degree is valuable. Programs like the best online human resource management masters degree equip students with skills to manage teams and navigate workplace complexities effectively.

Many learners seek flexible options to fit their lifestyle or career goals. Seniors or adults returning to education might find one year degree programs for seniors especially appealing, providing a streamlined path to earn relevant credentials quickly.

Additionally, those interested in digital libraries, data curation, or archiving scientific research should consider ALA-accredited schools, offering respected programs that prepare graduates for careers managing information in scientific fields.

Best Scientists Citing Nicholas Eyles

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles