World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Earth Science 41 5509 5094 2032 1804 114 6641

Richard Hey publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Richard Hey between 1957 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Richard Hey published across 65 years, from 1957 to 2021, averaging 1.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2019. 3 of the 121 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1957 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2019. 1957: 1 publication 1958: 0 publications 1959: 1 publication 1960: 1 publication 1961: 1 publication 1962: 0 publications 1963: 0 publications 1964: 0 publications 1965: 1 publication 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 1 publication 1973: 1 publication 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 3 publications 1977: 4 publications 1978: 1 publication 1979: 3 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 2 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 3 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 5 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 7 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 5 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 3 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 1 publication 2010: 1 publication 2011: 1 publication 2012: 3 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 3 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 1 publication
1957 2021

121 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Richard Hey: publications per year, 1957 to 2021
Year Publications
1957 1
1958 0
1959 1
1960 1
1961 1
1962 0
1963 0
1964 0
1965 1
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 1
1973 1
1974 0
1975 0
1976 3
1977 4
1978 1
1979 3
1980 1
1981 2
1982 1
1983 3
1984 3
1985 3
1986 5
1987 0
1988 2
1989 7
1990 1
1991 5
1992 3
1993 1
1994 0
1995 4
1996 2
1997 3
1998 3
1999 0
2000 0
2001 2
2002 2
2003 0
2004 2
2005 4
2006 1
2007 3
2008 1
2009 1
2010 1
2011 1
2012 3
2013 4
2014 3
2015 1
2016 3
2017 7
2018 2
2019 10
2020 2
2021 1
Total 121
Download as CSV

Richard Hey publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard Hey sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 603+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 557. Most scientists, 557, have 128–137 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 108–117 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 5 scientists 48–57 publications: 33 scientists 58–67 publications: 94 scientists 68–77 publications: 161 scientists 78–87 publications: 278 scientists 88–97 publications: 376 scientists 98–107 publications: 404 scientists 108–117 publications: 484 scientists 118–127 publications: 540 scientists 128–137 publications: 557 scientists 138–147 publications: 491 scientists 148–157 publications: 495 scientists 158–167 publications: 458 scientists 168–177 publications: 490 scientists 178–187 publications: 414 scientists 188–197 publications: 401 scientists 198–207 publications: 333 scientists 208–217 publications: 292 scientists 218–227 publications: 290 scientists 228–237 publications: 262 scientists 238–247 publications: 243 scientists 248–257 publications: 208 scientists 258–267 publications: 185 scientists 268–277 publications: 147 scientists 278–287 publications: 128 scientists 288–297 publications: 119 scientists 298–307 publications: 120 scientists 308–317 publications: 107 scientists 318–327 publications: 93 scientists 328–337 publications: 87 scientists 338–347 publications: 64 scientists 348–357 publications: 87 scientists 358–367 publications: 60 scientists 368–377 publications: 60 scientists 378–387 publications: 34 scientists 388–397 publications: 50 scientists 398–407 publications: 44 scientists 408–417 publications: 31 scientists 418–427 publications: 39 scientists 428–437 publications: 27 scientists 438–447 publications: 36 scientists 448–457 publications: 27 scientists 458–467 publications: 29 scientists 468–477 publications: 30 scientists 478–487 publications: 19 scientists 488–497 publications: 15 scientists 498–507 publications: 18 scientists 508–517 publications: 19 scientists 518–527 publications: 16 scientists 528–537 publications: 10 scientists 538–547 publications: 11 scientists 548–557 publications: 14 scientists 558–567 publications: 11 scientists 568–577 publications: 7 scientists 578–587 publications: 14 scientists 588–597 publications: 5 scientists 598–602 publications: 4 scientists 603+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 603+

This scientist: 114 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 5
48–57 33
58–67 94
68–77 161
78–87 278
88–97 376
98–107 404
108–117 484 114
118–127 540
128–137 557
138–147 491
148–157 495
158–167 458
168–177 490
178–187 414
188–197 401
198–207 333
208–217 292
218–227 290
228–237 262
238–247 243
248–257 208
258–267 185
268–277 147
278–287 128
288–297 119
298–307 120
308–317 107
318–327 93
328–337 87
338–347 64
348–357 87
358–367 60
368–377 60
378–387 34
388–397 50
398–407 44
408–417 31
418–427 39
428–437 27
438–447 36
448–457 27
458–467 29
468–477 30
478–487 19
488–497 15
498–507 18
508–517 19
518–527 16
528–537 10
538–547 11
548–557 14
558–567 11
568–577 7
578–587 14
588–597 5
598–602 4
603+ 100
Download as CSV

Richard Hey D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard Hey sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 77 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 106+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 389. Most scientists, 389, have 36 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 144 scientists 31 D-Index: 215 scientists 32 D-Index: 278 scientists 33 D-Index: 379 scientists 34 D-Index: 366 scientists 35 D-Index: 372 scientists 36 D-Index: 389 scientists 37 D-Index: 366 scientists 38 D-Index: 344 scientists 39 D-Index: 349 scientists 40 D-Index: 296 scientists 41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42 D-Index: 277 scientists 43 D-Index: 279 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 257 scientists 46 D-Index: 212 scientists 47 D-Index: 202 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 204 scientists 50 D-Index: 183 scientists 51 D-Index: 178 scientists 52 D-Index: 182 scientists 53 D-Index: 178 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 117 scientists 56 D-Index: 163 scientists 57 D-Index: 120 scientists 58 D-Index: 113 scientists 59 D-Index: 136 scientists 60 D-Index: 135 scientists 61 D-Index: 96 scientists 62 D-Index: 103 scientists 63 D-Index: 83 scientists 64 D-Index: 103 scientists 65 D-Index: 83 scientists 66 D-Index: 89 scientists 67 D-Index: 92 scientists 68 D-Index: 89 scientists 69 D-Index: 78 scientists 70 D-Index: 75 scientists 71 D-Index: 53 scientists 72 D-Index: 62 scientists 73 D-Index: 54 scientists 74 D-Index: 35 scientists 75 D-Index: 52 scientists 76 D-Index: 50 scientists 77 D-Index: 32 scientists 78 D-Index: 37 scientists 79 D-Index: 20 scientists 80 D-Index: 33 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 34 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 24 scientists 85 D-Index: 19 scientists 86 D-Index: 18 scientists 87 D-Index: 26 scientists 88 D-Index: 30 scientists 89 D-Index: 17 scientists 90 D-Index: 21 scientists 91 D-Index: 19 scientists 92 D-Index: 15 scientists 93 D-Index: 14 scientists 94 D-Index: 20 scientists 95 D-Index: 9 scientists 96 D-Index: 10 scientists 97 D-Index: 15 scientists 98 D-Index: 13 scientists 99 D-Index: 3 scientists 100 D-Index: 13 scientists 101 D-Index: 3 scientists 102 D-Index: 9 scientists 103 D-Index: 4 scientists 104 D-Index: 6 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 106+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 144
31 215
32 278
33 379
34 366
35 372
36 389
37 366
38 344
39 349
40 296
41 289 41
42 277
43 279
44 248
45 257
46 212
47 202
48 207
49 204
50 183
51 178
52 182
53 178
54 163
55 117
56 163
57 120
58 113
59 136
60 135
61 96
62 103
63 83
64 103
65 83
66 89
67 92
68 89
69 78
70 75
71 53
72 62
73 54
74 35
75 52
76 50
77 32
78 37
79 20
80 33
81 36
82 34
83 34
84 24
85 19
86 18
87 26
88 30
89 17
90 21
91 19
92 15
93 14
94 20
95 9
96 10
97 15
98 13
99 3
100 13
101 3
102 9
103 4
104 6
105 6
106+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Plate tectonics
  • Volcano
  • Basalt

His scientific interests lie mostly in Seismology, Rift, Magnetic anomaly, Plate tectonics and Tectonics. His research related to Hotspot and Mid-ocean ridge might be considered part of Seismology. His Rift study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Transform fault, Seafloor spreading and Bathymetry.

Richard Hey focuses mostly in the field of Magnetic anomaly, narrowing it down to matters related to Ridge and, in some cases, Lava. In his study, which falls under the umbrella issue of Plate tectonics, Echelon formation, Fracture, Farallon Plate, Fault scarp and Triple junction is strongly linked to Fracture zone. His work on Lithosphere and Rift zone is typically connected to Clockwise as part of general Tectonics study, connecting several disciplines of science.

His most cited work include:

  • Tectonic evolution of the Cocos-Nazca spreading center (344 citations)
  • Propagating rifts on midocean ridges (274 citations)
  • A new class of “pseudofaults” and their bearing on plate tectonics: A propagating rift model (253 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His main research concerns Seismology, Rift, Paleontology, Seafloor spreading and Plate tectonics. His work deals with themes such as Bathymetry and Magnetic anomaly, which intersect with Seismology. The Magnetic anomaly study combines topics in areas such as Fracture zone, Juan de Fuca Plate and Oceanic crust.

His Rift research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Ridge, Lithosphere and Crust. His Paleontology research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Triple junction, Oceanography and Ridge. The Seafloor spreading study which covers Volcano that intersects with Seamount.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Seismology (53.21%)
  • Rift (47.71%)
  • Paleontology (28.44%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2014-2021)?

  • Ridge (14.68%)
  • Seismology (53.21%)
  • Paleontology (28.44%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His primary areas of study are Ridge, Seismology, Paleontology, Transform fault and Plate tectonics. His work carried out in the field of Ridge brings together such families of science as Cruise, Geophysics, Tectonophysics and Volcanology. Seismology is often connected to Seafloor spreading in his work.

His Tectonics study, which is part of a larger body of work in Paleontology, is frequently linked to Icelandic, bridging the gap between disciplines. His studies in Rift and Oceanic crust are all subfields of Tectonics research. His Plate tectonics research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Mantle plume and Mid-ocean ridge.

Between 2014 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • The Iceland Microcontinent and a continental Greenland-Iceland-Faroe Ridge (17 citations)
  • Propagating buoyant mantle upwelling on the Reykjanes Ridge (9 citations)
  • Multibeam investigation of the active North Atlantic plate boundary reorganization tip (8 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Plate tectonics
  • Volcano
  • Basalt

Richard Hey mainly investigates Paleontology, Plate tectonics, Transform fault, Mantle and Tectonics. His Plate tectonics study is focused on Seismology in general. His Seismology study often links to related topics such as Seafloor spreading.

Richard Hey has included themes like Mantle plume and Ridge in his Mantle study. His Ridge study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Mantle wedge, Mantle convection and Geophysics, Hotspot. His Tectonics research is mostly focused on the topic Rift.

Best Publications

  • Tectonic evolution of the Cocos-Nazca spreading center

    Richard Hey

  • Propagating rifts on midocean ridges

    Richard Hey;Frederick K. Duennebier;W. Jason Morgan

  • A new class of “pseudofaults” and their bearing on plate tectonics: A propagating rift model

    Richard Hey

  • Petrologic consequences of rift propagation on oceanic spreading ridges

    John M. Sinton;Douglas S. Wilson;David M. Christie;Richard N. Hey

  • Continental rifting and initial sea-floor spreading in the Woodlark basin

    Brian Taylor;Andrew Goodliffe;Fernando Martinez;Richard Hey

  • The Galapagos Triple Junction and Plate Motions in the East Pacific

    Richard N. Hey;K. S. Deffeyes;G. Leonard Johnson;Allen Lowrie

  • Recent plate motions in the Galapagos area

    Richard Hey;G. Leonard Johnson;Allen Lowrie

  • Subduction of Aseismic Oceanic Ridges: Effects on Shape, Seismicity, and Other Characteristics of Consuming Plate Boundaries

    P. R. Vogt;A. Lowrie;D. R. Bracey;R. N. Hey

  • Sea Beam/Deep-Tow Investigation of an active oceanic propagating rift system, Galapagos 95.5°W

    R. N. Hey;M. C. Kleinrock;S. P. Miller;T. M. Atwater

  • Tectonic evolution of the Easter Microplate

    David F. Naar;R. N. Hey

  • History of rift propagation and magnetization intensity for the Cocos-Nazca sspreading Center

    Douglas S. Wilson;Richard N. Hey

  • Propagation as a mechanism of reorientation of the Juan de Fuca Ridge

    Douglas S. Wilson;Richard N. Hey;Clyde Nishimura

  • Paleoceanography of the tropical eastern pacific ocean.

    Richard W. Grigg;Richard Hey

  • The Bouvet Triple Junction

    J. G. Sclater;C. Bowin;R. Hey;H. Hoskins

  • Microplate tectonics along a superfast seafloor spreading system near Easter Island

    R. N. Hey;D. F. Naar;M. C. Kleinrock;W. J. Phipps Morgan

  • Propagating rift explanation for the tectonic evolution of the northeast Pacific—the pseudomovie

    R.N. Hey;D.S. Wilson

  • Spreading center jumps and sub-axial asthenosphere flow near the Galapagos hotspot

    Richard Hey;Richard Hey;Peter Vogt;Peter Vogt

  • Easter microplate evolution

    J.-G. Schilling;H. Sigurdsson;A. N. Davis;R. N. Hey

  • Comprehensive sonar imaging of the Easter microplate

    R. C. Searle;R. I. Rusby;R. I. Rusby;J. Engeln;R. N. Hey

  • Detailed tectonics near the tip of the Galapagos 95.5°W propagator: How the lithosphere tears and a spreading axis develops

    Martin C. Kleinrock;R. N. Hey

  • Plate boundary reorganization at a large-offset, rapidly propagating rift

    R. N. Hey;P. D. Johnson;F. Martinez;J. Korenaga

Frequent Co-Authors

Fernando Martinez
Fernando Martinez University of Hawaii at Manoa
Ármann Höskuldsson
Ármann Höskuldsson University of Iceland
David F. Naar
David F. Naar University of South Florida
DelWayne R. Bohnenstiehl
DelWayne R. Bohnenstiehl North Carolina State University
Roger C. Searle
Roger C. Searle Durham University
Douglas S. Wilson
Douglas S. Wilson University of California, Santa Barbara
Gary J. Massoth
Gary J. Massoth Mass-Ex3 Consulting LLC
Edward T. Baker
Edward T. Baker Joint Institute for the Study of the Atmosphere and Ocean
Roger Hekinian
Roger Hekinian French Research Institute for Exploitation of the Sea
John E. Lupton
John E. Lupton Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Earth Science in the USA opens doors to diverse career pathways that extend beyond traditional geosciences. Many students complement their studies with interdisciplinary skills by pursuing related online degrees. For example, those interested in language skills and cultural exchange can find affordable opportunities through online degrees in Spanish, which enhance communication in global environmental fields.

Veterans seeking flexible and supportive programs may benefit from tailored options highlighted in the best online Spanish degree programs for veterans, combining their discipline with valuable language proficiency in environmental consulting or policy roles.

Creative individuals might explore blending Earth Science with visual storytelling by examining the online MFA visual arts programs, which can amplify careers in environmental education, media, and design. Additionally, students aiming for leadership roles within scientific organizations should consider the best online masters degree in human resource management programs to develop strong management and organizational skills.

Choosing the right online degree can provide flexibility, affordability, and specialized knowledge, which are crucial for a dynamic career in Earth Science and its related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Richard Hey

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles