World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Earth Science

D-Index
41
Citations
6641
World Ranking
5509
National Ranking
2032

Richard Hey publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard Hey sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

This scientist: 114 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Richard Hey D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard Hey sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Plate tectonics
  • Volcano
  • Basalt

His scientific interests lie mostly in Seismology, Rift, Magnetic anomaly, Plate tectonics and Tectonics. His research related to Hotspot and Mid-ocean ridge might be considered part of Seismology. His Rift study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Transform fault, Seafloor spreading and Bathymetry.

Richard Hey focuses mostly in the field of Magnetic anomaly, narrowing it down to matters related to Ridge and, in some cases, Lava. In his study, which falls under the umbrella issue of Plate tectonics, Echelon formation, Fracture, Farallon Plate, Fault scarp and Triple junction is strongly linked to Fracture zone. His work on Lithosphere and Rift zone is typically connected to Clockwise as part of general Tectonics study, connecting several disciplines of science.

His most cited work include:

  • Tectonic evolution of the Cocos-Nazca spreading center (344 citations)
  • Propagating rifts on midocean ridges (274 citations)
  • A new class of “pseudofaults” and their bearing on plate tectonics: A propagating rift model (253 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His main research concerns Seismology, Rift, Paleontology, Seafloor spreading and Plate tectonics. His work deals with themes such as Bathymetry and Magnetic anomaly, which intersect with Seismology. The Magnetic anomaly study combines topics in areas such as Fracture zone, Juan de Fuca Plate and Oceanic crust.

His Rift research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Ridge, Lithosphere and Crust. His Paleontology research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Triple junction, Oceanography and Ridge. The Seafloor spreading study which covers Volcano that intersects with Seamount.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Seismology (53.21%)
  • Rift (47.71%)
  • Paleontology (28.44%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2014-2021)?

  • Ridge (14.68%)
  • Seismology (53.21%)
  • Paleontology (28.44%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His primary areas of study are Ridge, Seismology, Paleontology, Transform fault and Plate tectonics. His work carried out in the field of Ridge brings together such families of science as Cruise, Geophysics, Tectonophysics and Volcanology. Seismology is often connected to Seafloor spreading in his work.

His Tectonics study, which is part of a larger body of work in Paleontology, is frequently linked to Icelandic, bridging the gap between disciplines. His studies in Rift and Oceanic crust are all subfields of Tectonics research. His Plate tectonics research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Mantle plume and Mid-ocean ridge.

Between 2014 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • The Iceland Microcontinent and a continental Greenland-Iceland-Faroe Ridge (17 citations)
  • Propagating buoyant mantle upwelling on the Reykjanes Ridge (9 citations)
  • Multibeam investigation of the active North Atlantic plate boundary reorganization tip (8 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Plate tectonics
  • Volcano
  • Basalt

Richard Hey mainly investigates Paleontology, Plate tectonics, Transform fault, Mantle and Tectonics. His Plate tectonics study is focused on Seismology in general. His Seismology study often links to related topics such as Seafloor spreading.

Richard Hey has included themes like Mantle plume and Ridge in his Mantle study. His Ridge study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Mantle wedge, Mantle convection and Geophysics, Hotspot. His Tectonics research is mostly focused on the topic Rift.

Best Publications

  • Tectonic evolution of the Cocos-Nazca spreading center

    Richard Hey

  • Propagating rifts on midocean ridges

    Richard Hey;Frederick K. Duennebier;W. Jason Morgan

  • A new class of “pseudofaults” and their bearing on plate tectonics: A propagating rift model

    Richard Hey

  • Petrologic consequences of rift propagation on oceanic spreading ridges

    John M. Sinton;Douglas S. Wilson;David M. Christie;Richard N. Hey

  • Continental rifting and initial sea-floor spreading in the Woodlark basin

    Brian Taylor;Andrew Goodliffe;Fernando Martinez;Richard Hey

  • The Galapagos Triple Junction and Plate Motions in the East Pacific

    Richard N. Hey;K. S. Deffeyes;G. Leonard Johnson;Allen Lowrie

  • Recent plate motions in the Galapagos area

    Richard Hey;G. Leonard Johnson;Allen Lowrie

  • Subduction of Aseismic Oceanic Ridges: Effects on Shape, Seismicity, and Other Characteristics of Consuming Plate Boundaries

    P. R. Vogt;A. Lowrie;D. R. Bracey;R. N. Hey

  • Sea Beam/Deep-Tow Investigation of an active oceanic propagating rift system, Galapagos 95.5°W

    R. N. Hey;M. C. Kleinrock;S. P. Miller;T. M. Atwater

  • Tectonic evolution of the Easter Microplate

    David F. Naar;R. N. Hey

  • History of rift propagation and magnetization intensity for the Cocos-Nazca sspreading Center

    Douglas S. Wilson;Richard N. Hey

  • Propagation as a mechanism of reorientation of the Juan de Fuca Ridge

    Douglas S. Wilson;Richard N. Hey;Clyde Nishimura

  • Paleoceanography of the tropical eastern pacific ocean.

    Richard W. Grigg;Richard Hey

  • The Bouvet Triple Junction

    J. G. Sclater;C. Bowin;R. Hey;H. Hoskins

  • Microplate tectonics along a superfast seafloor spreading system near Easter Island

    R. N. Hey;D. F. Naar;M. C. Kleinrock;W. J. Phipps Morgan

  • Propagating rift explanation for the tectonic evolution of the northeast Pacific—the pseudomovie

    R.N. Hey;D.S. Wilson

  • Spreading center jumps and sub-axial asthenosphere flow near the Galapagos hotspot

    Richard Hey;Richard Hey;Peter Vogt;Peter Vogt

  • Easter microplate evolution

    J.-G. Schilling;H. Sigurdsson;A. N. Davis;R. N. Hey

  • Comprehensive sonar imaging of the Easter microplate

    R. C. Searle;R. I. Rusby;R. I. Rusby;J. Engeln;R. N. Hey

  • Detailed tectonics near the tip of the Galapagos 95.5°W propagator: How the lithosphere tears and a spreading axis develops

    Martin C. Kleinrock;R. N. Hey

  • Plate boundary reorganization at a large-offset, rapidly propagating rift

    R. N. Hey;P. D. Johnson;F. Martinez;J. Korenaga

Frequent Co-Authors

Fernando Martinez
Fernando Martinez University of Hawaii at Manoa
Ármann Höskuldsson
Ármann Höskuldsson University of Iceland
David F. Naar
David F. Naar University of South Florida
DelWayne R. Bohnenstiehl
DelWayne R. Bohnenstiehl North Carolina State University
Roger C. Searle
Roger C. Searle Durham University
Douglas S. Wilson
Douglas S. Wilson University of California, Santa Barbara
Gary J. Massoth
Gary J. Massoth Mass-Ex3 Consulting LLC
Edward T. Baker
Edward T. Baker Joint Institute for the Study of the Atmosphere and Ocean
Roger Hekinian
Roger Hekinian French Research Institute for Exploitation of the Sea
John E. Lupton
John E. Lupton Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Earth Science in the USA opens doors to diverse career pathways that extend beyond traditional geosciences. Many students complement their studies with interdisciplinary skills by pursuing related online degrees. For example, those interested in language skills and cultural exchange can find affordable opportunities through online degrees in Spanish, which enhance communication in global environmental fields.

Veterans seeking flexible and supportive programs may benefit from tailored options highlighted in the best online Spanish degree programs for veterans, combining their discipline with valuable language proficiency in environmental consulting or policy roles.

Creative individuals might explore blending Earth Science with visual storytelling by examining the online MFA visual arts programs, which can amplify careers in environmental education, media, and design. Additionally, students aiming for leadership roles within scientific organizations should consider the best online masters degree in human resource management programs to develop strong management and organizational skills.

Choosing the right online degree can provide flexibility, affordability, and specialized knowledge, which are crucial for a dynamic career in Earth Science and its related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Richard Hey

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles