World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Peter Giacobbe

Peter Giacobbe

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
48
Citations
11948
World Ranking
6115
National Ranking
353

Peter Giacobbe publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Giacobbe sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 192 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Peter Giacobbe D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Giacobbe sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter Giacobbe is affiliated with the University of Toronto in Canada and has contributed extensively to the fields of medicine and neuroscience, with significant emphasis on neurology and cognitive neuroscience. Their research intersects with clinical psychology, cellular and molecular neuroscience, and pharmacology, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach to understanding brain function and mental health disorders.

The scientist's recent work includes several notable publications focusing on psychiatric and neurological treatments. Key papers include:

  • Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) 2023 Update on Clinical Guidelines for Management of Major Depressive Disorder in Adults, 2024, The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry
  • Probabilistic Mapping of Deep Brain Stimulation: Insights from 15 Years of Therapy, 2020, Annals of Neurology
  • Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound capsulotomy for refractory obsessive compulsive disorder and major depressive disorder: clinical and imaging results from two phase I trials, 2020, Molecular Psychiatry
  • Use of Machine Learning for Predicting Escitalopram Treatment Outcome From Electroencephalography Recordings in Adult Patients With Depression, 2020, JAMA Network Open
  • Treatment-resistant major depressive disorder: Canadian expert consensus on definition and assessment, 2021, Depression and Anxiety

Frequent coauthors in their research include:

  • Nir Lipsman
  • Clement Hamani
  • Jennifer S. Rabin
  • Sean M. Nestor
  • Benjamin Davidson

Peter Giacobbe has published regularly in a variety of scientific journals. The most frequent venues for their work are:

  • Biological Psychiatry
  • The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry
  • Brain Stimulation
  • Neuromodulation Technology at the Neural Interface
  • Journal of Affective Disorders

Their research topics broadly cover neurological disorders and treatments, with particular focus areas in:

  • Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Treatment of Major Depression
  • Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications

Overall, Peter Giacobbe's scientific work emphasizes the clinical and therapeutic aspects of brain disorders, using advanced neuroimaging and neuromodulation methods, alongside machine learning approaches for treatment prediction in depression and related conditions.

Best Publications

  • Effectiveness of theta burst versus high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with depression (THREE-D): a randomised non-inferiority trial

    Daniel M Blumberger;Daniel M Blumberger;Fidel Vila-Rodriguez;Kevin E Thorpe;Kevin E Thorpe;Kfir Feffer

  • Subcallosal cingulate gyrus deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression.

    Andres M. Lozano;Helen S. Mayberg;Helen S. Mayberg;Peter Giacobbe;Clement Hamani

  • Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) 2016 Clinical Guidelines for the Management of Adults with Major Depressive Disorder

    Unknown

  • Deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: follow-up after 3 to 6 years.

    Sidney H. Kennedy;Peter Giacobbe;Sakina J. Rizvi;Franca M. Placenza

  • Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) Clinical guidelines for the management of major depressive disorder in adults. IV. Neurostimulation therapies.

    Sidney H. Kennedy;Roumen Milev;Peter Giacobbe;Rajamannar Ramasubbu

  • A multicenter pilot study of subcallosal cingulate area deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression

    Andres M Lozano;Peter Giacobbe;Clement Hamani;Sakina J Rizvi

  • Anhedonia and Reward-Circuit Connectivity Distinguish Nonresponders from Responders to Dorsomedial Prefrontal Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Major Depression

    Jonathan Downar;Joseph Geraci;Tim V. Salomons;Katharine Dunlop

  • A Phase II Study of Fornix Deep Brain Stimulation in Mild Alzheimer's Disease.

    Andres M. Lozano;Lisa Fosdick;M. Mallar Chakravarty;Jeannie Marie Leoutsakos

  • Subcallosal cingulate deep brain stimulation for treatment-refractory anorexia nervosa: a phase 1 pilot trial

    Nir Lipsman;D Blake Woodside;Peter Giacobbe;Clement Hamani

  • rTMS of the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex for major depression: safety, tolerability, effectiveness, and outcome predictors for 10 Hz versus intermittent theta-burst stimulation.

    Nathan Bakker;Saba Shahab;Peter Giacobbe;Daniel M. Blumberger

  • Resting-State Cortico-Thalamic-Striatal Connectivity Predicts Response to Dorsomedial Prefrontal rTMS in Major Depressive Disorder

    Tim V Salomons;Katharine Dunlop;Sidney H Kennedy;Alastair Flint

  • Concordance Between BeamF3 and MRI-neuronavigated Target Sites for Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the Left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex.

    Arsalan Mir-Moghtadaei;Ruth Caballero;Ruth Caballero;Peter Fried;Michael D. Fox;Michael D. Fox

  • MicroRNAs 146a/b-5 and 425-3p and 24-3p are markers of antidepressant response and regulate MAPK/Wnt-system genes.

    Juan Pablo Lopez;Laura M. Fiori;Cristiana Cruceanu;Rixing Lin

  • Deep brain stimulation of the subcallosal cingulate gyrus for depression: anatomical location of active contacts in clinical responders and a suggested guideline for targeting.

    Clement Hamani;Helen Mayberg;Brian Snyder;Peter Giacobbe

  • Deep brain stimulation of the subcallosal cingulate for treatment-refractory anorexia nervosa: 1 year follow-up of an open-label trial.

    Nir Lipsman;Nir Lipsman;Eileen Lam;Matthew Volpini;Kalam Sutandar

  • Discovering biomarkers for antidepressant response: protocol from the Canadian biomarker integration network in depression (CAN-BIND) and clinical characteristics of the first patient cohort

    Raymond W. Lam;Roumen Milev;Susan Rotzinger;Susan Rotzinger;Ana C. Andreazza;Ana C. Andreazza

  • Trajectories of Response to Dorsolateral Prefrontal rTMS in Major Depression: A THREE-D Study

    Tyler S Kaster;Jonathan Downar;Fidel Vila-Rodriguez;Kevin E Thorpe

  • Reductions in Cortico-Striatal Hyperconnectivity Accompany Successful Treatment of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder with Dorsomedial Prefrontal rTMS

    Katharine Dunlop;Blake Woodside;Marion Olmsted;Patricia Colton

  • Number of pulses or number of sessions? An open-label study of trajectories of improvement for once-vs. twice-daily dorsomedial prefrontal rTMS in major depression.

    Laura Schulze;Kfir Feffer;Christopher Lozano;Peter Giacobbe

  • Effectiveness and acceptability of deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subgenual cingulate cortex for treatment-resistant depression: a systematic review and exploratory meta-analysis.

    Marcelo T. Berlim;Alexander McGirr;Frederique Van den Eynde;Marcelo P.A. Fleck

  • Treatment resistant depression as a failure of brain homeostatic mechanisms: implications for deep brain stimulation.

    Peter Giacobbe;Helen S. Mayberg;Andres M. Lozano

Frequent Co-Authors

Sidney H. Kennedy
Sidney H. Kennedy University Health Network
Zafiris J. Daskalakis
Zafiris J. Daskalakis University of California - San Diego School of Medicine
Andres M. Lozano
Andres M. Lozano University of Toronto
Raymond W. Lam
Raymond W. Lam University of British Columbia
Jonathan Downar
Jonathan Downar Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
Daniel M. Blumberger
Daniel M. Blumberger Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
Nir Lipsman
Nir Lipsman Sunnybrook Health Science Centre
Clement Hamani
Clement Hamani University of Toronto
Roumen Milev
Roumen Milev Queen's University
Helen S. Mayberg
Helen S. Mayberg Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Peter Giacobbe

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles