| Discipline name | D-Index | World Ranking | Current World Ranking | National Ranking | Current National Ranking | Publications | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 52 | 5225 | 4800 | 303 | 274 | 265 | 14734 |
The chart shows the history of publications by Nir Lipsman between 2006 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Nir Lipsman published across 21 years, from 2006 to 2026, averaging 16.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 50 publications in 2025. 51 of the 354 publications appeared in the last two years.
354 publications in total across all disciplines
| Year | Publications |
|---|---|
| 2006 | 1 |
| 2007 | 3 |
| 2008 | 1 |
| 2009 | 4 |
| 2010 | 6 |
| 2011 | 5 |
| 2012 | 17 |
| 2013 | 21 |
| 2014 | 15 |
| 2015 | 8 |
| 2016 | 4 |
| 2017 | 16 |
| 2018 | 22 |
| 2019 | 25 |
| 2020 | 26 |
| 2021 | 30 |
| 2022 | 30 |
| 2023 | 36 |
| 2024 | 33 |
| 2025 | 50 |
| 2026 | 1 |
| Total | 354 |
The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nir Lipsman sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 265 publications — 77th percentile
77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.
| Publications | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 38–47 | 18 | |
| 48–57 | 79 | |
| 58–67 | 193 | |
| 68–77 | 323 | |
| 78–87 | 406 | |
| 88–97 | 452 | |
| 98–107 | 539 | |
| 108–117 | 505 | |
| 118–127 | 522 | |
| 128–137 | 469 | |
| 138–147 | 456 | |
| 148–157 | 459 | |
| 158–167 | 397 | |
| 168–177 | 383 | |
| 178–187 | 350 | |
| 188–197 | 302 | |
| 198–207 | 306 | |
| 208–217 | 262 | |
| 218–227 | 242 | |
| 228–237 | 220 | |
| 238–247 | 203 | |
| 248–257 | 174 | |
| 258–267 | 176 | 265 |
| 268–277 | 175 | |
| 278–287 | 125 | |
| 288–297 | 116 | |
| 298–307 | 127 | |
| 308–317 | 128 | |
| 318–327 | 99 | |
| 328–337 | 89 | |
| 338–347 | 78 | |
| 348–357 | 96 | |
| 358–367 | 66 | |
| 368–377 | 59 | |
| 378–387 | 65 | |
| 388–397 | 54 | |
| 398–407 | 48 | |
| 408–417 | 49 | |
| 418–427 | 34 | |
| 428–437 | 31 | |
| 438–447 | 30 | |
| 448–457 | 31 | |
| 458–467 | 36 | |
| 468–477 | 40 | |
| 478–487 | 35 | |
| 488–497 | 30 | |
| 498–507 | 23 | |
| 508–517 | 26 | |
| 518–527 | 20 | |
| 528–537 | 23 | |
| 538–547 | 20 | |
| 548–557 | 20 | |
| 558–567 | 17 | |
| 568–577 | 14 | |
| 578–587 | 20 | |
| 588–597 | 20 | |
| 598–607 | 19 | |
| 608–617 | 18 | |
| 618–627 | 17 | |
| 628–637 | 11 | |
| 638–647 | 11 | |
| 648–657 | 11 | |
| 658–667 | 8 | |
| 668–677 | 7 | |
| 678–687 | 11 | |
| 688–697 | 10 | |
| 698–707 | 4 | |
| 708–717 | 6 | |
| 718–727 | 5 | |
| 728–737 | 5 | |
| 738–747 | 9 | |
| 748–757 | 9 | |
| 758–767 | 3 | |
| 768–777 | 7 | |
| 778–787 | 7 | |
| 788–797 | 6 | |
| 798–807 | 2 | |
| 808–817 | 2 | |
| 818–827 | 7 | |
| 828–837 | 0 | |
| 838–847 | 9 | |
| 848–857 | 3 | |
| 858–867 | 1 | |
| 868–877 | 3 | |
| 878–886 | 6 | |
| 887+ | 100 |
The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nir Lipsman sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 52 D-Index — 46th percentile
46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.
| D-Index | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 30–31 | 42 | |
| 32–33 | 172 | |
| 34–35 | 296 | |
| 36–37 | 435 | |
| 38–39 | 459 | |
| 40–41 | 456 | |
| 42–43 | 467 | |
| 44–45 | 478 | |
| 46–47 | 512 | |
| 48–49 | 435 | |
| 50–51 | 425 | |
| 52–53 | 418 | 52 |
| 54–55 | 392 | |
| 56–57 | 357 | |
| 58–59 | 334 | |
| 60–61 | 328 | |
| 62–63 | 260 | |
| 64–65 | 278 | |
| 66–67 | 239 | |
| 68–69 | 250 | |
| 70–71 | 210 | |
| 72–73 | 200 | |
| 74–75 | 189 | |
| 76–77 | 170 | |
| 78–79 | 146 | |
| 80–81 | 113 | |
| 82–83 | 126 | |
| 84–85 | 100 | |
| 86–87 | 84 | |
| 88–89 | 99 | |
| 90–91 | 84 | |
| 92–93 | 85 | |
| 94–95 | 72 | |
| 96–97 | 76 | |
| 98–99 | 45 | |
| 100–101 | 49 | |
| 102–103 | 43 | |
| 104–105 | 32 | |
| 106–107 | 45 | |
| 108–109 | 50 | |
| 110–111 | 32 | |
| 112–113 | 39 | |
| 114–115 | 32 | |
| 116–117 | 29 | |
| 118–119 | 27 | |
| 120–121 | 19 | |
| 122–123 | 23 | |
| 124–125 | 27 | |
| 126–127 | 16 | |
| 128–129 | 24 | |
| 130–131 | 13 | |
| 132–133 | 21 | |
| 134–135 | 17 | |
| 136–137 | 14 | |
| 138–139 | 15 | |
| 140–141 | 10 | |
| 142–143 | 10 | |
| 144–145 | 13 | |
| 146–147 | 9 | |
| 148–149 | 8 | |
| 150–151 | 6 | |
| 152–153 | 6 | |
| 154–155 | 7 | |
| 156–157 | 7 | |
| 158–159 | 10 | |
| 160–161 | 4 | |
| 162 | 8 | |
| 163+ | 100 |
Andres M. Lozano;Nir Lipsman;Hagai Bergman;Peter Brown
W. Jeffrey Elias;Nir Lipsman;William G. Ondo;Pejman Ghanouni
Nir Lipsman;Nir Lipsman;Ying Meng;Allison J. Bethune;Allison J. Bethune;Yuexi Huang
Joachim K. Krauss;Nir Lipsman;Tipu Aziz;Alexandre Boutet
Andres M. Lozano;Nir Lipsman
Nir Lipsman;Michael L Schwartz;Yuexi Huang;Liesly Lee
Agessandro Abrahao;Agessandro Abrahao;Ying Meng;Ying Meng;Maheleth Llinas;Maheleth Llinas;Yuexi Huang
Ying Meng;Kullervo Hynynen;Nir Lipsman;Nir Lipsman;Nir Lipsman
Nir Lipsman;D Blake Woodside;Peter Giacobbe;Clement Hamani
Bart Nuttin;Hemmings Wu;Helen Mayberg;Marwan Hariz
Laura M. Vecchio;Laura M. Vecchio;Ying Meng;Ying Meng;Kristiana Xhima;Kristiana Xhima;Nir Lipsman;Nir Lipsman
Ying Meng;Ying Meng;Raymond M. Reilly;Raymond M. Reilly;Rossanna C. Pezo;Rossanna C. Pezo;Maureen Trudeau;Maureen Trudeau
Alexandre Boutet;Manish Ranjan;Jidan Zhong;Jurgen Germann
Jin Woo Chang;Chang Kyu Park;Nir Lipsman;Michael L Schwartz
Nir Lipsman;Nir Lipsman;Eileen Lam;Matthew Volpini;Kalam Sutandar
Nir Lipsman;Joseph S Neimat;Andres M Lozano
Ying Meng;Christopher B. Pople;Harriet Lea-Banks;Agessandro Abrahao
Ying Meng;Ying Meng;Christopher B Pople;Suganth Suppiah;Maheleth Llinas
Ying Meng;Ying Meng;Agessandro Abrahao;Agessandro Abrahao;Chinthaka C Heyn;Chinthaka C Heyn;Allison J Bethune;Allison J Bethune
Nir Lipsman;Walter Glannon
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.