World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 47 6193 5755 421 395 219 8452

Eric Racine publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Eric Racine between 1999 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Eric Racine published across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025, averaging 12.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 30 publications in 2017. 29 of the 335 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 30. Peak 30 publications in 2017. 1999: 2 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 5 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 21 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 24 publications 2014: 17 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 30 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 19 publications 2020: 21 publications 2021: 22 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 22 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 17 publications
1999 2025

335 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Eric Racine: publications per year, 1999 to 2025
Year Publications
1999 2
2000 0
2001 5
2002 6
2003 4
2004 1
2005 5
2006 6
2007 7
2008 8
2009 9
2010 13
2011 21
2012 14
2013 24
2014 17
2015 13
2016 14
2017 30
2018 15
2019 19
2020 21
2021 22
2022 8
2023 22
2024 12
2025 17
Total 335
Download as CSV

Eric Racine publications per year - data summary

  • Eric Racine, a Psychology scholar from McGill University, has 335 publications recorded across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1999 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2017, with 30 publications.
  • The least productive year with any output is 2004, with 1 publication.
  • 1 of the 27 years in the span carries no publications at all (2000).
  • The rate of publication averages 12.4 papers per year over the whole span, or 12.9 per year counting only the 26 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 81 publications, 24% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1999-2007: 36 publications (4.0 per year); 2008-2016: 133 publications (14.8 per year); 2017-2025: 166 publications (18.4 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Eric Racine publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eric Racine sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 211–220 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 219 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313 219
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Eric Racine publication distribution in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 69 ranges running from 31–40 to 705+ publications.
  • Eric Racine, a Psychology scholar from McGill University, records 219 publications - the 74th percentile of the discipline.
  • 74% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Eric Racine, and about 26% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 151–160 publications range, and Eric Racine ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 101–110 publications, holding 736 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 72% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 201–210 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 705 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Eric Racine D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eric Racine sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495 47
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Eric Racine D-index placement in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 58 ranges running from 30–31 to 144+ D-Index.
  • Eric Racine, a Psychology scholar from McGill University, records 47 D-Index - the 47th percentile of the discipline.
  • 47% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Eric Racine, and about 53% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 48–49 D-Index range, and Eric Racine ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 32–33 D-Index, holding 702 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 68% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 58–59 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Eric Racine is affiliated with McGill University in Canada and has contributed extensively to the fields of medicine and health professions, with a focus on ethics in medical practice and pediatric healthcare. Their research spans multiple subfields including general health professions, pediatrics, perinatology and child health, public health, environmental and occupational health, cognitive neuroscience, and clinical psychology.

Their work covers a variety of topics with notable attention to:

  • Ethics in medical practice
  • Ethics and legal issues in pediatric healthcare
  • Palliative care and end-of-life issues
  • Autism spectrum disorder research
  • Healthcare decision-making and restraints
  • Family and disability support research
  • Ethics in clinical research

Recent papers by Eric Racine include:

  • "Ethical Challenges Arising in the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Overview from the Association of Bioethics Program Directors (ABPD) Task Force," 2020, The American Journal of Bioethics
  • "Making Autism Research Inclusive by Attending to Intersectionality: a Review of the Research Ethics Literature," 2020, Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
  • "A Review of Approaches, Strategies and Ethical Considerations in Participatory Research With Children," 2021, International Journal of Qualitative Methods
  • "Person-oriented ethics for autism research: Creating best practices through engagement with autism and autistic communities," 2020, Autism
  • "Cognitive Enhancement: Unanswered Questions About Human Psychology and Social Behavior," 2021, Science and Engineering Ethics

Frequent coauthors who have collaborated with Eric Racine include:

  • M. Ariel Cascio
  • Ariane Quintal
  • Jonathan A. Weiss
  • Marjorie Montreuil
  • Aline Bogossian

Publication venues where Eric Racine has regularly contributed are:

  • Neuroethics
  • The American Journal of Bioethics
  • Journal of Child Neurology
  • Qualitative Health Research
  • Disability & Society

Eric Racine's book publications include titles from Springer International Publishing and The MIT Press. These titles are:

  • Clinical Neurotechnology meets Artificial Intelligence (2021)
  • Brain Organoids in Research and Therapy (2022)
  • The Theory of Deliberative Wisdom (2025)

Best Publications

  • fMRI in the public eye

    Eric Racine;Ofek Bar-Ilan;Ofek Bar-Ilan;Judy Illes

  • Contemporary neuroscience in the media

    Eric Racine;Sarah Waldman;Jarett Rosenberg;Judy Illes;Judy Illes

  • The concept of 'vulnerability' in research ethics: an in-depth analysis of policies and guidelines.

    Dearbhail Bracken-Roche;Emily Bell;Mary Ellen Macdonald;Eric Racine

  • Imaging or imagining? A neuroethics challenge informed by genetics.

    Judy Illes;Eric Racine

  • Neurotalk: improving the communication of neuroscience research

    Judy Illes;Mary Anne Moser;Jennifer B. McCormick;Eric Racine

  • Ethical aspects of brain computer interfaces: a scoping review

    Sasha Burwell;Matthew Sample;Eric Racine

  • Preparing the ethical future of deep brain stimulation

    Emily Bell;Ghislaine Mathieu;Eric Racine

  • Pragmatic Neuroethics: Improving Treatment and Understanding of the Mind-Brain

    Eric Racine

  • Brain Imaging: A Decade of Coverage in the Print Media.

    Eric Racine;Ofek Bar-Ilan;Judy Illes

  • Autonomy and Coercion in Academic “Cognitive Enhancement” Using Methylphenidate: Perspectives of Key Stakeholders

    Cynthia Forlini;Eric Racine;Eric Racine

  • The Rising Tide of tDCS in the Media and Academic Literature

    Veljko Dubljević;Victoria Saigle;Eric Racine

  • Cognitive enhancement, lifestyle choice or misuse of prescription drugs? Ethics blind spots in current debates

    Eric Racine;Eric Racine;Cynthia Forlini

  • Diagnosis and management of Alzheimer's disease: past, present and future ethical issues.

    S. Gauthier;A. Leuzy;E. Racine;P. Rosa-Neto

  • Disorders of consciousness: responding to requests for novel diagnostic and therapeutic interventions

    Ralf J Jox;James L Bernat;Steven Laureys;Eric Racine

  • A Review of Approaches, Strategies and Ethical Considerations in Participatory Research With Children:

    Marjorie Montreuil;Marjorie Montreuil;Aline Bogossian;Emilie Laberge-Perrault;Eric Racine;Eric Racine

  • "Currents of hope": neurostimulation techniques in U.S. and U.K. print media.

    Eric Racine;Sarah Waldman;Nicole Palmour;David Risse

  • Disagreements with implications: diverging discourses on the ethics of non-medical use of methylphenidate for performance enhancement.

    Cynthia Forlini;Eric Racine;Eric Racine

  • Public Stigma Toward People With Drug Addiction: A Factorial Survey.

    Sebastian Sattler;Alice Escande;Eric Racine;Eric Racine;Anja S Göritz

  • MEDIA COVERAGE OF THE PERSISTENT VEGETATIVE STATE AND END-OF-LIFE DECISION-MAKING

    E. Racine;R. Amaram;M. Seidler;M. Karczewska

  • It’s a Shame! Stigma Against Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder: Examining the Ethical Implications for Public Health Practices and Policies

    Emily Bell;Gail Andrew;Nina Di Pietro;Albert E. Chudley

Frequent Co-Authors

Judy Illes
Judy Illes University of British Columbia
Michael Shevell
Michael Shevell McGill University
Annette Majnemer
Annette Majnemer McGill University
Jayne Lucke
Jayne Lucke La Trobe University
Mary Pat McAndrews
Mary Pat McAndrews University Health Network
Jonathan A. Weiss
Jonathan A. Weiss York University
Steven Laureys
Steven Laureys University of Liège
Abbas F. Sadikot
Abbas F. Sadikot Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
Serge Gauthier
Serge Gauthier McGill University
Wayne Hall
Wayne Hall University of Queensland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens the door to a variety of rewarding careers, including roles in mental health counseling, behavioral therapy, and substance abuse counseling. Many students pursue online psychology degrees, which can provide flexibility while meeting rigorous academic and licensing requirements.

If you’re interested in substance abuse counseling, requirements differ by state and even by city. For example, Santa Ana substance abuse counselors education requirements highlight the need for specialized coursework and supervised clinical experience. Similarly, Scottsdale substance abuse counselor certification requirements call for specific certifications and ongoing professional development.

In Washington State, cities such as Seattle and Spokane have their own guidelines. Seattle substance abuse counselors education requirements emphasize accredited degrees and practical training, while becoming a substance abuse counselor in Spokane involves meeting state licensure standards and completing relevant examinations.

Understanding these regional differences will help you choose the most suitable program and map your career pathway in the dynamic field of psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Eric Racine

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles