World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
47
Citations
8452
World Ranking
6193
National Ranking
421

Eric Racine publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eric Racine sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 219 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Eric Racine D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eric Racine sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Eric Racine is affiliated with McGill University in Canada and has contributed extensively to the fields of medicine and health professions, with a focus on ethics in medical practice and pediatric healthcare. Their research spans multiple subfields including general health professions, pediatrics, perinatology and child health, public health, environmental and occupational health, cognitive neuroscience, and clinical psychology.

Their work covers a variety of topics with notable attention to:

  • Ethics in medical practice
  • Ethics and legal issues in pediatric healthcare
  • Palliative care and end-of-life issues
  • Autism spectrum disorder research
  • Healthcare decision-making and restraints
  • Family and disability support research
  • Ethics in clinical research

Recent papers by Eric Racine include:

  • "Ethical Challenges Arising in the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Overview from the Association of Bioethics Program Directors (ABPD) Task Force," 2020, The American Journal of Bioethics
  • "Making Autism Research Inclusive by Attending to Intersectionality: a Review of the Research Ethics Literature," 2020, Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
  • "A Review of Approaches, Strategies and Ethical Considerations in Participatory Research With Children," 2021, International Journal of Qualitative Methods
  • "Person-oriented ethics for autism research: Creating best practices through engagement with autism and autistic communities," 2020, Autism
  • "Cognitive Enhancement: Unanswered Questions About Human Psychology and Social Behavior," 2021, Science and Engineering Ethics

Frequent coauthors who have collaborated with Eric Racine include:

  • M. Ariel Cascio
  • Ariane Quintal
  • Jonathan A. Weiss
  • Marjorie Montreuil
  • Aline Bogossian

Publication venues where Eric Racine has regularly contributed are:

  • Neuroethics
  • The American Journal of Bioethics
  • Journal of Child Neurology
  • Qualitative Health Research
  • Disability & Society

Eric Racine's book publications include titles from Springer International Publishing and The MIT Press. These titles are:

  • Clinical Neurotechnology meets Artificial Intelligence (2021)
  • Brain Organoids in Research and Therapy (2022)
  • The Theory of Deliberative Wisdom (2025)

Best Publications

  • fMRI in the public eye

    Eric Racine;Ofek Bar-Ilan;Ofek Bar-Ilan;Judy Illes

  • Contemporary neuroscience in the media

    Eric Racine;Sarah Waldman;Jarett Rosenberg;Judy Illes;Judy Illes

  • The concept of 'vulnerability' in research ethics: an in-depth analysis of policies and guidelines.

    Dearbhail Bracken-Roche;Emily Bell;Mary Ellen Macdonald;Eric Racine

  • Imaging or imagining? A neuroethics challenge informed by genetics.

    Judy Illes;Eric Racine

  • Neurotalk: improving the communication of neuroscience research

    Judy Illes;Mary Anne Moser;Jennifer B. McCormick;Eric Racine

  • Ethical aspects of brain computer interfaces: a scoping review

    Sasha Burwell;Matthew Sample;Eric Racine

  • Preparing the ethical future of deep brain stimulation

    Emily Bell;Ghislaine Mathieu;Eric Racine

  • Pragmatic Neuroethics: Improving Treatment and Understanding of the Mind-Brain

    Eric Racine

  • Brain Imaging: A Decade of Coverage in the Print Media.

    Eric Racine;Ofek Bar-Ilan;Judy Illes

  • Autonomy and Coercion in Academic “Cognitive Enhancement” Using Methylphenidate: Perspectives of Key Stakeholders

    Cynthia Forlini;Eric Racine;Eric Racine

  • Ethical Challenges Arising in the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Overview from the Association of Bioethics Program Directors (ABPD) Task Force.

    Amy L. McGuire;Mark P. Aulisio;F. Daniel Davis;Cheryl Erwin

  • The Rising Tide of tDCS in the Media and Academic Literature

    Veljko Dubljević;Victoria Saigle;Eric Racine

  • Cognitive enhancement, lifestyle choice or misuse of prescription drugs? Ethics blind spots in current debates

    Eric Racine;Eric Racine;Cynthia Forlini

  • Diagnosis and management of Alzheimer's disease: past, present and future ethical issues.

    S. Gauthier;A. Leuzy;E. Racine;P. Rosa-Neto

  • Disorders of consciousness: responding to requests for novel diagnostic and therapeutic interventions

    Ralf J Jox;James L Bernat;Steven Laureys;Eric Racine

  • Making Autism Research Inclusive by Attending to Intersectionality: a Review of the Research Ethics Literature

    M. A. Cascio;M. A. Cascio;J. A. Weiss;E. Racine;E. Racine

  • A Review of Approaches, Strategies and Ethical Considerations in Participatory Research With Children:

    Marjorie Montreuil;Marjorie Montreuil;Aline Bogossian;Emilie Laberge-Perrault;Eric Racine;Eric Racine

  • "Currents of hope": neurostimulation techniques in U.S. and U.K. print media.

    Eric Racine;Sarah Waldman;Nicole Palmour;David Risse

  • Disagreements with implications: diverging discourses on the ethics of non-medical use of methylphenidate for performance enhancement.

    Cynthia Forlini;Eric Racine;Eric Racine

  • Public Stigma Toward People With Drug Addiction: A Factorial Survey.

    Sebastian Sattler;Alice Escande;Eric Racine;Eric Racine;Anja S Göritz

  • MEDIA COVERAGE OF THE PERSISTENT VEGETATIVE STATE AND END-OF-LIFE DECISION-MAKING

    E. Racine;R. Amaram;M. Seidler;M. Karczewska

  • It’s a Shame! Stigma Against Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder: Examining the Ethical Implications for Public Health Practices and Policies

    Emily Bell;Gail Andrew;Nina Di Pietro;Albert E. Chudley

Frequent Co-Authors

Judy Illes
Judy Illes University of British Columbia
Michael Shevell
Michael Shevell McGill University
Annette Majnemer
Annette Majnemer McGill University
Jayne Lucke
Jayne Lucke La Trobe University
Mary Pat McAndrews
Mary Pat McAndrews University Health Network
Jonathan A. Weiss
Jonathan A. Weiss York University
Steven Laureys
Steven Laureys University of Liège
Abbas F. Sadikot
Abbas F. Sadikot Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
Serge Gauthier
Serge Gauthier McGill University
Wayne Hall
Wayne Hall University of Queensland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens the door to a variety of rewarding careers, including roles in mental health counseling, behavioral therapy, and substance abuse counseling. Many students pursue online psychology degrees, which can provide flexibility while meeting rigorous academic and licensing requirements.

If you’re interested in substance abuse counseling, requirements differ by state and even by city. For example, Santa Ana substance abuse counselors education requirements highlight the need for specialized coursework and supervised clinical experience. Similarly, Scottsdale substance abuse counselor certification requirements call for specific certifications and ongoing professional development.

In Washington State, cities such as Seattle and Spokane have their own guidelines. Seattle substance abuse counselors education requirements emphasize accredited degrees and practical training, while becoming a substance abuse counselor in Spokane involves meeting state licensure standards and completing relevant examinations.

Understanding these regional differences will help you choose the most suitable program and map your career pathway in the dynamic field of psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Eric Racine

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles