World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
67
Citations
19371
World Ranking
2855
National Ranking
165

Daniel M. Blumberger publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel M. Blumberger sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 545 publications — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Daniel M. Blumberger D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel M. Blumberger sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Daniel M. Blumberger is affiliated with the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health in Canada. Their research spans several key areas within neuroscience and medicine, with a focus on psychiatry and mental health.

The main fields of study for their work include:

  • Neuroscience
  • Medicine

Subfields that Daniel M. Blumberger has contributed to are:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Neurology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Pharmacology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

The primary topics covered in their research include:

  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Treatment of Major Depression
  • Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Neural dynamics and brain function

Daniel M. Blumberger has published in a number of academic journals, with frequent appearances in:

  • Biological Psychiatry
  • Brain Stimulation
  • American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
  • Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Some recent papers authored or co-authored by Daniel M. Blumberger include:

  • "Effectiveness of Standard Sequential Bilateral Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation vs Bilateral Theta Burst Stimulation in Older Adults With Depression" (2022), published in JAMA Psychiatry
  • "Frontostriatal salience network expansion in individuals in depression" (2024), published in Nature
  • "Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) 2023 Update on Clinical Guidelines for Management of Major Depressive Disorder in Adults: Réseau canadien pour les traitements de l'humeur et de l'anxiété (CANMAT) 2023: Mise à jour des lignes directrices cliniques pour la prise en charge du trouble dépressif majeur chez les adultes" (2024), published in The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry
  • "Management of Treatment-Resistant Depression: Challenges and Strategies" (2020), published in Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
  • "Magnitude of the Placebo Response Across Treatment Modalities Used for Treatment-Resistant Depression in Adults" (2021), published in JAMA Network Open

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Zafiris J. Daskalakis
  • Benoit H. Mulsant
  • Tarek K. Rajji
  • Jonathan Downar
  • Fidel Vila-Rodriguez

Best Publications

  • Effectiveness of theta burst versus high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with depression (THREE-D): a randomised non-inferiority trial

    Daniel M Blumberger;Daniel M Blumberger;Fidel Vila-Rodriguez;Kevin E Thorpe;Kevin E Thorpe;Kfir Feffer

  • Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) 2016 Clinical Guidelines for the Management of Adults with Major Depressive Disorder

    Unknown

  • Clinical utility and prospective of TMS–EEG

    Sara Tremblay;Sara Tremblay;Nigel C. Rogasch;Isabella Premoli;Daniel M. Blumberger

  • Transcranial direct current stimulation for acute major depressive episodes: meta-analysis of individual patient data.

    André R. Brunoni;Adriano H. Moffa;Felipe Fregni;Ulrich Palm

  • Management of Treatment-Resistant Depression: Challenges and Strategies.

    Daphne Voineskos;Zafiris J Daskalakis;Zafiris J Daskalakis;Daniel M Blumberger;Daniel M Blumberger

  • Efficacy and Safety of Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A Prospective Multicenter Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial.

    Lior Carmi;Aron Tendler;Alexander Bystritsky;Eric Hollander

  • Anhedonia and Reward-Circuit Connectivity Distinguish Nonresponders from Responders to Dorsomedial Prefrontal Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Major Depression

    Jonathan Downar;Joseph Geraci;Tim V. Salomons;Katharine Dunlop

  • Transitional interventions to reduce early psychiatric readmissions in adults: systematic review

    Simone N. Vigod;Paul A. Kurdyak;Cindy-Lee Dennis;Talia Leszcz

  • rTMS of the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex for major depression: safety, tolerability, effectiveness, and outcome predictors for 10 Hz versus intermittent theta-burst stimulation.

    Nathan Bakker;Saba Shahab;Peter Giacobbe;Daniel M. Blumberger

  • Glutamatergic neurometabolite levels in major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy studies

    Sho Moriguchi;Sho Moriguchi;Akihiro Takamiya;Yoshihiro Noda;Nobuyuki Horita

  • Evidence of Cortical Inhibitory Deficits in Major Depressive Disorder

    Andrea J. Levinson;Paul B. Fitzgerald;Gabriela Favalli;Daniel M. Blumberger

  • Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of augmentation pharmacotherapy with aripiprazole for treatment-resistant depression in late life: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

    Eric J Lenze;Benoit H Mulsant;Daniel M Blumberger;Jordan F Karp

  • Concordance Between BeamF3 and MRI-neuronavigated Target Sites for Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the Left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex.

    Arsalan Mir-Moghtadaei;Ruth Caballero;Ruth Caballero;Peter Fried;Michael D. Fox;Michael D. Fox

  • Safety, tolerability, and clinical effect of low-dose buprenorphine for treatment-resistant depression in midlife and older adults.

    Jordan F. Karp;Meryl A. Butters;Amy E. Begley;Mark D. Miller

  • Extent of Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Plasticity and Its Association With Working Memory in Patients With Alzheimer Disease.

    Sanjeev Kumar;Sanjeev Kumar;Reza Zomorrodi;Zaid Ghazala;Zaid Ghazala;Zaid Ghazala;Michelle S. Goodman;Michelle S. Goodman

  • A Randomized Double-Blind Sham-Controlled Study of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Major Depression

    Daniel M Blumberger;Lisa C Tran;Paul Bernard Fitzgerald;Kate Elizabeth Hoy

  • The Neural Crossroads of Psychiatric Illness: An Emerging Target for Brain Stimulation.

    Jonathan Downar;Daniel M. Blumberger;Daniel M. Blumberger;Zafiris J. Daskalakis;Zafiris J. Daskalakis

  • Characterization of Glutamatergic and GABA A -Mediated Neurotransmission in Motor and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Using Paired-Pulse TMS–EEG

    Robin F H Cash;Yoshihiro Noda;Yoshihiro Noda;Reza Zomorrodi;Natasha Radhu;Natasha Radhu

  • Theta-Gamma Coupling and Working Memory in Alzheimer's Dementia and Mild Cognitive Impairment.

    Michelle S. Goodman;Sanjeev Kumar;Reza Zomorrodi;Zaid Ghazala

  • Efficacy, tolerability, and cognitive effects of deep transcranial magnetic stimulation for late-life depression: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

    Tyler S. Kaster;Tyler S. Kaster;Zafiris J. Daskalakis;Zafiris J. Daskalakis;Yoshihiro Noda;Yuliya Knyahnytska;Yuliya Knyahnytska

  • Can Repetitive Magnetic Stimulation Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia? Pilot Data from a Randomized Controlled Trial

    Mera S Barr;Faranak Farzan;Tarek K Rajji;Aristotle N Voineskos

  • A meta-analysis of the effects of aging on motor cortex neurophysiology assessed by transcranial magnetic stimulation

    Apoorva Bhandari;Natasha Radhu;Faranak Farzan;Benoit H. Mulsant;Benoit H. Mulsant

Frequent Co-Authors

Zafiris J. Daskalakis
Zafiris J. Daskalakis University of California - San Diego School of Medicine
Benoit H. Mulsant
Benoit H. Mulsant Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
Tarek K. Rajji
Tarek K. Rajji Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
Paul B. Fitzgerald
Paul B. Fitzgerald Australian National University
Faranak Farzan
Faranak Farzan Simon Fraser University
Charles F. Reynolds
Charles F. Reynolds University of Pittsburgh
Mera S. Barr
Mera S. Barr University of Toronto
Jonathan Downar
Jonathan Downar Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
Peter Giacobbe
Peter Giacobbe University of Toronto
Corinne E. Fischer
Corinne E. Fischer St. Michael's Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're considering a future in neuroscience, there are several online educational paths and certifications that can complement your academic journey. Many students begin with the easiest online bachelor's degree options in psychology, biology, or health sciences to build a strong foundation before moving into more specialized fields.

For those looking to improve their career prospects quickly, there are a variety of online certification programs that pay well and can boost your credentials in healthcare-related roles. Certifications in areas like data analysis, mental health, or rehabilitation are particularly relevant to neuroscience.

If you’re passionate about helping people directly, earning a master's through online msw programs (Master of Social Work) can open doors in clinical neuroscience settings and mental health services. Additionally, those interested in behavioral analysis should explore bcba online masters programs, which are essential for Board Certified Behavior Analyst careers and can intersect with neuroscience research and therapy.

Each of these pathways offers flexibility, affordability, and practical opportunities—making them strong alternatives or additions for anyone passionate about neuroscience and its real-world applications.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel M. Blumberger

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles