World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 64 3235 2956 280 261 355 16545

Alkomiet Hasan publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Alkomiet Hasan between 1993 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Alkomiet Hasan published across 33 years, from 1993 to 2025, averaging 16.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 66 publications in 2023. 119 of the 548 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 66. Peak 66 publications in 2023. 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 2 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 3 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 25 publications 2014: 18 publications 2015: 27 publications 2016: 27 publications 2017: 20 publications 2018: 30 publications 2019: 43 publications 2020: 53 publications 2021: 40 publications 2022: 42 publications 2023: 66 publications 2024: 64 publications 2025: 55 publications
1993 2025

548 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Alkomiet Hasan: publications per year, 1993 to 2025
Year Publications
1993 1
1994 1
1995 1
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 0
2003 0
2004 0
2005 0
2006 1
2007 2
2008 1
2009 3
2010 8
2011 11
2012 9
2013 25
2014 18
2015 27
2016 27
2017 20
2018 30
2019 43
2020 53
2021 40
2022 42
2023 66
2024 64
2025 55
Total 548
Download as CSV

Alkomiet Hasan publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alkomiet Hasan sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 348–357 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 355 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96 355
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Alkomiet Hasan D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alkomiet Hasan sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 64–65 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278 64
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Alkomiet Hasan is affiliated with the University of Augsburg in Germany. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a focus on several subfields including Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Physiology, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

Their work covers a range of topics, notably including:

  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Physical Activity and Health
  • Child Nutrition and Water Access
  • Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions

Frequent publication venues for Hasan include Neuroscience Applied, PLOS Global Public Health, European Psychiatry, Scientific Reports, and Frontiers in Psychiatry. Hasan's collaboration network features several recurrent co-authors such as Azaz Bin Sharif, Peter Falkai, Daniel Keeser, Isabel Maurus, and Dušan Hirjak.

Recent publications by Hasan demonstrate a focus on mental health in various contexts and public health issues. Examples include:

  • "Perceived barriers to maintain physical activity and its association to mental health status of Bangladeshi adults: a quantile regression approach" (2023, Scientific Reports)
  • "Mental health status and the quality of life of infertile women receiving fertility treatment in Bangladesh: A cross-sectional study" (2023, PLOS Global Public Health)

Other notable recent papers in related fields, though with different first authors, correspond to associated research topics:

  • "Suicide stigma and suicide literacy among Bangladeshi young adults: a cross-sectional study" (2023, Frontiers in Psychiatry)
  • "Prevalence of scabies and its associated environmental risk factors among the Forcibly Displaced Myanmar Nationals living in the Cox's Bazar district of Bangladesh" (2024, Journal of Migration and Health)
  • "COVID-19 related psychological burden and potential benefits of vaccination - Data from a repeated cross-sectional survey in healthcare workers" (2022, Psychiatry Research Communications)

Hasan's interdisciplinary approach connects mental health, physical activity, and public health issues, often within diverse populations and socio-environmental contexts. Their scholarly output reflects engagement with both clinical and public health perspectives.

Best Publications

  • The Role of Interneuron Networks in Driving Human Motor Cortical Plasticity

    Masashi Hamada;Nagako Murase;Alkomiet Hasan;Alkomiet Hasan;Michelle Balaratnam

  • World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) Guidelines for Biological Treatment of Schizophrenia, Part 1: Update 2012 on the acute treatment of schizophrenia and the management of treatment resistance

    Alkomiet Hasan;Peter Falkai;Thomas Wobrock;Jeffrey Lieberman

  • World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) Guidelines for Biological Treatment of Schizophrenia, Part 2: Update 2012 on the long-term treatment of schizophrenia and management of antipsychotic-induced side effects

    Alkomiet Hasan;Peter Falkai;Thomas Wobrock;Jeffrey Lieberman

  • Systematic evaluation of the impact of stimulation intensity on neuroplastic after‐effects induced by transcranial direct current stimulation

    Asif Jamil;Giorgi Batsikadze;Hsiao-I. Kuo;Ludovica Labruna

  • The impact of environmental factors in severe psychiatric disorders.

    Andrea Schmitt;Berend Malchow;Alkomiet Hasan;Peter Falkai

  • Autoimmune psychosis: an international consensus on an approach to the diagnosis and management of psychosis of suspected autoimmune origin.

    Thomas A Pollak;Belinda R Lennox;Sabine Müller;Michael E Benros

  • Schizophrenia as a disorder of disconnectivity

    Andrea Schmitt;Andrea Schmitt;Alkomiet Hasan;Oliver Gruber;Peter Falkai

  • Cannabis use and psychosis: a review of reviews.

    Alkomiet Hasan;Rupert von Keller;Chris Maria Friemel;Wayne Hall

  • Multisite prediction of 4-week and 52-week treatment outcomes in patients with first-episode psychosis: a machine learning approach

    Nikolaos Koutsouleris;René S Kahn;Adam M Chekroud;Stefan Leucht

  • tDCS for the treatment of depression: a comprehensive review

    Ulrich Palm;Alkomiet Hasan;Wolfgang Strube;Frank Padberg

  • Left prefrontal high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of schizophrenia with predominant negative symptoms: a sham-controlled, randomized multicenter trial.

    Thomas Wobrock;Birgit Guse;Joachim Cordes;Wolfgang Wölwer

  • Dysfunctional long-term potentiation-like plasticity in schizophrenia revealed by transcranial direct current stimulation.

    Alkomiet Hasan;Michael A. Nitsche;Bettina Rein;Thomas Schneider-Axmann

  • Consensus statement on the use of clozapine during the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Dan Siskind;William G. Honer;Scott Clark;Christoph U. Correll

  • Efficacy and safety of clozapine in psychotic disorders—a systematic quantitative meta-review

    Elias Wagner;Spyridon Siafis;Piyumi Fernando;Peter Falkai

  • World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) Guidelines for Biological Treatment of Schizophrenia. Part 3: Update 2015 Management of special circumstances: Depression, Suicidality, substance use disorders and pregnancy and lactation.

    Alkomiet Hasan;Peter Falkai;Thomas Wobrock;Jeffrey Lieberman

  • The effects of physical exercise in schizophrenia and affective disorders.

    Berend Malchow;Daniela Reich-Erkelenz;Viola Oertel-Knöchel;Katriona Keller

  • Vagus nerve stimulation in psychiatry: a systematic review of the available evidence.

    Camelia-Lucia Cimpianu;Wolfgang Strube;Peter Falkai;Ulrich Palm

  • Prefrontal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Treatment of Schizophrenia With Predominant Negative Symptoms: A Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Proof-of-Concept Study

    Ulrich Palm;Daniel Keeser;Alkomiet Hasan;Michael J. Kupka

  • Motor Cortical Excitability Assessed by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Psychiatric Disorders: A Systematic Review

    Tilmann Bunse;Thomas Wobrock;Wolfgang Strube;Frank Padberg

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter Falkai
Peter Falkai Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Andrea Schmitt
Andrea Schmitt Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Frank Padberg
Frank Padberg Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Wolfgang Gaebel
Wolfgang Gaebel Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Daniel Keeser
Daniel Keeser Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Ulrich Palm
Ulrich Palm Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Berthold Langguth
Berthold Langguth University of Regensburg
Michael A. Nitsche
Michael A. Nitsche TU Dortmund University
William G. Honer
William G. Honer University of British Columbia
Oliver Gruber
Oliver Gruber Heidelberg University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in studying neuroscience in the USA, there are many online education options to consider. Accelerated programs can be a great choice if you want to complete your degree faster and start your career sooner. These programs are designed for motivated students who are ready to take on an intensive course load.

When selecting a degree, consider your long-term career goals. Some of the best degrees in the world are focused on science, technology, engineering, and healthcare fields, all of which are closely connected to neuroscience. Exploring the most profitable degrees may also give you insight into which disciplines offer high earning potential after graduation.

Financial accessibility is also critical. For those needing financial support, researching the cheapest online colleges that accept fafsa can help you find affordable pathways to earning your degree. Choosing the right online degree can open the door to a wide variety of neuroscience-related careers—from research and clinical roles to academic and industry opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Alkomiet Hasan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles