World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
64
Citations
16545
World Ranking
3235
National Ranking
280

Alkomiet Hasan publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alkomiet Hasan sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 355 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Alkomiet Hasan D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alkomiet Hasan sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Alkomiet Hasan is affiliated with the University of Augsburg in Germany. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a focus on several subfields including Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Physiology, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

Their work covers a range of topics, notably including:

  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Physical Activity and Health
  • Child Nutrition and Water Access
  • Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions

Frequent publication venues for Hasan include Neuroscience Applied, PLOS Global Public Health, European Psychiatry, Scientific Reports, and Frontiers in Psychiatry. Hasan's collaboration network features several recurrent co-authors such as Azaz Bin Sharif, Peter Falkai, Daniel Keeser, Isabel Maurus, and Dušan Hirjak.

Recent publications by Hasan demonstrate a focus on mental health in various contexts and public health issues. Examples include:

  • "Perceived barriers to maintain physical activity and its association to mental health status of Bangladeshi adults: a quantile regression approach" (2023, Scientific Reports)
  • "Mental health status and the quality of life of infertile women receiving fertility treatment in Bangladesh: A cross-sectional study" (2023, PLOS Global Public Health)

Other notable recent papers in related fields, though with different first authors, correspond to associated research topics:

  • "Suicide stigma and suicide literacy among Bangladeshi young adults: a cross-sectional study" (2023, Frontiers in Psychiatry)
  • "Prevalence of scabies and its associated environmental risk factors among the Forcibly Displaced Myanmar Nationals living in the Cox's Bazar district of Bangladesh" (2024, Journal of Migration and Health)
  • "COVID-19 related psychological burden and potential benefits of vaccination - Data from a repeated cross-sectional survey in healthcare workers" (2022, Psychiatry Research Communications)

Hasan's interdisciplinary approach connects mental health, physical activity, and public health issues, often within diverse populations and socio-environmental contexts. Their scholarly output reflects engagement with both clinical and public health perspectives.

Best Publications

  • Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): An update (2014–2018)

    Jean Pascal Lefaucheur;André Aleman;Chris Baeken;David H. Benninger

  • The Role of Interneuron Networks in Driving Human Motor Cortical Plasticity

    Masashi Hamada;Nagako Murase;Alkomiet Hasan;Alkomiet Hasan;Michelle Balaratnam

  • World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) Guidelines for Biological Treatment of Schizophrenia, Part 1: Update 2012 on the acute treatment of schizophrenia and the management of treatment resistance

    Alkomiet Hasan;Peter Falkai;Thomas Wobrock;Jeffrey Lieberman

  • World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) Guidelines for Biological Treatment of Schizophrenia, Part 2: Update 2012 on the long-term treatment of schizophrenia and management of antipsychotic-induced side effects

    Alkomiet Hasan;Peter Falkai;Thomas Wobrock;Jeffrey Lieberman

  • Systematic evaluation of the impact of stimulation intensity on neuroplastic after‐effects induced by transcranial direct current stimulation

    Asif Jamil;Giorgi Batsikadze;Hsiao-I. Kuo;Ludovica Labruna

  • The impact of environmental factors in severe psychiatric disorders.

    Andrea Schmitt;Berend Malchow;Alkomiet Hasan;Peter Falkai

  • Autoimmune psychosis: an international consensus on an approach to the diagnosis and management of psychosis of suspected autoimmune origin.

    Thomas A Pollak;Belinda R Lennox;Sabine Müller;Michael E Benros

  • International Consensus Based Review and Recommendations for Minimum Reporting Standards in Research on Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation (Version 2020).

    Adam D. Farmer;Adam Strzelczyk;Alessandra Finisguerra;Alexander V. Gourine

  • Schizophrenia as a disorder of disconnectivity

    Andrea Schmitt;Andrea Schmitt;Alkomiet Hasan;Oliver Gruber;Peter Falkai

  • Cannabis use and psychosis: a review of reviews.

    Alkomiet Hasan;Rupert von Keller;Chris Maria Friemel;Wayne Hall

  • Multisite prediction of 4-week and 52-week treatment outcomes in patients with first-episode psychosis: a machine learning approach

    Nikolaos Koutsouleris;René S Kahn;Adam M Chekroud;Stefan Leucht

  • tDCS for the treatment of depression: a comprehensive review

    Ulrich Palm;Alkomiet Hasan;Wolfgang Strube;Frank Padberg

  • Left prefrontal high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of schizophrenia with predominant negative symptoms: a sham-controlled, randomized multicenter trial.

    Thomas Wobrock;Birgit Guse;Joachim Cordes;Wolfgang Wölwer

  • Dysfunctional long-term potentiation-like plasticity in schizophrenia revealed by transcranial direct current stimulation.

    Alkomiet Hasan;Michael A. Nitsche;Bettina Rein;Thomas Schneider-Axmann

  • Consensus statement on the use of clozapine during the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Dan Siskind;William G. Honer;Scott Clark;Christoph U. Correll

  • Efficacy and safety of clozapine in psychotic disorders—a systematic quantitative meta-review

    Elias Wagner;Spyridon Siafis;Piyumi Fernando;Peter Falkai

  • World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) Guidelines for Biological Treatment of Schizophrenia. Part 3: Update 2015 Management of special circumstances: Depression, Suicidality, substance use disorders and pregnancy and lactation.

    Alkomiet Hasan;Peter Falkai;Thomas Wobrock;Jeffrey Lieberman

  • The effects of physical exercise in schizophrenia and affective disorders.

    Berend Malchow;Daniela Reich-Erkelenz;Viola Oertel-Knöchel;Katriona Keller

  • Vagus nerve stimulation in psychiatry: a systematic review of the available evidence.

    Camelia-Lucia Cimpianu;Wolfgang Strube;Peter Falkai;Ulrich Palm

  • Prefrontal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Treatment of Schizophrenia With Predominant Negative Symptoms: A Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Proof-of-Concept Study

    Ulrich Palm;Daniel Keeser;Alkomiet Hasan;Michael J. Kupka

  • Subjective burden and perspectives of German healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Victoria Kramer;Irina Papazova;Andreas Thoma;Miriam Kunz

  • Motor Cortical Excitability Assessed by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Psychiatric Disorders: A Systematic Review

    Tilmann Bunse;Thomas Wobrock;Wolfgang Strube;Frank Padberg

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter Falkai
Peter Falkai Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Andrea Schmitt
Andrea Schmitt Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Frank Padberg
Frank Padberg Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Wolfgang Gaebel
Wolfgang Gaebel Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Daniel Keeser
Daniel Keeser Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Ulrich Palm
Ulrich Palm Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Berthold Langguth
Berthold Langguth University of Regensburg
Michael A. Nitsche
Michael A. Nitsche TU Dortmund University
William G. Honer
William G. Honer University of British Columbia
Oliver Gruber
Oliver Gruber Heidelberg University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in studying neuroscience in the USA, there are many online education options to consider. Accelerated programs can be a great choice if you want to complete your degree faster and start your career sooner. These programs are designed for motivated students who are ready to take on an intensive course load.

When selecting a degree, consider your long-term career goals. Some of the best degrees in the world are focused on science, technology, engineering, and healthcare fields, all of which are closely connected to neuroscience. Exploring the most profitable degrees may also give you insight into which disciplines offer high earning potential after graduation.

Financial accessibility is also critical. For those needing financial support, researching the cheapest online colleges that accept fafsa can help you find affordable pathways to earning your degree. Choosing the right online degree can open the door to a wide variety of neuroscience-related careers—from research and clinical roles to academic and industry opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Alkomiet Hasan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles