World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
41
Citations
6019
World Ranking
7907
National Ranking
663

Daniel Keeser publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel Keeser sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 203 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Daniel Keeser D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel Keeser sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Daniel Keeser is affiliated with Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München in Germany. Their research spans multiple fields within neuroscience and medicine, with a strong focus on cognitive neuroscience, neurology, psychiatry and mental health, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, and physiology.

The scientist's work covers a range of specialized topics including:

  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Schizophrenia Research and Treatment
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Alzheimer's Disease Research and Treatments

Among the frequently recurring publication venues for their research are:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
  • Brain Stimulation
  • NeuroImage Clinical
  • Neuroscience Applied

Daniel Keeser has collaborated often with other researchers including:

  • Peter Falkai
  • Frank Padberg
  • Andrea Schmitt
  • Alkomiet Hasan
  • Florian J. Raabe

Selected recent papers illustrating the scope of their research include:

  • "Genetic variants associated with longitudinal changes in brain structure across the lifespan" (2022, Nature Neuroscience)
  • "Transcranial direct current stimulation as an additional treatment to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in adults with major depressive disorder in Germany (DepressionDC): a triple-blind, randomised, sham-controlled, multicentre trial" (2023, The Lancet)
  • "Concurrent TMS-fMRI: Technical Challenges, Developments, and Overview of Previous Studies" (2022, Frontiers in Psychiatry)
  • "Association between tDCS computational modeling and clinical outcomes in depression: data from the ELECT-TDCS trial" (2020, European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience)
  • "Microglial Activation and Connectivity in Alzheimer Disease and Aging" (2022, Annals of Neurology)

Best Publications

  • Prefrontal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Changes Connectivity of Resting-State Networks during fMRI

    Daniel Keeser;Thomas Meindl;Julie Bor;Ulrich Palm

  • Prefrontal direct current stimulation modulates resting EEG and event-related potentials in healthy subjects: A standardized low resolution tomography (sLORETA) study

    Daniel Keeser;Frank Padberg;E. Reisinger;Oliver Pogarell

  • Transcranial direct current stimulation in treatment resistant depression: A randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study

    U. Palm;C. Schiller;Z. Fintescu;M. Obermeier

  • Evaluation of sham transcranial direct current stimulation for randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials.

    Ulrich Palm;Eva Reisinger;Daniel Keeser;Min-Fang Kuo

  • Skin lesions after treatment with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS).

    Ulrich Palm;Daniel Keeser;Christina Schiller;Zoe Fintescu

  • Convergent Findings of Altered Functional and Structural Brain Connectivity in Individuals with High Functioning Autism: A Multimodal MRI Study

    Sophia Mueller;Daniel Keeser;Andrea Christiane Samson;Valerie Kirsch

  • Structural and functional connectivity mapping of the vestibular circuitry from human brainstem to cortex

    V Kirsch;D Keeser;T Hergenroeder;O Erat

  • Prefrontal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Treatment of Schizophrenia With Predominant Negative Symptoms: A Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Proof-of-Concept Study

    Ulrich Palm;Daniel Keeser;Alkomiet Hasan;Michael J. Kupka

  • Conceptual and Procedural Shortcomings of the Systematic Review “Evidence That Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Generates Little-to-no Reliable Neurophysiologic Effect Beyond MEP Amplitude Modulation in Healthy Human Subjects: A Systematic Review” by Horvath and Co-workers

    A. Antal;D. Keeser;F. Padberg

  • Home Use, Remotely Supervised, and Remotely Controlled Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: A Systematic Review of the Available Evidence.

    Ulrich Palm;Ulrike Kumpf;Nora Behler;Linda Wulf

  • MR volumetric assessment of endolymphatic hydrops.

    R. Gürkov;A. Berman;O. Dietrich;W. Flatz

  • The effects of methylphenidate on whole brain intrinsic functional connectivity

    Sophia Mueller;Anna Costa;Daniel Keeser;Oliver Pogarell

  • Modulation of Craving Related Brain Responses Using Real-Time fMRI in Patients with Alcohol Use Disorder

    Susanne Karch;Daniel Keeser;Sebastian Hümmer;Marco Paolini

  • Transcranial direct current stimulation as an additional treatment to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in adults with major depressive disorder in Germany (DepressionDC): a triple-blind, randomised, sham-controlled, multicentre trial

    Unknown

  • Classifying fMRI-derived resting-state connectivity patterns according to their daily rhythmicity.

    Janusch Blautzik;Céline Vetter;Isabella Peres;Evgeny Gutyrchik

  • The role of contact media at the skin-electrode interface during transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS).

    Ulrich Palm;Katrina B. Feichtner;Alkomiet Hasan;Gerd Gauglitz

  • Effects of endurance training on brain structures in chronic schizophrenia patients and healthy controls

    Berend Malchow;Daniel Keeser;Katriona Keller;Katriona Keller;Alkomiet Hasan

  • Effects of Aerobic Exercise on Metabolic Syndrome, Cardiorespiratory Fitness, and Symptoms in Schizophrenia Include Decreased Mortality.

    Andrea Schmitt;Andrea Schmitt;Isabel Maurus;Moritz J. Rossner;Astrid Röh

  • Microglial Activation and Connectivity in Alzheimer Disease and Aging

    Unknown

  • Concurrent TMS-fMRI: Technical Challenges, Developments, and Overview of Previous Studies

    Unknown

  • Functional and Structural MR Imaging in Neuropsychiatric Disorders, Part 2: Application in Schizophrenia and Autism

    S. Mueller;D. Keeser;M.F. Reiser;S. Teipel

  • Polygenic risk has an impact on the structural plasticity of hippocampal subfields during aerobic exercise combined with cognitive remediation in multi-episode schizophrenia.

    S Papiol;D Popovic;D Keeser;Alkomiet Hasan

  • Effectsofendurancetrainingonbrainstructuresinchronicschizophrenia patients and healthy controls

    Berend Malchow;Daniel Keeser;Katriona Keller;Alkomiet Hasan

Frequent Co-Authors

Frank Padberg
Frank Padberg Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Birgit Ertl-Wagner
Birgit Ertl-Wagner University of Toronto
Oliver Pogarell
Oliver Pogarell Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Alkomiet Hasan
Alkomiet Hasan University of Augsburg
Andrea Schmitt
Andrea Schmitt Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Peter Falkai
Peter Falkai Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Ulrich Palm
Ulrich Palm Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Andre R. Brunoni
Andre R. Brunoni Universidade de São Paulo
Thomas Meindl
Thomas Meindl Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Christoph Mulert
Christoph Mulert University of Giessen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in Neuroscience but exploring other flexible learning options? There are a variety of certifications that pay well which can complement or provide alternatives to traditional neuroscience programs. These certifications can help open doors to high-paying roles in healthcare, research, data analysis, and more.

For those concerned about academic difficulty or course load, some students prefer to start with the easiest college majors before moving into more specialized neuroscience studies. These easier majors can still provide foundational knowledge applicable to neuroscience and related fields.

If you're interested in mental health, pursuing an msw degree (Master of Social Work) online is an affordable path to a rewarding career as a social worker or counselor. Another related field is applied behavior analysis, where you can find flexible, quality education through online bcba programs.

Exploring these alternative programs can help you build a versatile skill set and discover diverse career pathways connected to neuroscience and the broader behavioral health sciences.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel Keeser

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles