World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
64
Citations
13791
World Ranking
3289
National Ranking
286

Oliver Pogarell publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Oliver Pogarell sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 398 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Oliver Pogarell D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Oliver Pogarell sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Oliver Pogarell is affiliated with Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München in Germany and works primarily in the fields of Medicine and Neuroscience. Their research spans numerous subfields, notably Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology, Physiology, and Neurology.

Their main research topics include Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, Schizophrenia research and treatment, EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces, Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research, Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research, Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes, and Alzheimer's disease research and treatments.

Oliver Pogarell has published extensively in a variety of venues. Frequent publication venues include MMW - Fortschritte der Medizin, European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, Frontiers in Psychiatry, Clinical EEG and Neuroscience, and bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory).

Recent representative papers by Oliver Pogarell include:

  • "Microglial Activation and Connectivity in Alzheimer Disease and Aging," 2022, Annals of Neurology
  • "Effects of binaural and monaural beat stimulation on attention and EEG," 2021, Experimental Brain Research
  • "Optical coherence tomography reveals retinal thinning in schizophrenia spectrum disorders," 2022, European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
  • "Auswirkungen der COVID-19-Pandemie auf die Versorgungssituation in psychiatrischen Kliniken in Deutschland," 2021, Der Nervenarzt
  • "Acute alcohol withdrawal and recovery in men lead to profound changes in DNA methylation profiles: a longitudinal clinical study," 2020, Addiction

Throughout their career, Oliver Pogarell has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including Daniel Keeser, Kristina Adorjan, Peter Falkai, Susanne Karch, and Boris-Stephan Rauchmann.

Best Publications

  • Accurate differentiation of parkinsonism and essential tremor using visual assessment of [123I]-FP-CIT SPECT imaging: the [123I]-FP-CIT study group.

    Hani T. S. Benamer;Jim Patterson;Donald G. Grosset;J. Booij

  • Integration of fMRI and simultaneous EEG: towards a comprehensive understanding of localization and time-course of brain activity in target detection

    Christoph Mulert;Lorenz Jäger;Robert Schmitt;Patrick Bussfeld

  • Prefrontal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Changes Connectivity of Resting-State Networks during fMRI

    Daniel Keeser;Thomas Meindl;Julie Bor;Ulrich Palm

  • EEG-vigilance and BOLD effect during simultaneous EEG/fMRI measurement

    Sebastian Olbrich;Christoph Mulert;Susanne Karch;Maja Trenner

  • Bilateral caudate and putamen grafts of embryonic mesencephalic tissue treated with lazaroids in Parkinson's disease

    Patrik Brundin;O Pogarell;Peter Hagell;P Piccini

  • Prefrontal direct current stimulation modulates resting EEG and event-related potentials in healthy subjects: A standardized low resolution tomography (sLORETA) study

    Daniel Keeser;Frank Padberg;E. Reisinger;Oliver Pogarell

  • Long-term changes of striatal dopamine D2 receptors in patients with Parkinson's disease: a study with positron emission tomography and [11C]raclopride.

    Angelo Antonini;Johannes Schwarz;Wolfgang H. Oertel;Oliver Pogarell

  • Transcranial direct current stimulation in treatment resistant depression: A randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study

    U. Palm;C. Schiller;Z. Fintescu;M. Obermeier

  • Parkinson's disease is overdiagnosed clinically at baseline in diagnostically uncertain cases: a 3-year European multicenter study with repeat [123I]FP-CIT SPECT.

    Vicky L. Marshall;Cornelia B. Reininger;Moritz Marquardt;Jim Patterson

  • Pramipexole in patients with Parkinson's disease and marked drug resistant tremor: a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled multicentre study

    O Pogarell;T Gasser;J J van Hilten;S Spieker

  • Evaluation of sham transcranial direct current stimulation for randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials.

    Ulrich Palm;Eva Reisinger;Daniel Keeser;Min-Fang Kuo

  • Sound level dependence of the primary auditory cortex: Simultaneous measurement with 61-channel EEG and fMRI

    Christoph Mulert;Lorenz Jäger;Sebastian Propp;Susanne Karch

  • Striatal dopamine release after prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in major depression: preliminary results of a dynamic [123I] IBZM SPECT study.

    Oliver Pogarell;Walter Koch;Gabriele Pöpperl;Klaus Tatsch

  • Graft-Induced Dyskinesias in Parkinson's Disease: High Striatal Serotonin/Dopamine Transporter Ratio

    Marios Politis;Wolfgang H. Oertel;Kit Wu;Niall P. Quinn

  • Prospective study of presynaptic dopaminergic imaging in patients with mild parkinsonism and tremor disorders: Part 1. Baseline and 3‐month observations

    Hani T.S. Benamer;Wolfgang H. Oertel;Jim Patterson;Donald M. Hadley

  • Theta Burst Stimulation of the Prefrontal Cortex: Safety and Impact on Cognition, Mood, and Resting Electroencephalogram

    Nicola Grossheinrich;Anne Rau;Oliver Pogarell;Kristina Hennig-Fast

  • Relationship between clinical features of Parkinson's disease and presynaptic dopamine transporter binding assessed with [123I]IPT and single-photon emission tomography

    K Tatsch;J Schwarz;P D Mozley;R Linke

  • Evidence for a close relationship between conscious effort and anterior cingulate cortex activity.

    Christoph Mulert;Elisabeth Menzinger;Gregor Leicht;Oliver Pogarell

  • The neural basis of the P300 potential. Focus on the time-course of the underlying cortical generators.

    C. Mulert;O. Pogarell;G. Juckel;D. Rujescu

  • Efficacy, safety, and tolerance of the non-ergoline dopamine agonist pramipexole in the treatment of advanced Parkinson’s disease: a double blind, placebo controlled, randomised, multicentre study

    Unknown

  • Single-trial coupling of EEG and fMRI reveals the involvement of early anterior cingulate cortex activation in effortful decision making.

    Christoph Mulert;Christian Seifert;Gregor Leicht;Valerie Kirsch

  • Prediction of treatment response in major depression: integration of concepts.

    Christoph Mulert;Georg Juckel;Michael Brunnmeier;Susanne Karch

  • Acute prefrontal rTMS increases striatal dopamine to a similar degree as D-amphetamine.

    Oliver Pogarell;Walter Koch;Gabriele Pöpperl;Klaus Tatsch

Frequent Co-Authors

Ulrich Hegerl
Ulrich Hegerl Stiftung Deutsche Depressionshilfe
Daniel Keeser
Daniel Keeser Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Georg Juckel
Georg Juckel Ruhr University Bochum
H.-J. Möller
H.-J. Möller Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Frank Padberg
Frank Padberg Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Dan Rujescu
Dan Rujescu Medical University of Vienna
Hans-Jürgen Möller
Hans-Jürgen Möller Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Ina Giegling
Ina Giegling Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
Thomas Meindl
Thomas Meindl Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Peter Falkai
Peter Falkai Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience can open up a range of online degree options and diverse career pathways. Many students interested in brain science consider programs in psychology, social work, or counseling to build relevant skills. For those looking to fast-track their education, there are high-quality accelerated msw programs that prepare graduates for advanced roles in mental health and social care.

If your focus is on the science of mind and behavior, accelerated psychology programs provide flexible online options that let you earn your degree in less time. For those leaning toward professional counseling, make sure your chosen degree meets quality standards, such as cacrep accreditation, to ensure eligibility for licensure and career advancement.

Financial considerations are also important. Many universities are working to reduce tuition rates or offer financial aid for online learners. Researching the masters in counseling online cost can help you find programs that match your budget without compromising on quality. These pathways all support future careers in neuroscience, mental health, research, and clinical practice.

Best Scientists Citing Oliver Pogarell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles