World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 64 3289 3008 286 267 398 13791

Oliver Pogarell publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Oliver Pogarell between 1997 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Oliver Pogarell published across 29 years, from 1997 to 2025, averaging 16.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 42 publications in 2007. 41 of the 491 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 42. Peak 42 publications in 2007. 1997: 6 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 15 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 12 publications 2007: 42 publications 2008: 18 publications 2009: 32 publications 2010: 18 publications 2011: 25 publications 2012: 15 publications 2013: 27 publications 2014: 29 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 20 publications 2018: 18 publications 2019: 26 publications 2020: 19 publications 2021: 26 publications 2022: 27 publications 2023: 23 publications 2024: 23 publications 2025: 18 publications
1997 2025

491 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Oliver Pogarell: publications per year, 1997 to 2025
Year Publications
1997 6
1998 5
1999 3
2000 3
2001 2
2002 3
2003 5
2004 15
2005 9
2006 12
2007 42
2008 18
2009 32
2010 18
2011 25
2012 15
2013 27
2014 29
2015 12
2016 10
2017 20
2018 18
2019 26
2020 19
2021 26
2022 27
2023 23
2024 23
2025 18
Total 491
Download as CSV

Oliver Pogarell publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Oliver Pogarell sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 398–407 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 398 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48 398
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Oliver Pogarell D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Oliver Pogarell sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 64–65 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278 64
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Oliver Pogarell is affiliated with Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München in Germany and works primarily in the fields of Medicine and Neuroscience. Their research spans numerous subfields, notably Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology, Physiology, and Neurology.

Their main research topics include Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, Schizophrenia research and treatment, EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces, Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research, Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research, Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes, and Alzheimer's disease research and treatments.

Oliver Pogarell has published extensively in a variety of venues. Frequent publication venues include MMW - Fortschritte der Medizin, European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, Frontiers in Psychiatry, Clinical EEG and Neuroscience, and bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory).

Recent representative papers by Oliver Pogarell include:

  • "Microglial Activation and Connectivity in Alzheimer Disease and Aging," 2022, Annals of Neurology
  • "Effects of binaural and monaural beat stimulation on attention and EEG," 2021, Experimental Brain Research
  • "Optical coherence tomography reveals retinal thinning in schizophrenia spectrum disorders," 2022, European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
  • "Auswirkungen der COVID-19-Pandemie auf die Versorgungssituation in psychiatrischen Kliniken in Deutschland," 2021, Der Nervenarzt
  • "Acute alcohol withdrawal and recovery in men lead to profound changes in DNA methylation profiles: a longitudinal clinical study," 2020, Addiction

Throughout their career, Oliver Pogarell has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including Daniel Keeser, Kristina Adorjan, Peter Falkai, Susanne Karch, and Boris-Stephan Rauchmann.

Best Publications

  • Accurate differentiation of parkinsonism and essential tremor using visual assessment of [123I]-FP-CIT SPECT imaging: the [123I]-FP-CIT study group.

    Hani T. S. Benamer;Jim Patterson;Donald G. Grosset;J. Booij

  • Integration of fMRI and simultaneous EEG: towards a comprehensive understanding of localization and time-course of brain activity in target detection

    Christoph Mulert;Lorenz Jäger;Robert Schmitt;Patrick Bussfeld

  • Prefrontal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Changes Connectivity of Resting-State Networks during fMRI

    Daniel Keeser;Thomas Meindl;Julie Bor;Ulrich Palm

  • EEG-vigilance and BOLD effect during simultaneous EEG/fMRI measurement

    Sebastian Olbrich;Christoph Mulert;Susanne Karch;Maja Trenner

  • Bilateral caudate and putamen grafts of embryonic mesencephalic tissue treated with lazaroids in Parkinson's disease

    Patrik Brundin;O Pogarell;Peter Hagell;P Piccini

  • Prefrontal direct current stimulation modulates resting EEG and event-related potentials in healthy subjects: A standardized low resolution tomography (sLORETA) study

    Daniel Keeser;Frank Padberg;E. Reisinger;Oliver Pogarell

  • Long-term changes of striatal dopamine D2 receptors in patients with Parkinson's disease: a study with positron emission tomography and [11C]raclopride.

    Angelo Antonini;Johannes Schwarz;Wolfgang H. Oertel;Oliver Pogarell

  • Transcranial direct current stimulation in treatment resistant depression: A randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study

    U. Palm;C. Schiller;Z. Fintescu;M. Obermeier

  • Parkinson's disease is overdiagnosed clinically at baseline in diagnostically uncertain cases: a 3-year European multicenter study with repeat [123I]FP-CIT SPECT.

    Vicky L. Marshall;Cornelia B. Reininger;Moritz Marquardt;Jim Patterson

  • Pramipexole in patients with Parkinson's disease and marked drug resistant tremor: a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled multicentre study

    O Pogarell;T Gasser;J J van Hilten;S Spieker

  • Evaluation of sham transcranial direct current stimulation for randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials.

    Ulrich Palm;Eva Reisinger;Daniel Keeser;Min-Fang Kuo

  • Sound level dependence of the primary auditory cortex: Simultaneous measurement with 61-channel EEG and fMRI

    Christoph Mulert;Lorenz Jäger;Sebastian Propp;Susanne Karch

  • Striatal dopamine release after prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in major depression: preliminary results of a dynamic [123I] IBZM SPECT study.

    Oliver Pogarell;Walter Koch;Gabriele Pöpperl;Klaus Tatsch

  • Graft-Induced Dyskinesias in Parkinson's Disease: High Striatal Serotonin/Dopamine Transporter Ratio

    Marios Politis;Wolfgang H. Oertel;Kit Wu;Niall P. Quinn

  • Prospective study of presynaptic dopaminergic imaging in patients with mild parkinsonism and tremor disorders: Part 1. Baseline and 3‐month observations

    Hani T.S. Benamer;Wolfgang H. Oertel;Jim Patterson;Donald M. Hadley

  • Theta Burst Stimulation of the Prefrontal Cortex: Safety and Impact on Cognition, Mood, and Resting Electroencephalogram

    Nicola Grossheinrich;Anne Rau;Oliver Pogarell;Kristina Hennig-Fast

  • Relationship between clinical features of Parkinson's disease and presynaptic dopamine transporter binding assessed with [123I]IPT and single-photon emission tomography

    K Tatsch;J Schwarz;P D Mozley;R Linke

  • Evidence for a close relationship between conscious effort and anterior cingulate cortex activity.

    Christoph Mulert;Elisabeth Menzinger;Gregor Leicht;Oliver Pogarell

  • The neural basis of the P300 potential. Focus on the time-course of the underlying cortical generators.

    C. Mulert;O. Pogarell;G. Juckel;D. Rujescu

  • Efficacy, safety, and tolerance of the non-ergoline dopamine agonist pramipexole in the treatment of advanced Parkinson’s disease: a double blind, placebo controlled, randomised, multicentre study

    Unknown

  • Single-trial coupling of EEG and fMRI reveals the involvement of early anterior cingulate cortex activation in effortful decision making.

    Christoph Mulert;Christian Seifert;Gregor Leicht;Valerie Kirsch

  • Prediction of treatment response in major depression: integration of concepts.

    Christoph Mulert;Georg Juckel;Michael Brunnmeier;Susanne Karch

  • Acute prefrontal rTMS increases striatal dopamine to a similar degree as D-amphetamine.

    Oliver Pogarell;Walter Koch;Gabriele Pöpperl;Klaus Tatsch

Frequent Co-Authors

Ulrich Hegerl
Ulrich Hegerl Stiftung Deutsche Depressionshilfe
Daniel Keeser
Daniel Keeser Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Georg Juckel
Georg Juckel Ruhr University Bochum
H.-J. Möller
H.-J. Möller Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Frank Padberg
Frank Padberg Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Dan Rujescu
Dan Rujescu Medical University of Vienna
Hans-Jürgen Möller
Hans-Jürgen Möller Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Ina Giegling
Ina Giegling Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
Thomas Meindl
Thomas Meindl Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Peter Falkai
Peter Falkai Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience can open up a range of online degree options and diverse career pathways. Many students interested in brain science consider programs in psychology, social work, or counseling to build relevant skills. For those looking to fast-track their education, there are high-quality accelerated msw programs that prepare graduates for advanced roles in mental health and social care.

If your focus is on the science of mind and behavior, accelerated psychology programs provide flexible online options that let you earn your degree in less time. For those leaning toward professional counseling, make sure your chosen degree meets quality standards, such as cacrep accreditation, to ensure eligibility for licensure and career advancement.

Financial considerations are also important. Many universities are working to reduce tuition rates or offer financial aid for online learners. Researching the masters in counseling online cost can help you find programs that match your budget without compromising on quality. These pathways all support future careers in neuroscience, mental health, research, and clinical practice.

Best Scientists Citing Oliver Pogarell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles