World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
52
Citations
8791
World Ranking
5371
National Ranking
454

Thomas Meindl publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Meindl sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 140 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Thomas Meindl D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Meindl sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Thomas Meindl is affiliated with Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München in Germany. Their research primarily spans the fields of psychology and medicine, with a focus on clinical psychology, social psychology, cognitive neuroscience, psychiatry and mental health, as well as experimental and cognitive psychology.

The scientist has contributed to a number of studies related to functional brain connectivity, schizophrenia research and treatment, mental health research topics, neuroendocrine regulation and behavior, attachment and relationship dynamics, maternal mental health during pregnancy and postpartum, as well as personality disorders and psychopathology.

Some of Meindl's recent publications include:

  • Two Sides of Theory of Mind: Mental State Attribution to Moving Shapes in Paranoid Schizophrenia Is Independent of the Severity of Positive Symptoms, 2024, Brain Sciences
  • The Interplay of Oxytocin and Attachment in Schizophrenic Patients: An fMRI Study, 2023, Brain Sciences
  • Two Sides of the Same Coin in Female Borderline Personality Disorder: Self-Reported Guilt and Shame and Their Neurofunctional Correlates, 2024, Brain Sciences

Frequently, Meindl has collaborated with other researchers including Martin Drießen, Kristina Hennig-Fast, Dirk W. Eilert, Norbert Müller, and Hans-Jürgen Möller. These collaborative efforts have resulted in publications predominantly appearing in the journal Brain Sciences.

The topics addressed in their work reflect a strong engagement with understanding complex psychological and neurobiological mechanisms underlying mental health and psychiatric conditions. This includes investigating brain connectivity patterns, the neurofunctional correlates of emotions such as guilt and shame, and the role of hormonal and attachment systems in schizophrenia and borderline personality disorder.

Meindl's work bridges multiple subfields by integrating clinical, social, and cognitive perspectives on mental health, with an emphasis on empirical studies involving neuroimaging and behavioral assessments. This multidisciplinary approach supports the examination of both psychological symptoms and their biological underpinnings.

Best Publications

  • Prefrontal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Changes Connectivity of Resting-State Networks during fMRI

    Daniel Keeser;Thomas Meindl;Julie Bor;Ulrich Palm

  • An open science resource for establishing reliability and reproducibility in functional connectomics

    Xi Nian Zuo;Jeffrey S. Anderson;Pierre Bellec;Rasmus M. Birn

  • Penumbral imaging and functional outcome in patients with anterior circulation ischaemic stroke treated with endovascular thrombectomy versus medical therapy: a meta-analysis of individual patient-level data

    Bruce C V Campbell;Charles B L M Majoie;Gregory W Albers;Bijoy K Menon

  • Automated detection of brain atrophy patterns based on MRI for the prediction of Alzheimer's disease.

    Claudia Plant;Stefan J. Teipel;Stefan J. Teipel;Annahita Oswald;Christian Böhm

  • Imaging features and safety and efficacy of endovascular stroke treatment: a meta-analysis of individual patient-level data.

    Luis San Roman;Bijoy K. Menon;Jordi Blasco;Maria Hernandez-Perez

  • Diagnostic power of default mode network resting state fMRI in the detection of Alzheimer's disease

    Walter Koch;Stephan Teipel;Sophia Mueller;Jens Benninghoff

  • Functional connectivity of the fusiform gyrus during a face-matching task in subjects with mild cognitive impairment.

    A. L. W. Bokde;P. Lopez-Bayo;T. Meindl;S. Pechler

  • Effects of aging on default mode network activity in resting state fMRI: Does the method of analysis matter?

    W. Koch;Stefan J. Teipel;Sophia Mueller;Katharina Buerger

  • White matter microstructure underlying default mode network connectivity in the human brain.

    Stefan J. Teipel;Arun L.W. Bokde;Thomas Meindl;Edson Amaro

  • Test-retest reproducibility of the default-mode network in healthy individuals.

    Thomas Meindl;Stefan Teipel;Rachid Elmouden;Sophia Mueller

  • Longitudinal changes in fiber tract integrity in healthy aging and mild cognitive impairment: a DTI follow-up study.

    Stefan J. Teipel;Stefan J. Teipel;Thomas Meindl;Maximilian Wagner;Bram Stieltjes

  • Convergent Findings of Altered Functional and Structural Brain Connectivity in Individuals with High Functioning Autism: A Multimodal MRI Study

    Sophia Mueller;Daniel Keeser;Andrea Christiane Samson;Valerie Kirsch

  • Diagnostic value of muscle MRI in differentiating LGMD2I from other LGMDs.

    Dirk Fischer;Maggie C Walter;Kristina Kesper;Jens A Petersen

  • Neurobiological underpinnings of shame and guilt: a pilot fMRI study

    Petra Michl;Thomas Meindl;Franziska Meister;Christine Born

  • The cholinergic system in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease: an in vivo MRI and DTI study.

    Stefan J. Teipel;Thomas Meindl;Lea Grinberg;Michel Grothe;Michel Grothe

  • Prefrontal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Treatment of Schizophrenia With Predominant Negative Symptoms: A Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Proof-of-Concept Study

    Ulrich Palm;Daniel Keeser;Alkomiet Hasan;Michael J. Kupka

  • Hippocampal function during associative learning in patients with posttraumatic stress disorder

    Natalie S. Werner;Thomas Meindl;Rolf R. Engel;Rita Rosner

  • Robust Automated Detection of Microstructural White Matter Degeneration in Alzheimer’s Disease Using Machine Learning Classification of Multicenter DTI Data

    Martin Dyrba;Michael Ewers;Martin Wegrzyn;Ingo Kilimann

  • Novel MRI techniques in the assessment of dementia

    Stefan J. Teipel;Stefan J. Teipel;Thomas Meindl;Lea Grinberg;Helmut Heinsen

  • Multicenter stability of diffusion tensor imaging measures: A European clinical and physical phantom study

    Stefan J. Teipel;Stefan J. Teipel;Sigrid Reuter;Sigrid Reuter;Bram Stieltjes;Julio Acosta-Cabronero

  • Anatomical MRI and DTI in the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: A european multicenter study

    Stefan J Teipel;Stefan J Teipel;Martin Wegrzyn;Thomas Meindl;Giovanni B Frisoni

  • An open science resource for establishing reliability and reproducibility in functional

    Randy L. Buckner;Vince D. Calhoun;F. Xavier Castellanos;Antao Chen

Frequent Co-Authors

Harald Hampel
Harald Hampel Eisai (United States)
Maximilian F. Reiser
Maximilian F. Reiser Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Arun L.W. Bokde
Arun L.W. Bokde Trinity College Dublin
Oliver Pogarell
Oliver Pogarell Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Stefan J. Teipel
Stefan J. Teipel German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases
Christine Born
Christine Born Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Ernst Pöppel
Ernst Pöppel Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Daniel Keeser
Daniel Keeser Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Hans-Jürgen Möller
Hans-Jürgen Möller Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Michael Ewers
Michael Ewers Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Thomas Meindl

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles