World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
47
Citations
8993
World Ranking
3400
National Ranking
1639

Rachel R. Hardeman publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rachel R. Hardeman sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 113 publications — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Rachel R. Hardeman D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rachel R. Hardeman sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Rachel R. Hardeman is affiliated with the University of Minnesota in the United States. Their research centers on social sciences and health professions, with significant contributions across sociology, political science, clinical psychology, public health, environmental and occupational health.

Their work spans multiple subfields including:

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • General Health Professions
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Health
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Main topics in their research involve:

  • Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Diversity and Career in Medicine
  • Reproductive Health and Contraception
  • Homelessness and Social Issues

Recent publications by Rachel R. Hardeman include:

  • "Physician-patient racial concordance and disparities in birthing mortality for newborns," 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "Improving The Measurement Of Structural Racism To Achieve Antiracist Health Policy," 2022, Health Affairs
  • "Health Equity Tourism: Ravaging the Justice Landscape," 2022, Journal of Medical Systems
  • "Examining racism in health services research: A disciplinary self-critique," 2020, Health Services Research
  • "Police Brutality and Mistrust in Medical Institutions," 2020, Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Hardeman include:

  • Tongtan Chantarat
  • J'Mag Karbeah
  • Sirry Alang
  • Asha Hassan
  • Donna McAlpine

Rachel R. Hardeman's work appears primarily in these publication venues:

  • Health Services Research
  • Maternal and Child Health Journal
  • American Journal of Public Health
  • New England Journal of Medicine
  • JAMA Network Open

Best Publications

  • Physician-patient racial concordance and disparities in birthing mortality for newborns.

    Brad N Greenwood;Rachel R Hardeman;Laura Huang;Aaron Sojourner

  • Association of clinical specialty with symptoms of burnout and career choice regret among US resident physicians

    Liselotte N. Dyrbye;Sara E. Burke;Rachel R. Hardeman;Jeph Herrin

  • Improving The Measurement Of Structural Racism To Achieve Antiracist Health Policy

    Unknown

  • Structural Racism and Supporting Black Lives — The Role of Health Professionals

    Rachel R. Hardeman;Eduardo M. Medina;Katy B. Kozhimannil

  • Police Brutality and Black Health: Setting the Agenda for Public Health Scholars

    Sirry Alang;Donna McAlpine;Ellen M. McCreedy;Rachel R. Hardeman

  • Medical School Experiences Associated with Change in Implicit Racial Bias Among 3547 Students: A Medical Student CHANGES Study Report

    Mph Michelle van Ryn PhD;Rachel Hardeman;Sean M. Phelan;Diana J. Burgess;Diana J. Burgess

  • Implicit and explicit weight bias in a national sample of 4,732 medical students: The medical student CHANGES study

    Sean M. Phelan;John F. Dovidio;Rebecca M. Puhl;Diana J. Burgess;Diana J. Burgess

  • Do Contact and Empathy Mitigate Bias Against Gay and Lesbian People Among Heterosexual First-Year Medical Students? A Report From the Medical Student CHANGE Study.

    Sara E. Burke;John F. Dovidio;Julia M. Przedworski;Rachel R. Hardeman

  • Doula Care, Birth Outcomes, and Costs Among Medicaid Beneficiaries

    Katy Backes Kozhimannil;Rachel R. Hardeman;Laura B. Attanasio;Cori Blauer-Peterson

  • Naming Institutionalized Racism in the Public Health Literature: A Systematic Literature Review:

    Rachel R Hardeman;Katy A Murphy;J'Mag Karbeah;Katy Backes Kozhimannil

  • Modeling the Cost‐Effectiveness of Doula Care Associated with Reductions in Preterm Birth and Cesarean Delivery

    Katy B. Kozhimannil;Rachel R. Hardeman;Fernando Alarid-Escudero;Carrie A. Vogelsang

  • Disrupting the Pathways of Social Determinants of Health: Doula Support during Pregnancy and Childbirth

    Katy B. Kozhimannil;Carrie A. Vogelsang;Rachel R. Hardeman;Shailendra Prasad

  • Medical students’ learning orientation regarding interracial interactions affects preparedness to care for minority patients: a report from Medical Student CHANGES

    Diana J. Burgess;Diana J. Burgess;Sara E. Burke;Brooke A. Cunningham;John F. Dovidio

  • Examining racism in health services research: A disciplinary self-critique.

    Rachel R. Hardeman;J'Mag Karbeah

  • Association of Racial Bias with Burnout among Resident Physicians

    Liselotte Dyrbye;Jeph Herrin;Colin P. West;Natalie M. Wittlin

  • Police Brutality and Mistrust in Medical Institutions

    Sirry Alang;Donna D. McAlpine;Rachel Hardeman

  • Measuring inequity: a systematic review of methods used to quantify structural racism

    Maya Groos;Maeve Wallace;Rachel Hardeman;Katherine P Theall

  • The mixed impact of medical school on medical students’ implicit and explicit weight bias

    Sean M. Phelan;Rebecca M. Puhl;Sara E. Burke;Rachel Hardeman

  • A comparison of the mental health and well-being of sexual minority and heterosexual first-year medical students: A report from the medical student CHANGE study

    Julia M. Przedworski;John F. Dovidio;Rachel R. Hardeman;Sean M. Phelan

  • Medical School Factors Associated with Changes in Implicit and Explicit Bias Against Gay and Lesbian People among 3492 Graduating Medical Students.

    Sean M. Phelan;Sara E. Burke;Rachel R. Hardeman;Richard O. White

  • The Adverse Effect of Weight Stigma on the Well-Being of Medical Students with Overweight or Obesity: Findings from a National Survey

    Sean M. Phelan;Diana J. Burgess;Rebecca Puhl;Liselotte N. Dyrbye

  • Stolen Breaths

    Rachel R Hardeman;Eduardo M Medina;Rhea W Boyd

Frequent Co-Authors

Diana J. Burgess
Diana J. Burgess United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Michelle van Ryn
Michelle van Ryn Oregon Health & Science University
John F. Dovidio
John F. Dovidio Yale University
Donna D. McAlpine
Donna D. McAlpine University of Minnesota
Liselotte N. Dyrbye
Liselotte N. Dyrbye University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
José A. Pagán
José A. Pagán New York University
Rebecca M. Puhl
Rebecca M. Puhl University of Connecticut
Katherine P. Theall
Katherine P. Theall Tulane University
Tait D. Shanafelt
Tait D. Shanafelt Stanford University
David A. Asch
David A. Asch University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Social Sciences and Humanities, a range of flexible and affordable online degrees are available. Pursuing a career in counseling is a popular choice, and selecting from cacrep-accredited online counseling programs ensures you receive high-quality training that meets national standards.

If your career goals involve helping couples and families, exploring marriage and family therapy master's programs equips you with specialized skills to address complex relationship dynamics. For those seeking a broader understanding of human behavior or planning diverse roles in social services, psychology is a versatile field. You can find some of the cheapest online psychology degree options that offer both flexibility and affordability.

Social work is another impactful pathway, and accessible choices exist among the msw degree programs, designed for students looking for easier admissions processes. Each of these online degrees opens doors to rewarding careers in counseling, therapy, psychology, and social work, supporting individuals and communities while offering a pathway to personal growth.

Best Scientists Citing Rachel R. Hardeman

Trending Scientists